- Share This Post
- submit
- 25
-
Sparkle (0)
America entered the new year knowing it had elected the first African-American president but also seeing video of a white BART police officer shooting Oscar Grant, an Africa-American, in the back, killing him as another officer pinned him to the ground. In May, on YouTube, the world watched a black EMT being choked by a white Oklahoma state trooper against the EMT's ambulance while a patient awaited transport to the hospital inside. And this week it's Cambridge Police arresting Henry Louis Gates, Jr., a "preeminent" African-American scholar, the Alphonse Fletcher University Professor of Harvard University, Mass., and editor-in-chief of TheRoot.com, at his own home near Harvard Square.
After hearing on his radio that a woman had called the police saying she saw two black men trying to push in the front door of her neighbor's house, a police officer arrived at Gates's home. The professor had just called his real estate company to say his front door had been damaged. Gates, arriving at his home with a driver and luggage following a trip, had trouble with the front door's lock. He and his driver were the two black men the neighbor had seen "breaking in."
Two accounts of what happened at Gates's home are on the record regarding what happened, the police officer's and Gates's. The officer's account has Gates screaming the word "racist" for no apparent reason other than a white cop showed up at his home and also indicates Gates threatened to go after the cop's job. Gates's account says Gates suggested the cop has mistreated him because he is black after the officer refuses to give Gates his name and badge number. Both accounts agree that Prof. Gates produced his driver's license and his Harvard University ID, that he is who he says he is and that it was indeed his house. And yet, the police officer arrested Gates for disorderly conduct.
When Oscar Grant was shot to death, people wanted to know, "Was Grant a criminal? Did he have a record?" When the trooper choked the black EMT, people wanted to know, "Who really had the right-of-way on that Oklahoma road? Isn't it true the black EMT was wrong to go first?" And now, after learning that a 58-year-old black Harvard professor of slender build, who requires a cane to walk, is arrested at his own home, some, who assume the officer's story must be true, are saying, "He shouldn't have said that to the policeman, who was only doing his job" and also declaring that Gates's position as a college professor with no criminal record should not be a factor at all in the story. Others say looks like racism, smells like racism, we say "racism."
Yesterday, the day after the arrest story broke, Gates and the Cambridge Police Department issued a joint press release stating they have come to an agreement. Neither will pursue legal action. Everybody wins!
The City of Cambridge and the Cambridge Police Department have recommended to the Middlesex County District Attorney that the criminal charge against Professor Gates not proceed. Therefore, in the interests of justice, the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office has agreed to enter a nolle prosequi in this matter.
The City of Cambridge, the Cambridge Police Department, and Professor Gates acknowledge that the incident of July 16, 2009 was regrettable and unfortunate. This incident should not be viewed as one that demeans the character and reputation of Professor Gates or the character of the Cambridge Police Department. All parties agree that this is a just resolution to an unfortunate set of circumstances.
As can be expected, neither of the parties involved may dictate to the American public how to perceive them or their actions. For instance, PPR_Scribe poses a series of "what if questions" while Field Negro says, "Yes, that educated Negro, caved," and a white columnist at Examiner.com assumes the professor's willingness not to sue means he's guilty of something.
After reading the tweets of Princeton Professor Melissa Harris-Lacewell on Monday and her opinion that Gates is not a radical by any means, I was not surprised to learn the Harvard Professor did not pursue legal action. I considered that he may fear damaging his reputation, something that could conceivably happen through a campaign of lies and innuendo, the kind typically heaped upon people of color who speak out against racial injustice.
Today at The Nation, under















