Blog
PunditMom
Bio
Joanne Bamberger is a recovering attorney, writer, political analyst and political/media consultant living in the shadow of the nation’s capital....
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

And Then There Were Two

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

As an ardent John Edwards supporter, today is a sad day for me as he announces he is dropping out of the race for the White House.

His campaign moved me in the way I know that Hillary Clinton's campaign and Barack Obama's efforts moved others. At another group blog, MOMocrats, many of us were writing about why we supported Edwards in this race and proclaimed, "Vote for John Edwards or you're grounded!"

So how did I come to this decision as a liberal woman? One word -- poverty. Not just a plan to toss a little money at food stamps or a "stimulus package." But a comprehensive proposal to actually end poverty in this country.

I grew up on a small family farm and things were always tight. There were often discussions around the table at election time that one candidate or another was good, but no one was holding their breath that we were going to get any real attention about making things better. Many politicians give lip-service to helping the poor, but when it comes right down to it, unless you're a huge political donor or a large, recognized voting block, your voice gets lost.

John Edwards wasn't going to let that happen for the first time in a long time.

At a conference this weekend, we went through an exercise to evaluate the websites of a variety of the presidential candidates. The only site where the clear message on the front page was one of wanting to focus on voters was Edwards' site.

And I think that's something that resonated with many. About Edwards decision, MOMocrat Jen says:

Edwards kept his playing field focused on the issues and focused on the human beings who need his message most. He was the one candidate who specifically addressed poverty and his passion for alleviating poverty touched a nerve deep within me.

Spending a decade working with the homeless and in shelters has allowed me to straddle the fence of the darker side of America, the one where many do not have enough to eat or a roof over their head. People, amazing, beautiful people who are forced to allow illnesses to go untended and can't feed their children. People who by virtue of poverty alone are systematically stripped of their basic human rights until they've lost everything, hope included.

MOMocrat Stefania added:

For the first time since I voted for Nader in the primary all those years back, my head and my heart were aligned when I chose my candidate. (I've already voted for Edwards via absentee ballot.)

I now fall into the very undecided camp and I know that whomever I vote for it will be a trade-off. In the end I will vote the party line, but Hillary and Barack, if you are reading this: you are going to have to work hard for my vote. All the pundits this morning are speculating as to whom Edwards' voters are going to support and I can honestly say Hillary and Barack, you probably won't know (because I won't know) until I cast my vote in November. I dare say I am not alone.

And, there is something about John and Elizabeth Edwards together that moved some of us, including Amie at Momma Loves ...:

I knew his odds weren't great, but I liked his messages. I like what both he and Elizabeth stand for.

It was just bad timing.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not disappointed with my remaining choices. I am over the moon that the two top contenders are not white men. I'm proud of my country for finally considering candidates for their experience and knowledge rather than dismissing them due to their skin color or genitals. It's about time.

But still...there was just something about the Edwards. I would have been proud to have them represent my country too.

Of course, for the Republicans, Rudy Giuliani is also withdrawing from the race. I can only assume that people who were passionate about his race are also having a tough time today. But while he was, at one point, seen as the front-runner for the GOP, he wasn't really tested on the national level.

Edwards, I felt, had a message that could benefit everyone, regardless of whether they could give a dime to a campaign or whether there was political might in their votes.

I admit that from the start of the campaign, there

  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
PunditMom 5 pts

Tex, Thanks for stopping by. It's great to have the perspective of an ex-pat. I hope you'll be voting by absentee!!

Tex925 5 pts

Hiya, I'm an American living in England (only having just moved here after five years in Australia) and I'd thought I'd share with you the general thoughts of the entire rest of the world on this years election.....Anyone but George!

I was so happy to see the field of candidates for the party this year, it's amazing to have a woman, a black man, and a 'grass-roots' kinda guy all running at the same time! What saddens me is that two of them seem to be fighting with each other and dividing the Democratic party, whilst the other one gets no attention (because there isn't any left!) when what we should be doing is fighting the republicans! Now Edwards has left and we are left with two equally as good candidates, however the two of them seem to be doing more harm than good to the party these days!

I left the states by choice, and I often joke to friends that I am a political refugee as I felt that my own government was evil.....now there is real hope that thing may change, however if we don't stop fighting each other and start fighting the 'rich white men' then that hope will be dashed!

www.freewebs.com/lifeupsidedown ( http://www.freewebs.com/lifeupsidedown )

PunditMom 5 pts

I know, Dana, I don't know who I will ultimately vote for. We are a state that is after Super Tuesday. Flip a coin?

PunditMom 5 pts

... even though I'd love it, it would surprise if either Clinton or Obama offered Edwards the VP slot -- or if he would be interested. But I would love to see him involved in a Dem administration -- what slot do you think would be good if not VP?

DanaFiles 5 pts

I have to say I was more surprised at Edwards' withdrawal, not Giuliani's. This narrows the playing field, but I still can't decide who will win the game (and my vote).

PunditMom 5 pts

I really haven't decided yet. I need to mourn for a while. Having said that, PunditGirl is lobbying me HEAVILY for Hillary because "she's the girl!"

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

even though I'm not an Edwards supporter. I will miss his contributions and I will miss Elizabeth!

Dare I ask who you all would support now? Obama?

Sister Sassy 5 pts

I liked John Edwards, he was my favorite last time too. Why can't he get any love? I'm with you, I like his stance on poverty and big business....sigh... maybe someone will pick him for VP and we can have him after whoever wins this round is out of office.

JenInShanghai 5 pts

Since GWB has taken the government and done WHATEVER he wants to it I think it would be perfectly fine for the Democratic candidate that WILL become president next year to pick the other 2 candidates to be Co-VP's. We NEED Edwards in a position to where his politics/policies can be enacted!