Bio
My name is Amy Gates (also known on the ‘net as amygeekgrl or the Crunchy Domestic Goddess). I live in Colorado with my husband Jody (yes, he’s a guy...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

The Baby Borrowers: Reality TV gone too far?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

NBC's new reality show "The Baby Borrowers" takes five teenage couples through a crash course in adulthood tasking them with responsibilities such as a house payment, a job, and for three days, the care of a baby (and later, a toddler, pre-teen and elderly person). Many bloggers and others are up in arms over infants being separated from their parents for so long for a so-called "social experiment" saying it is irresponsible television and some have even called it child abuse.

The Baby BorrowersAlthough my stomach lurched when I first heard about this show with a catchy name and the slogan "It's not TV. It's birth control!" and had no intention of watching it, I decided that if I was going to write about it with any sort of authority I really needed to take a look at least some of it. I watched the second half of the first episode, when the parents dropped off their infants to the teenage couples, and most of the second episode which also dealt with the couples caring (or not) for the babies and their first days going to work outside the home.

As I watched it one word kept coming to mind: exploitation. The whole show reeked of exploitation - exploitation of the infants and of the teens. I've read people argue that it's not like these babies were kidnapped. After all, their parents willingly signed up to participate and handed them over for the show. But my concern is not what the parents' opinion or thoughts on participating were or that safety measures were all in place, it is that the babies had no say in the matter. They weren't able to voice their feelings and say, "No, I don't want to leave you, Mommy and Daddy, and go live with strangers who know nothing about babies for three days." They were only able to cry, and cry they did. These poor babies had no idea how long their parents would be gone, or really if they'd ever return. My heart broke every time one of them cried, was called "it" (which happened on many occasions), was told to "starve" (as one was when he wouldn't eat), or was juggled about haphazardly.

Yet not all of the show consisted of upset crying babies. There were happy times for them as well and a few of the teenagers really seemed to rise to the occasion and take their parenting role seriously. But we'll never know what really went on behind the scenes, how much was edited or how NBC's "social experiment" will affect these little people in the immediate future or further down the road.

Zero to Three, a national nonprofit multidisciplinary organization who's mission is "to support the healthy development and well-being of infants, toddlers and their families," issued a response to The Baby Borrowers citing studies that have been done on babies who have been through prolonged separation from their family. Here is just a bit of it:

For the past 80 years, many studies have shown unequivocally that babies and toddlers suffer when they are exposed to this kind of prolonged separation from family and left with people that they do not know or love. As all parents know, babies and toddlers are very distressed by separation. They cry, cling, and search for their parents. The longer the separation, the more upset they become. Some children are unable to sleep and refuse to eat. The responses routinely last long past the child’s reunion with the parent. Prolonged separations heighten young children’s separation anxiety and damage their trust that their parents will be available to protect and care for them. Children can become angry and rejecting of their parents after being reunited with them, damaging the fabric of the child-parent relationship.

Studies show that babies and toddlers need to feel safe and secure in order to form a positive sense of self, to form healthy relationships, and to feel confident to explore their world. This sense of security is dependent on the availability and stability of their trusted primary caregivers. Being separated for a three-day period from a parent or trusted, familiar adult, and being thrust into the care of a total stranger who has no experience with the child—how he or she is comforted, likes to be fed, held, etc.—and who has no experience caring for young children at all, can be very stressful for the child.

Due to her concern for the "present

  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
chilito1970 5 pts

You hens need to relax.  There are much worse things happening to kids in our world. Get some prespective and get a clue.

amygeekgrl 5 pts

If any of you are interested in reading more about this show and those involved, I just posted an interview with Natalie Nichols, the attachment parenting mom who's two children ( http://crunchydomesticgoddess.com/2008/07/15/exclu... ) appeared on The Baby Borrowers.

Thank you.

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess ( http://crunchydomesticgoddess.com )
BlogHers Act contributing editor ( http://www.blogher.com/special-events/bloghers-act )

ReneeJRoss 5 pts

I was deep into attachment parenting - up until I had to return to work full-time when my baby was 4 months old.  Then the ties that bind were broken.  My first few days of work my son stayed at my home with my mother - he was in a familiar environment with his Grandma, he had moments as all babies do but in general he was fine.  Flash forward to my dropping him off at the in home daycare - he only lasted an hour and a half.  He cried the whole time and the "caregiver" called me to pick him up.  Luckily I was home sick that day so i could easily get him.

 But I had to work so I found another place around the corner - where he cried, and cried and cried.  So the following week I found the best place where they nurtured him... and cared for him as if he was their own.

I say all that because I would not have been involved in this experiment - but I do not question the judgement of the parents that did.  My son survived daycare - as a matter of fact although I am a WAHM I still take him to daycare a few days a week because I need time during the day to work and he is just too young and too mobile to understand "stay right here, play with your toys and be quiet while Mommy is on the phone (writing this letter, etc.).

I believe that the children will be okay and the parents were basically a house away.  As pp have noted, these "reality" shows are anything but reality - they are edited for television and I am sure they showed the most damaging images for the most part to prove their points to teens considering becoming parents.

Honestly, I don't believe this show will deter any teen - that will take good judgement and great outside influences.  As one of the teens on the show mentioned "my baby won't be like this" and I am sure that sentiment will be shared by other teens.

www.cutiebootycakes.blogspot.com 

alyssaroyse 5 pts

I TOTALLY agree that it's apples and oranges. My issue was the assumption that kids are doomed to suffer long-term damage as a result of the separation. I just don't think that's a safe (or fair) assumption....  These babies are going to be fine. Unless, of course, their parents continue to make such decisions. But it's not gonna be those 3 days that do it, it's gonna be a lifetime of decisions like that.

Honestly, I question everything about the parents who handed their babies over for this. I don't think it really harmed the kids, but I get super judgmental (which I try to keep in check) about the parents.  Not a choice I would make.

That said, I feel pretty confident that NBC and all of it's affiliates and insurance people and lawyers probably made sure those kids were so well cared for that it would put any daycare center to shame.  I am totally certain there was way more parent contact than we saw....

All I was saying was that saying the parents are knowingly harming their children isn't quite fair. They certainly didn't intend to harm the kids, and I don't think it's safe to assume that the kids will be harmed. Our collective intelligence as a society on the other hand, continuing it's plummet. 

____________

Alyssa Royse

Just Cause It: ( http://www.justcauseit.com )A Web Site To Save The World

Start Her Up: ( http://www.startherup.com )A Blog for Women Entrepreneurs

amygeekgrl 5 pts

I feel fortunate that I was able to be a SAHM since the birth of my first child. I didn't look into any kind of childcare until my daughter was 3 and I decided to enroll her in preschool. When that time came, I first got some recommendations from friends and then visited the preschool to see how the teacher interacted with the students. After that, my husband and I met with the teacher for an interview to make sure that she was a good fit for us and that our daughter was a good fit for the school. It was then that we decided it would be a good place to send our daughter.

I think most people, when they sign up for daycare or preschool for their child, go through a similar process. They want their child to be in good, experienced hands. They check credentials, they interview, they sit in to observe. All of this is in stark contrast to what happened on The Baby Borrowers when parents let their babies go with immature, self-absorbed strangers that had little to no experience with babies - certainly no formal training.

Also, as "amamasblog" pointed out with daycare there are often trial runs, and the baby gets used to the caregiver gradually and the caregiver to the baby. It's possible that this happened behind the scenes w/ the TV show, but as far as I know, we can't confirm that and they certainly didn't elude to that taking place. With a gradual introduction to daycare, baby begins to see that it is a routine and that mommy or daddy will come back for them each time. Whereas with The Baby Borrowers, the parents were to leave the babies for 3 days. Yes, they were watching them on nannycams, but the babies didn't know that. And yes, they could stop in whenever they wanted and we don't know how often that really happened, but it still does not feel the same to me as a daycare situation.

It is because of these things that I don't feel it is fair to compare The Baby Borrowers to  daycare. They are apples and oranges.

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess ( http://crunchydomesticgoddess.com )
BlogHers Act contributing editor ( http://www.blogher.com/special-events/bloghers-act )

amamasblog 5 pts

I have read some other comments about this show being pretty much like daycare in that a baby is left with a stranger for most of the day, five days a week.

I refuse to watch any of this show, so I don't know if the teens and the babies were given time to know each other before the switch was made or not.  But, I don't think you can compare this show to daycare. 

Most people who work in daycare are VERY experienced around babies.  Some daycares won't even accept infants, if they are not prepared for them.  Daycares in general have rules and regulations and training for the staff who will handle babies, and usually use the same person day after day to care for the babies. Furthermore, many daycare workers have degrees or some education in child development.   

I have never heard of a daycare center accepting a baby either, without a few trial runs.  Most providers want you to start daycare a few weeks before, and leave the baby for a half-an-hour at first, then an hour, etc. to work up to gradual time the baby will be left.  And the parents are always back with the baby after work. 

My biggest complaint with this show and comparing it to daycare is most people who leave their children and daycare for 8+ hours a day HAVE to- they have no choice.  And I am assuming most of these parents strive to find the warmest, most caring, and loving setting they can find.  Of course babies can bond to more than one person, and this often happens with a daycare provider long term, and the process can be quickened with someone who is experienced in caring for babies. 

In my mind is morally wrong to leave babies with strangers for mere entertainment for a TV show!  There is a big difference in having to leave your baby with a care provider if an emergency comes up, or you have to work.  But to hand your baby over, to try to teach teens a lesson about the "reality" of babies, is wrong.  Why not just turn the babies over to teens right when they are born, so they can see what having a newborn is like? 

The bond between a parent and their baby is sacred.  It is the cornerstone and foundation for building a secure and confident person- and is a basic element for the building blocks of our society.  Messing with this bond on purpose, and dumping your baby off to teens, who are not fully emotionally developed themselves to handle the demands of a baby, for a TV show is wrong. 

It scares me to think what people will do for fame- obviously nothing- not even the bond between a mother/father and their baby- is sacred anymore. 

alyssaroyse 5 pts

Let me start by saying that Baby Borrowers really bothered me and I do think that it was remarkably poor decision making on the part of NBC. (Except that we're all sitting here talking about it and more than a few people who didn't see it last time will probably tune in next time. Well done, NBC!)

Using babies as pawns for ratings is gross. Yes, it's worse than other lame reality TV shows.

But, before we assume this children will have lifelong scars as a result, let's step back and be careful that we don't inadvertently demonize every parent who has left their child alone for an extended period. (Again, NBC, tasteless.) 

I know that when my daughter was 6 weeks old my appendix burst and my daughter was suddenly without me for a week. For that matter, there wasn't a drop of breast milk ever again after that. Oh, and she never needed to sleep with me through the night again. And she's fine. (Actually, the age of 10, she's about to pack up and head to sleep away camp for 6 weeks. Her choice - I'll be a wreck.)

Children all over the country are dropped off at daycare for 12 hours a day. Most of them are fine. 

Indeed, none of us knows what decision we make in our children's early childhood that will land them on the therapist couch later in life. (Mine recently assured my that my insistence on singing loudly to the radio in the car will scar her for life.)

I know that when I chose to put my daughter in daycare while I was working I was told she would be scarred due to the separation. Likewise, when I quit work to be a stay-at-home mom, I was told she would be scarred because she wasn't being socialized. Call me crazy, but I think that most parents make the decisions that feel right to them at the time. You may not agree with someone else's decisions and they may not agree with yours. No one is right.

As for the birth control impact? I dunno. I had forgotten how hard those early days were and one episode of Baby Borrowers caused me to tear up the adoption papers I was thinking about filling out. I think that teenagers generally do watch tv shows about teenagers, so I wouldn't be surprised if they hit their demographic. And personally, I bet it worked.  

Like others, I assume there was a whole lot more back-end security and contact than we saw.

Now, can we talk about The Bachelor? Good Gods, what that does for peoples idea of love is insane. Baby Borrowers? Pretty realistic.  (Both, in my mind are equally tasteless and function at approximately the same maturity level.)

___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE: ( http://www.justcauseit.com ) A Web Site To Save The World

Start Her Up ( http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/startherup/ ): A blog for Women Entrepreneurs

workoutmommy 6 pts

I too was sick to my stomach at the thought of handing my baby over to strangers!

Not only that, but how could the parents of the teens allow them to be on this show? I don't think they ever revealed the ages, but one of the girls was wearing a shirt that said "junior girls", so I am assuming they are still in high school. Since when is it ok to set up house and share a bed with your high school boyfriend? on national tv?

I think 2 of them said they have never had a job before. They have never had to work, yet they are being trusted with babies?

I agree, there are better ways to teach teens about babies. I think NBC dropped the ball on this one, all in the name of ratings.

Lisa

www.workoutmommy.com ( http://www.workoutmommy.com )

go.chris 5 pts

Certainly parents are responsible for their babies emotional health. And I highly doubt that this wasn't considered when they signed up for this project. Perhaps they felt that if they saved one other baby from coming into the world to an unprepared teen parent, that good would outweigh any potential damage.

Babies are left with strangers all of the time. Even grandparents, and some might argue fathers, are strangers at some point. Maybe part of the plan was to see first hand how their children reacted to strangers? Maybe they wanted to ensure that a stranger would never watch their child again? We will never know.

My point was more that playing the blame game doesn't help. Parents make decisions all the time about the well being of their children. Sometimes they don't make the best decisions, or at least what seems the best to us, but I have to believe that they all do the best they can.

--chris

{blog} http://www.onceupon.com/27floor/blogger.html
beyond the loop :: my adventures in boxes

amygeekgrl 5 pts

Chris,

You raise a good point in that reality shows are never actually about reality. Funny how that is, huh?  

You said: "I don't know that it is fair to blame the parents." If the parents aren't responsible for the babies, then who? I understand that safety measures to protect their physical health were all in place, but who was taking care of the babies' emotional health? Did the parents consider that before handing their little ones over?

I think you are right that it's likely the parents stopped in much more often than we saw.

I believe the show was done for the ratings, not to deter teens from having babies. 

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess ( http://crunchydomesticgoddess.com )
BlogHers Act contributing editor ( http://www.blogher.com/special-events/bloghers-act )

go.chris 5 pts

I confess I watched the first show, although I am pretty anti-reality show and not a big fan of TV period. Insomnia can make you do strange things.

To me the whole thing was comical. For starters, what high schooler is going to be able to afford to live in such a house with a shiney new car in the driveway? Right there, you know that this set up is not "real". It is all about ratings.

What they want you to see is crying, pooping babies being called 'IT'. There are five couples and for a 24 hour period, each couple got maybe 6 minutes of camera time (there was a lot of set up in the first episode). So what the audience saw was what NBC felt would get the best ratings.

I don't know that it is fair to blame the parents. Legally there is no way NBC would allow anything bad to happen to the children. The parents could stop things at any time, and I suspect knocked on doors more than we saw. How is this any different than dropping off a baby at a daycare center or even with a babysitter or trusted friend or family? You never know how someone else is going to take care of a child. They at least had nannycams and on-site people for back up. There are countless stories of things going wrong with childcare providers, even ones that have been recommended, trained, and checked out.

As for motivation, I suspect some of it might be in it for their 15 minutes of fame. There were hints that a couple of the parents genuinely wanted these teens to see that babies are a full-time job that require you to give up your needs and develop patience. In the long run, I don't know that this will make people, especially teens, think before they have a child. There may be a few who decide to hold off, but I don't think this show is really something teens would want to watch.

Despite being raised by teen parents, I don't think this is something i would participate in. But as I said, I don't really understand the lure of reality tv. If we want it to stop, people need to stop watching.

--chris

{blog} http://www.onceupon.com/27floor/blogger.html
beyond the loop :: my adventures in boxes