Bio
I am 62, divorced, basically without living relatives, endlessly curious, spiritually imaginative and always embarking on one sort of journey or anot...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

A 20 Year CNN Career Ends for Octavia Nasr After a Controversial Tweet.

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 16
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Octavia NasrIt didn't take long from posting a Tweet to losing a job.

On Monday, CNN reporter Octavia Nasr, who had been with CNN for 20 years (most recently as Senior Editor of Mid East Affairs) tweeted: “Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah… One of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot.”

Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah was the leading Shiite cleric in Lebanon and long regarded as the spiritual mentor for Hezbollah. The NY Daily News describes the sheik: "Fadallah had often praised suicide bombings - including one in 2008 that left 8 students dead at an Israeli yeshiva. He was also fiercely anti-American."

Thousands of Lebanese shiite attend funeral of Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah in Beirut, Lebanon, on July 6, 2010. Fadlallah was one of shiite Islam's highest authorities, and seen as Hezbollah's mentor. Photo by Balkis Press/ABACAPRESS.COM Photo via Newscom

By Tuesday, a storm had broken loose.

Response came quickly. Tuesday Nasr posted this and more in her blog on the CNN site:

Reaction to my tweet was immediate, overwhelming and a provides a good lesson on why 140 characters should not be used to comment on controversial or sensitive issues, especially those dealing with the Middle East.

It was an error of judgment for me to write such a simplistic comment and I'm sorry because it conveyed that I supported Fadlallah's life's work. That's not the case at all.

Here's what I should have conveyed more fully:

I used the words "respect" and "sad" because to me as a Middle Eastern woman, Fadlallah took a contrarian and pioneering stand among Shia clerics on woman's rights. He called for the abolition of the tribal system of "honor killing." He called the practice primitive and non-productive. He warned Muslim men that abuse of women was against Islam.

She went on to describe an interview she had with Fadllalah and chronicled his complex history in Hezbollah. And she regretted her judgment once again.

It was too little and too late. By Wednesday, she lost her job.

Below is the internal memo from CNN obtained by Mediaite. Excerpts from the memo are also posted on the CNN site in their announcement of her departure.

From Parisa Khosravi – SVP CNN International Newsgathering

I had a conversation with Octavia this morning and I want to share with you that we have decided that she will be leaving the company. As you know, her tweet over the weekend created a wide reaction. As she has stated in her blog on CNN.com, she fully accepts that she should not have made such a simplistic comment without any context whatsoever. However, at this point, we believe that her credibility in her position as senior editor for Middle Eastern affairs has been compromised going forward.

As a colleague and friend we’re going to miss seeing Octavia everyday. She has been an extremely dedicated and committed part of our team. We thank Octavia for all of her hard work and we certainly wish her all the best.

Parisa.

What do you think? Should she have been fired? If you've blogged about this, link to your blog in your comments here.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool

Image of Octavia Nasr courtesy CNN.

  • 16
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Mata H 5 pts

Well, my issue is unqualified praise -- which is not appropriate in this case. A fair portrayal would have been a different story.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

MLOKnitting 5 pts

On both sides I see only the drums of war. No true willingness to do much of anything. India, Pakistan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, France, Great Britain, the Oligarchs of the former Soviet Union and even China encourage the rhetoric through weapons sales and support of the madrasas.

He was a human being who was a product of the environment from which he came - and yet was able to see past his cultural biases to work towards more equitable treatment in the society he lived in. That is no small accomplishment.

Perhaps my study of history has long made me aware of the fact that no side is completely innocent or guilty in any event. Great evil is exclusive to no group. And, truth be told, even those who are most evil in the eyes of the world can do great good in some areas.

There are other issues that are hot button issues for some people. The only one I can think of as being as much a hot potato as the Israel / Middle East issue is abortion. And that makes me despair of the human race.

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

Mata H 5 pts

While I may agree that the Middle East is a complex environment, and it is true that the deceased did advocate for Muslim women, it really is not a trivial issue that he did not accept the right of Israel to exist. That is not a small thing, or one that can be seen as minor. Heaping unqualified praise on such a man does not accurately portray him.

Mata

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

MLOKnitting 5 pts

I think it highlights that those in positions of power - and who are loudest - seem to believe that anything that praises someone who is not lock-step pro-US and pro-Israel will be demonized as if they too were an enemy of the state. I find this disturbingly more prevalent.

I also know that among the general populace there is an ever growing return to isolationism when they realize how much money keeps going to support non-Americans. (Americans, historically, are quite parochial.)

I realize a lot of people believe that the lack of civil discourse is a new phenomenon. It is not. It is a return of rough and tumble politicking that has been a large part of the American landscape since before our inception.

We are a raucous bunch when it comes to politics. The thing that has changed? The ability to find compromises. People in positions of power are now so wedded to some ideology or the other that dissenting views are not even allowed a voice even when they are proven to be erudite in other matters.

Once upon a time, being 80 or above allowed you to say anything you want and people understood that you were 80. That illustrious careers are being destroyed because people with different religious and ethnic backgrounds coloring their view on world events are being vilified for having unpopular views on one - and only one - political scene.

The Middle East issues are complicated. The actions of any of the players involved do not help matters. Vilifying any of the players really doesn't serve to do anything but "beat the drums of war" which is not productive to a lasting peace anywhere.

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

Mata H 5 pts

Hi Jess...

Now the British envoy to Lebanon has had her blog removed because of positive comments. The comples Middle East situation is well-described here in The Independent ( http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-eas... ). This man was neither evil nor an angel -- he did things and said things that are both worthy of praise and worthy of critique -- but what is most true is that he did not fit the Western image of the "stereotypical" Ayatollah.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Mata H 5 pts

I am actually having sign made for my front lawn, one of which will read "Return Civility to Civil Discourse"

Thanks for your comment!
mata

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

emilysteers 5 pts

if she had had a follow-up tweet, or chosen a different media, she really could have created an interesting dialog.
my next question wonders why pundits who force-ably squash all possibility for dialog (glenn beck, etc) appear to be so popular...

 -emily

www.happyhomeblog.com
( http://www.happyhomeblog.com )

transgressorsgrace 5 pts

I think it's a shame that she was fired. I have to respect a person who is able to look at the totality of someone's life and career and appreciate the good things they did, while even disdaining the bad. That takes a remarkable kind of objectivity, which I would think would be crucial in the news business.

Jess from Trangressor's Grace

Read more from me at: http://transgressors-grace.blogspot.com/

kyooty 5 pts

Of all the University and college classes I took, the one course I actually passed the first time was communications. Communication can not be repeated or erased is still etched in my brain 19yrs later. Once the message is out it's out, and it's like that game of telephone, everyone adds a bit more with their own version. Even the original speaker will not be able to control how the message is recieved every time. Make all your words count.

Mata H 5 pts

I would add that the American public is shunning discourse, period. I think if she hadn't been so lavish in her unqualified praise, she may have had the opportunity later to mention what he did do for women.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Mata H 5 pts

It strikes me that firing her doesn't really give the larger community a way to hold her accountable. And if news anchors are fired who are not impartial, can we expect a FOX News exodus anytime soon?

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Mata H 5 pts

Your statement "you lose control of the message the minute you post/send it." is so deeply true. I am reminded of my mother's words "Once you say it, you can't unsay it."

mata

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Rebecca Miles 5 pts

Kim, I encourage my daughter (and my students) to embrace learning opportunities...such as this one. I'd like to read your take on Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, both who he was and what he believed. If you'll start the dialog, others will follow.

Rebecca writes about Learning Through Teaching ( http://rmiles2go.blogspot.com/ )

Kim Pearson 5 pts

CNN is on the ropes and American public discourse no longer admits complexity, nuance or the presumption of good will. And yes, she let the mask slip, which is something she shouldn't have done. It would be nice if we used this moment to learn more about him and his views in women's rights, but that is too much to expect.

Kim Pearson
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://blogher.org/blog/kim-pearson )|KimPearson.net ( http://kimpearson.net )|

Rebecca Miles 5 pts

When I teach business students about communication, I always caution them to think about what they write...and how they write it...because you lose control of the message the minute you post/send it. If 20 years of credibility can be unwound with one tweet by a seasoned journalist, imagine how much damage can be done by a much younger and much less experienced newcomer.

Learning Through Teaching -- http://rmiles2go.blogspot.com/

Melissa Ford 5 pts

It does create a bit of a minefield when a solid 20-year career can be unwound with one tweet. Nor does there seem to be a black-and-white consensus where x-behaviour always equals y-consequence. Too little too late--a 24-hour lag time? And at the same time, do I want my impartial news anchors expressing their partiality?

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).