Bio
My name is Amy Gates (also known on the ‘net as amygeekgrl or the Crunchy Domestic Goddess). I live in Colorado with my husband Jody (yes, he’s a guy...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Cesarean Awareness Month: Why Is It So Hard to Get a Vaginal Birth These Days?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 25
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Cesarean Awareness Month - AprilApril is Cesarean Awareness Month. You may wonder why an entire month needs to be devoted for raising awareness about C-sections. Here's why. The C-section rate in the United States is on the rise at an alarming rate. It's estimated that in 2008 over 1.3 million babies in the U.S. were born by C-section, accounting for 32.3 percent of all births. It also marks the 12th consecutive year the Cesarean birth rate has risen, despite a number of medical organizations —- including The World Health Organization (WHO) and American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) —- urging medical care providers to work on lowering the Cesarean birth rates and increase access to Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC).

My Gentle Birthing Blog discusses that while VBAC is often suggested as an option to a woman who has had a C-section, in reality, VBACs are hard to come by due to the fact that many hospitals no longer allow them.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, the C-section rate in the United States has risen 53 percent since 1996. Cesarean birth is being overused, and VBAC (Vaginal Birth After Cesarean) is being grossly underused, at about 8 percent, because many hospitals are outlawing VBACs. Because of bans on VBACs, women have been denied access in over 40 percent of hospitals in the United States. The National Institutes of Health has found that VBACs are reasonably safe for women who had a previous Cesarean birth and are low risk for uterine rupture.

Andrea Owen says, "Fighting for my own VBAC has changed my life. I don't use that term very often, only when I truly mean it. It opened my eyes up to the world of American obstetrics, and how far we've come away from birth as a natural process. In my opinion, we've shoved a big, fat middle finger in Mother Nature's face."



And in the sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction category, the Keyboard Revolutionary wants to know how it is that "a woman can waltz in off the street, say she's pregnant and wants a Cesarean, and everyone leaps to her command ... yet a woman who IS pregnant has to jump through hoops and fight tooth and nail just to give birth vaginally?" Yep, in 2008 in Fayetteville, NC, a woman who was NOT even pregnant was given a C-section.

So how can a woman avoid a C-section in the first place? Knowledge is power. Here is a list of Five Essential Questions to ask your care provider. My Gentle Birthing Blog also has a list of the risks with Cesarean birth as well as a list that might help you avoid having your first C-section.

On Live Your Ideal Life guest blogger Pamela Candelaria who writes over at Natural Birth for Normal Women discusses the risks of a C-section as described on a typical consent form and says, "what isn’t on the form may be surprising."

Heather of A Mama's Blog provides a lot of information about The Reality of C-sections.

And Breastfeeding Moms Unite posted What to Expect of Your Body after a C-section.

Bellies and Babies has a great round up of posts in honor of Cesarean Awareness Month.

There is one victory worth celebrating regarding Cesarean birth and women's health in general. Thanks to the health care reform, C-sections, giving birth and domestic violence can no longer be considered pre-existing conditions and used to deny insurance coverage. It's a step in the right direction, but so much more needs to be done to lower the C-section rates and allow women access to VBACs, so that they don't have to travel 350 miles just to have a vaginal birth. And that's why an entire month is needed to raise awareness about Cesarean sections.

Additional resources:

  • 25
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
famtyt1stlady 5 pts

I wanted to have a VBAC with this child, but it really is not an option for me. I am all for vaginal delivery. Let me speak of my experiences.

I had my first child, a girl, natural (no medicines) vaginal. She was 8lbs 6oz and 21 1/2" long. This was in 2001. I labored naturally for 41 hours and the pushing part was the easiest. Loved it. The recovery was amazing and easy. I was pleasantly surprised. Three years later, I was getting ready to have an emergency c-section for transverse twins. Ugh. I was devastated. I was against spinals, epidurals, etc. It really bothered me I could not have them natural, but I knew the medical reasoning.

After having this c-section, I was devastated. The doctor left an inch and a half of my uterus open. I bled internally. I had a bag for a staph abcess inside of me. Then my c-section came open and I had to have a home health nurse for almost 1 year to help me, pack it, etc. It was HORRIFIC!!

This go around, it's been 8 years since the twins delivery, I asked could I have a VBAC. Nope, sure can't. Doctor's reasoning, she is afraid we might hemorrhage. Although, having a hysterectomy after delivery don't sound too bad, I am scared to DEATH about having another c-section. I feel I will die on the table.

I am all for VAGINAL! I wish I could speak to everyone about the differences. I hate seeing people OPT for a c-section. Women giving birth is a natural life process. It saddens me.

dragonmoon 5 pts

I shouldn't post when I'm half asleep...

Where I was going was that I have yet to see a rate based on full-term births. When I was pregnant, I had a conversation with a doula about the c-section rates in the local hospitals. The hospital with the NICU & a high-risk OB group had the highest C-section rate. What we didn't know was how much those services impacted the rates (by choice or by necessity).

On the historical end, I just wonder if a previous generation's miscarriage or stillbirth would be this generation's preemie or full-term baby.

I know that, in the larger picture, preemies are a statistical drop in the bucket. The c-section rate is way too high (thank you professional liability insurance and other factors).

Jory Des Jardins 5 pts

Of all the branded months out there, "Caesarian Awareness Month" strikes me as bizarre and unnecessary. The procedure is obviously getting far too much recognition. I have friends who were saved from trauma through Caesarian section, so I don't argue with some of the need for it. But now it takes very little to require one, and women aren't given options. I was a breach, twin, natural birth. Today that would have been a C-section situation.

Jory Des Jardins
writes on business and career topics at BlogHer, and on her personal blog From Here to Autonomy ( http://www.jorydesjardins.com )

MommaHarms 5 pts

Hmmm, while I do think maybe c-sections are over-done in this country, I have a different perspective to add to this conversation. My first was born vaginally via induction at 34 weeks due to pre-e. Recovery was horrible. Baby was in NICU for 13 days. Developed PPD after a horrid delivery, separation from baby, stress of pumping, not being able to care for my baby, etc.

Second was measuring close to 10 pounds, which in and of itself was not enough to warrant a c-section. She was breech, so c-section was planned, then she flipped. Further measuring indicated she had very, very, very broad shoulders (true and she still does). Doc would not tell me what to do. She said she felt a c-section would be safer because she felt strongly the baby could get stuck in the birth canal. The head could fit, but not the shoulders. In that case they would have to break her collarbone to get her out. The doctor didn't tell me this until I specifically asked. There was no pressure.

I chose the c-section. It was my choice. I was going to do ANYTHING in my power to keep my baby out of the NICU and avoid that entire experience again. I was going to do everything I could to keep this delivery from becoming an emergency situation like the first was.

For me, it was the right decision. Baby was 10 lbs, 4 oz, (exactly double her sister's weight) and the doctor said there was no way she would have fit the way she was positioned. Whether or not that is true I guess we will never know, but I left the hosptial with baby in tow, and honestly, for me the recovery wasn't bad at all. It was easier than my very tramatic vaginal delivery.

Is vaginal better? Of course. That's the way God designed it. Will I opt for a VBAC next time if offered? Probably not. The risk is simply not worth it to me.

Harms Family News ( http://tharmsfamily.blogspot.com )

amamasblog 5 pts

Thanks for including one of my blog posts in this story.

I think it is important to add in Feb. of this year, California's maternal mortality rate had increased from 4.3 deaths per 100,000 births in 1996 to 16.9 deaths per 100,000 births in 2006 (the last year statistics are available).

Officials are now citing C-sections as a major reason for the increase.

It’s no secret that other countries who have lower C-section rates also have lower maternal death rates. In Ireland for instance, the C-section rate averages around 21 percent. A joint UN/WHO report in 2007 found that Ireland also had the lowest maternal death rate in the world for women dying during or after pregnancy. Only one out of 47,600 women died, compared with one in 4,800 in the United States. The C-section rate in the United States in 2006 was 31.1 percent.

(http://amamasblog.com/2010/02/05/maternal-death-ra... ( http://amamasblog.com/2010/02/05/maternal-death-ra... ))

It seems very obvious C-sections do have their place, but they are overperformed in the United States, and are leading to higher maternal death rates as well.

Heather
*A Mama's Blog ( http://www.amamasblog.com/ )

NaturalAsPossibleMom 5 pts

I am appalled at how difficult it is to get the birth that you want. I had a midwife and knew how I wanted everything to go (no meds, no anesthesia, intermittent monitoring, birthing chair) and I had to fight tooth and nail for it. My midwife actually had to threaten the head nurse, saying she was going to report her to the hospital because she was refusing to move me to a birthing room. She wanted to keep me in triage since it was easier for them to check on me. The birthing rooms were too far away. Oh, and the other girls who were laboring with me in triage? Hooked up to monitors and stuck in bed all three had C-sections. Poor things.

Follow me on Twitter: NaturalAsPosMom

Blog: NaturalAsPossibleMom.com

andrea_owen 5 pts

Great post and thanks for the mention. It still amazes me that we are being told what we can and cannot do with our vaginas.

PureNaturalDiva 5 pts

One of my best friends is a Birthing Doula. She had to have an emergency c-section for her first child. She was determined to try for a VBAC with her second and it took her most of her pregnancy to find an OB who would support her choice. Once she did - the office continued to try to schedule her for a C-Section.

In the end she had a successful VBAC - but had she not been uber informed and fought for it - there was no way her 2nd baby would have been born vaginally.

To make matters even scarier - she wants a large family and continued c-sections reduce your ability to successfully carry multiple babies safely to term.

So sad.

coppe10 5 pts

I had a c-section for my 4 year old son and it was an extremely painful recovery. The doctor on-call, whom I had never met, did it for "fetal distress", but my son had no signs of it at birth. Thank God for a good outcome, but I did not want to go through that again.

When I got pregnant with my daughter last year, I became VBAC-obssessed. I researched and read everything I could, joined an ICAN (Int'l. Cesarean Awareness Network) support group and seriously considered a homebirth. I wanted a natural birth this time around.

Thankfully, I found a group of doctors who supported VBACs and had an 80% success rate. It was a 45 minute drive to each appointment, but totally worth it! I believed they wouldn't do a c-section, unless it was a true medical emergency.

I developed high blood pressure at 38 weeks, then went into labor at 39 weeks. I was very carefully monitored through the labor...fetal signs were perfect throughout...we prayed, our family and friends prayed...and when I got to 10cm, I pushed and got my beautiful baby daughter...and my vbac.

It was the most amazing, wonderful, incredible, inspiring experience...everything I imagined and more! I didn't even cry, I was so happy that I got to hold my daughter immediately at birth (not an hour after in recovery, like with the C-sec.)!

It was a healing experience, and an answer to prayer, thank God!

Even if you have to change doctors, I say do what you can to increase your chances of a natural birth and avoid unnecessary surgery.

Thanks for increasing VBAC awareness! Happy ICAN month!

Amy Gates 5 pts

Gidge,
Congratulations on all of your births. :) Thank you for sharing your experience. I wish you a speedy recovery.
It boggles my mind how someone who's never experienced a vaginal birth could say a c-section is so much easier. I would never say a vaginal birth is so much easier simply because I've never had a cesarean and can't compare the two.

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess ( http://crunchydomesticgoddess.com )
BlogHers Act contributing editor ( http://www.blogher.com/special-events/bloghers-act )

Amy Gates 5 pts

C-sections have been used for years (I was born via c-section almost 35 yrs ago), but I don't think premature deliveries have anything to do with the rising rate. I think, as FabFrugalFoodie said, more preemies surviving is due to NICU advances, not more c-sections.

"I truly am glad you had a beautiful, healthy girl. Having healthy babies AND mothers is the entire point of being, frankly, appalled at the current maternity care climate." I totally agree.

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess ( http://crunchydomesticgoddess.com )
BlogHers Act contributing editor ( http://www.blogher.com/special-events/bloghers-act )

Gidge 5 pts

Hi Amy! I actually just lived the C-section nightmare last week. Having delivered a healthy 9 pound boy and TWINS who came in at 7 pounds vaginally, I was absolutely terrified at the prospect of c-section for my last child, who was in a breech/transverse position and as a very large baby too big to get turned.
I was besieged by people who fed me the "Oh C-Section is so much easier" line.......when in fact they had never experience vaginal birth.
I think your post is so very important.
C-Section was the only safe option for me, because of a uterine deformity and the baby's position -but so many women are ill informed about their options and the severity of what is going to be done to the medically via c-section.
I'm not anti-cesarian.......but I think that greater eductation must exist and women have got to be informed what this is going to be like.
Personally, I thought it was like hell.
Gidge
href="http://livefromthewangofamerica.blogspot.com">livefromthewangofamerica.blogspot.com

mrsL 5 pts

I'm not sure that avoiding exhaustion is a good reason for major abdominal surgery. Recovering from surgery is also very draining and that lasts for weeks! BTDT

Elena,

"If you bungle raising your children, nothing else much matters." Jackie Kennedy

mrsL 5 pts

Great post and thanks for getting awareness out there on BlogHer!

I've done C-sec, VBAC and homebirth and I definitely believe that women need to take back the birthing process. I'm starting now by educating my daughters so that when they are becoming moms they'll know what their choices really are.

Elena,

"If you bungle raising your children, nothing else much matters." Jackie Kennedy

KatieBeez 5 pts

I had my baby abroad last September but read "Your Best Birth" by Lake and Epstein beforehand, though it focuses mostly on the US birth experience.

I feel lucky to had have a natural birth with my daughter, but it so easily could have gone differently.

Mothers should definitely be given the chance to try for VBACs.

Apron Strings Blog 5 pts

I'm not sure I understand your point. It IS wonderful that preterm babies are surviving more frequently, no doubt. But if they had been delivered by cesarean and not survived, say, 20 years ago, the cesarean itself still would have been included in the statistics. I think the increase in survival rates has everything to do with (incredible) advances in neonatal intensive care. If more frequent c-sections has any impact on preemie survival *apart* from NICU advances, I doubt it is by more than a few percentage points. We're at 32.3% when the maximum recommended by the WHO is 15%. Preemies don't account for 17.3%.

I truly am glad you had a beautiful, healthy girl. Having healthy babies AND mothers is the entire point of being, frankly, appalled at the current maternity care climate.

Fabulously frugal recipes - for foodies. ( http://www.fabfrugalfood.com/ )

dragonmoon 5 pts

I wonder how much the C-Section rates are skewed by pre-term births. I'm not referring to a week or two early, but the fact that infants as early as 24 weeks gestation are surviving thanks to Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Some of these kids may not have even made it to term, or even have been conceived a generation ago. A simple "C-Section Rate" statistic misses quite a bit of information.

I had my daughter vaginally at the age of 35. We all knew that a C-Section was something that we wanted to avoid (the possible complications for me were very high), but it was a very real possibility. I never felt bullied or coerced, in fact the approach taken was "what can we do to not do a C-Section". Things went well and I have a beautiful, healthy girl - and that's what matters to me.

Rusty Hoe 5 pts

It's disappointing to see yet again women are losing the ability to choose what happens with their bodies. C-sections are without doubt an important medical option. They save the lives of mums and bubs daily. But the notion of compulsory surgery seems absurd.

This is not just a product of the medical and insurance industry but also what many women are now seeing as the best option. We are doing ourselves a disservice as women to make this move the norm. I'm not saying vaginal birth is a bed of roses (been there twice and still shudder at the memories, thank god for drugs) and I don't subscribe to the 'natural birth' notion, but this should still be the initial path unless issues arise and a c-section is required. Risks are present in both birth options and as women we need to be educated about all pros and cons and then a considered decision made.

As women we need to speak up for choice and participate in the discussion and not allow someone else to dictate what we do with our bodies yet again. Sorry will hop off my soap box now :)

Michelle Roger writes for Living With Bob (Dysautonomia) ( http://bobisdysautonomia.blogspot.com/ )

Apron Strings Blog 5 pts

Thank you SO MUCH for writing this - and including such a great round-up of resources there. As a doula in my non-foodie life, this is an issue very close to my heart.

Fabulously frugal recipes - for foodies. ( http://www.fabfrugalfood.com/ )

TheFeministBreeder 5 pts

Amy,

Thank you SO MUCH for putting this on BlogHer. It is absolutely insane the things that docs are doing to women these days, and convincing them that they or their babies would have died without it. I've been through it all, and what some of them are doing is downright criminal, but so many women don't know better.

The Feminist Breeder
Blog: http://www.thefeministbreeder.com/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/feministbreeder
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Feminist-Breeder...

Radio Show: http://www.blogtalkradio/thefeminisbr

Emsxiety 9 pts

My daughter was born in 1989 by Emergency C-section. Two years later in 1991 I had my son VBAC. I was encouraged to have my son VBAC by the doctors and the hospital where I went. I wonder what has changed over the years that they are discouraging it now.

Jagged Edge of Em's Anxiety ( http://emsxiety.blogspot.com/ )

quatro_mama 5 pts

As a mother who had a c-section with my quadruplets (manditory) and an additional surgery w/ c-section recovery it shocks me why anyone would ELECT for a evasive and MAJOR surgery + recovery.
This is not the easy way to get a baby out, people!

Jen

Mama 2 Quadruplets

www.murraycrew.blogspot.com ( http://www.murraycrew.blogspot.com/ )

Dwana of Houseonahillorg 7 pts

This is such an important topic. Many new moms give up or do not have the proper coaching - and in desperate situations will choose the seemingly easier choice of C-section when giving birth. This is a great post covering all sides of the debate.

Every birth is different, as is every situation, but with education and patience families hoping to deliver vaginally should be encouraged and supported-its the way it was intended.

I'm Houseonahillorg ~
Healthier Happier You! ( http://www.Houseonahillorg.blogspot.com )
Welcome To Wellness ( http://www.HealthierHappierHouseonahill.org )

Amy Gates 5 pts

I agree with you, SuburbanGrandma. Thank goodness c-sections are an option. They definitely can and do save lives. :) Yet, they are definitely over-performed (perhaps for fear of law suits, perhaps because time is money, perhaps for convenience, etc.).
The World Health Organization (WHO) states that no region in the world is justified in having a cesarean rate greater than 10 to 15 percent because rates above 15% seem to do more harm than good. Yet the USA's rate (in 2008, the most recent info available) is 32.3% and the rate continues to climb. Something has to change.

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess ( http://crunchydomesticgoddess.com )
BlogHers Act contributing editor ( http://www.blogher.com/special-events/bloghers-act )

suburbangrandma 5 pts

suburbangrandma.com

I am glad that some doctors are able to make that decision faster than others, realizing the danger the mother and baby are being in. If my daughter's doctor waited longer, my daughter would have been totally exhausted, unnecessarily, and I am not sure if I would have been lucky to have a granddaughter, as I do now.
It may be true that some doctors jump to that decision too quickly (maybe to avoid law suits), but thank God for others who make that choice on time.