<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>DesiGal's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/desigal"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/1559/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.blogher.com/blog/1559/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-08-10T00:16:45-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Islam, hijab and one vocal actress</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/12085" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/12085</id>
    <published>2006-10-30T23:21:05-06:00</published>
    <updated>2006-10-30T23:25:42-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Religion &amp; Spirituality" />
    <category term="Southeast Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p>[img_assist|fid=2165|thumb=1|alt=shabana|caption= ]<br />
<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/131971.cms">Indian actress Shabana Azmi</a>, who was awarded the International Gandhi Peace Prize in London earlier this month, has triggered off a controversy with her statements that Islam did not <em>require</em> women to cover their faces. (Azmi is Muslim.) Predictably enough, the more conservative Muslim clerics in India are riled up about it.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p>[img_assist|fid=2165|thumb=1|alt=shabana|caption= ]<br />
<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/131971.cms">Indian actress Shabana Azmi</a>, who was awarded the International Gandhi Peace Prize in London earlier this month, has triggered off a controversy with her statements that Islam did not <em>require</em> women to cover their faces. (Azmi is Muslim.) Predictably enough, the more conservative Muslim clerics in India are riled up about it. </p>
<p>Syed Ahmad Bukhari, grand imam of New Delhi's Jama Masjid mosque <a href="http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?rep=2&amp;aid=332291&amp;sid=NAT">rather patronisingly said</a></p>
<blockquote><p>"Has Shabana Azmi ever read a single page from the holy quran...., she is an entertainer and she should confine herself to her profession and must not speak on things she has no knowledge about," Bukhari told reporters here.</p></blockquote>
<p>Saturday we were at an Id party where Shabana's statements were the hot topic of discussion. The group was evenly divided - near equal numbers of Hindus, Muslims and agnostics. Equal numbers of Indians and Pakistanis, so that made for a very interesting discussion.</p>
<p>Our Muslim friends believed that Shabana was in fact wrong, that the Koran was clear that women should cover themselves. The word that kept coming up in this context was 'hijab' which is what we typically see Muslim women in the West wearing - a covering that hides the hair, ears etc of the wearer, but leaves the face in full view. If the Koran is clear about the hijab, it sort of proves what Shabana was saying - that there is no Koranic requirement to <em>cover</em> women's faces, as practised by the use of purdah and niqab in the Middle East, South East Asia.</p>
<p>Sam at <a href="http://islamic-science.blogspot.com/">Islamic Science</a> believes Shabana is wrong. He provides some verses from the Koran:</p>
<blockquote><p>â€œAnd say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what must ordinarily appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands' fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers, or their brothers' sons or their sisters' sons, or their women or the servants whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex, and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O you Believers turn you all together towards Allah, that you may attain Bliss.â€ (Quran 24:31).</p>
<p>â€œO Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them (when they go abroad). That will be better, so that they may be recognized and not annoyed. Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful.â€ (Quran 33:59)
</p></blockquote>
<p>Farzana Versey at <a href="http://farzana-versey.blogspot.com/2006/10/now-shabana-rides-on-veil-bandwagon.html">Cross Connections</a> feels Shabana is jumping onto the veil bandwagon. She recounts watching an interview with the actress on Indian TV:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Ms. Azmi said that if someone asked her to wear a veil here she would never do so, but if Jack Straw asked her to not wear a veil in England, then she would wear three veils. Of course, it was the taaliyaan kind of statement that got the applause. I have yet to hear of such a simplistic analysis. This is the sort of knee-jerk rebellion that teenagers are given to. Is this even half an ideological position? I think some of these people really like riding on the wave of such storms in teacups...<br />
2. Someone said that if Ms. Azmi decided to wear a veil she would be out of business. This the lady took as a â€œpersonal attackâ€. It wasnâ€™t. I watched the whole programme. It was with reference to the matter of choice. And it is a fact that given her profession or that of the model is there any place for the veil?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hindustan Times reports that "Senior vice chairman of All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) and renowned Islamic scholar Dr Kalbe Sadiq on Sunday announced that Islam was against "Talibani Purdah" (rigid purdah system imposed by Talibans in Afghanistan)."</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;friendID=95249032&amp;blogID=186916807">Caroline's MySpace page</a> provides a Western perspective on the whole issue, where commenter Stephen compares the situation to what the Dixie Chicks faced: "I suspect the potential parallels between Shabana Azmi and the Dixie Chicks drew you to this story. (Bukhari's quote that Azmi's "profession is to sing and dance" might as well read "Shut Up And Sing.")"</p>
<p>I'm left more confused than ever about these things. Is it wrong to want to rebel against any stricture - one way or another? Are acts of civil disobedience, such as what Shabana Azmi, worthless acts? I sincerely believe the answer is no in both cases. Why do you agree/disagree with me?</p>
<p>I'd also love to hear from Muslims - both men and women? What are your interpretations? How do you reconcile differences between your thinking and the "official" line when it comes to modesty? Non-Muslim readers - is veiling all that different from Catholic nuns' habits? What is the history behind the evolution of the habit in Christianity?</p>
<p>Image from <a href="inhome.rediff.com/movies/2006/oct/27shabana.htm">Rediff.com</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>India set to score with Brangelina</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/12010" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/12010</id>
    <published>2006-10-28T00:34:39-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-10-28T00:37:46-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p>[img_assist|fid=2145|thumb=1|alt=jolie] I really don't know what to think of <A href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/193226.cms">rumors circulating</a> that Brangelina are adopting from India this time. With a name like India planned, I assumed it would be a girl. But, to wit:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p>[img_assist|fid=2145|thumb=1|alt=jolie] I really don't know what to think of <A href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/193226.cms">rumors circulating</a> that Brangelina are adopting from India this time. With a name like India planned, I assumed it would be a girl. But, to wit:</p>
<blockquote><p>They hope to be able to bring the child home by Christmas. Brad would prefer a boy no older than 18 months to even out the sexes but Angie has told him she canâ€™t guarantee she wonâ€™t fall in love with a little girl." </p>
<p>The source told US magazine Globe: "Whichever they end up with, they'd like to name the child India to honour its homeland.</p></blockquote>
<p>Like the quote says, it could well be a boy that's saddled with the name. </p>
<p>But Brad, Angie - I say - dare to be creative. Unwanted though they might be, here're some other suggestions:<br />
Boy: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India">Bharat</a>, Jodhmal<br />
Girl: Bharati, Bharatmata, Poona Devi, Jodhabai</p>
<p>Yeah, if you really want to help the kid, this is how you do it. Each time your kid gets in a fight on the playground, his/her friends could play verbal football trying to get some of these names right!</p>
<p>Manish on <a href="http://www.Ultrabrown.com">Ultrabrown</a> has a <a href="http://www.ultrabrown.com/posts/indiajolie">great post on the name</a>, and quotes from Salman Rushdie's <em>Shalimar the Clown</em> to show how it might be yet another Western exotification of India. Taz on <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/003910.html#comments">Sepia Mutiny</a> points out that the other Jolie Pitt kids have cool names like Maddox, Zahara and Shiloh, and there're none named after their countries of birth - no Cambodia or Ethiopia. Or Namibia I might add. Whatever the politics of the name, I choose to think that India lends itself to being chosen as a name. I mean, seriously, which parent would want to inflict Azerbaijan or Massachussetts as a first name on their kid.</p>
<p>Of course everyone's talking about the United Nations they're creating for themselves. There's only the Americas, Australasia and Europe left to adopt from. Wonder if countries on those continents are jumping up and down trying to get Angelina's compassionate eye, the way us <a href="http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/reform/cluster1/2004/0922permbids.htm">super power wannabes </a> jostle for permanent Security Council seats :)</p>
<p>Jokes apart, I think it's a mixed blessing that they're adopting, that Madonna adopted. It might not be the best thing for the child, but at least it's an option, which <a href="http://www.unicef.org/sowc/index.html">many children don't even get</a>.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Happy Birthday Gandhiji!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/11121" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/11121</id>
    <published>2006-10-03T00:25:34-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-10-03T00:27:44-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Southeast Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>[img_assist|fid=1906|thumb=1|alt=gandhi]<br />
October 2nd was Mahatma Gandhi's birthday. In India, we used to look forward to this day mainly because it was a government holiday. Schools, banks, post offices all closed down. There'd be ceremonies everywhere - serious looking politicos would garland Gandhi photos, prayer songs would be sung. If your parents were like mine, they'd sit you down in front of the telly and make you watch Attenborough's <em>Gandhi</em> for the 418th time in your life.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>[img_assist|fid=1906|thumb=1|alt=gandhi]<br />
October 2nd was Mahatma Gandhi's birthday. In India, we used to look forward to this day mainly because it was a government holiday. Schools, banks, post offices all closed down. There'd be ceremonies everywhere - serious looking politicos would garland Gandhi photos, prayer songs would be sung. If your parents were like mine, they'd sit you down in front of the telly and make you watch Attenborough's <em>Gandhi</em> for the 418th time in your life. </p>
<p>Then, there was that adolescent phase of the late eighties and early nineties when all around us was tumult - Tiananmen had just occurred, India was burning with anti-reservation protests following the Mandal commission reports (reservation is India's quota based affirmative action program), Indira Gandhi and Rajiv her son (no relation to the Mahatma) had been assassinated in the span of seven years. Suddenly it seemed as if Gandhian principles such as satya (truth) and ahimsa (non-violence) had no relevance in modern India.</p>
<p>Sayesha, an Indian blogger who lives in Singapore perfectly catches this:</p>
<blockquote><p>In one of the seven schools I studied in, there was one that had a debating competition on Gandhi Jayanti every year. And the topic too was the same every year - Are Gandhian principles relevant and applicable in modern times?</p>
<p>My teachers picked two students to represent our school in the competition. A draw of lots was done to decide who would argue for and who against. I ended up with the 'for' chit of paper.</p>
<p>Oh man. I was screwed.</p>
<p>Dad.</p>
<p>Me - "Dad, I'm taking part in the inter-school debating competition, and the topic is "Are Gandhian principles relevant and applicable in modern times?"</p>
<p>Dad - Hmmm... and?</p>
<p>Me - I need help. There was a draw of lots and I am supposed to defend the topic. And I don't know what to say.</p>
<p>Dad - Why not??</p>
<p>Me - Because I don't quite believe in it?</p>
<p>Dad - So you don't actually believe in Gandhian principles but you're supposed to talk about them in a positive light?</p>
<p>Me - Exactly.</p>
<p>Dad - So tell me, why don't you believe in Gandhian principles?</p>
<p>Me - Hmmm... I guess it's kinda uncool to be Gandhian these days. In fact, when someone is too goody-goody, we call him Gandhiji. It's not a compliment. I mean, now we gotta be more assertive and all that. If someone slaps you, you can't really offer the other cheek. You gotta kick his ass.
</p></blockquote>
<p>As a country, we've debated ourselves sick over this question - hoe relevant is Gandhian thought in modern day India. But suddenly these days, being a Gandhian is back in vogue. And it's all thanks to one Bollywood film - <em>Lage Raho Munna Bhai</em> -a cheeky, irreverent film that couches Gandhian philosophy in slick <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapori">Bombaiyya tapori language.</a></p>
<p>Blogger Ash on DesiPundit likens it to a Jesus Christ Super Star moment for Gandhi:<br />
<blockquote>
Mahatma Gandhi is back in the public consciousness â€“ and right in time for his â€œHappy Birthdayâ€, as Circuit (the character played by Arshad Warsi) describes October 2. Itâ€™s that irreverence, perhaps, thatâ€™s made us buy into Bapu again â€“ just as Andrew Lloyd Webberâ€™s cheeky recasting of the founder of Christianity as a rock-star god made Jesus Christ a superstar for the seventies â€“ because this is a fun Bapu, a cool Bapu, Bapu as Best Buddy and not Bapu as Finger-wagging Deliverer of High-minded Sermons to Better Ourselves.
</blockquote></p>
<p>If blogs and reviews are anything to go by, it looks like Gandhigiri might just stage a comeback.</p>
<p><em>Contributing Editor <a href="http://dckimaya.blospot.com">Priya Ramachandran</a> always thought Gandhian philosophy kicked ass (except for a short spell in her adolescent life she owned up to above). She has never really been able to live it in her daily life but will try very hard.</em></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The black creeps out of the ears</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/10921" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/10921</id>
    <published>2006-09-27T16:32:25-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-09-27T19:50:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Body Image" />
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Southeast Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Every mother knows this - pregnancy gives you that extra sanction, that lets you smile wistfully at kids on the street, or strike up "Don't you have the cutest smile ever?" conversations with wide-eyed kids. I was no different. I'd stop to admire kids everywhere - on the Metro, Target, Walmart, the restroom line. I'd gush about these kids to my husband, who thankfully did not suffer from the same craziness.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Every mother knows this - pregnancy gives you that extra sanction, that lets you smile wistfully at kids on the street, or strike up "Don't you have the cutest smile ever?" conversations with wide-eyed kids. I was no different. I'd stop to admire kids everywhere - on the Metro, Target, Walmart, the restroom line. I'd gush about these kids to my husband, who thankfully did not suffer from the same craziness. </p>
<p>He usually just smiled through my cooing descriptions, but once, just once, he slipped. After I'd told a Mexican toddler she was a cutie, he said rather brusquely - "You do realize your own kid will look nothing like this?"</p>
<p>"What do you mean - this?" I blubbered.</p>
<p>"This equals fair, chubby look. 'Cute' in your words."</p>
<p>I was shocked. How dare he suggest that color and looks were all I cared about? Hadn't I showered the exact same kind of attention on African American kids I'd seen in the mall? When my mother-in-law had suggested I stop drinking coffee, and a friend had told me to eat almonds - all to improve the baby's color - I had laughed outright and said I was happy whatever color my baby was. I knew enough about science and genes and melanin to know my kids would never look like "this". I shut my mouth rather pointedly, and decided never to bother with a sourpuss like him again.</p>
<p>Flash forward: My daughter's birth - She was here, the little bundle I had waited 9 months to meet. She had a pretty mouth, pink, full, a little bow, just like her dad's. When he held her for the first time, I noticed how much fairer she seemed. We analyzed every feature of hers - and eagerly claimed this part and that as our own genetic imprint. Everything about her was perfect, except the tips of her ears, which were a deep reddish brown. I wondered if people would notice her birthmark, and tease her later in life, but decided that long hair would hide it just fine. </p>
<p>There was so much to do - mastering breastfeeding, changing diapers, timing my sleep around my little one - that I forgot about the birthmark. When her pediatrician came in for a final visit before I was discharged, my husband showed him the ears and asked if the birthmark was permanent and if it could be removed.</p>
<p>"Um.. that. That's the actual color of your baby's skin," said the doctor. "Slowly the rest of the body will darken to match it."</p>
<p>My husband and I simply stared. I remember my exact thought at that point - "The black creeps out of the ears." All those almond feeders and coffee abstinence advocates had never told us that my baby would be born a certain color, and the darker color would just spread out from her ears. </p>
<p>Under our ever watchful eyes, that's what her ears proceeded to do for the next 3 weeks. Take over every nook and cranny, till she became an even chocolate brown.</p>
<p>One afternoon, about a fortnight after her birth, I sat down and wept. I sobbed to my mother about all those times when well-meaning but utterly rude relatives had wondered how I would ever get married, given how dark I was. I remembered the stupid jackass TA who would always grade my pretty friend higher during our viva voces or quizzes. Wasn't it enough that I had to go through all this? Does life have to treat her that way too? I asked. My mother listened but in the end, said quite matter-of-factly, "It's your inner beauty that counts, right? And you don't have to saddle her with your own baggage." </p>
<p>I quietened. Though my own experiences had me question the wisdom of her first point from time to time, I had also largely believed it when my parents told me my inner beauty mattered to everyone. And she was absolutely right about the other part too. My daughter didn't have to be like me. Here maybe life would be different for her. Maybe all I needed was a voice of reason in those hormone-crazed days post-pregnancy, but it soothed me a great deal to have my fears out in the open with my mom.</p>
<p><hr /></p>
<p>When <a href="http://www.blogher.com/node/9833">Karen Walrond</a> had posted about Lisa Lerner, a Jewish American woman who had adopted transracially from India, and who had a hard time dealing with how dark her adopted daughter was, I thought it was time to confront my own demons. Change the Jewish American to Hindu Indian, add a husband, and change transracial adoption to biological daughter, and you would have my story. </p>
<p>My mother has written about her experiences as a dark child in a fair family <a href="http://hiphopgmom.blogspot.com/2006/08/help-children-grow.html">here</a>. Usha Vaidyanathan, a prolific blogger from Bangalore, wrote about the <a href="http://agelessbonding.blogspot.com/2006/09/pigmentation-issue.html">same topic</a> and how she's thankful that her skin color never came between her and her "milky white" sister. She says: </p>
<blockquote><p>
Perhaps all dark girls in this country have the same story to share. Today most of us do not openly talk about fair skin being an essential pre requisite for being considered pretty...
</p></blockquote>
<p>What a pity we don't talk about it. At least discrimination has a name here. In Asia people go about their covert racism without even thinking about it. If more people like <a href="http://pissedoffpaki.blogspot.com/2006/07/colour-complex.html">Pissed off Paki</a> wrote about color racism maybe we'd be on track to dealing with it. Or maybe, like my story or Lisa Lerner's, we have only just begun admitting it even to ourselves.</p>
<p><em><b>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></b></em></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Keeping a faith alive</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/10289" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/10289</id>
    <published>2006-09-07T13:21:01-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-09-07T16:00:48-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Religion &amp; Spirituality" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>My daughter's baptism is around the corner. She will be formally accepted into the Catholic Church this Saturday. I have mixed feelings about it. In some ways, I rationalize that I just want her to be a good human being, so it does not matter what faith she is. But then, I worry that she will learn little of the Hindu identity she inherits from me, especially given how glamorous Christmas and Santa Claus can be. I worry than my plain vanilla Gods will pale in front of all that dazzle.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>My daughter's baptism is around the corner. She will be formally accepted into the Catholic Church this Saturday. I have mixed feelings about it. In some ways, I rationalize that I just want her to be a good human being, so it does not matter what faith she is. But then, I worry that she will learn little of the Hindu identity she inherits from me, especially given how glamorous Christmas and Santa Claus can be. I worry than my plain vanilla Gods will pale in front of all that dazzle.</p>
<p>I can already see the effects of being a minority in this country, as she speaks only English, and anglicizes all the Hindi words we teach her. (BTW, 'Hindi' is an official language in India, not to be confused with 'Hindu' - which means practitioner of Hinduism)</p>
<p>Yesterday, the New York Times had a great story about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/06/us/06faith.html?ex=1157774400&amp;en=8004858826643eaf&amp;ei=5087%0A">how practitioners of the Zoroastrian faith</a> are trying to keep their alive. </p>
<p>According to the article, there are about 190,000 Parsis (the word derives from Persia, the old name for Iran) around the world. Their numbers are dwindling, mainly because the faith frowns upon conversion, and interreligious marriages and does not consider children born of such marriages to be Parsis. Relative affluence and higher levels of education also contributes to few children being born.</p>
<blockquote><p>
â€œSurvival has become a community obsession,â€? said Dina McIntyre, an Indian-American lawyer in Chesapeake, Va., who has written and lectured widely on her religion.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Nowhere is this more apparent than the story of Rohena Ullal, a Parsi who married a Hindu.</p>
<blockquote><p>
...before they even became engaged, they talked about her desire to raise their children as Zoroastrians. </p>
<p>â€œItâ€™s scary; weâ€™re dipping down in numbers,â€? she said. â€œI donâ€™t want to hurt his parents, but he doesnâ€™t have the kind of responsibility, whereas I do.â€?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe the Zoroastrian faith would do good to follow the example of Roman Catholicism. When I married my Catholic husband, I had to sign an affidavit stating that any children born into our marriage would be raised Catholic. It is a stricture I railed against at the time - I felt I was signing away my children's right to choose a religion or none at all. I still signed it, because it mattered to my husband's family.</p>
<p>I've heard that in Judaism, the child follows the faith of the mother. So a child is Jewish if the mother is Jewish. To me, it's a wonderful piece of common wisdom codified into religious law. Children did spend most of their formative years with their mothers and did what their mothers did. So it just makes sense that children will take on the religion of their mothers too. Or does it? I don't know.</p>
<p>Those of you who had mixed religious marriages, how do you cope? What kind of religious education do you give your kids? What identity do they tend towards?</p>
<p><strong><em>Contributing editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></strong></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Airy travel</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/9830" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/9830</id>
    <published>2006-08-25T10:01:39-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-08-25T10:01:39-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Europe" />
    <category term="Politics &amp; News" />
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Southeast Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Two airline related stories this week caught my eye.<br />
The first was the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5278092.stm">arrest of 12 Muslim passengers</a> on a flight from the US to Bombay. BBC reported earlier this week that:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Two airline related stories this week caught my eye.<br />
The first was the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5278092.stm">arrest of 12 Muslim passengers</a> on a flight from the US to Bombay. BBC reported earlier this week that:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The pilot turned back over German airspace after the crew said a number of passengers on the flight to Mumbai (Bombay) were behaving suspiciously.
</p></blockquote>
<p>News.com.au reported today that the <a href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20254645-1702,00.html">Dutch ambassador has issued an apology</a> for the arrests.</p>
<p>The story says:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Other passengers from the detained flight, who arrived in Mumbai last night, said they saw the 12 men exchanging seats and fidgeting with their mobile phones. </p>
<p>"I think the men raised the crew's suspicion because they were not listening to them and changing their seats," said Nitin Dalal, a passenger on the detained flight.
</p></blockquote>
<p>If you're a brown passenger, you had better be on your best behavior through out your flight, if you don't want to arouse suspicions.</p>
<p>Another story earlier this week was about <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/5267884.stm">a pair of men who were speaking Arabic</a> and acting suspicious. <a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/20/flight-613-mutiny" />Sister Toldjah</a> says passengers are conducting their own profiling where their governments wonâ€™t.</p>
<p>Great going, passengers, except when you'replain wrong. </p>
<p>These two Arabic men were released too and allowed to continue with their journeys when no evidence of any harmful intent was found. </p>
<p>Now all that's left is for:<br />
The airlines to be sued<br />
Airlines to issue an apology<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/5276504.stm">Random people to stand up and defend such profiling</a><br />
Equally random people to issue statements that Islam is a religion of peace</p>
<p>Any or all of these things will happen. Forgive me if I sound cynical, but I'm really sick of all this. I dread traveling, because either my husband or I or both get pulled out for body searches on our flights. On one occasion, a female security guard frisked our 2-year old while she wailed her heart out. </p>
<p>And God forbid, we do anything but smile through this, because then we'll be automatically deemed suspicious people. Don't get me wrong, I hate the 9/11 hijackers as much as the next person, but I can't understand why it's become such a blanket, catch-all profiling.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sweetheart, you speak English?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/9673" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/9673</id>
    <published>2006-08-21T23:30:57-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-08-21T23:35:17-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="&quot;On Becoming Fearless&quot;" />
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="United States" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have only about a quarter of a head of hair - I blame the loss of the rest to bad genes, bad hormones and bad karma. Even though I don't sport a mullet - mohawk, I can understand and empathize with <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/15/AR2006081501210.html">S. R. Sidarth</a>.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have only about a quarter of a head of hair - I blame the loss of the rest to bad genes, bad hormones and bad karma. Even though I don't sport a mullet - mohawk, I can understand and empathize with <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/15/AR2006081501210.html">S. R. Sidarth</a>.</p>
<p>A couple of Fridays ago, I'd just left office only to find out that my train was late by almost an hour. Like every other conscientious worker who can't leave her gadgets alone, I yanked out my laptop and began hacking away at my unfinished tasks to make my wait worthwhile. To my left was a pair of guys - tourists from the look of it, maps in hand, huge pieces of luggage and all.</p>
<p>The louder of the two - a strapping man in an orange t-shirt who really was quite handsome except for the frown and the swearing - was pissed. It was hot, the train was late, the tickets hadn't been bought. "There's no way I'm gonna drag this stuff around," he said, before stomping off in search of the ticket counter.</p>
<p>Great, I thought. A few moments of quiet.</p>
<p>Then suddenly - Boo! came a cry. Slap slap. </p>
<p>I started. It was Orange T, back from his ticket counter hunting expedition, surprising his friend.</p>
<p>"Gotcha dude!" he yelled.</p>
<p>I must've stared/glared/scowled. Because suddenly Orange T leapt, and landed up in front of me.</p>
<p>"Sweetheart," he drawled, obnoxious and sweet all at the same time.</p>
<p>I looked. He was inches away from me.</p>
<p>"I said. Do. You. Speak. English?" He moved closer. </p>
<p>Everyone was looking at us now. Why did he want to know, I thought. If I said yes, would he tell me I was better off returning to whichever impoverished country I was from? If I said no, would I get a lecture on learning to speak the language?</p>
<p>I nodded.</p>
<p>"Then you watch luggage. Ok?"</p>
<p>I croaked out a yes.</p>
<p>"Me my friend here we buy tickets. You watch luggage. Ok? Don't go nowhere."</p>
<p>Yeah right, talk to me in pidgin English, as if I'm an idiot. They left, while I sat with an appropriately imbecilic expression of someone who speaks at all the wrong times, but whose voice had just deserted her. Also looking like I had a sub-zero IQ meant no one would notice my trembing hands.</p>
<p>A voice clucked from behind me.</p>
<p>"How rude."</p>
<p>"Good thing you didn't say anything, he seemed ready to pick a fight," said a young woman.</p>
<p>I said I thought the man ought to be banished to a Miss Manners concentration camp. I smiled when I said it, though deep down I knew it was just to pretend I wasn't fazed. I was still shaking, but sat back in my chair for a few momwnts, took a few deep breaths. I finally put my laptop back in its bag and walked off.</p>
<p>No, I don't want to watch your bags, Orange T, I thought. Especially since your request was so badly put. And yes, I can speak English - three flavours actually. The propah Queen's tongue, a put-on American one and in a musical, lilting Indian way. Wake me up from my sleep, and you'll hear some choice cuss words in the Indian accent. Watch me with my white friends and you'll hear the Rs rolling and the vowels shortening. Which one did you want to hear, <em>sweetheart</em>?</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>I later wondered what it is I'm giving my daughter - an American citizen from the day of her birth. At least I have a fall-back country, my "root" culture that I think I can return to if the need arises. Is this what I'm giving her - does it mean a lifetime of outsiderness? Someone commenting on an entry in <A href="http://hiphopgmom.blogspot.com">my mother's blog</a> said in peace we were who we imagine ourselves to be, but in war and adversity, our true selves came out. Incidents like this remind me that sometimes American eyes cannot see the differences between shades of brown, and all it takes is a few adverse events to rock the (mostly) happy dream that is life in the US.</p>
<p>I wish I could conclude that I had been audacious, hard-as-nails fearless. Maybe I would've regaled you with stories of knockout punches and kickass punchlines had I been a different sort of a person. What I learnt from this incident is that fearlessness is not always a given. Before I could talk about it, I had to understand myself, more than anyone else. I had to get rid of any associated shame. Sugarcoat my acerbity with humor. And oftentimes, fearlessness is just faking it till you get there.</p>
<p><b><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></b></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Can we get some of those Baby on Board buttons for Metro?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/9163" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/9163</id>
    <published>2006-08-09T23:17:04-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-08-09T23:30:47-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Asia" />
    <category term="BlogHer Ad Network for Parents" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>[img_assist|fid=1328|thumb=1|alt=preg]I just finished watching an old George Carlin stand-up routine, in which he railed against Baby on Board stickers. According to the gent, those stickers are meant to tell people that everyone knows they're crazy drivers, but please would they straighten up their driving for a while, because there's a baby on board. Erm, yes, us new parents do tend to think the sun rises from our progeny's hinies.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>[img_assist|fid=1328|thumb=1|alt=preg]I just finished watching an old George Carlin stand-up routine, in which he railed against Baby on Board stickers. According to the gent, those stickers are meant to tell people that everyone knows they're crazy drivers, but please would they straighten up their driving for a while, because there's a baby on board. Erm, yes, us new parents do tend to think the sun rises from our progeny's hinies.</p>
<p>I was still getting rid of my remnant giggles when I found this interesting story at <a href="http://feministing.com/archives/005507.html"> Feministing</a>. Apparently Tokyo rail companies are trying to encourage commuters to give up their seats for pregnant women. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060808/od_nm/japan_pregnancy_dc;_ylt=ApCOPz398L1F8.XwdHVddwrtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--">Yahoo reports</a> that the companies are handing out badges announcing the happy news.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Tokyo rail companies are providing pregnant women with badges in the hope of prompting other passengers on the Japanese capital's crowded trains to offer them seats.</p>
<p>The pink and blue badges reading: "There is a baby in my belly" are being handed out at stations around the region to try to make commuting and other train journeys easier for pregnant women, who are often left standing. No proof of pregnancy is required.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Only last week, when my commuter train was packed to its gills, I overheard a passenger telling another how he never offers his seats to pregnant women, or anyone who was not visibly, obviously handicapped. Apparently he'd been offering them to a lot of heavyset women who were not pregnant, and had been at the receiving ends of tirades.</p>
<p>Maybe it was the some form of that rationale that caused people never to offer me a seat when I was pregnant. Once, a gentleman even pushed me aside to get on to the train.</p>
<p>That last sentence made me smile - no proof required. Sans that maybe women who claimed they were pregnant but not visibly so would've been banished to restrooms, armed with pregnancy kits.</p>
<p>But I personally think it's a great idea. Some non-pregnant women will abuse the system - that's a given. Some might be offended that the system treats pregnancy on par with the disabled. I still think it's great that pregnant women at least have the option to exercise, rather than having to stand around hoping for someone to get off.</p>
<p>Now, maybe I should write Metro to see if they can implement something similar here in DC.</p>
<p><b><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></b></p>
<p>Image Credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/462542">Sxc.hu</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chindia Rules - Indian Blogs, China-style Censorship</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/7820" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/7820</id>
    <published>2006-07-20T11:53:08-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-07-20T11:54:02-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Southeast Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/06/23/windia23.xml&amp;sSheet=/news/2006/06/23/ixnews.html">India's big dream</a> for itself is to transform Bombay to a Shanghai like shimmering city by the sea. <a href="http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,1205390,00.html">Dr. Manmohan Singh</a>, the Indian Prime Minister, has made no secret of this desire of his. While Shanghai remains a distant reach for Mumbai - as of now - India's managed the dubious distinction of mimicking China's stranglehold on spontaneous creativity.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/06/23/windia23.xml&amp;sSheet=/news/2006/06/23/ixnews.html">India's big dream</a> for itself is to transform Bombay to a Shanghai like shimmering city by the sea. <a href="http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,1205390,00.html">Dr. Manmohan Singh</a>, the Indian Prime Minister, has made no secret of this desire of his. While Shanghai remains a distant reach for Mumbai - as of now - India's managed the dubious distinction of mimicking China's stranglehold on spontaneous creativity.</p>
<p>Last week, I wrote about the bomb blasts in Bombay. One of the bigger fallouts of the blasts has been India's Department of Technology (DoT) blocking certain blog sites. Bloggers in India haven't been able to access popular blog sites such as Blogspot and LiveJournal. And boy <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5194172.stm">are they hopping mad</a>.</p>
<p>On BBC, here's what the goverment officials are saying:</p>
<blockquote><p>... a spokesman for India's Internet Service Providers Association says that not all the ISPs have blocked blog sites. </p>
<p>"I have personally checked through different ISPs and logged on to many blogging sites, apart from the ones which have been specifically banned by the government," says Deepak Maheshwari, secretary of the association. </p>
<p>A government official has also said there has been no blanket ban on blogging hosts like Blogspot. </p>
<p>"The government order has four blogs under blogspot.com. The order didn't ask the whole site to be banned," Gulshan Rai of India's state-run Computer Emergency Response Team told reporters.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The ostensible reason for the block has still not been spelt out to bloggers. General consensus on various blogs and newspaper reports seems that the government is preventing access to terrorists and rumor mongers by blocking these blogs. According to a report in <A href="http://www.hindu.com/2006/07/20/stories/2006072017710300.htm">The Hindu</a>, a representative of Internet Service Providers Associations of India said </p>
<blockquote><p>
"Imagine being asked to remove just a couple of chairs from a classroom. If it is not possible to remove just those chairs, the only option left is to close the room."</p></blockquote>
<p>Implying that the technology doesn't allow for only certain pages to be blocked, and hence they've had to take the extreme measure of blocking the domain. </p>
<p>From such statements I can only infer that DoT is either not knowledgeable enough or is just being lazy. Instead of filtering for keywords or combing blogs to pinpoint subversive content, it's taking the simpler route of blocking an entire domain. This makes for myopic thinking. Not only are worthy endeavors like mumbaihelp.blogspot.com blocked out, it puts a lid on India's creativity. Web 2.0 and blogs by extension is such a seething, crazy, excessive, and ultimately creative mass that suppressing it only works against India's interests.</p>
<p>Resources such as <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/censorroute.html">BoingBoing</a> and <a href="http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=15013">Reporters Without Borders</a> have been offering tips on how to get around internet censorships. Tips range from installing softwares on your computer to using alternate sites which retrieve the banned content requested. If Indian bloggers can get to any of these resources, it might help them get on to their blog sites, at least to read.</p>
<p>If this happened in the US, what would you do? How would you try to get around censorship, and how would you help your fellow bloggers out?</p>
<p>Edit: The Hindu is running <a href="http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200607202130.htm">a plea</a> to the Indian government to lift the ban. There is no comment feature, but even reading this plea could be a silent show of your support.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bombay burning</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/7391" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/7391</id>
    <published>2006-07-12T00:11:41-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-07-12T23:44:44-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Southeast Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>[img_assist|fid=829|thumb=1|alt=Bombay blasts|caption=Image from BBC]<br />
I don't remember ever enjoying the train rides in Mumbai's local trains. They were bipolar extremes maquerading as public transport. You were squished by humanity from all sides, and hence you floated into and out of the trains, a human buoy. Your nose was assaulted by the unholy mix of sweat and Cuticura powder and smelly shoes. But when you went back to your small town life, you complained to anyone who would listen how you never had to wait more than two minutes for a missed train in Bombay.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>[img_assist|fid=829|thumb=1|alt=Bombay blasts|caption=Image from BBC]<br />
I don't remember ever enjoying the train rides in Mumbai's local trains. They were bipolar extremes maquerading as public transport. You were squished by humanity from all sides, and hence you floated into and out of the trains, a human buoy. Your nose was assaulted by the unholy mix of sweat and Cuticura powder and smelly shoes. But when you went back to your small town life, you complained to anyone who would listen how you never had to wait more than two minutes for a missed train in Bombay.</p>
<p>The glamorous dream Bombay of my childhood has transformed into the humid, horrific Mumbai of my adult life. It's my port of entry each time I return to India. There is no easy way to write about the Mumbai blasts. When I read the casualty numbers this morning, they were put at about 30. It slowly climbed up to 190. I was filled with almost a sense of thankfulness that the toll was still a fathomable number. I have to be honest here. I feel bad about feeling this way, and it bothers me that the world might look at these numbers and think along the same lines.</p>
<p>The numbers are comparable to the <A href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114291,00.html">toll in the Madrid blasts</a>. They're about a tenth of 9/11's casualties, and almost nothing compared to <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/topics/topic.php?topicId=1081">2004's Boxing Day tsunami</a>. In a poor Third World country with one billion people, of what significance is 190? </p>
<p>To Mumbaikars, the seven blasts of 11/7 might represent a certain degree of discomfort in the immediate future - loss of revenue, loss of reliable transportation. According to the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5171258.stm">BBC</a>, the city's trains services about 6 million people a day. Any disruption is bound to hurt the city's economy.</p>
<p>To the various Indian government agencies managing the aftermath, those 190 are worth INR 100,000 each (roughly USD 2222). That is the amount promised to the next of kin of deceased persons. An injured person is worth half that amount. Desperate families might clamor for more, and then one by one, quietly accept the amounts. People will debate the worth of such compensation, and this day and these numbers too will be forgotten, only to be trotted out the next time something like this happens.</p>
<p>To India's religious fundamentalists, these deaths might represent 190 individual slights that need to redressal. These might just be the acts that spur <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2802591.stm">another Godhra</a>. Or maybe <A href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1733417.cms">India's secular tradition</a> will withstand these thousand small cuts, as Times of India reports. Only time will tell.</p>
<p>Image from <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5171258.stm">BBC</a></p>
<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/mumbai" rel="tag">Mumbai</a> | <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bombay" rel="tag">Bombay</a> | <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blasts" rel="tag">blasts</a> |  <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/train+blasts" rel="tag">train blasts</a> |  <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/india" rel="tag">India</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Wrath of Bus Uncle</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/6477" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/6477</id>
    <published>2006-06-15T21:37:28-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-06-16T08:47:21-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p>If you're not a Youtube regular, chances are you might have missed the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSHziqJWYcM">Bus Uncle video</a> that's been doing the rounds on <a href="http://www.youtube.com">Youtube</a> since late May. From what <A href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19362403-29677,00.html">web</a> <a href="http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20060524_1.htm">sources</a> reported, and from seeing the video with English subtitles, this is what I gathered: A young man riding a Hong Kong commuter bus was bugged with the loud cell phone conversation of a fellow rider. Elvis Ho tapped on Roger Chan's shoulder trying to get him to lower his voice. This riled Chan up, and he demanded an explanation from the younger man. A co-passenger witnessing the altercation captured the entire thing via his cell phone and posted it to Youtube.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p>If you're not a Youtube regular, chances are you might have missed the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSHziqJWYcM">Bus Uncle video</a> that's been doing the rounds on <a href="http://www.youtube.com">Youtube</a> since late May. From what <A href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19362403-29677,00.html">web</a> <a href="http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20060524_1.htm">sources</a> reported, and from seeing the video with English subtitles, this is what I gathered: A young man riding a Hong Kong commuter bus was bugged with the loud cell phone conversation of a fellow rider. Elvis Ho tapped on Roger Chan's shoulder trying to get him to lower his voice. This riled Chan up, and he demanded an explanation from the younger man. A co-passenger witnessing the altercation captured the entire thing via his cell phone and posted it to Youtube.</p>
<p>The video is funny in fits and starts. I suspect some of the flavor that has made it so popular with Cantonese netizens has been lost in translation. Roger Chan's words "I have pressure. You have pressure" and "It's not settled yet" have already achieved <A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_uncle">cult status</a> in Hong Kong. </p>
<p>There has been much dissection in Asian media since this video became popular. The case is said to be symptomatic of Hong Kong ineffectual youth unable to take on an older generation, even when the younger people are essentially in the right. Washington Post's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/08/AR2006060801533.html">Eugene Robinson</a> reminded readers that life as we know it has become a giant opportunity for candid camera, and we better have our best smiles ready.</p>
<p>Seeing the video and reading about the hoopla, two things stare out at me. How a <A href="http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20060524_1.htm">subtitled video</a> "befit[ting] Hong Kong's status as a cosmopolitan city" has been able to command world attention. Wired magazine features a regular section called Japanese Schoolgirl Watch. Far Eastern bloggers regular hold Technorati hostage with Singapore or Hong Kong centric searches. From United Colors of Benetton, we've progressed to a stage where an Asian face is a given in Gap and Old Navy ads. The flavor of this century may well be soy sauce.</p>
<p>What gets me more than this though is how easily an altercation between two adult males drags in mothers and sexual organs into the picture. Is this tendency as natural to men as the ability to bear children is to us women? Chan's crudeness made me laugh I admit, but I was willing Elvis Ho to do something - punch the guy, throw the cell phone. Do anything, say anything. Get up off that seat. It's your mother.</p>
<p>I don't know. Maybe I'm being uptight? I'd love to know your thoughts.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nicked and plucked</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/5975" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/5975</id>
    <published>2006-06-01T15:15:09-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-06-01T20:56:55-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Fashion &amp; Shopping" />
    <category term="Feminism &amp; Gender" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em>[img_assist|fid=428|thumb=0|alt=summer|caption=Summer's here]<br />
Every time I shave, I inadvertently nick myself somewhere. The knees and the elbows are particularly vulnerable. Come to think of it, shaving is what I hate most about summers. I like my shorts and my tanks and I have a healthy disdain for <em>Rules</em>, but I still don't have <A href="http://www.strangecelebrities.com/content/item/108554.html">Julia Roberts' bravado</a> about body hair.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em>[img_assist|fid=428|thumb=0|alt=summer|caption=Summer's here]<br />
Every time I shave, I inadvertently nick myself somewhere. The knees and the elbows are particularly vulnerable. Come to think of it, shaving is what I hate most about summers. I like my shorts and my tanks and I have a healthy disdain for <em>Rules</em>, but I still don't have <A href="http://www.strangecelebrities.com/content/item/108554.html">Julia Roberts' bravado</a> about body hair.</p>
<p>At my workplace, women are about 60% of the workforce. Now that summer's here, my office landscape is now filled with fuschias and tangerines, ballooning skirts and rounded, tanned shoulders. And the men? Still stuck in their corporate wear. Some of them have taken to wearing short sleeved shirts, or polo neck tees. But the colors are still the pale blues, whites or grays. No knobbly knees or hairy legs on display. Even the security guard who stews in his greenhouse of a glass cube at the entrance to the campus wears a proper uniform, 7 days a week.</p>
<p>I can't help but feel sorry for him and the other men. Women have been able to subtly push envelopes (or hemlines) where corporate wear is concerned. Yeah, there've been cases like the <a href="http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/20963" />Harrah's makeup case</a> where the court's decided it was ok to fire a woman for not wearing makeup, but those are still the aberrations, not the rules.</p>
<p>Think about it. In corporate America, not many men can wear shorts or capris. Sandals or flipflops are all taboo. Any hint of skin is only reserved for the evenings or weekends. Or more common in places like San Francisco and LA where the culture skews more liberal. I wonder how much of it has to do with appearing in control, and how much a general resignation to the present status quo? The West's stiffness vis-a-vis menswear almost seems as stifling to me personally as the hijab.</p>
<p>When I ask my husband about this, he simply shrugs. Maybe he'd rather not get so hot under the collar for something trivial like this.</p>
<p>Image from <a href="http://www.placer.ca.gov" title="http://www.placer.ca.gov">http://www.placer.ca.gov</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Snooper Sister</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/5366" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/5366</id>
    <published>2006-05-14T22:23:42-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-05-15T06:32:50-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Asia" />
    <category term="Politics &amp; News" />
    <category term="Social Media" />
    <category term="Technology &amp; Web" />
    <category term="World" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p><a href="node/5365"><img src="http://www.blogher.com/files/images/Tiana_0.jpg" width="300" height="194" alt="Tiananmen Square" /></a> Last week <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060506/wr_nm/china_blogs_dc_1">Yahoo</a> reported that blogs were booming in China, and that it was the second largest Internet market after the US. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/09/world/asia/09internet.html?ex=1304827200&amp;en=47dd8aad3c9107e6&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">New York Times</a> had a great article about a new effort in some universities in China to police Internet forums. The article described discussion moderator Hu Yingying's activities thus:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
<p><a href="node/5365"><img src="http://www.blogher.com/files/images/Tiana_0.jpg" width="300" height="194" alt="Tiananmen Square" /></a> Last week <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060506/wr_nm/china_blogs_dc_1">Yahoo</a> reported that blogs were booming in China, and that it was the second largest Internet market after the US. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/09/world/asia/09internet.html?ex=1304827200&amp;en=47dd8aad3c9107e6&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">New York Times</a> had a great article about a new effort in some universities in China to police Internet forums. The article described discussion moderator Hu Yingying's activities thus:</p>
<blockquote><p>
For several hours each week she repairs to a little-known on-campus office crammed with computers, where she logs in unsuspected by other students to help police her school's Internet forums.</p>
<p>Once online, following suggestions from professors or older students, she introduces politically correct or innocuous themes for discussion<br />
...<br />
Ms. Hu says she and her fellow moderators try to steer what they consider negative conversations in a positive direction with well-placed comments of their own.<br />
...<br />
Ms. Hu beams with pride over her contribution toward building a "harmonious society."
</p></blockquote>
<p>The images I carry in my mind of Communist China are iconic images, placed there by Western media. The solitary young man facing off the tank at Tiananmen Square. Cycles. Men in Mao pantsuits, and defeminized women in the same unisex attire. Mostly male. So now the public face of the Communist effort is <em>little sister</em>, a softer antidote to young China's ideological promiscuities.  </p>
<p>When all-volunteer armies of the righteous Red armies descend, it must be cause for concern. [Incidentally I remember a conversation with a Chinese acquaintance of mine. According to her, strong belief in Communism earned you a right-winger epithet within China. The term left-wing is reserved for what's considered the religious right in the West and other parts of the world. Interesting inversion of labels.]</p>
<p>I looked up Technorati to see who was discussing this article and how. Reactions within China to such reports would be bound to vary from how ABCs (American Born Chinese) perceive them. Taiwanese and Hong Kong natives might bring other tales to the table. </p>
<p>So imagine my surpise that a mere six posts referenced this article, of which two were in Chinese and two really just linked the articles, no opinion stated. When it comes to blogs by people from the far east, it seems as if we're living in insular islands, the English based world, and the rest of us. The blog world really needs reliable translation services, because important things might be getting said in other languages, and we won't even know what they're saying.</p>
<p><em>Image from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989">WikiPedia</a></em></p>
<p>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/China" rel="tag">China</a> | <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/student+informer" rel="tag">Student Informer</a> | <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/sanitize" rel="tag">sanitize</a> |  <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/thought+police" rel="tag">Thought Police</a> |  <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/chinese+blogs" rel="tag">Chinese Blogs</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Democracy in Nepal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/5002" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/5002</id>
    <published>2006-05-04T13:50:07-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-05-04T13:56:09-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Politics &amp; News" />
    <category term="Southeast Asia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <A href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em>[img_assist|fid=215|thumb=1|alt=Democracy in Nepal|caption=Pramila Giri* walked 7 hours to get to Bhoktini.(Picture from Samudaya.org)]<br />
I don't pretend to understand the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Democracy_movement_in_Nepal">nuances of the Nepali democracy movement</a> that's going on. The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/03/AR2006050302219.html">reported today</a> that the government had declared truce towards the rebels.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <A href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em>[img_assist|fid=215|thumb=1|alt=Democracy in Nepal|caption=Pramila Giri* walked 7 hours to get to Bhoktini.(Picture from Samudaya.org)]<br />
I don't pretend to understand the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Democracy_movement_in_Nepal">nuances of the Nepali democracy movement</a> that's going on. The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/03/AR2006050302219.html">reported today</a> that the government had declared truce towards the rebels.</p>
<p>After weeks of wrangling between King Gyanendra and political parties, Nepal finally has a seven member Council of Ministers, that <A href="http://www.blog.com.np/united-we-blog/2006/05/02/finally-we-have-ministers" />United We Blog</a> proudly reports "didn't go to the royal palace to take oath", preferring to be sworn in at the National Planning Commission Hall. Sometimes even a symbolic gesture speaks louder than words</p>
<p>Samudaya.org has a wonderful <a href="http://www.samudaya.org/articles/archives/2006/05/a_human_face_to.php">featured pictorial</a> that shows the Bhoktini rally that was part of the democracy movement. It was heartening to see so many women involved in the process.</p>
<p>[There is not much information on Bhoktini on the web. From the context, it seems as if Bhoktini was a political rally or the name of a town/village where the rally was held. Above picture from Samudaya.org]</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Memory Magpies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/node/4876" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/node/4876</id>
    <published>2006-04-30T23:23:06-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-08-10T00:16:45-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DesiGal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Life" />
    <category term="Research, Academia &amp; Education" />
    <category term="Technology &amp; Web" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite memories from childhood is leading an old man home when the power suddenly went out one night. We were returning from the market, my mother and I, when the lights just upped and fizzled. The old man, who was carrying his grandson on his shoulders, was panicking because he couldn't see in the dark. I offered to lead the way.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite memories from childhood is leading an old man home when the power suddenly went out one night. We were returning from the market, my mother and I, when the lights just upped and fizzled. The old man, who was carrying his grandson on his shoulders, was panicking because he couldn't see in the dark. I offered to lead the way. </p>
<p>It was a strange procession of shadows. My mother with her bag of vegetables, I holding the old man's hand. A child, maybe five years old, perched on his bony shoulders. Five minutes later, the lights came back on, and the man left, assuring us that he could make it home on his own. I don't know why I remember this, but I often think of the old man and the little boy. Somethings just remain etched in your mind.</p>
<p>This week I've been doing a lot of reading of what I call memory blogs. Blogs that describe days long gone, which transport readers to nostalgic worlds. One of my favorite bloggers is Pakistani <a href="ann-badnaam.blogspot.com">Ann-beynaam</a>. Her posts about her childhood in Lahore have that delicious feel of languorous summers in a familiar land, even though hers is Pakistan and mine India.</p>
<blockquote><p>
lahore. it was the place where i first learned to appreciate history, not just in books, but in the buildings in the city. for me the old city was laced with romanticism, particularly the area around the river ravi. that was where the lahore fort was built, and later on the badshahi masjid.</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>my earliest memory of liberty cinema is that it was a reddish colored building, and it used to show both english and urdu language feature films. some of the carry on doctor films were shown there, among others. capri cinema was right next to it, a more recent appearance on the scene.</p></blockquote>
<p>Time and again, I sit up and notice how new technology, but blogging in particular, is shaping the memory creation process. This <A href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2006-04-16-brain-fit_x.htm">article in USA Today</a> says that decline in mental agility or memory skills can be lessened through activities such as blogging. Apart from the capacity of blogs to store our stories, we have indispensable tools like search and tagging that organize our memories from slipping into obscurity. </p>
<p>A post by blogger <a href="http://wrapping.marthaburtis.net/?p=98">Martha Burtis</a> tells us about a class she had almost forgotten about:</p>
<blockquote><p>I had almost forgotten about this class. In particular, I had forgotten about a set of journal entries that I had written for the class. I read over many of them late yesterday. </p>
<p>I was amazed by how much I had forgotten from this class. As I read those journal entries, I might as well have been reading someone else's writing. And while reading them has sort of allowed me to re-connect with the ideas that I had back then, the experience is in no way the same as when I generated those ideas in the first place. The journal entries don't really allow me to re-capture the process by which I got to those ideas.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, blogs help us rediscover ourselves. I wonder though, do we perhaps<br />
rely <em>too much</em> on tools like blogging as memory banks? Could it be possible that there are mundanities best forgotten?</p>
<p><em>Contributing Editor Priya Ramachandran also blogs at <a href="http://dckimaya.blogspot.com">Words on Water</a></em></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
