Bio
I'm a freelance science writer and PhD student in Cell and Molecular Biology at the University of Hawaii. I blog for Scientific American's blog netwo...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Are You Wasting Money? Four Myths About Organic Food

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 25
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Ten years ago, Certified Organic didn't exist in the United States. Yet in 2010, a mere eight years after USDA's regulations officially went into effect, organic foods and beverages made $26.7 billion. In the past year or two, certified organic sales have jumped to about $52 billion worldwide despite the fact that organic foods cost up to three times as much as those produced by conventional methods.

More and more, people are shelling out their hard-earned cash for what they believe are the best foods available. Imagine, people say: you can improve your nutrition while helping save the planet from the evils of conventional agriculture -- a complete win-win. And who wouldn't buy organic, when it just sounds so good?


Photo by Tim Psych.

Here's the thing: there are a lot of myths out there about organic foods, and a lot of propaganda supporting methods that are rarely understood. It's like your mother used to say: just because everyone is jumping off a bridge doesn't mean you should do it, too. Now, before I get yelled at too much, let me state unequivocally that I'm not saying organic farming is bad -- far from it. There are some definite upsides and benefits that come from many organic farming methods. For example, the efforts of organic farmers to move away from monocultures, where crops are farmed in single-species plots, are fantastic; crop rotations and mixed planting are much better for the soil and environment. My goal in this post isn't to bash organic farms, instead, it's to bust the worst of the myths that surround them so that everyone can judge organic farming based on facts. In particular, there are four myths thrown around like they're real that just drive me crazy.

Myth #1: Organic Farms Don’t Use Pesticides

When the Soil Association, a major organic accreditation body in the UK, asked consumers why they buy organic food, 95% of them said their top reason was to avoid pesticides. They, like many people, believe that organic farming involves little to no pesticide use. I hate to burst the bubble, but that's simply not true. Organic farming, just like other forms of agriculture, still uses pesticides and fungicides to prevent critters from destroying their crops. Confused?

So was I, when I first learned this from a guy I was dating. His family owns a farm in rural Ohio. He was grumbling about how everyone praised the local organic farms for being so environmentally-conscientious, even though they sprayed their crops with pesticides all the time while his family farm got no credit for being pesticide-free (they're not organic because they use a non-organic herbicide once a year). I didn't believe him at first, so I looked into it: turns out that there are over 20 chemicals commonly used in the growing and processing of organic crops that are approved by the US Organic Standards. And, shockingly, the actual volume usage of pesticides on organic farms is not recorded by the government.

Why the government isn't keeping watch on organic pesticide and fungicide use is a damn good question, especially considering that many organic pesticides that are also used by conventional farmers are used more intensively than synthetic ones due to their lower levels of effectiveness. According to the National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, the top two organic fungicides, copper and sulfur, were used at a rate of 4 and 34 pounds per acre in 1971 1. In contrast, the synthetic fungicides only required a rate of 1.6 lbs per acre, less than half the amount of the organic alternatives.

The sad truth is, factory farming is factory farming, whether its organic or conventional. Many large organic farms use pesticides liberally. They're organic by certification, but you'd never know it if you saw their farming practices. As Michael Pollan, best-selling book author and organic supporter, said in an interview with Organic Gardening, "They're organic by the letter, not organic in spirit ... if most organic consumers went to those places, they would feel they were getting ripped off."

What makes organic farming different, then? It's not the use of pesticides, it's the origin of the pesticides used. Organic pesticides are those that are derived from natural sources and processed lightly if at all before use. This is different than the current pesticides used by conventional agriculture, which are generally synthetic. It has been assumed for years that pesticides that occur naturally (in certain plants, for example) are somehow better for us and

  • 25
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Andre Such 5 pts

That's Nice! It's a lot to thing about!

Anaiis 5 pts

Interesting premise, NerdyChristie. And you have provided one of the best arguments for buying locally grown organic products and getting to know your farmer. I'm an urban farmer, and have not have to use any kind of chemical, herbicide or pesticide in my operation. With the intensive planting and rotation method I use, there is so much diversity in the plantings that the worst pests are confused and kept in check by beneficial insects and other living organisms in the soil. People who buy my vegetables aren't getting certified organic produce, they are buying chemical free produce. Sun, water, rain are doing the job so far.

No2GMO 5 pts

E. coli is mostly from packaging and handling of commodities, and conventional farming has higher rates than organic, which is more strictly regulated regarding use of manure, although conventional farming uses more manure than does organic.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/organic/stossellie...

Organic chickens less likely to carry salmonella.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_2...

GMOs are dangerous to health and economy.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/wheat.cfm

Rob 5 pts

Your concluding sentiment is admirable, but I'm afraid that your reasoning and your research is seriously flawed. Let me highlight just a few points.

For instance, your gee-whiz claims about the POTENTIAL benefits of GMOs fails to acknowledge the fact that the overwhelming majority of the GMO crops currently under cultivation are modified to resist herbicides, a practice that has given rise to "superweeds" that have taken over millions of acres of farmland and may be having even more serious consequences. Then you accuse organic farmers of hypocrisy because they have responsibly used naturally-occurring Bt for years when necessary but refuse to plant crops that have been genetically altered to express the Bt toxin in every cell of every plant for its entire lifespan -- and you claim this practice reduces pesticide use? Perhaps you should research the studies that show Bt toxin in river basins and in the blood of pregnant women in Canada.

As for nutritional differences, there are a number of studies showing that organic foods are higher in antioxidants and other health-promoting phenolic compounds - genetically-modifying these foods is an unnecessary waste of time and money - they simply need to be grown in nutrient-rich soils and not pumped up with synthetic fertilizers.

Although you rightly acknowledge that advances in organic research may help narrow the yield gap (especially if it received even a fraction of the support poured into conventional/biotech research), you fail to realize that organic farming has already been demonstrated to be 20% more efficient in terms of energy use than conventional. The yield advantages of conventional agriculture are hugely dependent on fossil fuel-derived inputs, and they are not getting any cheaper or more plentiful. Studies already show that in developing countries, employing organic/ecological methods can double or triple yields without imposing dependence on purchased inputs. And in a world that wastes 30% of the food produced, with as many over-nourished people as hungry people, any claims that the only solution to world hunger is more intensive production or more land clearing is clearly self-serving propaganda.

I'm glad that you don't think organic farming is bad, but you have clearly bought into a great deal of "anti-organic" propaganda from those who do. Try talking to some organic experts or doing some truly independent research before your next "myth-busting" exercise.

bobbin35 5 pts

What I‘m saying is, ( and apparently I was too wordy to fit this in one post )

Organic on the large scale is much different than organic on the small scale, and for reasons that I totally understand. But I also think that the whole term "organic" is being overused and the rules are being edited to accommodate profits.

If you want the real organic experience, like the others comments here have said, find yourself a farm, or a farmers market, look into CSA shares. Talk to the farmer, shop around, Buy local, in season. If the price is a little higher, that’s because they are working harder to keep it organic, but it’s the real type of organic that you think you are getting in the grocery store.

bobbin35 5 pts

Very well written article ( and comments ) with many good points for thought. I have to agree with the larger /global issues of land use, supply and demand, production per acre and volume of chemicals required to be effective, world hunger etc. But, I get the feeling that the organic farms that are being compared to the commercial operations here are large scale and therefore commercial themselves, and following the allowable guidelines that will keep them tagged as the ever profitable "organic".

Whether or not an organic vegetable has more nutrients than non-organic? Well I can’t really comment on that, because I have no idea. But where taste is concerned, if the panel could not tell the difference in a blind taste test, then they were most likely being offered hot house goods, grown in California and shipped to the UK in February. In which case, I agree, you would not be able to tell the difference.

And with that said, the entire "organic" label comes in 2 forms now: Large and Small scale operation, and with the sub-categories of: Local and In Season.

Lewis Goudy 5 pts

You note that organic animal products contained slightly higher levels of trans fats, but you neglected to point out that both organic and conventional contain only trace amounts. You also declined to address omega-6 to omega-3 ratios, which are certainly germane to human nutrition, especially in the context of high intakes of refined vegetable oils.

Cherry picking?

Amybb 5 pts

I wrote about this a while back as well. Years ago, my dad who was a farmer, was going to go Organic, but he didn't like the pesticides he was allowed to use, as he felt they were more harmful than those that weren't approved. And like you said, yes, pesticides are approved.

I also agree with the comments about not taking down all the same Organic farmers with this article. Those guys are probably truly organic and we applaud them. It's the "organic" that you buy in the big box grocery store that you need to be careful of. Or at least those are my personal thoughts.

Thanks for shedding light on this. I think too many people are spending money on something they should probably research more.

Holly102011 5 pts

Sorry, this is totally untrue. Did you speak with any actual organic farmers at all? We don't use any chemical pesticides or herbicides, instead we use cover crops for early spring until the real crops are planted to keep weeds down, walk beans and corn if needed, crop rotation, etc. We fertilize with poultry manure. We know several organic farmers in our area and none of them use the practices you describe. I don't mean to rude about your well written article, and maybe some organic farmers do use the practices you describe, but don't take the rest of us down with them. We put a lot of hard work into what we do.

clux6r4 6 pts

I am a small, organic farmer. I do no use pesticides or herbicides controls of any kind. A well managed organic farm doesn't have to. I have to side on those that say buy local and know your farmer. Visiting the farm your food grows on will give you peace of mind about what you consume and what your family eats. As a rule, my produce is not more expensive than grocery store produce, and thousands of miles fresher. Certified organic does not mean what you think it means. Lobbyist are constantly working to compromise the meaning of certified organic, such as allowing 10% of feed to be non-organic in a certified organic meat animals--makes no sense. Buy local, know your farmer, organic or not it's the better choice.

Kishag 5 pts

Wow-Great piece. It really gave me something to chew on. I was just discussing how it’s unfair that most of American can’t even consider buying organic. It makes the wealthy feel better and well, as a former health nut-I still go for the organic whenever possible…it feels like insurance. You are right in saying quantity of the good stuff is what really counts, I like that thought. I hate wasting money and after learning about the pesticides in organics I have some more research to do and some thing’s to think on. I wish this world could wrap its arms around the global issue of hunger instead of being so consumed with the petty stuff. Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts on this!

yeepoa 9 pts

I don't disagree with the idea that the big-business agri is problematic, whether or not it is organic. I myself have gotten to know local farmers, and have chosen to support a family who is very open about the choices to make, and also the reasons for blemishes on some fruits and veggies as well as the ramifications of the products he chooses, or chooses not to use.

Here is my biggest two problems with GMO foods:

1. If something is pesticide resistant, drought resistant and pest resistant, who is PROVING the foods are not also digestive resistant.

I work with a bakery, and it is unbelievable the numbers of our long-time CLIENTS who are no longer able to digest wheat.

Also, with regards to peanuts, I don't believe that we have always had the quantity of people unable to digest this product -- I'd love to read an unbiased history on the changes made, whether through modern-day genetic engineering or through past grafting of one plant on another to see if there exists any correlation between the two.

My young niece (2) and nephew (5) both show considerable reactions to soy, reactions that have seen my sister's daughter-in change the way she runs her kitchen and the foods she can purchase. Let me tell you, soy is in everything and soy is GMO.

2. The democratic process and indeed, the ability to educate one's self based on disinterested (monetary) transparency does not exist. And don't fool yourself. It hasn't for a long, long time. But you asking me to believe that scientists and business people interested in discoveries that will make them world renown and wealthy (respectively) will be open minded in seeing that there are issues with their life's work or last big investment beg me to ignore history, both recent and distant. I simply cannot do that.

yeepoa 9 pts

And so, to conclude, with all due respect. This article is impressive and the premise that we should not buy Organic as a brand is entirely correct.. I buy local, from farmers who are willing to share all they know and understand to be true with me. They rotate their crops, they pay their workers a living wage, save their seeds. They keep notes on what works and what doesn't. They have gathered community around them to ensure, community that is willing to share the risk, so that that they may be supported financially as they find their way in a tough economic world. They defer to elder farmers who can explain why they do/did what they do/did and, most importantly they employ their own intellect to educate themselves about what is best for themselves and their land, which they do not consider to be their slave but rather an equal participant that requires their care and attention to produce the best crops they can. They also look for ways to include poorer families in their harvests at prices they can pay, including a sliding scale CSA.

I do not choose Organics by brand. I choose growers who I trust, I get to know the growers both by visiting their farms and by frequenting the farmer's market at less busy times and *talking to the farmers*. I also know my prices, and can easily find foods grown to standards with which I can live at a price I can pay. It is important to note that while I do not live under the poverty line, we are a family of five living on a single and not-particularly-impressive income for our area. In otherwords, we are neither rich, nor are we poor.

It is a very simple formula that ensures my family reasonably priced foods that are healthy.

GreenCntryGirl 7 pts

Very thoughtful piece and I see a lot of your points. I'm gun shy about GMOs, though. Really gun shy.

Also loved your point that just because something is "organic" doesn't mean it's good for you. I cannot remember what issue I was investigated...it was food related, though...and the writer said that just because something was natural didn't mean it's good for you and used rattlesnake venom as an example.

If a person really wants as much control as possible over their food sources, I would guess that growing your own food would be the way to go?

Baby Feet 7 pts

This was fabulous. You didn't vilify organic at all. It was informative. I didn't agree with it all, but it was so well written, I was impressed at all the information etc that it really had me thinking about why I buy organic. I mostly chose root veggies and meats when I can afford them. Very well written!!

OrganicBabyU 10 pts

I find it frustrating that the only conversation about GMO is positive. There are new studies showing damaging effects of GMOs and that they are NOT killed in the gut as these chemical companies would have you believe. GMO Bt from corn has been found in breastmilk and cord blood showing it is being passed to unborn children. It is a science experiment on our children. And the idea that making a Hep B vaccine in bananas I find absolutely terrifying! Not a wonderful advancement!

paulag01 12 pts

I agree with you that local = knowing what's going on, as long as you can see behind the curtain (one local veal farm near me is one of the worst offenders of animal abuse and on the hotlist from Animal Sanctuary).

That said, why would we want to genetically modify a peanut to remove the protein?

And, while there are people going hungry, most of the United States at least is facing an obesity epidemic because of what they do eat (processed junk vs organic or conventional fruits/veggies). I find some great information in your article and yet in the cases where "researchers" find things like people can't taste a difference, etc. I wonder whose pockets the "researchers" are tied to. The best solution is true transparency and education... I don't want to be forced to eat 10 or 20 conventional apples to match the nutritional content of one 1940 apple (or whatever the crazy # was that Michael Pollan cited in this book "In Defense of Food".) Clearly there is no simple and quick solution to an industry gone awry, but I hope awareness leads us closer to one.

jreinman 6 pts

I work with a lot of dietitians who are frustrated to see moms shying away from buying conventional produce because they can't afford organic (because of the perceived risk). List like the EWG's "dirty dozen" may contribute to those kinds of decisions. There is a good website that further clarifies some of the myths you're talking about at www.safefruitsandveggies.com. Experts remind us all to wash our produce and enjoy the benefits of all fruits and veggies.

Shannon LC Cate 14 pts

Thanks so much. I have seen this stuff before, but in the grocery store, I kind of just vaguely remember that "USDA Organic" isn't all it's cracked up to be, but figure it's still vaguely better than conventional and buy it.

I do try to go with local "deep" if not "certified" organic when I have a choice, as I learned about in Pollan's work.

Conversation from Facebook

Brooke Harshbarger Schmidt
Brooke Harshbarger Schmidt

Google Monsanto. Research it FOR REAL. Then make a decision.

Pervara Kapadia
Pervara Kapadia

Interesting.

Harriet Thespy
Harriet Thespy

Was this one funded by Monsanto? It reads like it. She is not busting any myths -- she's actually spouting myths that have already been debunked. nancy

Michelle Welsh Giguiere
Michelle Welsh Giguiere

Thank you! You've worded wonderfully what I try to explain to people. Don't get me wrong, I think Organic is great, however people just ASSUME it's the healthier choice or the most environmentally friendly.

Jessica Levenson Madden
Jessica Levenson Madden

Fantastic post!