Bio
Hi, I'm Karen Ballum. but I'm better know around the web as Sassymonkey. I live in Ottawa, Ontario -- Canada's national capital. (No, I do not wo...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Amazon's GLBTQ "Glitch"

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Oh Amazon, when you fail you do so spectacularly! I spent three days away from the computer only to return to an inbox and twitter stream full of "#amazonfail" and "#glitchmyass". I was expecting that someone had a really bad customer service experience. That would be so much better than what I found when I started reading. It seems that a great number of books that have GLBTQ themes were being labelled as "adult" and being pulled out of Amazon sales rankings and searches.

I started off reading a link to the the Seattle Post Intelligencer blog that someone sent me and followed links from there. First to Mark Probst's blog. Probst is an author who noticed that his young adult novel, The Filly, had been removed from Amazon rankings. The email he received from a customer servicerepresentative stated the following:

In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude "adult" material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.

As Probst went on to point out in blog post his book is YA and not "adult" and meanwhile Playboy books have no problem staying in the rankings.

As the twitterstorm brewed it was becoming increasingly obvious that a lot of books containing GLBT themes had been stripped of their Amazon rankings. Censorship flags were flying high.

At Booksquare Kassia Krozser wrote an open letter to Amazon.

As a heterosexual, happily married adult female, I am deeply offended by this decision. As a customer, I am angered enough to take my business elsewhere, and I’d like a refund on my Kindle since, despite reports that your database sweep was not complete, you have decided to limit my ability to purchase books — from literary classics like Lady Chatterley’s Lover to newesque titles like Tipping The Velvet and Running With Scissors.

The ladies at Smart Bitches Love Trashy Books didn't mince words when they stated their opinion of the events.

What, I ask, the fucking fuckhell? Many an Amazon customer is infuriated, and the #amazonfail hashtag on Twitter has pretty much become the only thing worth following. What to do, what to do?

It’s time to hit ‘em where it hurts. No, not a boycott. When you want someone to pay attention, you hit ‘em in the PR.

It’s Google Bomb Time!

Yes, they are Google Bombing Amazon Rank. Their definition includes (but is not limited to so click on the link for the full version):

1. To censor and exclude on the basis of adult content in literature (except for Playboy, Penthouse, dogfighting and graphic novels depicting incest orgies).
2. To make changes based on inconsistent applications of standards, logic and common sense.

Amazon clearly did not officially respond right away, as one would expect on a Sunday (Easter Sunday to boot). When they did respond it was declared a "glitch" and that Amazon does not have a new policy regarding "adult" titles. As Publisher's Weekly observed, bloggers aren't buying it.

Bloggers aren't buying the glitch explanation and some are calling an Amazon boycott, but the fact that such a wide range of titles have lost their rankings suggest that whatever Amazon may have been trying to do went haywire.

Jane at Dear Author did some metadata investigation. The conclusion? It would have to be one heck of a sophisticated "glitch".

Thus, as a “glitch” it was a remarkably targeted one that seems to support the emails that Mark Probst and Craig Seymour received from Amazon which was gay and lesbian works were deemed “adult” content regardless of actual content. This evidence appears to indicate that it isn’t so much a glitch but a specific policy. The question is then who implemented the policy of marking GLBT books as adult and who knew of the implementation? What kind of supervisory person signed off on it?

This are just the tip of the #amazonfail iceberg. I had no problem finding people who are less than pleased with Amazon about this "glitch".

Angry Black Woman on Amazonfail

Oh Amazon, when you fail you fail so very, very hard.

And then you fail harder by lying. Or, if not lying, covering your ass without checking whether someone in your organization has already said that you’re doing exactly what you just said you’re not doing and haven’t been doing since February.
This is a form of censorship. And while it may be that Amazon has the legal right to censorship on their website, that doesn’t mean anyone has to stand for

  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
mashadutoit 5 pts

What else they are glitching?

Did this come out because of the e-mails to the author?  What other topics are "hidden"?

She Who 5 pts

More like, "One Vice president in charge of web design" with a new commitment to a televangelist.

http://www.blogher.com/blog/she-who

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

Glitch, one employee, or even hacker theory if it made sense. I don't think any of the single explanations work individually, which is why I'd like to see a better statement from Amazon on this.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

Amazon is a private company. They can sell, or not sell, whatever they want. If they don't want to they don't have to sell GLBTQ books. Don't get me wrong, they absolutely should sell them but they don't have to. Again the key is transparency - if they don't plan to sell them or if there was a plan to sell them but make them really hard to find they need to be upfront about it (and I personally will take my dollars elsewhere).

I absolutely agree they need to be more transparent about what happened. So far their response to this has been woefully inadequate. And I really don't like that it's been pinned on a single random employee in France.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

She Who 5 pts

*glitch* my delicate derrierre. I've worked in bookstores with those kinds of 'glitches'. Generally they track back to one person with issues.

http://www.blogher.com/blog/she-who

kperfetto 5 pts

I spent a large chunk of my holiday weekend watching this whole mess unfold. Amazon needs to be more transparent about this, even if it was a "glitch" or the work of trolls, whatever. As as long time Amazon customer, I want to believe this is the job of a hacker rather than some algorithm gone horribly wrong, because that says there is some policy in place to flag books customers might find offensive. It's only Amazon's job to sell books, not dictate taste. 

Available Light ( http://kathy-p.blogspot.com ) & Five Dollar Radio ( http://fivedollarradio.blogspot.com/ )

nellewrites 6 pts

that they should speak clearly, and from pretty close to the top.

Likely they fear a backlash if they appear too conciliatory. I guess they'd rather sell books on how to raise children to 'have a healthy heterosexual orientation' and 'help children identify with their gender'.  

llhaesa ( http://llhaesa.org/ )

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

Is that it was a "ham-fisted" catalogue error ( http://blog.seattlepi.com/amazon/archives/166329.a... ).

One Amazon employee is saying that an employee in France confused listings ( http://blog.seattlepi.com/amazon/archives/166384.a... ) that said "erotica" and "sexuality" with "adult", the French word for porn.

Some people are now saying #amazonsorry.

I think that Amazon's response to this is still an #amazonfail. Too many stories are coming out and there's been no direct message from Amazon (it's all being filtered through media outlets), which has just added to the speculation and disbelief of customers.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

But darn it all I couldn't.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

Second to last paragraph.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

jeanne 5 pts

there are reports circulating that this was a hoax, perpetrated by a hacker, NOT by amazon.

see http://www.pcworld.com/article/163024/hacker_claim... ( http://www.pcworld.com/article/163024/hacker_claim... )

nellewrites 6 pts

I was pre-disposed to find some humour in this; after all, the queer community getting kicked around and slighted is nothing new. Sometimes it pisses me off, sometimes I shake my head and roll my eyes, other times some morbid humour kicks in.

Following your chatter link, humour was ready to go in terms of feeling, not writing. Then I did the search thingie in the last quote.

I'll add perverse to the descriptives of the search results.

Whoever made the call to remove, and somewhere in the food chain that person exists, um, thanks, and... what were you thinking?

Thanks for the post, it is very imformative. I saw something out there on Amazon this morning and blew past it, so guess this is what the fuss is about.

llhaesa ( http://llhaesa.org/ )