<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>lilcheese's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/lilcheese"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/14012/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.blogher.com/blog/14012/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-02-07T05:14:07-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>FDA, Stevia, and Artificial Sweeteners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/fda-stevia-and-artificial-sweeteners" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/fda-stevia-and-artificial-sweeteners</id>
    <published>2008-02-14T00:49:25-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-14T00:49:25-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>lilcheese</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Food &amp; Drink" />
    <category term="artificial sweeteners" />
    <category term="fda" />
    <category term="stevia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration has it in for the natural sweetener stevia, an herb from South America used by the Guarani tribe for many centuries, but refuses to ban the use of artificial sweeteners as food additives. A study published in this month’s issue of Behavioral Neuroscience cited laboratory evidence that the use of artificial sweeteners may make it harder for people to control both their body weight and intake.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration has it in for the natural sweetener stevia, an herb from South America used by the Guarani tribe for many centuries, but refuses to ban the use of artificial sweeteners as food additives. A study published in this month’s issue of Behavioral Neuroscience cited laboratory evidence that the use of artificial sweeteners may make it harder for people to control both their body weight and intake. </p>
<p>Conducted by psychologists at Purdue University’s Ingestive Behavior Research Center, the study compared rats that ate yogurt containing sugar with rats that ate yogurt sweetened containing saccharin. The rats that ate the yogurt with artificial sweeteners consumed more calories, gained more weight, and had more body fat. </p>
<p>The FDA first approved aspartame, an artificial sweetener added to sodas, in 1974, but rescinded the approval after two studies that showed it caused brain tumors in laboratory animals. Although the FDA never refuted the studies, aspartame was approved again in 1981, and then in 1983 as a soft drink additive. </p>
<p>During the late 1980s the FDA began making visits to companies selling stevia because it was not an approved food additive. The FDA issued an alert on stevia in May 1991 in order to prevent its importation into the U.S., and warned companies not to use stevia. Last August the FDA sent a letter to Hain Celestial Group Inc., the company who makes Celestial Seasonings teas, that its products with stevia contained “an unsafe food additive.” </p>
<p>Ironically stevia is used as a food additive in countries all over the globe, including Japan and China. Coca-Cola Co. and Cargill Inc. use stevia in soft drinks manufactured and sold in other countries. The FDA posted a petition on its website submitted in 1995 which cited more than 900 studies on stevia, and none of the studies indicated the herb is unsafe for human consumption. </p>
<p> “The petition cites over 120 articles about stevia written before 1958, and over 900 articles published to date. In this well-chronicled history of stevia, no author has ever reported any adverse human health consequences associated with consumption of stevia leaf,” the Thomas J. Lipton Company submitted in the 1995 petition.</p>
<p>The 1995 petition also quoted Brazilian scientist Mauro Alvarez as stating, “...as a scientist with over 15 years researching the safety of stevia and of many other plants used as food or food ingredients, I can assure that our conclusions in these various studies indicate that stevia is safe for human consumption as per intended usage, that is, as a sweetener.”</p>
<p>The American Herbal Products Association states on its website that stevia is “a natural product that has been used for at least 400 years as a food product, principally as a sweetener or other flavoring agent. None of this common usage in foods has indicated any evidence of a safety problem. There are no reports of any government agency in any of the above countries indicating any public health concern whatsoever in connection with the use of stevia in foods.”</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Iraq War, Clinton, &amp; NOW&#039;s Endorsement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/iraq-war-clinton-nows-endorsement" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/iraq-war-clinton-nows-endorsement</id>
    <published>2008-02-06T20:39:00-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-07T05:14:07-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>lilcheese</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Politics &amp; News" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <category term="Election 2008" />
    <category term="hilary clinton" />
    <category term="N.O.W." />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Last week Senator Edward Kennedy (MA) endorsed Barack Obama for president. The National Organization of Women (NOW) responded to Kennedy's endorsement by releasing a statement affirming the feminist organization's support for Kennedy, but reaffirming support for Clinton. </p>
<p>"Though the National Organization for Women Political Action Committee has proudly endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton for president, we respect Sen. Kennedy's endorsement," the statement read.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Last week Senator Edward Kennedy (MA) endorsed Barack Obama for president. The National Organization of Women (NOW) responded to Kennedy's endorsement by releasing a statement affirming the feminist organization's support for Kennedy, but reaffirming support for Clinton. </p>
<p>"Though the National Organization for Women Political Action Committee has proudly endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton for president, we respect Sen. Kennedy's endorsement," the statement read.</p>
<p>Back in March NOW released a statement endorsing Clinton. The statement declared that the U.S. "needs strong, experienced and principled leadership to restore faith in our government and repair its credibility at home and abroad, and to end the destructive policies that have eroded our civil liberties and increased injustice and inequality in our society." Later the statement claimed, "Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is just such a leader." </p>
<p>Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) voted for the Senate resolution in 2002 which authorized the use of force to invade Iraq. In 2004 Clinton said she did not regret her affirmative vote. “No, I don't regret giving the president authority because at the time it was in the context of weapons of mass destruction, grave threats to the United States, and clearly, Saddam Hussein had been a real problem for the international community for more than a decade,” she said during a debate for Democratic presidential candidates.</p>
<p>In contrast, presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama (D, IL), then a U.S. representative, voted against the House resolution in 2002 which authorized the use of force to invade Iraq. In May he contrasted fellow Democratic candidate Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton’s (NY) position on the Iraq war with his by stating that "we had a fundamentally different opinion on the wisdom of this war. I don't think we can revise history when it comes to that."</p>
<p>Both Obama and Clinton consistently voted to fund the occupation of Iraq until both opposed the May 24, 2007 Senate resolution to give more funds to the U.S. military in Iraq because it did not contain a timeline for withdrawing troops. Obama and Clinton were two of ten Democrats who opposed the resolution.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
