<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>CadyM's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/cadym"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/18268/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.blogher.com/blog/18268/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-01-20T18:46:45-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>What&#039;s Up With Raw?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/whats-raw" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/whats-raw</id>
    <published>2009-04-10T13:31:20-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-04-10T13:34:10-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Food &amp; Drink" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Cooking for Health" />
    <category term="Food 101" />
    <category term="Food Politics" />
    <category term="Green" />
    <category term="Cooking" />
    <category term="Going Green" />
    <category term="peacemeals" />
    <category term="raw food" />
    <category term="raw vegan" />
    <category term="vegan" />
    <category term="Food" />
    <category term="Cooking for Health" />
    <category term="Gluten Free" />
    <category term="Nutrition" />
    <category term="Vegan" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I live in the Bay Area, where Cafe Gratitude (that raw food haven) first started, so I'm certainly at an advantage when it comes to hearing about raw foods. When I hit our Whole Foods, I pass by Cafe Gratitude's counter, their shelves full of books and Himalayan crystal salt and to-go cakes, across from the aisle of raw chocolate and raw kale chips and raw cookies.</p>
<p><img src="http://us.st12.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/I/yhst-96025587295787_2049_6008640" alt="pretty cards from Cafe Gratitude" width="84" height="120" align="absmiddle" /></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I live in the Bay Area, where Cafe Gratitude (that raw food haven) first started, so I'm certainly at an advantage when it comes to hearing about raw foods. When I hit our Whole Foods, I pass by Cafe Gratitude's counter, their shelves full of books and Himalayan crystal salt and to-go cakes, across from the aisle of raw chocolate and raw kale chips and raw cookies.</p>
<p><img src="http://us.st12.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/I/yhst-96025587295787_2049_6008640" alt="pretty cards from Cafe Gratitude" width="84" height="120" align="absmiddle" /></p>
<p>And yet I still don't understand the basic concepts behind raw food. I get that people say cooking food kills at least some of the enzymes in it, and that that can make it lose nutritional value. I get that some greens, like spinach, need to be cooked in order to make their nutrients accessible, because they have oxalic acid or other juices in there that are somewhat toxic to us and prevent us from getting at the good stuff. And I know that I feel full faster when eating raw food, but I don't know why. So what's the bottom line?</p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3007/2426924116_f77b699cdc.jpg?v=0" alt="Line of fruit by Jill Clardy on Flickr" width="500" height="253" align="middle" /></p>
<p>I'm doing some research on it right now, and I thought I'd share it with you as I go. But first, my bottom line conclusions - for those of you who just want the facts, not the journey!</p>
<p>So, in support of raw foods:<br />* They often contain enzymes which aid digestion, as well as vitamins and amino acids, whereas many of the above are destroyed in the heat of cooking.<br />* Eating raw generally forces people to stick to high-nutrient foods that contain tons of antioxidants, etc., because the foods that don't tend to be the ones that REALLY need a bunch of processing to be edible.<br />* Many raw foods, and foods which have been fermented to &quot;cook&quot; them, are good for the immune system because they are packed with probiotic and prebiotic bacteria (i.e. &quot;good bacteria&quot;) that support the digestive system, which is closely tied with the immune system - and these also tend to be killed by cooking. Which makes sense since killing off bacteria is one of our major arguments for cooking food.<br />* There are foods that it's dangerous to eat raw - I don't mean chicken here, but things like sprouted alfalfa - but not as many as I thought, and Wikipedia has what I <em>hope </em>is a complete list - linked below. </p>
<p>If you want to see more information and the process of getting there, <a href="http://www.fortydollargourmet.com/?p=144">read on through!</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Non-Alcoholic New Year - Or: (Alcohol-)Free Drinks!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/non-alcoholic-new-year-or-alcohol-free-drinks" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/non-alcoholic-new-year-or-alcohol-free-drinks</id>
    <published>2009-01-03T11:07:47-06:00</published>
    <updated>2009-01-03T11:29:12-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Food &amp; Drink" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="cocktails" />
    <category term="Drinks" />
    <category term="New Year&#039;s Eve" />
    <category term="non-alcoholic" />
    <category term="Recipes" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In researching these recipes, I came across a little blurb about Holiday Inn coming out with a whole line of non-alcoholic drinks that's &quot;an industry first.&quot; Which it really is, and I've never understood why. Alcohol is not the tasty part of a drink, y'all. Most of those ingredients in fancy mixed drinks are there to mask the flavor of the alcohol. That's why it's always strong flavors like ginger or citrus or chocolate.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In researching these recipes, I came across a little blurb about Holiday Inn coming out with a whole line of non-alcoholic drinks that's &quot;an industry first.&quot; Which it really is, and I've never understood why. Alcohol is not the tasty part of a drink, y'all. Most of those ingredients in fancy mixed drinks are there to mask the flavor of the alcohol. That's why it's always strong flavors like ginger or citrus or chocolate.</p>
<p>I love all those flavors, but why throw in the alcohol? Granted, I have zero interest in getting drunk: it doesn't feel good during, it doesn't feel good after, and even back in college I was too concerned about always being &quot;in control&quot; to want to drink. There were still times that I way overused in college, but they just served to confirm that I didn't want to do that.</p>
<p>But that doesn't mean I don't want fun, interesting stuff to drink! I am always reading the descriptions of cocktails on menus and thinking &quot;Wow, lemon and sugar and zest, that sounds great!... Oh right, except the gin and vodka.&quot; And what better day than New Year's Eve to explore and share some real drink recipes with you all?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/people/12305112@N07/"><img src="http://www.fortydollargourmet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/switchelrisabee2007-300x225.jpg" alt=" Risa Bear via Flickr" width="300" height="225" align="middle" /></a> </p>
<p>This one was <a href="http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=18613674">featured in last week's meal planning kits of recipes from the Gold Rush era</a>. That's the California Gold Rush, 160 years ago! I remember drinks like switchel appearing in the Little House on the Prairie books by Laura Ingalls Wilder - whenever Pa and all the hired men were working out in the field, they'd drink something that sounded nasty made with vinegar and water. Maybe sugar was mentioned. I don't know if they had ginger to add, off in the middle of the country back then, but I think it really makes this drink delicious. Like an old-fashioned ginger ale.</p>
<p><em><strong>Switchel</strong></em></p>
<p><em>½ cup light brown sugar<br />½ cup white wine vinegar<br />¼ cup light molasses<br />1 teaspoon ground ginger<br />2 cups water</em></p>
<p><em>Mix together the first four ingredients, then stir in water. Serve chilled.</em></p>
<p>You know what else reminds me of those books, every time I hear of it? Yellow jackets. Remember when their cousin was acting out all over the place and got tangled up with a nest of yellow jackets? And they had to cover him in mud (which draws out the toxins) and wrap him up in a sheet (to keep the mud on)? Well, apparently someone named a cocktail after it!</p>
<p><strong><em>Yellow Jacket</em></strong></p>
<p><em>4 parts pineapple juice</em></p>
<p><em>4 parts orange juice</em></p>
<p><em>3 parts lemon juice</em></p>
<p><em>Shake and strain out over ice.</em></p>
<p>I'm sure it wasn't really named after the scene in those books, but that's my only association with it. The drink is undoubtedly less painful than the sting! Or do yellow jackets bite? I think one bit me during a company picnic once... we had a great citrus-marinated chicken that they were all over, and I did okay maneuvering around them until I tried to brush off something I felt tickling my finger and it bit me. Fair enough, I suppose. But I wasn't very happy about it at the time.</p>
<p>My vote for &quot;most hilarious name&quot; has to go to the &quot;Virgin Mary&quot;. Or maybe that should just be &quot;most unintentionally gross name&quot;.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/bitchbuzz/"><img src="http://www.fortydollargourmet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/bloodymarybitchbuzz.jpg" alt=" BitchBuzz on Flickr" width="150" height="256" align="middle" /></a> </p>
<p><strong><em>Virgin Mary</em></strong></p>
<p><em>Equal parts tomato and cranberry juice</em></p>
<p><em>1 tsp. lime juice per serving</em></p>
<p><em>Hot sauce and pepper to taste</em></p>
<p>Wouldn't you think a Virgin Mary should be, I don't know... Jesus-ier? Maybe a traditional drink of Bethlehem? Or blue, or something? The mocktails that just virginize a standard cocktail are not my favorites. They're the -tinis of the mocktail set. You know, like an appletini, a mintini, a scotchtini - just a mindless variation on a theme, created more often because it's expected than because it tastes good. When I pick a mixed drink, I want it to be there because someone thought those ingredients really went well together.</p>
<p>I find that I can trust the New York Times to think hard about food, and they have some good insights into mocktailing. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/20/dining/20appe.html">In one recent article, Melissa Davis suggests using tonic water</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Made from botanicals and quinine, which gives it its distinctive bitterness, it can transform even the most mundane fruit juice into something sophisticated, especially if you use a less sugary brand like Q or Fever-Tree. At Franny’s, Nekisia Davis, a manager, makes tonic water with cinchona bark (quinine), lavender, chamomile and plenty of fresh herbs. Zipped up with lime juice, it’s one of my summer favorites, boozy or dry.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>She also wisely observes that &quot;A mocktail should be the grown-up in the crowd, a complex drink with just enough sharpness or bitterness to set itself apart from anything cloyingly twee.&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fortydollargourmet.com/?p=105">The extreme end of that fascinates me: (Read more....)</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Number (and the number of books in my house!) </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/number-and-number-books-my-house" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/number-and-number-books-my-house</id>
    <published>2008-05-23T12:27:50-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-23T12:59:58-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Business &amp; Career" />
    <category term="Entertainment &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Healthy Wallets" />
    <category term="addiction" />
    <category term="books" />
    <category term="codependence" />
    <category term="codependency" />
    <category term="compulsive spending" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="lee eisenberg" />
    <category term="money" />
    <category term="retirement" />
    <category term="shopping" />
    <category term="the number" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;id=pVtMLGvMGPsC&amp;dq=the+number+rest+of+your+life+&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;source=web&amp;ots=is7FscJc5i&amp;sig=Sb9-So6pQczTfjuEjoWppK8HTu8">The Number: A Completely Different Way To Think About the Rest Of Your Life</a></p>
<p>by Lee Eisenberg</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;id=pVtMLGvMGPsC&amp;dq=the+number+rest+of+your+life+&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;source=web&amp;ots=is7FscJc5i&amp;sig=Sb9-So6pQczTfjuEjoWppK8HTu8">The Number: A Completely Different Way To Think About the Rest Of Your Life</a></p>
<p>by Lee Eisenberg</p>
<p>I was very proud of myself because when this book caught my eye in a local bookstore recently, I raced down the street to check it out of the library first. I have had a lifelong habit of buying first and deciding later… often much later. In fact, over the past year and a half, I’ve gotten rid of at least three hundred books that I never read, or read and didn’t like enough to re-read, or never finished. A lot of this was codependent book-buying: I had so many books that I thought I should own, so that I could convince other people to read them. You know, Important Political Books that would make them see why they should think a certain way, usually about things like race in America or class in the 20th century or women in the workplace. And I had even more books that I thought I should own because, well, they seemed like “my” kind of books. I thought that they “proved” something about me - like that I had the right ideas about race or class or gender or sexuality or…. It took me years to look at why I actually owned them and accept that it clearly wasn’t for reading.</p>
<p>Those were the books that I wanted to want to read. There was a whole other category after that: books that I wanted to finish or to like. I wasn’t trusting my feelings about them. What if I got rid of one and then realized I desperately wanted to read it? What if I got rid of something that I didn’t know I would really like? Worst of all were the books that I really wasn’t sure about. All the ones that looked like they might be good, but which I had never gotten around to reading and didn’t feel that motivated to try. A whole lot of these were books that had seemed really exciting in the store, but which turned dull and uninspirational as soon as I got them home. Could it be that it was just the thrill of the chase, of picking out and spending tons of money on books, that made me want them in the first place?</p>
<p>Well, I was finally willing to face reality. And I still have hundreds of books. I’d say at this point they break down pretty much into 60% comfort books that I love to read over and over again, 30% books that I haven’t read and think I would really enjoy if I could bring myself to try them, and 10% reference sorts of<br />
books. I lean very heavily toward comfort reading, whether it’s books that I have read before or books I know I will love and am excited about trying. Facing a book that looks good when I flip through it, but which I know nothing about, is like trying to psych myself up to get into a cold swimming pool. Sure, most of the time I love it once I’m in there and can’t wait to go back, but it’s really hard to overcome that initial bump.</p>
<p>I guess it’s a kind of fear, fear of the cold plunge or the inhospitable novel. And thinking of it that way helps a lot. I can separate fear and reality; I know that there’s nothing I actually need to be afraid of in starting a new book, because I am also finally willing to put down a book that sucks instead of trying to struggle on through. If I refuse to buy into that bump of fear, I can see that I am just trying a new book on for size to see if<br />
it meets my needs. I can see that I have the power to make sure my reading needs get met; I’m not at the book’s mercy. And I like thinking of it from that angle, like I’m challenging the book to pull me in and give me what I want. It puts the power back in my hands, instead of giving me the illusion that I’m at the mercy of a bad book.</p>
<p>The Number was a good book, with some important information. It’s about the amount that we need to retire, about what different people do with retirement and how that is changing, about how different people save for retirement and how that is changing. One of the big points I took away with me, which he makes<br />
repeatedly, is that a whole lot of people don’t start thinking about planning for retirement until they are about 50 - and that for many people, that is way too late.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=96">Read more....</a>)</strong></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>You know all the answers already!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/you-know-all-answers-already" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/you-know-all-answers-already</id>
    <published>2008-05-23T12:12:31-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-23T12:12:31-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Business &amp; Career" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="recovery" />
    <category term="self-esteem" />
    <category term="shame" />
    <category term="work" />
    <category term="workaholism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I recently discovered <a href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/">Penelope Trunk’s blog, Brazen Careerist</a>. It has a fantastic name, doesn’t it? <a href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/03/05/my-name-is-not-really-penelope/">She does, too.</a></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I recently discovered <a href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/">Penelope Trunk’s blog, Brazen Careerist</a>. It has a fantastic name, doesn’t it? <a href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/03/05/my-name-is-not-really-penelope/">She does, too.</a><br />
Well, I have a not-so-secret love of personal finance and business writing, which is slooowly leading me toward becoming a successful entrepreneur… which overlaps a lot with recovery. I mean, how many people do you know who do something <strong>brilliantly</strong> - crafts or writing or coding or cooking - who you just know could make tons of money doing it <strong>if they only believed in themselves</strong>? How many skills do you have, honestly, that you could turn into a career if you paid for it with the time and energy and <em>self-worth</em> that that takes?</p>
<p>(There are plenty of successful entrepreneurs, and successful everything elses, who don’t have a strong sense of self-worth. I’m thinking of people like Stephen Fry, Ellen Degeneres, and Douglas Adams, people who create amazing things and are modest and self-effacingly doubtful about it to the point of ridiculousness. The trade-off, I think, may be that <strong>with less self-esteem it takes more time and energy to make it</strong>, and it’s a lot harder to enjoy.)</p>
<p>Well, damnit, that’s not the post I am trying to write today, although it cries out to be written and will certainly be coming soon. My point today is that despite my struggles with self-promotion, I am pulled to read things like Brazen Careerist, and in that particular blog I have found <strong>a great treasure trove </strong>of smart, clear writing not only about business matters but about life. And I really knew I had found something good when I read <strong><a href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/05/12/why-you-already-know-what-you-should-be-doing-next/">Why you already know what you should be doing next</a></strong>.</p>
<p>This piece reminds me a lot of Wishcraft, <a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=120">one of the books I’m recommending for the cat-herding challenge</a> and one which I will be including in the “tools” section of Facing Abuse when it comes out. In Wishcraft, one of Barbara Sher’s great points is that <strong>we can go back to our childhood interests and passions and memories</strong> in general to find out what it is we want to be doing. And it may not be as simple as “I loved to fingerpaint or collect twigs so I should become… a famous fingerpainting twig-collector,” of course. We can look at what we loved about those things, what pushed us to do them and what we got out of them.</p>
<p>And we can do the same in adulthood; we may have lifelong dreams of becoming an opera singer and find that what we wanted to get out of it is satisfied tremendously by joining a local choir, or by working behind the scenes for an opera, or something else we had never considered. Or, of course, that nothing but becoming an opera singer<br />
will satisfy that itch, and that that passion is enough to power years of voice training and drama classes.</p>
<p>Trunk shares a similar story. She suggests that all we have to do is pick a memory and pull it apart:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Close your eyes and think of a great memory of childhood… Do you have it? In my own, haphazard studies of this test, <strong>you can always learn something from the moment you pick</strong>. The first time I did this exercise, I thought of playing in my grandparents’ huge front yard. Of course, I was telling all my younger cousins what to do. Probably telling them why croquet was a great idea and I was going first. Something like that. But the bigger thing I learn from the story is that<strong> I am connected to space and nature and running around</strong>. All still true for me now, but it took me years of living in big cities before I could figure that out.” (emphasis mine)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The first childhood memory that came up for me was from, I think, first grade. We did this art project where we drew a colorful picture in crayons, and then (confusingly) painted over it with black paint. When the paint dried, we got to scratch it off, making a new picture in the black paint, and the old bright crayon colors showed through<br />
wherever we scratched.</p>
<p>I remember a butterfly; I’m not sure whether we HAD to scratch a butterfly drawing (you know how rigid teachers can be with art projects), whether I did one, or whether both the Rachels in the class did. I think it was one of those where we each had to do a butterfly, I guess on the reasoning that butterflies are colorful. I was pretty pissed off about having to paint over my original drawing, not to mention having to then “draw” whatever the teacher told me to.</p>
<p>But I know that the Rachels did because I remember that their pictures both said Rachel and they were both of butterflies. And this bothered me <strong>tremendously</strong>. I was like, how are they going to be able to tell their pictures apart?! So I tried to help by scratching one of the Rachel’s names on the front of her drawing.</p>
<p>Man, <strong>you have never seen such a fuss</strong>. I am sure that it was huge and sprawling and defaced the whole picture, and as an adult I know that it was probably unnecessary - that they probably each could recognize their own butterfly. And maybe it didn’t matter if they couldn’t. But I remember the Rachel whose name I scratched being really upset, and the teacher calling my parents in (whether for a special meeting or just when they picked me up from school I don’t know) and them all very seriously and with great concern asking me why I did it, and trying to guess whether I was mad at Rachel about something or what.</p>
<p>And I tried to explain, and I don’t know if I had the language skills back then to do it. It’s hard for little kids to consciously reason these things out and get all the way to being able to explain them in terms adults will understand. <strong>Adults just aren’t that <em>smart</em>. </strong>They don’t remember, often, what it was like to be a kid and not have all these concepts of what upsets other people and how they feel about their artwork and that they might have different feelings than you do. Actually, I guess it’s more that they often don’t have the concepts<br />
themselves that other people might feel differently, in a way. I mean, it was really hard for them to grasp that I might not think about it like an attack like they did, that I might actually have thought I was helping and be<strong> telling the truth</strong> when I said that. Adults, I remember, <strong>are weird</strong>.</p>
<p>Oh, and then I felt really guilty and weird around whichever Rachel it was for ages after that, because it had been borne upon me that she was totally shattered (SHATTERED!) about her ruined picture.</p>
<p><strong>So what does this say about me?</strong></p>
<p>Well, it illustrates some patterns that continue in my life, that I know are related to abuse. Like: the adults in my life loved to shame me to try to get me to act the way they wanted, which is not uncommon. And I learned from them that I should feel bad and guilty - <strong>shame myself</strong> - if other people might not like what I did. Not just if I accidentally hurt them, but if they didn’t like the work I produced or the way I expressed myself. It’s like how, <strong>if you are faced with an angry gorilla, you are supposed to attack yourself first</strong> so it will feel bad for you and try to soothe you instead. It’s <strong>codependence</strong>, really: worrying about how other people will feel and trying to guess and fix it to protect ourselves, <strong>even when there’s no need to</strong>. (And really, there’s never any need to.)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><br />
(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=124">Read more....</a>)</strong></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sinking Into Sweet Uncertainty</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/sinking-sweet-uncertainty" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/sinking-sweet-uncertainty</id>
    <published>2008-05-23T12:06:43-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-23T12:06:43-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Food &amp; Drink" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Mommy &amp; Family" />
    <category term="Religion &amp; Spirituality" />
    <category term="abnadonment" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="addiction" />
    <category term="coe" />
    <category term="compassion" />
    <category term="compulsive overeating" />
    <category term="deprivation" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="food addiction" />
    <category term="Healthy Body, Mind &amp; Wallet" />
    <category term="memory" />
    <category term="powerless" />
    <category term="recovery" />
    <category term="spirituality" />
    <category term="twelve steps" />
    <category term="vicious cycle" />
    <category term="work" />
    <category term="workaholism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(guest post by Annie)  </p>
<p><span>I’m on the verge of giving notice at my job, at a place I’ve worked for nearly nine years, the school I came to straight out of high school. I have been here for 12 years, my entire adult life.<br />
</span></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(guest post by Annie)  </p>
<p><span>I’m on the verge of giving notice at my job, at a place I’ve worked for nearly nine years, the school I came to straight out of high school. I have been here for 12 years, my entire adult life.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span>This afternoon I am writing the documentation that is the last thing I have to do before I go, and then, “out of nowhere,” I remember what a peanut butter and honey sandwich on Home Pride bread tastes like, and I miss my mommy and want chocolate milk, with the Nestle Quik crystals not fully stirred up so when you get to the bottom of the glass, there’s powder that isn’t even wet you get to scrape up with your spoon.</span></p>
<p>I cannot actually eat any of those foods. Not a one! I’m lactose-intolerant and gluten-intolerant. I am a sugar addict and a peanut butter addict and a caffeine addict in recovery. I don’t want the actual experience of chocolate milk and a peanut butter and honey sandwich (nor, incidentally, do I want the experience of being with my mother); I want what those things did for me when I was a little girl, or what I thought they were doing for me. I want the comfort. I want the familiarity. I want the sweetness.</p>
<p>When my mom abandoned our family, I couldn’t run to her anymore. And it was much too painful for me to even think of running to her. I felt so sad and so scared, and I wanted her to come and comfort me, but I felt that way <em>because of her</em>, so the feelings built on themselves. I was triggered, and when I sought relief, I became even more triggered, in a seemingly endless cycle.</p>
<p>I loved my food, though. I loved it and it comforted me. I stood in front of the cupboard after school, looking at the bounty and furtively gathering my favorite foods. I took out slices of white bread and spread them with peanut butter, chocolate syrup, and coconut shreds. I smushed them into my mouth as fast as I could so no one would catch me.<br />
At the kitchen table, I ate bowl after bowl of cereal, adding more milk in between servings. I ate spoonfuls of sugar straight from the sugar bowl.</p>
<p>I did other things, too. I read books and I watched TV and I pretended outside as long as it was light out. I went to church. I petted cats. I listened to my records and cassettes over and over again.</p>
<p>The food, though, goes straight to the core for me. It is unmediated. It is direct and primal and central. You eat to live. You eat to survive. Nourishment. Sustenance. I needed to be nourished. I needed to be sustained, and I was.</p>
<p>There wasn’t a lot of love or tenderness in my life. I didn’t get a lot of the things a child– or any person, really– needs in order to survive. I couldn’t make anyone hug me or hold me. I couldn’t make anyone tuck me into bed or hold my hand. I couldn’t make anyone tell me it was going to be all right. But there was food in my house and I could get it myself. I could make a peanut butter and honey sandwich. I could mix chocolate into milk.</p>
<p>And now, I could easily do the same thing. I am powerless over peanut butter and honey and chocolate milk and white bread. If I didn’t give those things over to my Higher Power, it isn’t just that I <em>could</em> eat the sandwich and drink the milk, it is that I <em>couldn’t not</em> eat and drink them. What happens when I don’t comfort myself with food?</p>
<p><strong>(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=123">Read more....</a>) </strong></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Do We Read?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/why-do-we-read" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/why-do-we-read</id>
    <published>2008-05-21T15:11:58-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-21T15:13:41-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Mommy &amp; Family" />
    <category term="books" />
    <category term="effects of abuse" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="learning to read" />
    <category term="Reading" />
    <category term="self-esteem" />
    <category term="shame" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I learned to read when I was two or three. There are family stories about this: That I taught myself to read. That<br />
when I was two - and a tiny child for two, at that - my mother brought me to the post office and I freaked everyone out by pointing at the door and reading, “Exit.” That by three, I was reading sentences (and after that there was no stopping me). I don’t think I taught myself to read exactly. I don’t know what happened; apparently I just sucked it<br />
in through my pores. I’ve met a lot of other people who had the same experience.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I learned to read when I was two or three. There are family stories about this: That I taught myself to read. That<br />
when I was two - and a tiny child for two, at that - my mother brought me to the post office and I freaked everyone out by pointing at the door and reading, “Exit.” That by three, I was reading sentences (and after that there was no stopping me). I don’t think I taught myself to read exactly. I don’t know what happened; apparently I just sucked it<br />
in through my pores. I’ve met a lot of other people who had the same experience. </p>
<p>You know who had a different experience? My brother. I remember being totally baffled because he didn’t want to read. He didn’t like reading. He struggled with learning to read until he was seven or eight, and resisted it tremendously because of that struggle. </p>
<p>My son struggled too. It was obvious to me that he was struggling because he carried so much shame and fear around reading. He had suffered through a lot of emotional abuse from his birth family (and, for a while, from a simultaneously high-pressure and neglectful preschool with a lot of violent bullying) and he couldn’t bear the<br />
pressure of reading, the fear that if he couldn’t read a word it meant he was stupid. Imagine (if you’ve never experienced that) pushing through that fear anew with almost every word on the page: wanting to try it, thinking you can get it, and then the tidal wave of fear telling you every horrible thing you’ll prove if you “mess up,” and the<br />
drowning shame of not being able to try and feeling that you’ve proven each of those fears right. With each fucking word. </p>
<p>I don’t know if that’s anything like what my brother experienced. The terrible thing, of course, is that besides all the emotional and performance pressure I know both of them experienced, there stands the truth that <strong>they were perfectly fine where they were</strong>. Seven or eight is a totally reasonable, healthy age, developmentally,<br />
for children to learn to read. I could see that without all the intense emotional struggles from the abuse, my son could have learned to read many years before; he was nearly there when he was three, but each hop and leap forward resulted in tremendous fear for years. But there was nothing for him to fear; <strong>he was fine where he was</strong>. It’s just that he had already been taught the exact opposite of that truth. </p>
<p>Both of them are enthusiastic readers and incredible writers, now, one at 27 and one at 10 years old. Which is a huge relief to me, because when I was growing up, books were my salvation, and I wanted my son to be able to have that too. </p>
<p><a href="http://shereadsbooks.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/tell-me/">She Reads Books wrote recently</a> about the question of why we read. There are a million reasons, of course, for any reader. But I think there are also reasons particularly related to abuse.</p>
<p><a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=112">(Read more....)</a> </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>There&#039;s No Such Thing As Laziness</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/theres-no-such-thing-laziness" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/theres-no-such-thing-laziness</id>
    <published>2008-05-21T15:06:33-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-21T15:08:27-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Business &amp; Career" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="effects of abuse" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="laziness" />
    <category term="lazy" />
    <category term="recovery" />
    <category term="work" />
    <category term="workaholism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I’ve wanted for a while to start writing about a different <strong>abuse-related myth</strong> every Monday. Because they start with the same letter, of course! And there are so many different <strong>common, harmful ideas that come from abuse</strong>. </p>
<p>Like <strong>laziness</strong>. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I’ve wanted for a while to start writing about a different <strong>abuse-related myth</strong> every Monday. Because they start with the same letter, of course! And there are so many different <strong>common, harmful ideas that come from abuse</strong>. </p>
<p>Like <strong>laziness</strong>. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.fborfw.com/strip_fix/strips/2008/may/m2p/080511dfg.jpg" alt="Elly works her ass off all day and, eight panels later, rejoices in having earned the right to take a freaking BATH." width="622" height="430" /></p>
<p>Lazy is one of those words that can mean a lot of different things depending on its connotation. It’s a little like “<strong>sinful</strong>.” I always see ads for ice cream or chocolate or yogurt that babble mindlessly about how <em>sinful</em> it is (to eat something that tastes good, or has any fat content) and how we no longer need to feel <em>guilty</em><br />
about it if we eat their brand. Often, people use “lazy” the same way:<br />
to mean “I feel kind of guilty about doing something that feels good.”<br />
“I feel kind of guilty about enjoying myself.” “I feel kind of guilty<br />
about doing something that’s just for me.” It’s that Puritan idea that<br />
pleasure is a sin. </p>
<p>It all comes back to <strong>shame</strong>. Specifically, to the<br />
message abuse carries that we’re not good enough, not worthy or<br />
deserving of basic pleasures like safety. (And see there, how pleasures<br />
are also needs?) <em>Guilt is shame</em>. It’s the feeling we get from<br />
subconsciously (or, sometimes, consciously) telling ourselves that what<br />
we are doing is wrong. That it’s Not Okay. When, really, it’s the abuse<br />
that was Not Okay all along. Abuse is really good at teaching<br />
upside-down messages like that. </p>
<p>Laziness. Elly in this For Better Or For Worse strip confuses <strong>relaxation and peace</strong><br />
with being “lazy.” She thinks she has to “earn” those things by working<br />
herself to the bone. Just to take a bubble bath! I mean, that’s <strong>basic self-care</strong>. What does she do if she really gets stuff done - award herself an extra fifteen minutes to brush her teeth? </p>
<p><a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=111"><strong> (Read more....) </strong></a></p>
<p></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cobain and Grohl: Mythic Heroes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/cobain-and-grohl-mythic-heroes" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/cobain-and-grohl-mythic-heroes</id>
    <published>2008-05-21T13:48:04-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-21T13:52:05-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Healthy Body" />
    <category term="Healthy Mind" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="alternative music" />
    <category term="bipolar" />
    <category term="borderline" />
    <category term="bpd" />
    <category term="child abuse" />
    <category term="dave grohl" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="foo fighters" />
    <category term="kurt cobain" />
    <category term="nirvana" />
    <category term="recovery" />
    <category term="Suicide" />
    <category term="Pop Culture" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Kurt Cobain and Dave Grohl were both in Nirvana. Both musical<br />
legends. Wizards at writing lyrics, at performing, at playing<br />
instruments, at writing music. Gods venerated by young people for their<br />
scorching hotness (depending on your taste) and electrifying rebellion.</p>
<p>And one of them is still alive. And I think their lyrics say a lot about why….</p>
<p><strong>KURT COBAIN</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.guitarscanada.com/Legends/KurtCobain.jpg" alt="" width="190" height="240" /></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Kurt Cobain and Dave Grohl were both in Nirvana. Both musical<br />
legends. Wizards at writing lyrics, at performing, at playing<br />
instruments, at writing music. Gods venerated by young people for their<br />
scorching hotness (depending on your taste) and electrifying rebellion.</p>
<p>And one of them is still alive. And I think their lyrics say a lot about why….</p>
<p><strong>KURT COBAIN</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.guitarscanada.com/Legends/KurtCobain.jpg" alt="" width="190" height="240" /></p>
<p>
I read the most hilariously bad mini-bio of Kurt Cobain just now, on <a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/www.guitarscanada.com/Legends/cobain.htm">a guitar website</a>. It summarized his childhood thus:</p>
<blockquote><p>Cobain was a happy child, but was hyperactive. When he<br />
was 7, his parents divorced. He took it very hard and was extremely<br />
hard to live with, so his parents sent him to live with relatives.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I could use that story as a good example of how one effect of abuse<br />
is the severing of cause and effect. When people haven’t recognized the<br />
abuse they experienced and its effects on them, they tell stories like<br />
this one: He was happy. But he was hyper. Then his parents divorced.<br />
Then he was hard to live with. Then they sent him away. Then he became<br />
a rock star. Then he did drugs. Then he shot himself.</p>
<p>Just a string of more or less unconnected events. No need to<br />
question what effect any of those events had, or how they might have<br />
affected each other, or how they might have affected him. Connecting<br />
back to reality through recovery brings up a lot of questions, like:<br />
Why state that he was happy, and then list all these reasons he wasn’t?<br />
How much more abuse was perpetrated by the kind of parents who would<br />
decide an upset seven-year-old was too “hard to live with” and send him<br />
away? Was he really “hyperactive” at that early age, or was it yet<br />
another case of a young child seeming “hyper” because their anxiety<br />
from the dysfunction in their family is so intense? And finally, what<br />
kind of a dumbass says “Oh, he’s taken us splitting up so hard - now<br />
that he can’t get enough time with both of us, let’s divorce him too<br />
and send him away entirely”?</p>
<p>There were other intense and clear signs of past abuse in his life, like <a href="http://www.bipolar-lives.com/kurt-cobain-and-manic-depression.html">his bipolar disorder</a>,<br />
fierce drug addiction, and the lyrics of many of his songs. His life<br />
and art resonated deeply with many young abuse survivors, who saw their<br />
feelings and experiences echoed in songs like Floyd the Barber:</p>
<blockquote><p>Barney ties me to the chair. / I can’t see I’m really<br />
scared. / Floyd breathes hard I hear a zip. / Beat me, pressed against<br />
my lips. / I was shaved, / I’m ashamed, / I was shamed. / I sense<br />
others in the room. / Opie, Aunt Bea, I presume. / They take turns to<br />
cut me up. / I died smothered in Andy’s clutch….</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Or Paper Cuts: </p>
<blockquote><p>At my feeding time she pushes food through the door. / I<br />
crawl towards the cracks of light - sometimes I can’t find my way. /<br />
Newspapers spread around / Soaking all they can. / A cleaning is due<br />
again, a good hosing down. / The lady whom I feel maternal love for /<br />
Can not look me in the eyes, / But I see hers and they are blue / And<br />
they cock and twist and masturbate…. /<br />
Black windows of paint I scratch with my nails. / I see others just<br />
like me, why do they not try to escape? / They bring out the older<br />
ones. They point at my way. / They come with a flash of light, and take<br />
my family away. / And very later I have learned to accept / Some<br />
friends of ridicule. / My whole existence is for your amusement, / And<br />
that is why I’m here with you….</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The gravitational pull of the abuse was too much for Kurt. Hard<br />
drugs tend to accelerate the downward spiral of abuse’s effects,<br />
increasing shame and pain and dissociation, decreasing the connection<br />
with reality and the ability to experience hope and seek help. His<br />
songs were a beacon for others in the same stage of abuse: the stage of<br />
merely experiencing its pain and looking for someone else who can<br />
validate it, maybe without even being able to acknowledge that abuse<br />
has occurred (or is still occurring). </p>
<p>What seems remarkable, to me, is that one of his bandmates went on<br />
to create songs that could be seen as a joyous, rebellious response to<br />
abuse - a call to arms to fight for recovery. </p>
<p><strong>DAVE GROHL</strong></p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.severed-dreams.net/qotsa/dave/images/dave9.jpg" alt="the inspirational dave grohl" width="215" height="240" /> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=116">Read more....</a>)</strong>
</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Talking to children about abuse</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/talking-children-about-abuse" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/talking-children-about-abuse</id>
    <published>2008-04-26T00:29:37-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-26T00:36:15-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Mommy &amp; Family" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="child abuse" />
    <category term="children" />
    <category term="dysfunctional family" />
    <category term="emotional abuse" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="family" />
    <category term="kids" />
    <category term="parenting" />
    <category term="parents" />
    <category term="physical abuse" />
    <category term="ritual abuse" />
    <category term="sexual abuse" />
    <category term="teaching" />
    <category term="teaching kids" />
    <category term="K-12" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p> These are my suggestions for talking to children about abuse, <a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=89">based on my personal experiences</a>....</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p> These are my suggestions for talking to children about abuse, <a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=89">based on my personal experiences</a>....</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Don’t ask once and then drop it.</strong> This is a very<br />
common mistake, particularly if a child says they have never been<br />
abused. Why? Well, a “no” answer (or just no answer) can be a great<br />
relief even to an adult who has lots of reasons to suspect abuse. And a<br />
“no” answer can be inaccurate, especially when coming from a child,<br />
because they might not understand the question, especially at a young<br />
age; might have repressed the experience; might not feel safe talking<br />
about it to anyone, especially if they have been threatened or told no<br />
one will believe them; might not know how to talk about what happened;<br />
might want to tell but not be ready to deal with those feelings or what<br />
they imagine would happen next; might not feel safe talking about it in<br />
this particular place or with this particular person…. It often takes<br />
time for children to process what has happened, to consider how to talk<br />
to you about it, and to decide that it is safe. You can support them in<br />
that process by letting them know the conversation is still open.</li>
<li><strong>Do remember that it is okay to keep asking, or to keep talking about abuse in general.</strong> It’s easy to tell ourselves that it is harassment, or that we will end up wrongly “convincing” them that they were abused. <a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=79">We already know, from decades of research, that it’s impossible to convince someone they were abused if they weren’t</a>. We just have to respect their boundaries while still letting them know the conversation isn’t over.</li>
<li><strong>Do talk to them about abuse in general, about what it includes, why it happens, and what effects it has.  </strong>Always<br />
in an age-appropriate way. You can talk about it meaning something that<br />
something does that is Not Okay, and help them brainstorm about what<br />
that might be. Abuse isn’t always a huge grotesque, life-changing<br />
event; there are many everyday forms. You can talk about bullying as a<br />
form of abuse, or things you see on TV, or talk about your or their<br />
experiences. Abusive behavior doesn’t make someone An Abuser, and being<br />
an abuser doesn’t mean that someone is intentionally cruel or unloving;<br />
you can help them grow up to be able to call a spade a spade without<br />
collapsing under the fear of what others will think of the term. You<br />
can find a lot of information about that stuff on this site, and more<br />
is always coming. You can also <a href="mailto:gambini@gmail.com">send in questions about anything you’d like</a> related to abuse, addiction, and/or recovery.</li>
<li><strong>Don’t threaten or pressure the child to talk about it.</strong>  No “you need to tell me,” no well-meaning “you have to talk to someone<br />
about it,” no “we’ll sit here until you are willing to talk”…. The fact<br />
is, they don’t have to talk about it. Many children never do. Some<br />
adults never do. You can let them know that you are ready to listen<br />
whenever they want to talk, or that you can help them find someone they<br />
can trust to talk to. You can let them know that talking about this<br />
stuff helps people feel better, and that the more you (or whoever they<br />
want to talk to) knows about it, the better you (or whoever) will be<br />
able to help.</li>
<li><strong>Do pay attention to and respect the child’s reactions.</strong>  Treat them with the respect you would an adult having a sensitive conversation. </li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=92">(Read more....) </a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Dozen Steps Toward Recovery</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/dozen-steps-toward-recovery" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/dozen-steps-toward-recovery</id>
    <published>2008-03-21T12:43:03-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-21T12:43:03-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Mommy &amp; Family" />
    <category term="Religion &amp; Spirituality" />
    <category term="Sex &amp; Relationships" />
    <category term="Healthy Mind" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="addiction" />
    <category term="alcoholics anonymous" />
    <category term="alcoholism" />
    <category term="community" />
    <category term="domestic violence" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="recovery" />
    <category term="sexual abuse" />
    <category term="spirituality" />
    <category term="trauma" />
    <category term="twelve steps" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In Alcoholics Anonymous, they often say that alcoholism is not the problem, it is just a symptom. Many people, especially in early recovery, enthusiastically cast aside drinking for another addictive behavior, and just about everyone in every twelve-step program discovers myriad other self-destructive behaviors they’re engaging in as they take inventory of their lives. These behaviors echo past trauma and abuse. The true problem is that these traumas have taught us that we deserve pain and chaos. We have learned to seek out and recreate our unresolved traumatic experiences even after the original harmful situations have passed. It is immaterial whether we perpetuate it by starving ourselves, berating ourselves, short-circuiting our bodies with harmful substances, underearning, choosing and staying with abusive people, cutting our bodies, or something else entirely.</p>
<p>So what’s the solution?</p>
<p>Well, don’t worry, we have our top psychologists, scientists, and therapists working on that around the clock… oh. We don’t?</p>
<p>Well. Here are a few pieces that might fit.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In Alcoholics Anonymous, they often say that alcoholism is not the problem, it is just a symptom. Many people, especially in early recovery, enthusiastically cast aside drinking for another addictive behavior, and just about everyone in every twelve-step program discovers myriad other self-destructive behaviors they’re engaging in as they take inventory of their lives. These behaviors echo past trauma and abuse. The true problem is that these traumas have taught us that we deserve pain and chaos. We have learned to seek out and recreate our unresolved traumatic experiences even after the original harmful situations have passed. It is immaterial whether we perpetuate it by starving ourselves, berating ourselves, short-circuiting our bodies with harmful substances, underearning, choosing and staying with abusive people, cutting our bodies, or something else entirely.</p>
<p>So what’s the solution?</p>
<p>Well, don’t worry, we have our top psychologists, scientists, and therapists working on that around the clock… oh. We don’t?</p>
<p>Well. Here are a few pieces that might fit.</p>
<p>Every twelve-step program uses the same twelve steps, regardless of the behavior being addressed. And, I believe, part of the reason that this is done and that it works for all our addictive “symptoms” must be that it addresses this core problem. Let’s see what the steps ask us to do that might be vital to recovery from trauma and abuse.</p>
<p>The first step, of course, is to admit that we have a problem. It is a very profound step: it helps us begin to see what we are doing that is harming us. It shows us what is not working, what we want to change. It helps us begin to be honest with ourselves and others, instead of harming ourselves with denial and fear.</p>
<p>Step two gives us the opportunity to explore what we believe about the universe, and what parts of that have and haven’t worked for us. We get to see what has worked for others, too, and see that other people have found relief from these painful problems. In step two, we begin to experience hope that things can be different, which I think is crucial to any kind of recovery.</p>
<p>In step three, we learn to ask for help. We seek a willingness to seek out healing from outside, trustworthy sources - to stop trying to do it all ourselves - to realize that our methods have not been working for us. This is mindblowing for many people, especially for those of us who have learned not to ask for help because we are just a burden. Beginning to understand that that is not actually true, and to see ourselves as worthwhile human beings who deserve support and who deserve to get our needs met, is nothing short of a miracle.</p>
<p>The fourth step brings us back to that honesty. We take a long, hard look at our lives, being as honest as we can about our resentments, fears, and relationships in general. This has tremendous implications: it can lead to much deeper clarity about what things have been like and what is harming us; it can bring us back to the emotions that we’ve numbed for so long; it can teach us where our boundaries really are and what we need to do to take responsibility for them. It is an incredible and far-reaching exercise.</p>
<p>The fifth step is even more terrifying for many people than the fourth. It asks us to share everything we learned in the fourth step with another human being and with a higher power of our own understanding. But when we share this with someone who is trustworthy, we learn amazing things. We learn that we are not alone. We learn that our feelings and actions and experiences are not so horrifying that people will run from us if they find out the truth about them. We even learn that those feelings, actions, and experiences are not who we are. And with all of this this comes a greater ability to trust, and a step toward self-acceptance.</p>
<p>Step six builds on that fourth step work too. We get to look at all of the behaviors that are harming us and start thinking about the possibility of maybe someday not doing them anymore. We get to just be willing for things to change, and to know that for the moment, that is enough.</p>
<p>So with the first six steps, what do people get that helps them recover? The beginnings of honesty; hope; help; reality; feelings; boundaries; trust; the possibility of change; and a door opens toward self-acceptance and compassion. That compassion is not located in any specific step, but undergirds the whole process. It’s the motor that powers all our healing.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=44">More....</a>)</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Olivia Joules and the Really Great List </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/olivia-joules-and-really-great-list" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/olivia-joules-and-really-great-list</id>
    <published>2008-03-05T16:57:40-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-05T16:57:40-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="addiction" />
    <category term="adventure" />
    <category term="alcoholism" />
    <category term="books" />
    <category term="bridget jones" />
    <category term="chick lit" />
    <category term="comedy" />
    <category term="debtors anonymous" />
    <category term="effects of abuse" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="helen fielding" />
    <category term="jane bond" />
    <category term="olivia joules" />
    <category term="recovery" />
    <category term="Gender" />
    <category term="Pop Culture" />
    <category term="Writing" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I finally read Bridget Jones’ Diary, and launched from there into a campaign to read everything Helen Fielding has ever written. I thought the Bridget Jones books were hilariously funny; they made me laugh on almost every page. But I especially enjoyed a more recent book of hers, “Olivia Joules and the Overactive Imagination.”</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I finally read Bridget Jones’ Diary, and launched from there into a campaign to read everything Helen Fielding has ever written. I thought the Bridget Jones books were hilariously funny; they made me laugh on almost every page. But I especially enjoyed a more recent book of hers, “Olivia Joules and the Overactive Imagination.”</p>
<p>The Bridget Jones books are awesome, but Bridget’s way of spinning between all her addictions and sort of haplessly happening to fall into just the circumstance she needs is… well, it’s a mainstay of a lot of chick lit (the Shopaholic books are of course another great example) and it’s not something I would want to read all the time. Happily, Olivia Jones is a great antidote. This book - which I hope will be the beginning of a series of Olivia Jones adventures - is frequently funny but also very adventurous.</p>
<p>A lot of “chick lit” heroines follow a character arc of at first seeming to mess up everything they do, and then - rather than getting a handle on their lives - just luckily land in the right place at the right moment. Everyone thinks they are out of control, and then they have a brilliant idea in the depths of their addiction, a glimmering of how incredibly powerful they would be without it, and they turn the company around or start their own or save the day in general and everyone who doubted them has to, briefly, eat crow. Olivia Joules’ adventure starts out, misleadingly, just like that - she has grandiose journalistic dreams which always turn out to be figments of her imagination - but instead of going on as a comedy of errors, she actually turns into a sort of Jane Bond character who learns from her mistakes and becomes ever smarter, even wiser, as the adventure unfolds.</p>
<p>I often wonder, when I read the kind of chick lit that relies heavily on codependent, sex-addicted, alcoholic compulsive eaters, whether the authors are writing from personal experience with recovery and plan to show the chaos of addiction and then the process of recovery in some way, or whether it’s going to be a continual dance between Step One and just plain acting out. I am STILL waiting for <a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/bantamdell/kinsella/books" />Becky Bloomwood</a> to get into <a href="http://debtorsanonymous.org">Debtors Anonymous</a>. I appreciate Helen Fielding’s books in part because she illustrates the causes and effects of abuse better than most. Bridget Jones’ mom is incredibly emotionally abusive and neglectful, her dad a wilfully codependent partner in neglect. And in Olivia Joules she even dares to have one of the characters recognize another’s oblivious alcoholism and identify it to others, which in many ways is a pretty advanced skill. It’s a great relief to find an author who I can trust to write about these issues in a realistic way, instead of the blithely sloppy “You can act out in seven thousand ways at once and still have an idealistic happy ending!” sort of writing that often gets a pass in chick lit.</p>
<p>Olivia Joules and the Overactive imagination certainly qualifies as chick lit - which is a great thing - but instead of holding the protagonist down in a perpetual pattern of Humorously Identifiable Foibles, Helen Fielding brings the entire genre to a hilariously, wonderfully empowering place.</p>
<p>But I’m not sharing this here because I want to point everyone to a great book or a great author. I’m sharing it because the protagonist has a list of rules she lives by, and I loved them. #2 is a realization that has helped me a lot since I came to it myself in about junior high school; #10 is a lesson I’ve only learned over the past year, which I’m still working on. In the book, she reviews these rules in stressful situations and finds that one or two of them tend to jump out at her, different ones at different times, and those tend to be the ones they need (what people in 12-step programs would think of as a higher power kind of thing). Which ones jump out at you?</p>
<p>(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=30">Rules for Living....</a>)</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This disease kills.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/disease-kills" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/disease-kills</id>
    <published>2008-02-28T16:50:18-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-28T16:50:18-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="addiction" />
    <category term="alcoholism" />
    <category term="amy winehouse" />
    <category term="death" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="heath ledger" />
    <category term="recovery" />
    <category term="Pop Culture" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Guestblogging by Annie Gowan)</p>
<p>I didn’t believe my Esteemed Colleague when she said Heath Ledger was dead. In fact, my exact response was, “No, he’s not.”</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Guestblogging by Annie Gowan)</p>
<p>I didn’t believe my Esteemed Colleague when she said Heath Ledger was dead. In fact, my exact response was, “No, he’s not.”</p>
<p>He died the day before the fifth anniversary of my last drink. He was nearly the same age as me. And while I feel lots of things about his passing– which is to say I project a lot of things onto his death– I don’t pretend that I knew Heath Ledger or that I know his story. I know as much as anyone who reads Internet: he was found unconscious, on January 22nd, apparently having taken a mix of legal, prescription drugs. He never regained consciousness. He had been having trouble sleeping, hence the pills. He had apparently not ingested the pills with the intent of killing himself.</p>
<p>My second response to the news of his death: this disease kills.</p>
<p>Less than a year before I stopped using, I took an overdose of prescription medication and then, through the grace of my Higher Power, in a moment of clarity, called 911 on myself. The EMTs came, and– this is a testament to the insanity of my disease– I flirted with one, right after he fed me charcoal to absorb the poison. The driver had the sirens going, and the EMT in the back of the ambulance told me that if I had started by swallowing the other prescription first, I might’ve died. Instead, they were rushing me to the ER. This was my most serious suicide attempt, but it was my third. It was to be my sixth stay in a psych hospital. My life was so insane that I could not even recognize that it was so. I was ashamed of myself, yes, but I didn’t recognize my drama or my self-absorption. I had my crazy-meter calibrated to: rushed to hospital = amusing! As far as I was concerned, I was only hurting myself, with the side benefit of getting taken care of by people (in the ambulance, in the hospital, and sometimes when I was released.)</p>
<p>My understanding of my life was thus: I was sick and depressed and anxious and crazy. I had to take pills in order to function at all– never really examining whether repeated suicide attempts counted as “functioning.” And as for my drinking, I like this quote on the subject: “Well, you’d drink too, if you had my life!” I was doing the best that I could, considering.</p>
<p>Considering what, exactly? Well, here’s my present understanding of my life back then: I was using my prescription medications in the same way that I was using alcohol, which was the same way I was using suicide attempts, which was the same way I was using “crazy.” It’s all one disease. I was abused as a child and teenager by people who were likely in the same disease I am in, who didn’t have the coping skills, who didn’t have recovery, who were still “out there.” My response to the abuse was to GET AWAY the best I could, through medication, through alcohol, through destructive relationships, food, hospitalization, any way that I could. And my addictions neatly doubled as sources of further trauma, meaning that I attempted to use the addictions to escape the trauma they themselves were causing! (How’s that for “hair of the dog!”)</p>
<p>(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=21">More...</a>)</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Swimsuit Theory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/swimsuit-theory" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/swimsuit-theory</id>
    <published>2008-02-25T15:15:24-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-25T15:15:24-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Life" />
    <category term="Mommy &amp; Family" />
    <category term="Sex &amp; Relationships" />
    <category term="Healthy Mind" />
    <category term="child sexual abuse" />
    <category term="children" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="incest" />
    <category term="parenting" />
    <category term="sexual abuse" />
    <category term="sexual assault" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The “swimsuit theory” is one of the most common ideas about how to approach children about sexual abuse. The idea is that if we tell them not to let anyone touch their “swimsuit areas” - the areas of their body that would be covered by a swimsuit - or if we tell them to tell someone if they are touched there - sexual abuse will magically end forever.</p>
<p>It’s a wacky little idea. It demonstrates a very common lack of understanding of the effects and causes of sexual abuse. It also demonstrates one of the effects of abuse: a disconnection between cause and effect. Telling children to tell on abusers doesn’t end abuse, and material that suggests this rarely (if ever) says what to do when the children tell. If children get support in healing the effects of the abuse, they will not go on to abuse others… but it seems harsh, abusive, and downright impractical to say “we plan to end the cycle of abuse by waiting until our children are abused and then helping them heal the resulting psychological issues.”</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The “swimsuit theory” is one of the most common ideas about how to approach children about sexual abuse. The idea is that if we tell them not to let anyone touch their “swimsuit areas” - the areas of their body that would be covered by a swimsuit - or if we tell them to tell someone if they are touched there - sexual abuse will magically end forever.</p>
<p>It’s a wacky little idea. It demonstrates a very common lack of understanding of the effects and causes of sexual abuse. It also demonstrates one of the effects of abuse: a disconnection between cause and effect. Telling children to tell on abusers doesn’t end abuse, and material that suggests this rarely (if ever) says what to do when the children tell. If children get support in healing the effects of the abuse, they will not go on to abuse others… but it seems harsh, abusive, and downright impractical to say “we plan to end the cycle of abuse by waiting until our children are abused and then helping them heal the resulting psychological issues.”</p>
<p>Of course, this begs the question “How can we talk to children about sexual abuse in a way that is helpful to them?” Let’s start out by looking at the most common ideas that people have about discussing sexual abuse with children:</p>
<p>1. That children who have been abused go through five stages. In 1983, Dr. Rolland Summitt suggested that these stages include  secrecy, helplessness, entrapment, disclosure and retraction. Others use a different sequence: denial, reluctance, gradual disclosure, recantation and reaffirmation.</p>
<p>2. That therapists therefore need to ask them lots of times, educate themselves about the signs of child abuse and the ways children can express it in different stages.</p>
<p>3. That asking children repeatedly whether they have been sexually abused can lead to “accidentally convincing” children they have been sexually abused, misinterpreting their responses for a “false positive” of sexual abuse, or “implanting false memories” of sexual abuse.</p>
<ul>* That there are no such things as “false memories” or “accidentally” thinking things have happened to us, although we can be mistaken about the details of memories. (There are also lots of great guidelines now for people in the legal system who need to talk to children about sexual abuse in nonthreatening and noninvasive ways.)</ul>
<p>4.  That telling children to tell their parents or a trusted adult if someone “touches them in a way that makes them feel funny,” or not to let anyone touch their “swimsuit area,” et cetera, will somehow prevent them from being sexually abused. Or that children should learn that some adults have “touching problems” and need to be “told on” even if it seems like an accident or a secret.</p>
<ul>* That in fact, these ideas tell the child that it’s their job to protect themselves from sexual abuse, and to help those who abuse them.<br />
    * That these ideas are useless because they overlook the fact that very few children are sexually abused by a stranger and most abuse occurs within the family<br />
    * That these ideas are useless because they overlook the fact that most children cannot tell someone about the abuse because they are too afraid, because the abuser threatens to hurt them or someone they love if they tell, because the abuser tells them no one will believe them, because they believe it is their own fault and that they will “get in trouble” if they tell, because they are too young, because they are already caught up in the cycle of fear and shame from other experiences of abuse, or because they do not feel trust for or safety with any adults because of the abuse.<br />
    * That many children find that when they do tell, or when adults find out on their own, about the abuse, the adults do not do anything - either because they do not believe it, do not want to believe it, or because they do not have any idea what to do.<br />
    * That calling sexual abuse “touching” is so general and vague as to confuse children, and can make it even more difficult for them to report sexual abuse.<br />
    * That telling children to say “No! My family doesn’t allow bad secrets!” may just result in them feeling more shame and guilt if they are sexually abused and too afraid to tell but know they are “supposed to.”<br />
    * That talking to a child in this way after they have been abused is particularly unhelpful....</ul>

<p>(<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=25">More....</a>)</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Forgiving our abusers: is it insane?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/forgiving-our-abusers-it-insane" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/forgiving-our-abusers-it-insane</id>
    <published>2008-02-19T13:32:27-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-19T14:33:49-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Mommy &amp; Family" />
    <category term="Religion &amp; Spirituality" />
    <category term="Sex &amp; Relationships" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="anger" />
    <category term="boundaries" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="family" />
    <category term="forgiveness" />
    <category term="forgiving" />
    <category term="incest" />
    <category term="parenting" />
    <category term="peace" />
    <category term="rage" />
    <category term="resentment" />
    <category term="sexual abuse" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The blog Zen Habits posted a list of tips for loving our enemies the other day. Actually, it was “loving thy enemy,” which prompted a little discussion in the comments about why it should be “thine” (apparently it’s the difference between “a” and “an”) and prompted me just now to realize what sometimes bothers me about that site: it’s generally phrased as “here’s what you should do,” not “here’s what I do.” The tips are things that the blogger has been doing, but they’re written out in a way that’s prescriptive, rather than descriptive.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The blog Zen Habits posted a list of tips for loving our enemies the other day. Actually, it was “loving thy enemy,” which prompted a little discussion in the comments about why it should be “thine” (apparently it’s the difference between “a” and “an”) and prompted me just now to realize what sometimes bothers me about that site: it’s generally phrased as “here’s what you should do,” not “here’s what I do.” The tips are things that the blogger has been doing, but they’re written out in a way that’s prescriptive, rather than descriptive.</p>
<p>It chafes me a little because I’m used to people speaking from their own experiences, because we rarely know what our audiences are already doing, whether what has worked for us will work for them, or whether they’re way ahead of us in some areas. And I think that writing that way cheats us out of sharing a lot of our own experiences. Writing from my own perspective gives me a chance to learn more and process more of them as I go, and to learn that just sharing my life can benefit others. And personally, it helps me get off of the codependent soapbox that I love so much, from which I think that I have to fix everyone’s problems, say everything perfectly, anticipate their objections and knock those out of the ballpark too, and just generally take everyone’s inventories and tell them what to do instead.</p>
<p>So, there were some interesting - and I think very common - objections to the idea of loving our enemies. One person insisted that resentment was good for us and that it’s a “poison that exfoliates our soul”, which didn’t make a lick of sense to me - although the idea of clinging to my resentments sure did. Another shared her experiences with an extremely abusive family, with a sister who is undergoing brain surgery as an eventual result of the addictions caused by that abuse, and with her own ongoing rage around these things. She said, “What if as a result of how you were raised their actions continue to torment you, your siblings as well as themselves?” and shared the pain of her ongoing anger “simmering below the surface” as it ate away at her. I wrote the following reply in comments and wanted to share it here.</p>
<p>My family was very abusive too. I think that most families are, although some of us might call it dysfunctional or crazy or some other word. It’s hard for a lot of people to say that people they loved, who loved them, were abusive; we often think that abuse is just this horrible thing where people hurt us intentionally. But I know from experience that abuse is just people repeating harmful patterns that they grew up with, often unintentionally and with no awareness.</p>
<p>My father’s mother is currently a right-wing fundamentalist of the Very Crazy variety, the kind of person who can’t hear other people’s experiences because her defenses have hardened so much over the years - a form of borderline personality disorder. I don’t know what religion she practiced when her children were young, but I can see that she has been part of abusive cults or cult-like groups for many years in the marks it has left on them. Some of her children never speak, some have strings of abusive relationships, some have fled the state and rarely return to their family of origin, some have no boundaries at all.</p>
<p>My father is a particular example of the lack of boundaries. The man has no concept of what a boundary is. Not one! He sexually abused me for many many years, from infancy on, and continued covert sexual abuse into my adult life. He and my mother both had tremendous anger issues and control issues from their own abusive childhoods, and - while they plainly loved me, and provided many good things for all us kids - could be extremely abusive and rageful around things like lying or low grades.</p>
<p>My father also ritually abused me. My foggiest memories of this involve what I think of as “straightforward” experiences of ritual abuse, the kind with animal torture and groups of people doing bad things and people messing with children’s heads in order to traumatize them further. It also involved helping or letting his mother essentially prostitute me out, and doing that himself with his friends or colleagues. Much of it translated as a kind of medical abuse, because much of it happened in his lab at UC Davis. (He no longer works there; he was eventually fired, even with tenure, for his decades of sexually harassing his female students. There are some victories!)</p>
<p>Funnily enough, for a long time I was much angrier at my mother. I could accept that I had been abused in all these ways by my father, but what really ate me up at first was the fear and shame and pain and rage of the everyday emotional abuse. When I was growing up, my father was my favorite parent because he was the one who could more easily express love and joy with us; my mother was emotionally suffocated both by her relationship with him and from her childhood, and I resented her rage. Plus, she was always around; my father’s much rarer presence seemed like a treat. (This dynamic often leaves children more vulnerable to sexual abuse, because they are so hungry for any kind of attention that the abuse can almost seem desirable - at the time.)</p>
<p>Now my mother is the only one I have a relationship with, because she is the one who was willing to respect the boundaries I learned to set with her. She has actually worked on her side of the street so that we could grow toward having a healthy relationship.</p>
<p>My father, by contrast…. Four years ago, after some months of working on some of these issues in various 12-step programs, I came to realize that it was not working for me to have any contact with him. It was extremely triggering for days or weeks beforehand and it left me open to more of his abuse. I told him that I needed to have no contact with him for a while, gave him some examples (at his request) of ways that he did not respect my boundaries in my adult life, told him that it was a matter of rebuilding trust, not just something where he could promise to stop and immediately have contact again, and asked him to let me be the one to tell him if I changed my mind. Hilariously - and this is one of the things I love about abusers, they are so clear about how abusive they are once we learn to recognize it - he immediately responded by contacting me to invite me out to brunch, and has spent the past four years repeatedly contacting me through mail, email, and the phone to try to get me to talk to him, whether by invitation or threat from him.</p>
<p>I don’t know if my siblings were sexually or ritually abused, although I strongly suspect it. (I also suspect that, like me, they would have repressed these experiences and might not know enough about what the effects of sexual or ritual abuse look like to discover it.) It’s not generally the case that an abuser can pick and choose who they act out on, although they might think it’s them and not their background of abuse that’s making the decisions. The effects of my parents’ abuse on me and my siblings, as far as it’s visible to me, includes: a lot of dissociation, to the point of none of us having had concrete memories of much of our pre-teen childhoods; serious control issues; a lot of silence, denial, and repressed emotions, particularly from my brother; addictive behaviors and/or partnerships with people who have addictions; rage and fear and shame. I spent many years acting out sexually, around food, around work, and generally living in a way that hurt me, in order to check out from and reenact the chaos of my childhood without really being aware of it.</p>
<p>All of which is to say that I understand the experience of being abused and having it ruin or threaten our adult lives, and I know how hard it is for people to get into recovery even to save their own lives. And I understand the experience of being enraged at the abusers for their original and continuing abuse, and feeling like there is no other reasonable reaction to it.</p>
<p>When I first started working 12-step programs, I heard people talk about forgiving their abusers, and I heard people react to that with fear and anger. There is even a pamphlet in <a href="http://siawso.org">Survivors of Incest Anonymous</a> called something like “Must We Forgive?” I was grateful for the boundaries that people learned in program, that let them express their fear and anger while understanding that it had nothing to do with the person who forgave their abusers.</p>
<p>At first I heard sayings about resentment, like that it was like swallowing poison and waiting for the rat to die, with a lot of detachment and skepticism. I didn’t understand what it would be like to forgive, but I knew that I wasn’t anywhere near that yet. It sometimes seemed to me that my forgiveness must necessarily be contingent upon them changing their behavior, begging my forgiveness, something like that. Something sweeping and dramatic and equal to the level of emotion that I felt, to the level of drama and pain that they had created. How could one tiny person (as I saw myself) forgive, or even want to forgive, such unimaginable and monstrous acts?</p>
<p>Eventually I came to the fourth step, which for me in part involved writing about alllllll of my resentments. All the things that pissed me off, everything I hated, all the stuff I raged about. And all my fears. And then, to look at my side of the street. Everyone who helped me, fortunately, was perfectly clear that we do not have a part in childhood abuse. We can never say “Well, sure he raped me, but I enjoyed it” or “Well, they may have screamed at me for hours, but I DID get bad grades.” In adulthood, we can say that our part in an abusive relationship might at least be that we had not yet left, but in childhood we did not even have that.</p>
<p>But a strange thing happened as I catalogued and explored these feelings. I had never before really given myself permission to feel angry. In my family, it wasn’t safe to feel sadness or fear - nobody expressed these things. There was no support for them. And I grew up with the subconscious fear that if I did feel my fear or my sadness, those feelings would overwhelm and drown me. We were allowed to feel happy, in fact we were supposed to. We were not supposed to feel anger, but it was at least modeled for us and we all expressed our anger in various ways much of the time, and were usually punished for it. Now, for the first time, I was giving myself permission to feel that anger - to write about every way anyone had “done me wrong,” without considering yet whether it was “justifiable” or whether I had a part in it or what I had done wrong myself. Just to be angry about the injustices and harms I had experienced, for once, to affirm to myself that I did not deserve this pain.</p>
<p>I went on, after many amazingly detailed pages of resentments, to write about the few fears I could then identify. I was afraid (ironically?) of writing about them, but I eventually did it. I found that rather than being plunged into terror, as I had feared, I felt liberated and enlightened by this writing. I learned a lot about what my fears meant to me and where they came from and what they affected in my life. And I learned that I did not have to keep carrying them.</p>
<p>More importantly, I realized that all of my anger came from fear. There was not a single resentment on that list that was not, somehow, the defensive face of fear at heart. I had just been clinging to anger because it felt safer than feeling afraid.</p>
<p>Even more importantly, I finally understood on a gut level why people in program were saying things like “My resentment is a threat to my sobriety.” Anger can be positive if we move through it and let it motivate us to set boundaries and understand new things about ourselves. But over the long term, this anger and rage and hatred and resentment - all essentially the same thing - were eating me up inside. (<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=20">More....</a>)</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>For Worse</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/worse" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/worse</id>
    <published>2008-01-20T18:35:13-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-20T18:46:45-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CadyM</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Life" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="Mommy &amp; Family" />
    <category term="Sex &amp; Relationships" />
    <category term="abuse" />
    <category term="binge eating" />
    <category term="codependency" />
    <category term="comics" />
    <category term="compulsive overeating" />
    <category term="effects of abuse" />
    <category term="emotional abuse" />
    <category term="facing abuse" />
    <category term="Food" />
    <category term="for better or for worse" />
    <category term="lynn johnston" />
    <category term="parenting" />
    <category term="workaholics" />
    <category term="workaholism" />
    <category term="Pop Culture" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's For Better Or For Worse strip is funny because it's so far removed from reality. It's not unusual for small children to draw all over the furniture. And it's not unusual for abused children to freak out when they mess up or break something because they know their parent's response will be so scary. What <em>isn't</em> going to happen is that a child who is old enough to analyze the situation and predict that his mother will freak out will go ahead and draw all over the couch and <em>then</em> get upset about it.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/michael.jpg" align="middle" /></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's For Better Or For Worse strip is funny because it's so far removed from reality. It's not unusual for small children to draw all over the furniture. And it's not unusual for abused children to freak out when they mess up or break something because they know their parent's response will be so scary. What <em>isn't</em> going to happen is that a child who is old enough to analyze the situation and predict that his mother will freak out will go ahead and draw all over the couch and <em>then</em> get upset about it.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/michael.jpg" align="middle" /></p>
<p align="left">Okay,  I can think of one possibility. Maybe Michael is multiple, and an even younger kid in his system came out and drew all over the sofa (I like to imagine this as an act of pure rage against their mother) and then this Michael found himself just holding the pens and the fear. But I'm pretty sure that's not what Lynn Johnston was going for.</p>
<p align="left">The funny thing, especially in the "flashback" strips of the past several months (which, apparently, are a combination of actual old strips and "fake" old For Better Or For Worses that Johnston is drawing as the strip winds down... so very, very slowly....) is that she draws them as if the kids are just acting crazy. She always has. I actually have a vintage strip which my parents cut out and put in my childhood photo album because it reminded them of me. In the strip, Liz is two or three and she is insisting that she wants to wear the RED hat. Her mother, for some reason, is absolutely insistent that Liz wear the white hat. So she makes up a whole elaborate story that goes on for panel after panel, all about a special magical bunny rabbit that gave up its tail to make Liz this hat. And in the last panel, she finally finishes, and Liz replies at the top of her lungs, "I WANT THE <em>RED</em> HAT!!!"</p>
<p align="left">It was in there because, like Liz, I was very clear about what I wanted, very stubborn, and at times very loud. And as an adult, I looked back at it and thought, "Why the hell couldn't Liz wear the red hat?" I always knew there was a second story running underneath it, about adults making exasperated jokes at the expense of their frustrating children. As an adult, I can see that there's a second and third story running underneath the whole "FOOBiverse." Lynn Johnston clearly thinks that the joke lies in that secondary subtext. Oh, wacky Liz, insisting on wearing the stupid red hat when her poor mother made up that clever story about a rabbit! Wacky Michael, drawing all over the new couch! How they try Elly's patience!</p>
<p align="left">The real story, the obvious and simple story that she misses every time, and which is being highlighted over and over as she revisits the strip's roots, is this one:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/prelude.jpg" align="middle" height="153" width="474" /></p>
<p><img src="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/notangry.jpg" height="229" width="546" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/no!!.jpg" title="Michael is tired and Elly screams her refusal to carry his toy airplane" alt="Michael is tired and Elly screams her refusal to carry his toy airplane" align="middle" height="338" width="355" /></p>
<p align="center"> <img src="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/growl.jpg" title="John smiles all through a hard day at work and then growls violently at Michael as soon as he gets home" alt="John smiles all through a hard day at work and then growls violently at Michael as soon as he gets home" align="middle" height="167" width="358" /></p>
<p align="center">And, my favorite, in its entirety: (<a href="http://eft.fabglitter.org/blog/?p=15">More....</a>)</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
