Birth plan? Doula? Natural birth? Not here you don't.
by Amy Gates

A sign posted at the Aspen OB/GYN Women's Center in Provo, Utah has many women up in arms. What's so offensive? Read for yourself.

The sign reads as follows:

Because the Physicians at Aspen Women’s Center care about the quality of their patient’s deliveries and are very concerned about the welfare and health of your unborn child, we will not participate in a “Birth Contract”, a Doulah Assisted, or a Bradley Method delivery. For those patients who are interested in such methods, please notify the nurse so we may arrange transfer of your care.

I first learned of this sign from Naomi, the Denver Doula, who posted it on Facebook. Being a doula (which is misspelled on the sign) herself, she took a particular interest in it. When she called the Center and inquired with the receptionist as to why the sign was posted she was told, "in case there is an emergency we don't want anyone to get in the way of the doctor doing what he has to do."

Annie from PhD in Parenting was inspired by the sign to write How Not To Have a Natural Birth and believes the center might as well have said:

Because Physicians at Aspen Women’s Center care only about doing things their own way and making as much money as possible from unnecessary birth interventions, even if it poses greater risks to the welfare and health your baby, we will not participate in a “Birth Contract”, a doula-assisted, or a Bradley Method delivery. For all patients who have done any research into having the safest birth possible, please notify the nurse so that we can transfer you to a facility that cares less about control and money.

Annie added, "I guess we can at least credit them with warning women in advance. Many hospitals with the same attitude don’t have a sign hanging out front."

Amber responded, "I always thought the big ‘trust birth’ poster in my midwives office was a little cheesy. Now that I’ve seen the alternative, I think it’s truly marvelous. Really."

Miriam Zoila Pérez of Radical Doula wrote a post called Signs You Don't Want to See at Your OB-GYN's Office. She believes the sign could be translated to say:

We don’t care at all what you want as a parent, or a person in labor. We want a patient who will sit quiet and do what we say–no matter what. Oh and if you have a partner you want involved, tough. Your desires don’t matter.

Miriam adds, "They should change the name of the center to the 'Unborn Children Center' since they don’t seem to care too much about the women involved."

A commenter named Janna responded saying, "That’s what bothered me most about this hateful little sign–not once is the “welfare and health” of the MOTHER mentioned, just the “welfare and health” of the “unborn child” and the “quality” of the “deliveries.” Who would want to give birth in a place where they’re the lowest priority on their caregiver’s list? I hope women in this area have other options and the opportunity to have safe, healthy, supportive births."

Does no doula, Bradley Method birth or birth "contract" equal no women's rights?

Summer who writes at Wired for Noise says signs like this one and stories like the lack of choice with regard to our reproductive health and doctors' personal "birth plans" make her sometimes think Doctors Hate Women.

What does it say when women have to escape, have to run away in order to do something as normal as give birth? What does it say when women are treated like children, talked down to, insulted, lied to, and handed letters telling them what the god-head doctor will allow or not allow. When all you want to do is give birth and you’re doctor is more concerned with telling you to sit down and shut up, what is that if not hatred?

I have to agree with Annie that at least some doctors are upfront with what they will and won't "allow" as part of their practice. Kudos to them for being honest. Hopefully that will allow women to look for another care provider while she's still early in her pregnancy.

Rest assured if the OB/GYN I had at my daughter's birth would have given me a piece of paper with her "rules" or had a sign posted like that at the Aspen Women's Clinic, I would have found another care provider pronto. Instead, however, she paid me lip service and acted like she cared about my birth plan (though she didn't act very well and that should have been a big clue for me) and said we could "try" Hypnobirthing, etc. However, when push came to shove (no pun intended), it was her way or the highway. I had my healthy baby girl at the end of it and for that I am truly thankful, but I also got a lot more than I bargained for (and not in a good way). Then again it was that experience lead me to pursue a home birth for my second child and become a home birth advocate.

Although I admire the Aspen Women's Center's honesty, I find it truly offensive that they imply that if a woman wants a doula, natural birth, or has a birth plan, she is not concerned with the welfare and health of her baby (so much more personal than "unborn child" don't you think?) or is even putting her baby's life at risk. Studies have shown that when doulas attend birth, labors are shorter with fewer complications, babies are healthier and they breastfeed more easily. And how exactly is choosing a Bradley birth not good for the health or welfare of the baby? "Bradley® classes teach families how to have natural births. The techniques are simple and effective. They are based on information about how the human body works during labor. Couples are taught how they can work with their bodies to reduce pain and make their labors more efficient." What about a birth plan or "contract?" Is that harmful to the "unborn child?" The American Pregnancy Association suggests, "Creating a birth plan can help you have a more positive birth experience."

There are other things I find offensive as well, like Janna mentioned above, the mother does not seem to be included in the equation at all. Is there any concern for her "welfare and health?"

Who's time money welfare are they really concerned with? I'll let you draw your own conclusions. I've obviously already drawn mine.

Contributing editor Amy Gates blogs about green living, attachment parenting, activism and life with an anxiety disorder at Crunchy Domestic Goddess.

Comments

 

GADS!!!!!!!

What a knee jerk (read JERK!) response to a movement toward consumer-driven care that threatens them.  First they said no to video cameras at births - we might film them making mistakes.  NExt, mothers separated from their husbands in labor to be asked if they are being abused (do they really think she is going to rat him out right now, IN LABOR?  They couldn't have asked during all those pre-natals?) ...now this.

"If you want a good birth, go some where else.  We will call you a cab."

Thank heaven for homebirth.

~Laine (doula and mama - 1 c-sec, 3 HBACs, 4 misscarriages at home)

 

 

My OB/GYN practice did ask

My OB/GYN practice did ask about abuse during pre-natal visits. I'm glad that they do. I have heard that some hospitals even provide red stickers in the women's washroom for women to put on the bottom of their urine sample bottle if they are being abused. They do that because the abusive men often accompany women to their prenatal appointments and there is no opportunity to speak to them alone.

All that to say I agree it is ridiculous to use that as an excuse to separate women from their partners during labour.

PhD in Parenting - http://phdinparenting.com

 

I agree. Screening for abuse

I agree. Screening for abuse during pregnancy is a GOOD thing. Primary incidents of abuse are significantly more likely to happen during pregnancy or the immediate postpartum/early breastfeeding period.

 

I am a strong supporter and

I am a strong supporter and myself used the Bradley Method I was kinda left scratching my head at the mention of forbidding Bradley.  Yes I understand that when you choose Bradley you choose natural births, but Bradley is all about preparing the body for birth, like you mentioned.  Seven months of endless Kegals and squats worked well in the delivery room for me.

Sadly with misspelling of Doula and not getting what Bradley is really about shows how misinformed the Doctor is- and there is nothing that should make women go running in the other direction then a uneducated Doctor.

~Susan

The Somethyme Writer

P.S I have been a lucky girl, I had two different Doctors with both my children and they were both fully supportive.  My daughter's doctor, and our doctor now, was excited at the prospect of delivering the Bradley Way and questioned in a positive way my journey. When I was contemplating a home birth his reaction was "If it was allowed I would be there, I think home births are a great way for a baby to come in the world"  Wow! Right?  I know, I ain't letting that Doctor go for the life of me.   Having that support from my Doctor truly made my births wonderful and natural! 

 

Reading a lot into this!

angelawd: the writer gets the last word

For heaven's sake, don't you think you're reading a lot into that sign? First it was the idea that the clinic didn't care about the health of the women or children, and then the idea that the sign equals no women's rights?

Couldn't it be that the doctors meant what they said - that if an emergency came up, they would do whatever was necessary?

I don't understand how people can get all worked up by a sign. If they don't like the policy, can't they go elsewhere for their care? Unless this is a government-funded clinic, aren't they legally allowed to make the policies that seem best for them?

 

It should be what is best

It should be what is best for the MOTHER and the baby.  Not allowing important options that can make birthing easier and a more rewarding experience for the mother.  Don't you think a doctor should properly educate their patients?  Offer options?  Share opinions? 

Like I said I have been spoiled with awesome Doctors who have done all that I have mentioned, I won't want any less-

~Susan

The Somethyme Writer

 

I'm Beyond Shocked!

I totally agree with everything you said and I am so glad that the sign is in place so that mothers can go elsewhere and get prenatal care for themselves and their babies. I am just saddened that there are women who will take this kind of treatment and not think twice about it. Our society is trying to make this typre of care the norm and it has got to be stopped! This just makes me even more glad that there are midwives and doulas and birth centers and homebirths. I personally don't see how forcing a woman to labor while in bed on her back with no food or drink, pumping her full of IV fluids and pitocin and epidurals is beneficial to a mother or an "unborn child". Obviously those doctors are more concerned with getting the babies out as fast and easily as possible than with the welfare of the mothers who are giving birth.

 
 

Not too suprising considering

Major tech difficulties over here with my attempt to leave a comment.....  one more time:

I gave birth in that town nearly 17 years ago, thankfully it was at a relatively cooperative community hospital. This place didn’t even exist back then that I recall. The attitude though that does surprise me, it’s par for the course with that whole area.

SAHM: Surviving Assorted Home Mayhem

 

I had two c-sections. The

I had two c-sections. The first was after 38 hours of labor put the baby in serious distress. The second was because after months of bed rest, the last couple in the hospital, the baby failed what is called a biophysical prophile ultrasound (meaning she wasn't moving, practicing breathing movements, and her heart rate was quite slow) and needed to be born immediately - six weeks early - in order to survive. Still, if things would have been completely normal with my second pregnancy I would still have elected to have a c-section because that is my CHOICE.

If women want to make a different choice, they do not have to go to this clinic. I have absolutely no problem with this sign. The doctors too, in this private practice, have the CHOICE to create policy, policy that is based on years of schooling, experience, and extensive research. 

What does it take to be a "doula"?  Two weeks at adult ed?  If that's your choice, knock yourself out.  It's none of my business how you choose to give birth.  I would never in a million years risk giving birth anywhere but in a hospital with doctors present, but I'm not going to tell you what to do.  I just wish I had the same courtesy. 

I don't understand the militancy.  I don't understand why the "natural birth" movement is so virulent in their disgust for women who choose, or those who don't have a choice to go a different route.  My health and the health of my children, actually our very lives, depended on immediate medical intervention.  In my case, it was the only responsible thing to do.  Still, I have been told that I was "duped" that I'm "ignorant of my 'real' choices" and all sorts of other vile, mean spirited things.

What about truly embracing choice instead of pretending to advocate for it but then ridiculing others who don't make the same choice you did?  What about supporting one another as women and as mothers instead of making this yet another polarizing parenting issue?

I support the sign, I support the doctors, and I support the women who choose to give birth in the manner they see fit, whatever that happens to be.  I support women boycotting this clinic if they feel that strongly. I wish more of you felt the same.

I think what everyone needs to remember here is that being a mother is not about the one day your baby is born.  To get so wrapped up in the actual birth, to put so much stock in it and to become so horribly critical of women who make choices you yourself wouldn't make is, quite frankly, ludicrous.  Being a mother begins with birth, obviously, but that is such a small fraction of the picture.  At the end of the day, "natural", home birth, VBAC, c-section, water birth, or any variation thereof all result in a precious little baby.  And that is the only thing that truly matters.

 

We have lost something dear

Stephanie - I mainly respond to you in this but also for everyone to read. There is a lot of truth in what you say. Some babies need more help out than others. Some are in trouble before labor even begins and some find their way there during labor. And thank goodness we have well-trained, highly-capable Obstetrical Surgeons to attend to those women and efficient and well-run Neonatal Intensive Care Units for the babies who are in distress. As a Birth Doula and a Childbirth Educator I have certainly seen this before. But the good news is it is rare. The truth is that 85% of all moms in America are considered "low-risk" and therefore do not need a surgeon to attend their low-risk and normal birth. Perhaps Dr. Wagner said it best - "Having a highly trained obstetrical surgeon attend a normal birth is analogous to having a pediatric surgeon babysit a healthy 2-year-old." - Marsden Wagner, MD.

As a Childbirth Educator it took me about 9 months of rigorous training and studying to become certified and as a birth doula, another 9 months of the same focus. I still read and study constantly to ensure I offer scientifically-sound, up-to-date and unbiased information. I have been involved professionally in the "birth world" for over 4 years - I have taught over 150 couples and have attended over 40 births. I have also worked extensively with the International Cesarean Awareness Network (http://www.ican-online.org) which educates about preventing unnecessary cesareans (which is at least half to two-thirds of all cesareans done in America) as well as supporting and advocating for women who have had cesareans and wish to seek a Vaginal Birth after a Cesarean (VBAC).

The main reason why this sign is so very sad to me in particular is that the women who sit there in that waiting room who ARE healthy and low-risk and don't think to find another care provider who will help them discover how wondrous a birth can really be. Now I believe every baby and every birth is a miracle and is very special. There is no doubt about that. But having ecstasy in birth... being supported and empowered to do what you were made to do as a woman... that is one of the purest forms of joy I have ever known. Truly what I get to do, what I choose to do is sacred work and I ache for the women who will never know what they are not partaking in.  I have a sister was one of those women with this very practice with her first child 9 years ago. She didn't have a cesarean, she didn't hate her birth and she didn't slip into massive depression over her experience. I don't have some amazing "conversion story" for you about her but she simply does not know what she has missed out on.

There are really two ways of thinking about birth - you can be afraid of it or you can trust it. You can believe that things can go wrong in a heartbeat and be ever-vigilant and focused on that aspect or you can know that although complications arise, they are rare and almost all can be prevented. Can a woman eat only cheetos and soda pop, smoke throughout her pregnancy, never exercise and expect a healthy baby and a beautiful, empowered birthing experience? Generally not. Trusting birth starts way before the birth.

The most amazing things in this life are earned, not moments we happen upon. 

This "natural birth movement" is motivated by what is truly best for not only the mother and her choices and being secure and supported but what is best for the baby- not just physically but emotionally as well. This is something science is just now really starting to catch on to - even ten years ago, it was general opinion that newborns could not feel pain. Any new mother will tell you that this is absurd. Emotionally and psychologically there are things that happen at birth that will never get the chance to happen again and sometimes the way a Care Provider practices will rob a mom-baby dyad of that. You can never ever get that back.

I know for me, I guard this as I would my own life... knowing not only that things can happen and situations change as well as fully-comprehending the significance of it these vital events. But having an excellent and competent birth team assembled and trusting myself to my powerful and vigilant Creator I would feel safer in that than with a stranger who I meet with for an average of 6 minutes per visit and has the attitude that my body could "self-destruct" at any time putting myself and my baby in harms way. Women who have babies at home have one to two midwives (who can do everything an OB can do except surgery) at their constant care. An OB is present at a birth for an average of 22 minutes TOTAL. Nurses are often spread between several patients and observe them from the station on a screen of monitors. Midwives, Family Practice Doctors and even OBs are trained to watch for problems that arise, as they do ever-so-slowly in low-risk, heathy and most importantly *unmedicated* mothers. "Emergencies" in labor are often a direct result of an intervention or a medication given and in most low-risk mothers they were not needed.

Clearly I am passionate and I'm certain you can see why. My intent is to shed some light on the "other side." I do not think everyone needs to think a certain way. I do not believe all babies should be born a home or without an epidural or with an epidural or via major surgery... I believe babies should be born the way they should be born and to say across the board it should be one way or the other is wrong. We just need a little more clear and unbiased information out there which is why I do what I do. 

We have lost something very dear in our culture. Something that really and truly does matter. Some of us have found it and and want, more than almost anything, to share of that beauty with other women. A doula is a woman serving a woman. To refuse to allow patients to have partake in this across the board is not only absurd, it is tragic in light of what is sacrificed to meager fear.

 

It is the mother's choice!

@stephaniedelger and @angelawd


I think the reason that it upsets people is because it is the doctor making the choice.  The doctor basically is saying, "I will not allow a mother to make these choices in my practice."  Why is that the doctor's choice?  If a mom wants a c-section that is the mother's choice.  If a mother wants to labor, that is the mother's choice.  If a mom wants to walk around that is the mother's choice.  Barring medical reasons, I don't understand how a doctor thinks it is her right to limit a mother's choice based on preferences.  That is my problem.  I don't care if you went to the hospital when you were 1 cm dilated, got an epidural, got knocked out, slept through the c-section, and sent your baby to the nursery for the duration of the stay if it was YOUR choice.  If a doctor told you you had to, I would be upset about that.

 

I totally understand that.

I totally understand that. Which is why you have the choice not to see a doctor in that practice. ;)

 

I would never step foot in her office

But, given the fact that none of those things are statistically or scientifically chosen to harm the birth process only to improve the outcomes for both mother and baby (proven in many studies), I feel upset when I see a doctor who thinks it is her choice to make such a decision.  It seems like again evidence-based medicine needs to step foot into that clinic.

 

And when someone is

And when someone is researching the above clinic and they come across this article they can make a more informed choice. ;)

~Susan

The Somethyme Writer

 

Let's hope

Let's hope women *do* research the center and come across this or similar articles so they can make an informed choice one way or the other. I don't care which choice they make, as long as they have all of the facts. The sign is misleading and that's what bothers me most (but I'll say more about that in another comment).

I always say - knowledge is power. :)

Amy Crunchy Domestic Goddess BlogHers Act contributing editor

 

I resent the implications about women
desiring natural birth

I gave birth to two babies while living in Provo. While it is true that there are many, MANY other maternity providers in the area, and conscientious women can just go somewhere else, it is sad that attitudes like this are acceptable at all, because it just serves to reinforce the belief that doctors always know best AND always have your best interests in mind, when really, neither of these two is always the case. (Especially in my experience with OB's in the Provo area.)

I resent the implication that women who desire natural, drug- and technology-free births care about ANYTHING more than they care about the safety and health of their babies and themselves. I know a lot of natural-birthing mamas, and saftey and health are ALWAYS their number one concerns. (If they talk a lot about the soothing, low-key environment, it is only because they know these things lead are more likely to lead to a safer birth.)

 

Agreed!

I just wanted to say I echo your thoughts, Kate. It has been my experience as well that women who are choosing unmedicated births are even more concerned and aware of safety concerns and overall health of both the mother and baby.

Provo is quite the interesting mix of people anyway as it must have a higher per-capita birth rate than almost anywhere else (having lived there for almost a year I have seen this first-hand) and I wonder how much the lifestyle and pressures of being students and very young families plays into this. Most of my students as a Bradley Teacher are having their first in their early to mid-thirties which is what sparked this analysis. More just musing than anything - I have no hard-data to back any of this up.

 

Absolutely reprehensible!

I hope this clinic is forced to close down for lack of business. Who would support such a thing?

 

Glad the put up a sign

 and I wish other practices that feel the same would act accordingly.  It would be much easier to scratch them off the list without getting three months or more into the pregnancy to find out that they have this kind of attitude.

 

Anti-woman is anti-baby.  If the mother feels good about her pregnancy and her delivery it will be much easier for her to bond with her baby and start motherhood out on the right foot - why the PTB can't understand this simple concent is beyond me!

 

Elena,

"If you bungle raising your children, nothing else much matters." Jackie Kennedy

 

Both Sides Need to be Open Minded

I like Annie's sign better. It's more honest.

I had the birth plan, the doula, the midwife, the Bradley Method. My kid should have been a c-section but was a vaginal delivery, had his cord around his neck in the birth canal, and was born hypoxic.

Now he has learning disabilities. Was that from the birth? I'll never know. I'd blame it on a natural birth, as much as I'd blame it on the anesthesia that he was exposed to during a c-section.

My point is, both sides need to be open-minded and not stick to one belief and one belief only about how this baby should be born. 

Amy Kehoe

www.amymusings.com

 

this sign went viral!

I wrote a Facebook note based on this posting to a OB nursing message board:  http://allnurses.com/ob-gyn-nursing/obs-birth-plan-375056.html.  In response, a friend I met in Colorado named Ginny Kooyman posted the sign you've featured in the story (I used to be a midwife in Colorado).  Ginny's friend's sister was greeted with that sign when she showed up at the only office on her insurance plan that also featured nurse-midwives in the practice.  It's crazy to see how far and wide the tiny sign has traveled!

 

All the More Reason to Promote Education!

I had a successful Bradley Birth in a hospital setting. Thanks to plenty of online research, Bradley Training, faith in God, and Mindset- I was able to run the "show" and all my midwife had to do was "catch" my son.

I trusted my body and was educated about all of the feelings I had during the labor process. The midwife on duty really didn't believe I would be able to go without medication but my husband and I proved her wrong!

Because of the great education we received in our Bradley classes, the hospital atmosphere didn't get the best of us. I even wrote a book about the psychology I used to achieve a natural birth!

 

The Koala Mom

 

Disappointing

I'm guessing that the doctor's office has had a bad experience or two with its patients, or possibly a lawsuit?  Malpractice suits are one of the main reasons that the c-section rate is so high in this country.  I'm sad to see that they have completely misjudged the rest of the natural birthing community.

@Stephanie - So sorry to hear that you've had some negative, mean-spirited remarks from other women about your birthing experience.  It's very similar in the breast feeding community too; some women feel so passionately about "breast is best" that any woman who decides to bottle feed (or has to, for biological reasons) has been misinformed at best.  What starts out as good intentioned usually is spoiled by a few haughty, "more-motherly-than-thou" attitudes.  Glad that you had your babies in a safe environment where YOU felt comfortable.

 

interesting

it would be interesting to see and compare (if possible?) this clinic's birth statistics (% of c-sections, # of interventions, patient satisfaction) with other, more woman-friendly clinics.

 

Quite interesting indeed

They are supposed to have those statistics be public record but when I called to ask for their Cesarean Rate I was transferred to Billing- they thought I wanted to know how much one COST. I chucked at that a bit. When I called right back and politely asked how many Cesareans they do they said "well, it depends on the circumstances and different things can happen" to which I replied "actually I am wondering about how many are actually done - like in the last month, the last year with your practice?" They told me to call the hospital and ask them but I told them I was curious about THEIR Cesarean rate for their practice. They told me to stop harassing them, that "this was a business" and they hung up on me. Clearly they are not willing to share such information with inquiring minds. I am still curious so if you find out please let me know :)

 

interesting

it would be interesting to see and compare (if possible?) this clinic's birth statistics (% of c-sections, # of interventions, patient satisfaction) with other, more woman-friendly clinics.

 

I Love Honesty

I think it's wonderful that this doctor's office put up a sign managing expectations for the patients. It gives the patient the power to make an informed decision.

Isn't that what it's all about? Empowering women to choose a childbirth provider they can trust - not because they are doing what is considered safest by some and dangerous by others - but because they're up-front and honest and you know how your care is going to be managed through your childbirth?

If all health care providers were this up-front and honest I'd feel a lot better about going to the doctor! It would make finding someone I can believe in so much easier.

Why anyone would want a doctor THAT honest to go out of business is beyond me.

Even if only one woman on the face of the earth wants an elective C-Section (I mean *really* elective, not the gray areas) - she deserves as much of a choice as a homebirthing mother. Of course, that's just my opinion...I know that for some women it's crazy to believe a woman could possibly feel safe with a highly medical OB in a hospital, but that's kind of the point of freedom of choice - you don't get to put your experiences on someone else's experiences. They get to decide for themselves. Freedom is so awesome like that.

Oh, one last thing...I really think we should call ALL births "Natural" - because the only way it's unnatural is if the fetus grows up in your belly and takes correspondence courses to graduate college. Anything that gets a baby from a uterus to a mother's arms is natural and is birth and is special and worthy of respect and a high-five. Calling vaginal birth natural automatically puts the connotation on the C-Section of unnatural and that's not right. I don't feel any woman should feel like LESS of a woman for not birthing vaginally.

Jen from Beyond Mom (two successful hospital births and one successful homebirth...and fine with women who make informed chioces no matter WHAT they decide!!)

 

My definition of "natural" birth

I realized after the fact that I shouldn't have used the word natural to refer to birth. It's too ambiguous.

When I say natural birth, I mean a birth without medication - in other words, an unmedicated birth. I don't think of natural equaling vaginal. Sorry for the confusion.

Thank you,

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess
BlogHers Act contributing editor

 

Choice is a wonderful thing

Freedom of choice is a great thing. The problem is that not all women really DO have a choice. Granted in Provo, Utah, where this practice is, there are a lot of other providers, hospitals, birthing centers, etc. and women who don't want to go to this care provider have lots of options. However, in other areas women don't have other options or they do but they aren't at all convenient. If they want to have a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in a hospital and the hospital near them doesn't do it, they may have to drive miles and miles to find a hospital that will. I've also heard stories of women having to go live in another state at the end of their pregnancies so that they can have a legal home birth there.

Choice is a great thing, but I think at this point, women still don't have access to the choices they deserve. This sign is a reminder of that.

Amy
Crunchy Domestic Goddess
BlogHers Act contributing editor