Bio
Laina Dawes is a contributing editor for Blogher and is also a music journalist whose writings can be found at Exclaim! Canada and...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Black History Month in a "Post-Racial" Society - Is it still needed?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Because many folks are more worried about keeping their jobs/houses - or getting a job - during this economic crisis than anything else, it seems as though the idea of attending Black History Month festivities have been put on the back burner.

More importantly, the recent inauguration of America's first African-American president - whom after winning the election by a landslide by folks that many presumed (quite cynically) were able to put their racial biases aside in favor of putting a Democrat back in power - signified to some that the following changes would happen overnight:

A) America is now a 'post-racial' society;

B) Black people can no longer cry 'racism' when they feel that they have been discriminated against because racism never really existed, right?

C) That black folks will now take a page from the Obama handbook, get jobs and stop robbing, killing and selling drugs - to people who are not black, that is. Oh, and mainstream Hip-Hop and other cultural signifiers that black people can get rich via questionable and somewhat unethical means, will miracously disappear from popular culture.

Many bloggers have also been asking, "do we still need a Black History Month?" Many have wondered whether the annual revisiting of African History makes an impact. Are people more worried about the day-to-day issues than Jim Crow and the Underground Railroad?  and more importantly, are they retaining any of the messages though the struggles of their ancestors?

Blogher CE Nordette's blog, The Urban Mother's Book of Prayers says that BHM reminds mothers that they need to teach their children that despite what they see within mainstream media culture, they, just like the people before them, will be able to overcome challenges. Also, because within urban dwellings the educational system does not adequately provide primary courses, that there is a greater chance that children are not being taught history in schools.

Nordette also discusses the Obama Impact on how people view race by saying this:

President Barack Obama is a beacon to many, but focusing on the achievement of one man would be a mistake. For instance, despite seeing President Barack Obama everyday, or maybe because they do, some whites will separate him from the rest of African-Americans and see him as like them and the rest of us the way they've always seen us, through the narrow scope of crime reports on the nightly news. Humans have a tendency to focus on information that supports the prejudices to which they cling.

The awesome blog The Black Critic  also noted the Obama effect in terms of the marketing of his image:

A lot of people died to make this moment in history happen.  The path to an Obama Presidency was paved by the blood, sweat and tears of millions of people you have never heard of, but who believed in this moment so passionately, they sacrificed everything for it–knowing they would never see the fruits of their sacrifices.  Forget the names of the folks you see splattered across Black History Month for a moment.  I wanted to pour a tab of brew out for all the anonymous heroes who will never get their names on a calendar.  And it seemed a bit cheap, a bit shallow, to sell these soldiers short with merchandise that have no real meaning.

Rachel from Rachel's Tavern argues that we need a 'Black Future Month." She also posted a recent speech from US Attorney General Eric Holder who called people out:

"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards," Holder said.

Race issues continue to be a topic of political discussion, but "we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race."

(Funny. I've got The View on as I'm writing this and Elisabeth Hasselbeck is harping about how offensive Holder's comments on 'cowardly Americans' were. Sigh.) I agree with what he says, as people seem to go into denial mode in the month of February. I get how come we don't get a White History Month? all the time. It is not just about the re-telling of black history, but a chance for people to have open and frank discussions, not just about race and racism but about how to communicate more effectively. Latoya Peterson from Racialicous also agrees:

I would like to see history taught as more of a conversation than a series of events to memorize. How did

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
PPR_Scribe 5 pts

The whole premise of my blog is that--if, indeed, there is such a thing as "post-racial"--it only lasted for a few moments or maybe a day or so around the time the US presidential election was called for Barack Obama. For lack of a better term, then, I call what we are living in now a post-post-racial time! LOL

And definitely in this time, Black History Month (as well as other ethnic group, gender, sexual orientation observances) is needed. It is time, however, for the month to "grow up." Not necessarily--as many say (maybe joking, maybe not)--that it needs to be in a longer month. But the way we learn and discuss in this month needs to be much different.

I absolutely agree with what you say here:

It is not just about the re-telling of black history, but a chance for
people to have open and frank discussions, not just about race and
racism but about how to communicate more effectively.

But I would go further. We like to talk about the "need for conversations"--as if discussion is a first step that would enable more forward movement. Discussion is not even possible at present--at least, not amongst the people who need to be involved. We still see things at cross purposes, and any conversations we have will reflect that fact and generally lead nowhere.

Instead, I think the challenge will be for those of us who want to have these kinds of conversations, to come up with new strategies (of "conversation," protesting, increasing awareness, etc.) and even new expectations for what results we want to see happen.

Not that I have any answers right now for what that would look like! LOL But I am convinced that is where we need to head next--for Black History Month and beyond.

Megan Smith 5 pts

Yes, Black History Month is definitely still needed.  Too much of the contributions black people have made in this country are either not known or totally discounted and Black History Month is a time when those nuggets of information and history can be brought up and maybe discussed the rest of the year.

And I also saw that episode of "The View."  All I could think was, if people would just open their ears and listen, we'd all be a hell of a lot better off.  Listen to the entire speech.  Listen to the context and what Eric Holder was really saying. 

Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/Online Video ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/megan-smith )

Megan's Minute ( http://www.megansminute.com/

lainad 5 pts

That was umm....interesting. 

 I thought Buchanan was going to have a stroke. Unfortunately, he pulled the same tired rhetoric that many racist whites do - pulling statistics, mis-truths, turning it around and saying that blacks are the blame for not only their issues but all the social ills of the world.

I wouldn't say white guilt - more like privleged, old white man fear. And while I certainly agree with Dyson, this 'discussion' makes me feel like the open dialogues  he is suggesting are never going to happen.

BTW, how does Buchanan continue (well,CNN's Lou Dobbs too) to keep their jobs? I guess Hardball thinks that the viewers are all white right-wing ultra conservatives.

Also, what continues to bother me - I actually said this on my blog yesterday, is the shock and indignation when black people actually voice their opinion in the media. An opinion that is vastly different from what they think. It's like they think we are all robots and then they scratch their heads in confusion like they have no idea what blacks are talking about. Buchanan talks about how great America is, but he is clearly living in a different America than the great majority of other Americans. How convenient, eh?

Contributing Editor - Race, Ethnicity & Culture

Writing is Fighting: www.lainad.typepad.com ( http://www.lainad.typepad.com/ )

Nordette Adams 6 pts

Laina, had to come back and add this link at Electronic Village since you mentioned the Holder comment in your post.  Pat Buchanan and Prof. Dyson nearly blew out the television discussing race, but it wasn't really a discussion as much as it was a shouting match.  Have a look ( http://electronicvillage.blogspot.com/2009/02/are-... ).

Nordette ( http://blogher.org/blog/nordette ): BlogHer CE. Blogs @ WSATA ( http://bigsole.blogspot.com ) & UMBOP ( http://urbanpsalms.blogspot.com ). @Twitter ( http://twitter.com/nordette_verite )

Nordette Adams 6 pts

He said a lot more than the comment that got all the media attention, which is why I posted his full speech about Black History Month at UMBOP ( http://urbanpsalms.blogspot.com/2009/02/holder-sai... ). Thank you for linking to my fledgling blog.  Also, have you thought about writing anything on black history in Canada. I think Canadian black history is fascinating.

Nordette ( http://blogher.org/blog/nordette ): BlogHer CE. Blogs @ WSATA ( http://bigsole.blogspot.com ) & UMBOP ( http://urbanpsalms.blogspot.com ). @Twitter ( http://twitter.com/nordette_verite )