<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>whattamisaid's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/whattamisaid"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/21922/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.blogher.com/blog/21922/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-12-28T20:23:05-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Why can&#039;t our first lady have sex with Mick Jagger?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/why-cant-our-first-lady-have-sex-mick-jagger" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/why-cant-our-first-lady-have-sex-mick-jagger</id>
    <published>2008-08-12T19:22:26-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-12T19:22:26-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Politics &amp; News" />
    <category term="Sex &amp; Relationships" />
    <category term="affair" />
    <category term="John Edwards" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <category term="Rielle Hunter" />
    <category term="sexual double standard" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Cossposted from What Tami Said</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Cossposted from What Tami Said</p>
<p>John Edwards is getting a lashing in the media now, but dollars to doughnuts this will all be forgotten eventually. America subconsciously believes that infidelity is something powerful men just do...hell, we think it's just something MEN just do, sort of like shaving. Just like JFK and MLK and lesser lights like John McCain and Newt Gingrich, we'll forgive Edwards his sexual peccadillos. He'll be back on the political scene one day--trust me. Of course, if the shamed adulterer had been Hillary Clinton or Barbara Boxer or Elizabeth Dole or Laura Bush, me thinks we'd have a different view. Respectable women are not sexual, much less unfaithful. Folks from the streets of Manhattan to the fields of the Bible Belt would pillory a woman who snuck a little sumthin' sumthin' in the Oval Office or was caught creeping on the campaign trail.</p>
<p>Considering the Edwards brouhaha, it was with some amusement that I read Vanity Fair's recent article on Carla Bruni, former model, folk/pop singer, lover of rock lions Mick Jagger and Eric Clapton, and, by the way, wife of French president Nicolas Sarkozy. Madame Sarkozy once famously said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I'm monogamous from time to time, but I prefer <a title="Polygamy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">polygamy</a> and <a title="Polyandry" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">polyandry</a>?
</p></blockquote>
<p>During a state visit to England earlier this year, scandal erupted around the Sarkozys when nude photos taken of Bruni in 1993 surfaced at a Christie's auction. The tasteful black-and-whites fetched $91,000. The photographer who took the pics said ominously, "I have other nude photographs of Carla far more explicit, but I would never sell them."</p>
<p>The Bruni-Sarkozys are nothing if not very...<em>French</em>. Karl Lagerfeld is quoted in the Vanity Fair piece as saying of the pair, "They are hunters who met--predators. It's a good thing. He has seduced many women and she was a kind of seductress. When two like this meet, it can be good." President Sarkozy met the previous Madame Sarkozy, Cecelia, when both were married, and both had very public affairs after he took office. Bruni has one son from a previous relationship with a young man she met while dating his father. Vive le France!</p>
<p>Now, I'm not endorsing all this slap and tickle and cheating, but I find it interesting that even though the French are ambivalent about the man they call President Bling-Bling for his flashy ways, they seem to quite like their first lady--adventurous sexual past and all. Meanwhile, back among the amber waves of grain, we prefer our first ladies (and other ladies) mute, maternal and fixed with an adoring gaze. We prefer all "good girls" be non-sexual, no matter how close they are to the halls of power. Come to think of it, perhaps that's why Michelle Obama catches such hell. I mean besides the blackness, out-spokenness, independence and intelligence, she's also beautiful and sexy-as-hell in a strong way. You get the feeling from watching Obama and her husband that this is one first couple who will definitely be "doing it" in the White House. Can't say the same for the McCains. Despite the illicit start to their marriage, I can't imagine enjoying fireworks in the boudoir with a man who squirms like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2y8dYwq01g" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this</a> at the mention of birth control.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.blogger.com/">Friday's post </a>on What Tami Said I mentioned the radio commenter who said of John Edwards: "I used to think John Edwards was 'soft,' but this makes me think he is a regular guy. I like him now." So, sexuality run amok is the essence of maleness? The reality that Americans hate to hear is that women have the same carnal desires as men. We have other desires...yes. We have more self control...maybe...sometimes. But women like sex, too. But for us, sexuality is something to be forgiven not celebrated.</p>
<p>I think that very soon we will see a female leader of the United States. But I tell you we will not achieve true equality until a woman can not only park her pumps in the Oval Office, but also get her freak on with a consenting young intern and have the forgiveness and admiration of the American electorate.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>From a married lady to young, single sisters</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/married-lady-young-single-sisters" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/married-lady-young-single-sisters</id>
    <published>2008-07-11T06:56:02-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-11T06:56:54-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Life" />
    <category term="Sex &amp; Relationships" />
    <category term="Single" />
    <category term="dating" />
    <category term="marriage" />
    <category term="relationships" />
    <category term="single women" />
    <category term="women" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Crosspost from <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" target="_blank">What Tami Said</a></p>
<p>It's funny the perspective that time gives. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Crosspost from <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" target="_blank">What Tami Said</a></p>
<p>It's funny the perspective that time gives. </p>
<p>Occasionally I see a young sister made crazy by society's romantic expectations and I want to reach down from my lofty perch of 30+ years of life experience, grab her and say, &quot;It will all work out...truly it will.&quot; I think of my early 20-something self, so worried about being paired up with someone. I admit that in some romantic entanglements back then, I forgave when I shouldn't have, overlooked what should have been obvious, gave up things that ought to have been sacred and a few times tried to make Mr. Right out of Mr. Wrong for Me.</p>
<p>I graduated from college and started my &quot;real life&quot; with big plans. I never wanted to marry young, nor did I want to have children. I wanted to join the Peace Corps., work at a newspaper, live in a big city, have a fancy job in gleaming high-rise, live on the East Coast, live in Europe, see the United States, see the world...I did several of those things, but part of young me was a little scared that after all the fun, I wouldn't find someone to settle down with. Now, before I lose my womanist bonafides, let me make it plain: I never believed that a woman <em>needs </em>a significant other to live a full life, I simply wanted a partner to come with me on life's journey. And most women reading this know that the pressure for a heterosexual woman to marry grows stronger as she approaches the 30-year mark. Friends start coupling and choosing china patterns. Questions are asked...Are you dating anybody?...Don't you want to get married?...You'd better hurry up...Don't you want to have kids? Then folks get to throwing around dire statistics about black women and marriage. It can make a girl feel a little crazy...a little desperate. It can make a girl do stupid things. </p>
<p>Over time, one becomes more mature in her singleness--at least I think I did. At around 29, I realized that, while I hoped to find the right man with which to share my life, I would have a damned good life no matter what. And frankly, there were too many rewarding things I could do alone or with friends for me waste even an hour of time on a dinner date with an aggravating knuckehead. I became pickier (Lately, I've heard a lot of folks trying to tell black women they don't have a right to high standards. <em>Every</em> self-respecting person ought to have high standards about whom they are intimate with. Don't let anyone tell you different.). I spent more time alone. I discovered who I am. I explored and experimented with life. </p>
<p>So, this weekend, I watched this young sister I know flail around in a relationship, trying unsuccessfully to live her life around a prospective husband's, trying to force something that doesn't fit. She is an acquaintance. I don't know her well enough to be all up in her business. And I'm not one to go around making pronouncements and dispensing advice (Unless you read my blog...hee.) But I just wanted to tell her to relax. I wanted to quote my favorite part of that song from Baz Luhrman's Romeo and Juliet, &quot;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTJ7AzBIJoI&amp;feature=related">Everybody's Free (To Wear Sunscreen)</a>&quot; (Ya'll know I have quirky musical tastes.):</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe you'll marry, maybe you won'tMaybe you'll have children, maybe you won'tMaybe you'll divorce at 40 Maybe you'll dance the funky chicken on your 75th wedding anniversaryWhatever you do, don't congratulate yourself too much or berate yourself eitherYour choices are half chance, so are everybody elses. </p></blockquote>
<p>By chance, <a href="http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2008/02/my-love-story.html">I did get married</a> at 31. I have a wonderful husband who suits me in all my eccentricity. I love him very much--with all my heart. We will celebrate our seventh anniversary next week. I enjoy being married. I grew up with married parents and married grandparents. I support marriage for everyone that wants it (Cause not everyone does or should want it.). And I regret that it sometimes seems that the black community has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/25/AR2006032500029.html">dispensed with the idea of healthy marriage</a>. But...if I had never met my sweetie, I think I would have been okay...better than okay...great. I would have tried to be great anyway (It's easy to say you would have been okay not getting the thing you wanted after you already have the thing.). I'm sure I would have been lonely sometimes...stressed sometimes...worn down sometimes...cash strapped sometimes...depressed sometimes, but marriage does not protect you from any of that. Marriage does not make a life and it doesn't make a woman. </p>
<p>I see too many young, black girls defining themselves through the gaze of young men. As they get older, little changes. In my circle, it is the diamond ring women are supposed to covet. In some other circles, it is some man's (or boy's) baby. But I think that's crap (Intellectually...emotionally, it is hard to unhook from these things). Men are judged as people separate from their romantic and familial entanglements. Women should be, too. </p>
<p>So, I have this to say to my single sisters (young and old): Be picky, but be fair; be adventurous; be YOU. Screw the folks who want to make you feel bad about not being hooked up. And if you're feeling down about your single status, hold on.</p>
<p>It's funny the perspective that time gives.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Our national sin: Roman not Paris</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/our-national-sin-roman-not-paris" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/our-national-sin-roman-not-paris</id>
    <published>2008-05-30T10:25:55-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-30T10:25:55-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Feminism &amp; Gender" />
    <category term="celebrity" />
    <category term="child abuse" />
    <category term="fame" />
    <category term="r. kelly" />
    <category term="roman polanski" />
    <category term="roman polanski: wanted and desired" />
    <category term="sexual abuse" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Remember back before the hype and noise of the 2008 presidential campaign. The media, not yet consumed with &quot;bittergate&quot; or &quot;Bosniagate,&quot; was gnashing its teeth about our society's seeming reckless and unreasoned adoration for celebrity, above all else. The unholy poster girl of our addled minds was supposed to be Paris Hilton. What shallow and dull-witted society would worship a pantyless, dull-eyed heiress with no discernible talent?</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Remember back before the hype and noise of the 2008 presidential campaign. The media, not yet consumed with &quot;bittergate&quot; or &quot;Bosniagate,&quot; was gnashing its teeth about our society's seeming reckless and unreasoned adoration for celebrity, above all else. The unholy poster girl of our addled minds was supposed to be Paris Hilton. What shallow and dull-witted society would worship a pantyless, dull-eyed heiress with no discernible talent? With Paris, Britney and Lindsay on the loose, there was much tsk, tsking. But it occurs to me, after reading &quot;<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/138382">Hollywood's Most Beloved Fugitive</a>,&quot; a film review in this week's <em>Newsweek</em>, that the sin of our celebrity obsession has little to do with celebrity twinkies--male or female. The sin of our celebrity obsession is that we moralizing Americans somehow find a way to absolve people with fame and fortune of truly monstrous behavior. And that is never more true than in the case of crimes against women and girls. </p>
<p>In recent years, O.J. Simpson, Robert Blake and Phil Spector--though evidence and reason seemed to be stacked against them--were all acquitted of murdering women with whom they had relationships. (Correction: Spector received a hung jury last year and further legal proceedings will likely take place.) But the <em>Newsweek </em>article reviews a documentary about an older incident: In 1977, acclaimed director Roman Polanski (<em>Chinatown</em>, <em>Rosemary's Baby</em>, <em>Tess</em>) took topless photos of a 13-year-old girl, gave her champagne and Quaaludes, and had sex with her. He was arrested and pleaded guilty to &quot;unlawful intercourse,&quot; but fled the country before sentencing. He has never returned, but he has continued to work. In 2002, he won a directing Oscar for <em>The Pianist</em>. At the Oscar ceremony, the absent director was given a standing ovation. </p>
<p>The <em>Newsweek </em>article, written by Cathleen McGuigan, claims that a new documentary about Polanski, <em>Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired</em>, &quot;paints a far more complex picture of what happened than most of us know.&quot; I am unclear what complexity makes it less than horrendous to take naked photos of a child, give the child liquor and drugs, and have sex with the child. Perhaps it is, as the article offers, that though Polanski's victim told police their encounter was not consensual, the girl admitted &quot;...she'd been drunk before. And that she'd had sex before,&quot; as if any of that matters. </p>
<p>The review, though it does not shy from the details of the rape case (Curiously, the article never uses the word &quot;rape&quot; to refer to the then-44-year-old man's sexual encounter with a likely seventh-grader.), reads as sympathetic to Polanski. If the writer is indeed sympatheic to the director, she is not alone. I mentioned that Polanski drew wild applause from Hollywood's brightest stars on the occasion of his Academy Award win. (The same stars booed another director: Michael Moore, who at the same ceremony spoke out against President George Bush and militarism. Read Jennifer Pozner's <a href="http://www.wimnonline.org/articles/hollywood.html">take</a> on the evening.) </p>
<p>It seems that in the eyes of some, Roman Polanski is as much a victim as <em>his </em>victim. He initially fled the States fearing that a fame-hungry judge would give him more than the probation (Yes--probation.) that was recommended. Now, some feel the director has been exiled too long. In an <a href="http://www.zoom-in.com/sundance/spotlights/meet_the_artists_marina_zenovich_director_of_roman_polanski_wanted_and_desired">interview</a>, documentary director Marina Zenovich says that in America we don't make people pay forever for their crimes. Except Roman Polanski has never paid for his crime. His &quot;punishment,&quot; if you can call living in France some sort of punishment, was self-imposed. Criminals don't get to choose how they are punished. </p>
<p>The <em>Newsweek </em>article reports that the Polanski documentary explores whether you can separate an artist's personal life from his art. Apparently we, the American public, cannot. Polanski isn't the only vaunted abuser of girls on the loose. This month, after a six-year delay, the trial of R&amp;B singer R. Kelly got underway in Chicago. Kelly faces seven counts of videotaping a sexual act with a minor, and seven counts of producing child pornography. The charges stem from a video that appears to show Kelly and a 14-year-old girl. At one point in the video, the man who appears to be Kelly, urinates on the female subject. A bootleg copy of the video is widely available on the Internet and the black market. Allegations of relationships with underage girls have long swirled around Kelly, who also faced similar legal charges in Florida, though they were dropped. Despite what is, at best, reckless and unethical behavior toward young girls, R. Kelly stills enjoys airplay on urban radio, accolades like an Image Award from the NAACP, and the support of a host of fans, including female ones, like the 53-year-old woman who posted this message to the artist's page on blackplanet.com: </p>
<blockquote><p>Hi my name is Maxine,I love R,kelley and even thou he had that mishap he is still my baby and we all make mistakesso i will continue to buy hi music and support him no matter what..Keep your head up R .and God will fight your battle and he is the only judge so don,t worry you will come out with the victory. </p></blockquote>
<p>What makes it okay for rich and successful men to sexually abuse children? That is undoubtably what happened in Polanski's case, and if evidence and reason are any indication, R. Kelly shares Polanski's predilections. I wonder if Maxine (above) found video that appeared to show her neighbor, Joe Regular, urinating on a child, would he &quot;still be her baby.&quot; Are we only mad at the men who lead the Texas polygamist group now in the news because they don't make music or movies? It seems we're only disgusted by everyday abusers, not the famous kind. (Actually, in the case of black girls, America is not even that concerned about everyday abuse. Just read <a href="http://whataboutourdaughters.blogspot.com/">What About Our Daughters </a>on the regular, if you don't believe me.) </p>
<p>But especially, it seems that a man who is skilled with a movie camera, or who can write a catchy R&amp;B tune, or run a football, or invent a &quot;wall of sound&quot; that makes pop songs into classics, or star in a 70s cop show, has license to treat women any way he wishes. </p>
<p>That's how much the citizens of this country love fame. THAT is the sin of our celebrity obsession.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Five reasons to be bitter</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/five-reasons-be-bitter" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/five-reasons-be-bitter</id>
    <published>2008-04-18T16:40:50-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-18T21:25:16-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Politics &amp; News" />
    <category term="2008 presidential election" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <category term="bitter" />
    <category term="Election 2008" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Cross-posted from the blog <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">What Tami Said</a></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Cross-posted from the blog <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">What Tami Said</a></p>
<p>I am a 38-year-old, middle-class, black woman. And I am bitter.</p>
<p><b>I am bitter because I am not doing better than my parents did.</b> That is the way it is supposed to work, isn’t it? Each generation is supposed to advance on the achievements of the last. My mother is the product of a working-class family; my father’s parents were farmers. My grandparents did not go to college, but my parents did. They earned bachelors and masters degrees. They became educators and they raised their children in suburban comfort. I did the right things, I think. I went to college and I have a good job, but my hold on middle classness seems ever more tenuous—a constant struggle, a balancing act. I commute more than 40 miles each day and gas is inching toward $4/gallon. The cost of groceries is rising. My husband and I have a heavy tax burden. Our energy bill is outrageous. The car—our only car—needs new rear tires. And my stepson wants to play football with all the associated fees. I don’t need to keep up with the Joneses. I don’t need a big-screen, high-def TV. I only want comfort and security for my family. But how the hell do you do that these days? Maybe it has never been easy. But I’m hearing an awful lot of people say that it has never felt so difficult to do well.</p>
<p><b>I am bitter because my hometown looks like a wasteland.</b> I grew up in the Indiana rust belt—“the region” as people here call it, more a part of the Chicago area than the more-rural rest of the Hoosier state. Stand on the beach in my old neighborhood, look over Lake Michigan and you can see a line of steel mills belching smoke into the air. For a long time, those pollution-heaving stacks meant prosperity for men (and women) like my grandfather, who worked at Inland Steel for decades and was able to own a smart little bungalow and send four children to college. All that changed in the 1980s with the recession and massive layoffs by steel companies. Somehow the benefits of Reagan’s grand economic plan never trickled down to the folks in my hometown. The city never recovered and remains mired in high unemployment and crime, and low development. A couple weeks ago, while visiting my parents, I took a wrong turn through a detour and ended up on Broadway—a once-vibrant main street. I confess, though I lived in that city for more than 20 years, for a moment I did not recognize my surroundings. I rode past rows of burned-out, leveled buildings, and boarded up businesses. Shuffling people loitered on the streets like zombies. It was not the city I once knew.</p>
<p><b>I am bitter because the fourth estate is failing me.</b> As I watched the news Monday morning while getting dressed for work, one of my local news stations gleefully reported on Britney Spears’ weekend fender bender, and I wondered why. Why waste time on celebrity news when oil prices are soaring? Why waste time on celebrity news when our country is in recession? Why waste time on celebrity news when the Bush administration has nine more months to inflame the international community, line the pockets of Texas cronies, and decimate the Constitution and our rights? Why waste time on celebrity news when media consolidation threatens to stifle all but a few voices? Why waste time on celebrity news when Darfur is still in crisis? I am increasingly disappointed by a mainstream media that seems more devoted to sensation than information, and that routinely confuses opinion with fact. I am sick to death of smirking, shouting pseudo-anchors like Joe Scarborough, Chris Matthews and Dan Abrams. I am a media junkie. I stay informed by watching TV news, listening to alternative talk radio, and reading a host of mainstream and alternative books, newspapers, magazines, Web sites and blogs. But too many people don’t have time to sift through the crap, and thus, we are an uninformed electorate. Thank you free press!</p>
<p><b>I am bitter because society has not advanced as far as I thought.</b> It seems I have been naïve. I thought most of us—at least we progressives—were on the same page regarding sexism and racism. The 2008 presidential campaign has shown me that I have been wrong. I believe there are many reasons not to like Hillary Clinton. Her laugh, her voice, her pantsuits and her husband’s infidelity shouldn’t be among them. Misogynist name calling has no place in a reasoned discussion about candidates. As a feminist, I am angry that thinly-veiled sexism can be passed off as political discourse. At the same time, I feel increasingly marginalized by my white sisters who challenge my feminist bonafides for not supporting Clinton, who overlook or excuse her campaign’s deft use of racism, and who claim black skin is a mark of privilege in American society. And I am increasingly saddened by the recognition that a lot of the mainstream believes racism is a thing of the distant past, and those of us who complain about it are simply ungrateful, whiners and radicals.</p>
<p><b>I am bitter because I live in an age of anti-intellectualism.</b> Increasingly, we are a culture that will not watch the whole thing if we can find a clip on You Tube. We will not read if we can catch the highlights on television. We will not consider informed counsel if we can trust our guts. We dismiss political candidates without bothering to so much as peruse their Web sites or read their position papers. We swallow talking points whole. We pursue only what confirms our existing world view. We distrust the elite and the cerebral. We are too frequently loud, ignorant and outraged—our emotions led by the latest media-inflamed scandal. And our rantings are given voice on talk radio, podcasts and…well…blogs. It is frightening. For, as Al Gore says in his book The Assault on Reason, “Never has there been a worse time for us to lose the capacity to face the reality of our long-term challenges, from national security to the economy, from issues of health and social welfare to the environment…We have precious little time to waste.”</p>
<p>I don’t think Barack Obama was referring to people like me last week in San Francisco. It is a privilege to be able to ruminate online about my bitterness. As I post this essay, I have a job, a roof over my head and healthcare. There are many, many folks worse off than I. Still, I am bitter. But what I cling to is the hope that this year, when Americans have the opportunity to change things, when we have a chance to put the corporatocracy in its place, when we have a chance to move toward a country that works for the majority of its citizens not just a few, when we have a chance to see each other as people and to come together for the greater good, this time…this time…we will do something different. We will look beyond media-created controversy, dirty politics, sexism, racism and fear mongering. We will reject anti-intellectualism and we will be informed. We will stand up and we will demand better from our government representatives, from our media and from ourselves.</p>
<p>Hope and change are not empty words. They mean something. They are the cure for the bitterness that ails people like me.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>My black history: Little gifts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/my-black-history-little-gifts" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/my-black-history-little-gifts</id>
    <published>2008-04-09T12:04:30-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-09T12:04:30-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Life" />
    <category term="black history" />
    <category term="family history" />
    <category term="Genealogy" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Cross-posted from </em><a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com"><em>What Tami Said</em></a><em> </em></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><em>Cross-posted from </em><a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com"><em>What Tami Said</em></a><em> </em></p>
<p>This is <a href="http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-black-history-more-little-gifts.html" target="_blank">Effie</a>. She is my great-great-great-grandmother.<img src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lGC93zZQvLU/R_ym16nVceI/AAAAAAAAAIU/B65oI3vxuz4/s1600-h/Effie.jpg" border="0" alt="Effie" width="1" height="1" align="top" /></p>
<p>Researching family history can sometimes be tedious. You can go along for months doing admin stuff, making sure historical documents are properly filed, adding newfound birth or death dates for distant aunts and uncles, trying to dig past some genealogical dead end to no avail; and then you’ll receive some little gift: an e-mail from a long-lost cousin with a wealth of new information about the family tree, an off-hand comment from a relative that sheds light on a research mystery, a great-great-grandparent finally uncovered in a census under a misspelled name.</p>
<p>Recently, while cleaning out a drawer, my mother unearthed a handout from a family reunion. Last weekend she brought it to me. It’s just a thin, pamphlet of photocopied paper with “Tillotson Family Reunion, 1994, Oakland, California” printed on the front in a dated sans serif font. But, oh the information in those few pages! It is the perfect little gift.</p>
<p>The pamphlet confirms most of the relationships and important dates regarding my maternal grandmother’s family that I’ve been painstakingly piecing together over the past year. But the best part is a one-page collage of photographs of my Tillotson ancestors. I admit that I am obsessed with this piece of paper. I’ve been carrying it with me, looking at it from time to time, since Sunday. I sort of think that if I let go of it, it will disappear. I've been scanning the pictures thinking the faces might seem familiar--like family. I've been looking for the origins of the &quot;Tillotson eyes&quot; that many of my relatives and I have (small with an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicanthal_fold">epicanthal fold</a>). All those faces that I have been imagining as I go about researching my family story—they are real now and scattered about this piece of paper, some smiling, some in profile, some with spouses that I didn’t even know existed. In the center of it all is Effie—the family matriarch.</p>
<p>I don’t know Effie’s last name. I don’t know much about her at all. I often lament the way female ancestors become lost. In a time when women did not own land, did not get draft cards or go to war, and married early and gave away their surnames, it is sometimes hard to find documentation of their existence. Even family recollections often exclude women, focusing instead on patriarchs.</p>
<p>Until this weekend, I wasn’t even sure that Effie was named “Effie.” A relative still living in Christian County, Kentucky, where the Tillotson family is from, recalled her as “Essie or Effie or something like that.” I knew that Effie had at least one child, Emmitt, my great-great-grandfather, born in 1860. Curiously, Emmitt’s death certificate lists both his parents as “unknown.”</p>
<p>Family lore says Effie was Native American—Cherokee. I think I see a Native American face in the photo, maybe. If Effie was indeed an Indian, it adds a new wrinkle to the family story. She gave birth to an at least half-black child five years before Emancipation. Was Emmitt’s father a slave—maybe one of the Africans enslaved by the Cherokee Nation—or did he live among the tribe? Was Effie enslaved? Was Emmitt?</p>
<p>And where did the Tillotson name come from? I don’t remember my grandmother telling me much about her family, but one story has stuck in my head for years. We were in the family room of the house where I grew up. My grandmother was sitting on the couch and I was sprawled on the floor watching television. (I tell you, I remember this story and my grandmother telling it strangely well.) And my grandmother, apropos of nothing I can remember now, told me that one of our male ancestors (presumably a slave) once ran away from a farm with a particularly nasty overseer, who was prone to use the whip with little provocation. My ancestor allegedly found shelter at the home of a kind white woman, who gave him work and treated him well. This woman’s last name was Tillotson. And it was this name that my ancestor took as his own. I can’t help thinking that this story, the only detailed one my grandmother ever told me about her family or at least the only one that I remember, holds some key to Effie and her son Emmitt’s story. Is the ancestor who took the Tillotson name perhaps Effie’s husband? Emmitt’s father?</p>
<p>There is so much that I don’t know about Effie. But I have <a href="http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-black-history-more-little-gifts.html" target="_blank">this photograph</a> and now I know her face—another little gift. </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dear America: What this black woman would like you to know about race</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/dear-america-what-black-woman-would-you-know-about-race" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/dear-america-what-black-woman-would-you-know-about-race</id>
    <published>2008-04-02T16:05:44-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-02T16:05:44-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="2008 presidential election" />
    <category term="race" />
    <category term="racism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong><em>Originally posted at the blog <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" target="_blank">What Tami Said</a></em></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong><em>Originally posted at the blog <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" target="_blank">What Tami Said</a></em></p>
<p><strong>It is normal to be prejudiced.</strong></p>
<p></p>...and in a country like America that was born and raised on the notion of white supremacy (See manifest destiny, slavery, Jim Crow, internment of Japanese citizens...), it is normal to be prejudiced against black people. So ingrained is the idea that white culture is right, or at least the benchmark for all other cultures, that even most black Americans devalue blackness (See &quot;<a href="http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2008/03/update-womens-history-month-blog.html">the doll test</a>&quot; as one example. See black hack comedians and their &quot;black people are always late, broke, triflin'...&quot; schtick as another.) So white America, modern prejudice is not all your fault.
<p>Now that I have said that, now that I have absolved you of personal guilt, can we have the conversation about race that everyone keeps referring to? I mean a REAL conversation, not the one that has played out over the last month on talk radio and cable news and political blogs and Web sites, where black people attempt to shed some light on the ways race affects our daily lives and white people get defensive and angry and insist that race is no longer an issue.</p>
<p>Witness the reaction to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's recent statements about race.</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Black Americans were a founding population,&quot; Rice said. &quot;Africans and Europeans came here and founded this country together — Europeans by choice and Africans in chains. That's not a very pretty reality of our founding.&quot;</p>
<p>As a result, Miss Rice told editors and reporters at The Washington Times,<br />&quot;descendants of slaves did not get much of a head start, and I think you continue to see some of the effects of that.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;That particular birth defect makes it hard for us to confront it, hard for us to talk about it, and hard for us to realize that it has continuing relevance for who we are today,&quot; she said. <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080328/FOREIGN/746301768/1001"><strong>SOURCE</strong></a></p></blockquote>
<p>What to me seemed like a reasoned statement that acknowledges the reality of our country's past and present, made Lou Dobbs clutch his pearls in horror.</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;There is no country on the face of the Earth as progressive, as racially and ethnically diverse as our own,&quot; Dobbs wailed. &quot;It's something we should be proud of.&quot; <strong><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/31/lou-dobbs-almost-calls-co_n_94301.html">SOURCE</a></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Why is the very mention of our country's racist past and its lingering prejudices anathema to some? Why does discussing racism so often result in defensive bravado? It's as if pointing out racial challenges negates the progress the country has made and condemns every member of the mainstream as an irredeemable racist. That is not the case.</p>
<p>If you are willing to listen, here are some other things that this black woman would like the mainstream to know about racism and the relationship between black and white Americans:</p>
<p><strong>Racism and prejudice aren't about white sheets and Jim Crow anymore.</strong> Black Americans know that. Only an idiot would claim that our nation has not made tremendous gains in racial equality.It is just that we know that racism and prejudice still exist, because we live with it every day. Unlike the naked racism faced by our grandparents and ancestors, the bias most of us face today is covert or institutionalized.</p>
<p>For those who listened to the Women's History Month <a href="http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2008/03/hear-come-together-live-discussion.html">panel discussion</a>, you may remember Shecodes, a black woman, sharing a story about a job interview with a Wall Street firm. The company was eager to recruit Shecodes after reviewing her resume and talking to her on the phone, but when she arrived for her interview, things changed. Shecodes waited nearly an hour before asking if the interview was going to happen. What followed was a discussion with a brusque interviewer who would not make eye contact and quickly dismissed her. Nearly every black professional I know can tell at least one story like this--a job interview where a potential employer is excited by stellar credentials and a race-neutral name and voice, but immediately turned off at the sight of a black candidate.</p>
<p>Now Shecodes eventually got a job on Wall Street and indeed ended up having the very office once occupied by her rude interviewer. Did she triumph? Yes! Is this occurrence as bad as being held in bondage or legally denied the vote? Maybe not. But it is still racism.</p>
<p>Modern racism is like a dull ache:</p>
<p>Being able to only rise so high in the company despite excellent credentials and performance ...a dull ache.</p>
<p>Having your natural kinky hair stared at and pawed by strangers...a dull ache.</p>
<p>Being followed around department stores by security officers...a dull ache.</p>
<p>Worrying about young male loved ones often stopped by police for &quot;driving while black&quot;...a dull ache.</p>
<p>Seeing how quick Americans were to believe erroneous tales of raping and pillaging among Hurricane Katrina victims at the Superdome...a dull ache.</p>
<p>Watching missing young white women and children garner national coverage while black women and children are ignored...a dull ache.</p>
<p>Living in the Midwest and knowing that there are still some towns that you dare not visit alone...a dull ache.</p>
<p>Wondering if the poor service and stares you received at that great new restaurant were based on your race...a dull ache.</p>
<p>A dull ache is far better than what my ancestors suffered (At 38, I am just one generation removed from Jim Crow.). I have only rarely been the victim of overt racism, but a dull ache is still depressing and stressful in its persistence. And covert racism keeps the playing field imbalanced just as overt racism does. I should also mention that I am the educated, middle class child of an educated, middle class family. For many black people, caught in a cycle of poverty, racism is less a dull ache than chronic torment.</p>
<p>Black people don't expect you to know about all of these things. How could you? How can Lou Dobbs, a wealthy, white man, unequivocally proclaim how &quot;progressive&quot; America is about race? How the hell would he know?</p>
<p>We just need you to admit that you don't know. And then we need you to listen.</p>
<p><strong>Anger at the system is not the same as anger at individual white people.</strong> Many black people are frustrated and angered by racial inequities inherent in &quot;the system,&quot; but that doesn't mean that we are angry with you the individual. During the Women's History Month broadcast, Shecodes clearly stated that her experience with the racist Wall Street interviewer did not make her dislike white people. Only that woman can bear the guilt for what she did. Most black people I know feel the same way. Most of us have white friends and neighbors. Some of us have white husbands and wives. Our anger isn't about hatred; it is about a desire for equality.</p>
<p><strong>Good people can be prejudiced.</strong> Where did everyone get the idea that prejudiced people were mustache-twirling, one-dimensional villains? The idea keeps everyday people from honestly evaluating their biases, because &quot;only bad people are prejudiced.&quot;</p>
<p>As I said in the first paragraph of this essay, white supremacy is ingrained in American culture and we are all affected by that. I don't mean the &quot;white power&quot; sort of supremacy, just the idea that the dominant culture, which is white/European, is the benchmark. So, it is no surprise that blond hair and blue eyes are celebrated, that a black preacher's fiery sermons would strike many Americans as odd, and that a black accent is perceived as less desirable than a white one.</p>
<p>The sin is not that we are biased in this way--and we are ALL biased. <strong>The sin is that we pretend that we aren't biased and fail to address the inequities that our prejudice creates.<br /></strong><br />There is more I could add, like: <strong>There are no official black leaders so please stop thinking Al Sharpton is the black Messiah.</strong> But the points above are ones that have been swirling in my head as public discourse has more and more turned to the topic of race.</p>
<p>Look, all this black woman wants is equal access to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. My experience tells me that despite great strides, we aren't there yet. And we won't get there as long as the majority of Americans think the job is already done. Unfortunately, recent conversations about race have led me to believe this is exactly what the majority of Americans think.</p>
<p>It is way past time to have a real conversation about race. But America, are you willing to listen as well as speak?</p>
<p>Agree with me? Disagree? Let me hear from you.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is the 2008 presidential election bad for feminism?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/2008-presidential-election-bad-feminism" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/2008-presidential-election-bad-feminism</id>
    <published>2008-02-27T13:26:44-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-29T08:53:31-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Feminism &amp; Gender" />
    <category term="Politics &amp; News" />
    <category term="2008 presidential election" />
    <category term="black women" />
    <category term="Election 2008" />
    <category term="feminism" />
    <category term="Hillary Clinton" />
    <category term="racism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
<p>I hear you out there--wondering if I'm crazy.</p>
<p>How can having a smart and accomplished woman a hair's breadth away from the Democratic nomination be bad for feminism? How can having America's ingrained gender prejudices dragged into the light be bad for feminism? I'll tell you how:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
<p>I hear you out there--wondering if I'm crazy.</p>
<p>How can having a smart and accomplished woman a hair's breadth away from the Democratic nomination be bad for feminism? How can having America's ingrained gender prejudices dragged into the light be bad for feminism? I'll tell you how:</p>
<p>The 2008 presidential election could be bad for feminism because as it has put a capable woman in the national spotlight and uncovered gender bias, it has also revealed and given voice to the prejudices of mainstream feminism. And those prejudices are alienating women who passionately want equality.</p>
<p>I firmly believe that marginalized groups--women, people of color, GLBT folks, immigrants, etc.--ought to have uncommon empathy for each other and should work together towards the common goal of equality. That's why I am saddened when I hear some of my black sisters and brothers spouting homophobic rhetoric, and equally distressed when I see how some in the white gay community have embraced the patently offensive Shirley Q. Liquor character. We're not going to get to the mountain top that way.</p>
<p>But it never fails to amaze me how tone deaf one group of marginalized people can be to the plight of other oppressed groups. The Democratic nomination, which has a white woman competing with a black man, has left me feeling that my acceptance by many white feminist sisters is predicated on my marching in lock step with the mainstream and ignoring my black self. I am frustrated and angry--angry enough to take the word "feminist" out of my blog profile. And on the eve of a Women's History Month blog carnival dedicated to healing tensions within the movement (<a href="http://womencometogether.blogspot.com" title="http://womencometogether.blogspot.com">http://womencometogether.blogspot.com</a>), I am still too frustrated to put it back.</p>
<p>I am angry because whether it is Gloria Steinem in The New York Times, Erica Jong on Huffington Post, or random posters on feminist and progressive Web sites, I am being subtly and not-so-subtly told that:</p>
<p>- Racism is not as important as sexism<br />
- A vote for Hillary Clinton is the only history-making vote at stake<br />
- White women are more oppressed as a group than black men<br />
- The only vote for true feminists is a vote for Hillary Clinton<br />
- Feminist = white woman<br />
- The needs of black women don't count<br />
- Black people who vote for Barack Obama are doing so only because of his race<br />
- Other people who vote for Barack Obama (women and men) are doing so only because of misogyny</p>
<p>Consider the not-so-uncommon comment from a Feministing poster re: Tina Fey's "Bitch is the new black" bit on last Saturday's SNL:</p>
<p> "As feminists, we have worked our whole lives for this moment. Our foremothers fought for us to have this moment. We have an amazing woman running for the office of the president. Not just any woman running, but the most<br />
qualified candidate in years. I cannnot believe the cowardly way women are rolling over to appease the male media. Don't vote your vagina, but no one is saying don't vote your skin color. On the contrary what black man or woman is<br />
not voting for Obama (90%!)? Which I fully support as they have fought their whole lives for this moment. But they have vision and clarity, and we are chcken shits. We lack the courage of our convictions to make this moment ours. I am proud of black America right now, but disgusted by women.</p>
<p>I don't really get the lame "I can vote who I want" BS as it is just a way to appease your mind that you failed to act. Excuse it all you like, in history, you prevented a great moment from happening. One that we could have shared with our daughters. But now, our daughters know, they are not able to be representations of "cool" "hip" r "inspirationsal". What this election has shown us is we all end up shrill, bitchy, women. Thank you feminsts, what a legacy we have created for the future.</p>
<p>When the weaker candidate messes up in his first term, I will be sure to proudly disply my "Don't blame me, I voted for Hillary" bumper sticker! "</p>
<p>Notice how black women are grouped with black men as "other." Notice that the appeal to "vote Hillary for our daughters" seems not to include mothers of black or bi-racial children. Frankly, I think either a Clinton or Obama win will send a powerful message to my young stepdaughter and my nieces. Notice how the fact that Hillary Clinton once held the majority of the black vote, particularly the black female vote, has been forgotten. Now all black people are voting for Obama, the once "not black enough" candidate, out of racial fealty. Notice how Obama, despite having more legislative experience than Clinton (11 years vs. seven), is being painted as a figurative "affirmative action hire" with few skills and a free ride.</p>
<p>This is why I am angry: Because it seems like some of my white feminist sisters are beckoning me to join the movement with one hand, while throwing racist bombs with the other; and because my feminist bonafides are questioned, yet Hillary Clinton can stand on stage with Bob Johnson who made his fortune by denigrating black women as bitches, hoes and sex objects and still be a feminist icon.</p>
<p>I am alienated from the feminist movement. And I am hurt. And many women like me feel similarly. So, where will we all be after the Democratic convention, when we have to go back to fighting together for equal pay, reproductive rights and other issues? How long will the scars take to heal? My experience over the last few months, I admit, has colored my view of feminism and left me searching for something else--some other movement that will embrace me as I embrace it. If women like me are doing the same, what does that mean for the feminist movement?</p>
<p>I know we have to come together. But how?</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>My uterus is my business</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/my-uterus-my-business" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/my-uterus-my-business</id>
    <published>2008-02-20T15:17:04-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-20T15:17:04-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Feminism &amp; Gender" />
    <category term="child free" />
    <category term="choice" />
    <category term="feminism" />
    <category term="motherhood" />
    <category term="parenting" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Note: This essay was originally posted at the blog What Tami Said.</p>
<p>I have a secret to share. I am a woman of child bearing age who has no desire to have a biological child. This is not such a secret to those closest to me. It is certainly no secret to my husband. But I rarely discuss my lack of desire to reproduce with others, particularly other women, because their reaction is always the same. Take this exchange with a friend of a friend at a girls' night out a few years ago:</p>
<p>She: When are you going to have kids?</p>
<p>Me: I have kids. I have two stepchildren.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Note: This essay was originally posted at the blog What Tami Said.</p>
<p>I have a secret to share. I am a woman of child bearing age who has no desire to have a biological child. This is not such a secret to those closest to me. It is certainly no secret to my husband. But I rarely discuss my lack of desire to reproduce with others, particularly other women, because their reaction is always the same. Take this exchange with a friend of a friend at a girls' night out a few years ago:</p>
<p>She: When are you going to have kids?</p>
<p>Me: I have kids. I have two stepchildren.</p>
<p>She: But when are you going to have your own kids?</p>
<p>Me: I'm not.</p>
<p>She: (in horror) Why!?</p>
<p>Me: I never really have had the desire to have children.</p>
<p>She: Is it because you think you can't have children? Because it took my husband and I a while to conceive and...</p>
<p>Me: No. I have no reason to think I can't have kids.</p>
<p>She: (pausing, staring at me quizzically) Well, my daughter is the best thing that ever happened to me. I love her more than anything. You just don't know what love is like until you become a mother.</p>
<p>Me: Okay.</p>
<p>When I say that I do not want to bear children, it is not because I don't like them. My 22-month-old niece loves me to death. She beams when I walk into a room. And I love to pick her up, squeeze her chubby little body, smell her baby smell and make her laugh. My 12-year-old nephew and I are reading the Alex Rider teen spy series together. And my six-year-old niece and I have a Saturday afternoon date this weekend. I aspire to one day be one of those eccentric, well-loved Auntie Mame-type characters.</p>
<p>When I say that I do not want to bear children, it is not because I am afraid of hard work, as one friend frequently subtly suggests. This friend once thought that child-free married adults were "selfish," but now that she has her own children, she says she understands. "Being a parent is hard work." But the implication is that all adults without children are living hedonist, responsibility-free lives of leisure that we cannot bear to interrupt. That may be the case for some, but not me.</p>
<p>When I say that I do not want to bear children, it is not because I do not understand the importance of being a parent. How can you deny the magnitude of being charged with molding a new life into a conscious and caring citizen of the world? I reject that parenthood is the most important job one can have, or the only job that matters. Would Joan of Arc or Mother Teresa or Harriet Tubman have been better women, more a service to the world, had they bore children? But certainly being a parent is one of the heaviest responsibilities one can undertake.</p>
<p>When I say that I do not want to bear children, it is because though I like children, I have never yearned for them. I have never felt that my life would be incomplete without them. I can explain it no better than that. It seems very simple to me. But to most women I encounter, the idea that I can choose not to have children is foreign and either insulting, a mistake or proof of some fatal flaw in my character.</p>
<p>As with the friend of a friend that interrogated me on my choice not to bear children, the calm assertion of my decision is often met with a breathless monologue about the joy of motherhood, how having a child changed the mother in question's life, how she did not know love until holding her newborn, how she was not whole until giving birth. Those feelings may be true for some women, but why must they be true for me? Why must I be treated as if I don't know my own mind? Because, what often comes after the aggressive proselytizing about parenthood, is the affirmation that I will change my mind some day. I am closer now to 40 than 30, and I feel the same way I felt at 16 and 26. I do not wish to have a baby.</p>
<p>I am not lazy, as my sister charges, or selfish, as my friend suggests. I value children and think the decision to have one should be made carefully. It should never be automatic. I believe children should not be something you do just because it is time, or because you like the way they smell, or because you want to see the blending of your genes and those of your beloved, or because your parents want grandchildren, or because you want someone to care for you when you grown old. Children deserve the best the world has to offer; too many do not get that, often because they are mercy to the whims of their parents. Why is it selfish for me to approach the decision to have a child thoughtfully?</p>
<p>It is also interesting that I do not get credit for the mothering I do. Though I have two stepchildren that I love and my stepson lives with my husband and I, this does not count or so the baby police say. Though I help to clothe and feed him, answers questions about girls, and help him with his homework, I am told my relationship with my stepson is not the same as a biological relationship.</p>
<p>Also worth noting is that for all the tsk tsking about single mothers in the black community, several professional black women that I know, who have chosen not to have children because they are not married, often get the stink eye from other black women for even that decision. It is as if, no matter the circumstance, we are not women until we have squeezed a child from our loins.</p>
<p>Why are so many other women eager to, as a friend puts it, "be all up in my uterus," questioning or demanding that I defend my life choices simply because they are different?</p>
<p>I fault no woman for choosing to be a mother and I fault no woman for choosing to be child free. Choice is freedom. For all the ways that society seeks to oppress women, we are too often accomplices who narrow the choices of our sisters through disapproval and badgering.</p>
<p>If you are confident in your choices, mine should not concern you.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Take it all off</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/take-it-all" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/take-it-all</id>
    <published>2008-01-29T14:05:36-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-29T14:05:36-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Beauty" />
    <category term="Feminism &amp; Gender" />
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="beauty standards" />
    <category term="black women" />
    <category term="hair" />
    <category term="nappy hair" />
    <category term="natural hair" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Beware of her fair hair, for she excels<br />
All women in the magic of her locks;<br />
And when she winds them round a young man's neck,<br />
She will not ever set him free again.<br />
    - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe</p>
<p>The hair is the richest ornament of women.<br />
    - Martin Luther</p>
<p>Yo mama hair so short she curls it with rice.<br />
    - Thousands of "dozens" players</p>
<p>Whatever.<br />
    - Tami</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Beware of her fair hair, for she excels<br />
All women in the magic of her locks;<br />
And when she winds them round a young man's neck,<br />
She will not ever set him free again.<br />
    - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe</p>
<p>The hair is the richest ornament of women.<br />
    - Martin Luther</p>
<p>Yo mama hair so short she curls it with rice.<br />
    - Thousands of "dozens" players</p>
<p>Whatever.<br />
    - Tami</p>
<p>In the natural hair community (What? Yes, there is a natural hair community.), there are two ways a black woman can shake a dependency to unnaturally straight hair. She can "transition," gradually clipping off chemically straightened ends as her natural hair grows. Or, she can do "the big chop," hacking off all her processed hair, leaving a TWA (That's teenie weenie afro.). </p>
<p>It is hard for any woman to contemplate cutting off her hair, but I submit that it is even tougher for black women. If we are honest, most of us try to minimize the ways our appearance departs from mainstream (read: European) beauty standards. And standards say that part of our beauty lies in our hair—hair that should be long, silky and preferably flaxen. </p>
<p>Currently, the ethnic hair care market is about $1.5-2.0 billion per year in the United States. Black hair care products make up the largest single group of this market. For a population that lags behind in accumulating wealth, we spend a whole lot of cheddar on frying, dyeing and weaving in hair that once belonged to women of other ethnicities.</p>
<p>Most sisters will tell you only a mad woman would cut off perfectly good hair. And to cut off straight hair to reveal a natural head of coils, kinks and NAPS? Doing that takes a pair of brass ovaries.</p>
<p>So, I walked into the salon one Saturday morning in August 2006, having made the decision to reclaim my natural locks (Read more about that decision here: <a href="http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2007/09/nappy-love-or-how-i-learned-to-stop.html" title="http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2007/09/nappy-love-or-how-i-learned-to-stop.html">http://whattamisaid.blogspot.com/2007/09/nappy-love-or-how-i-learned-to-...</a>), but adamant that I would hold on to my length for as long as possible. I reckoned I’d just have my stylist blow my roots super-straight to match my relaxed hair. And, yes, I knew this was potentially damaging to my tresses, but vanity…</p>
<p>I held on to this idea at the shampoo bowl, even as water hit the strands of my natural roots and they began to wind and coil, creating an impenetrable foundation.</p>
<p>My stylist, who, by the way, wears awesome looking dreds, frowned. “Uh-uh. I can’t do anything with your hair like this. You’re going to have to cut the perm out.”</p>
<p>I whined something about my head being too big for me to wear my hair short. I’ve been thin and I’ve been…er…not thin, but one thing never changes: my chubby cheeks and round face. I could see myself rolling out of the salon looking like a bald bobble head. Leave it to a black hair stylist to tell it like it t-i-tis.</p>
<p>“Look, when I went natural, I just cut the permed hair off,” she said. “Yeah, I know I have a big head and a pie face, but girl, it’s not like folks can’t see that when my hair is long.” </p>
<p>So true. </p>
<p>I took a deep breath and said, “Cut it off.” </p>
<p>I sat, my back to the mirror, and watched straight hair rain down around me, as my stylist cut first with scissors, then with clippers, whose buzz sounded as ominous as a dentist’s drill. Finally—a little moisturizer and a dollop of gel—and I was whirled around to face…me…with barely an inch of hair. I loved it!</p>
<p>There is something I have always found beautiful about women with close-cropped hair. Look at the footage of those little girls at Oprah Winfrey’s school in South Africa. You see them and focus on their expressive, beautiful faces. You can look into their eyes—the windows to the soul, y’know—unhindered by anything that obscures where their true beauty lies.</p>
<p>Without my hair…and without unnaturally straight hair…I felt liberated and, frankly, more beautiful.</p>
<p>That was a year and a half ago. I can pull my coils down to reach my shoulders now. I can twist my hair, pull it back into a puff or let my BAA fly (That’s big-ass afro). I love the versatility of my longer hair, but I will always cherish those early days of my natural journey, when I took it all off.</p>
<p>(Cross posted to <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dear Gloria Steinem: Ain&#039;t I a woman, too?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/dear-gloria-steinem-aint-i-woman-too" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/dear-gloria-steinem-aint-i-woman-too</id>
    <published>2008-01-09T14:52:20-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-09T16:10:41-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Feminism &amp; Gender" />
    <category term="2008 presidential elections" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <category term="DEMOCRATS" />
    <category term="Election 2008" />
    <category term="feminists" />
    <category term="gloria steinem" />
    <category term="Hillary Clinton" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>.</p>
<p>From time to time, I am challenged by other black women for calling myself a feminist. Some of them believe that while all women suffer from sexism, white women who make up the feminist mainstream do not understand the extra burden of race faced by women of color. Feminist icon Gloria Steinem's Jan. 8 Op-ed in The New York Times (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html?ex=1357534800&amp;en=9f6d8783ff1b15c9&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html?ex=1357534800&amp;en=9f6d8783ff1b15c9&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html?ex=1357534800&amp;e...</a>) just made it even harder for me to defend myself. In it, she declares that sexism trumps racism and that true "radical" feminists are casting their votes for Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries. Not only does Steinem show a remarkable ignorance and arrogance regarding the issue of race in America, but she seeks to make women's choices more narrow than those of the rest of the electorate.</p>
<p>Steinem begins her opinion piece by going for a gold medal in the oppression Olympics. "Gender is probably the most restricting force in American life," she writes.</p>
<p>Really? Before she decided that sexism beats racism, I wonder if Steinem asked someone who was both a woman and a racial minority. If she had, she may have come to a different conclusion. Has Steinem not read "Colonize This!" or any of the other fine writings by feminists of color?</p>
<p>I do not worry when going for a job interview that my gender will hinder me. I do worry about my race. I have experienced the disappointed look and rushed interview that comes when a potential employer, fooled by a nondescript phone voice, is surprised to encounter a black woman instead of a white one. I don't worry about wearing skirts and dresses and other gender-specific clothing in public. I do worry about the reaction to my unprocessed black hair, deemed ugly and unacceptable by the mainstream. In my years working in several major public relations agencies, I reported almost exclusively to white women and was nearly always the only black person in a professional position. Black women, in some cases even ones with post-graduate degrees, remained in administrative support roles. I DO face unique challenges as a woman, but my race compounds those challenges. Steinem appears to not be aware of her own inherent privilege.</p>
<p>I could go on about how women of color, are marginalized in our society, but Steinem provides a good example herself. Her op-ed piece reads as if the universal "women" she is writing to, includes only white women. In her view, a feminist's choice is between voting for one of her own, i.e. a woman candidate (Clinton), or voting for a man. What of those of us with more than one loyalty? Steinem separates the race issue from the gender issue as if there are not some of us affected by society's views of both. Ain't I a woman, too?</p>
<p>"That's why the Iowa primary was following our historical pattern of making change. Black men were given the vote a half-century before women of any race were allowed to mark a ballot, and generally have ascended to positions of power, from the military to the boardroom, before any women (with the possible exception of obedient family members in the latter). "</p>
<p>I assume that at 18, Gloria Steinem cast her first presidential vote in the 1952 election. Certainly society did not prevent her from doing so. My paternal grandfather was a 53-year-old black man living in Mississippi that year. He was not afforded that freedom. Do we really want to go here? Apparently not. Later in her article, Steinem says:</p>
<p>"I'm not advocating a competition for who has it toughest."</p>
<p>Good. Let's agree that trying to parse whether sexism beats racism is an empty, pointless exercise, and offensive to boot. Let's just say that women and ethnic minorities have both overcome considerable challenges and continue to fight for equality in this country and abroad. Let's acknowledge that both groups were once bound by the chains of oppression and forbidden from exercising one of the most fundamental American rights--the right to vote.</p>
<p>This is the other thing that dismays me about Steinem's article. She seeks to replace the chains of sexism with the shackles of tribal loyalty, which, I should point out, is one of the things that historically has kept women and minorities from having a seat at the political table.</p>
<p>Generations of men and women fought and died for my right to weigh the issues of the day, walk into a voting booth and cast my ballot for the person of my choosing. But Steinem wants me to give up that right and instead walk in lock step with first-wave feminists and cast my vote for symbolism's sake. Apparently as a woman, my choices should be narrower than those of other Americans. The presence of a woman on the Democratic primary ballot means my vote is preordained.</p>
<p>This kind of thinking is as ludicrous as that of many black people who say I MUST vote for Barack Obama without critically reviewing the policies of all candidates.</p>
<p>"We have to be able to say: 'I'm supporting her because she'll be a great president and because she's a woman.' "</p>
<p>No. I need to be able to say that I am supporting a candidate that will get us out of Iraq swiftly, who will repair America's broken reputation abroad, who will stand up to the corporatocracy, who will protect my right to govern my own body, who will make sure that every American child gets the health care she needs, who will strengthen laws barring discrimination based on race, gender or sexuality, who will ease the burdens of the middle class and the poor, who will improve our education system, who will mend the "red" vs. "blue" divide...Gender (and race) has nothing to do with it.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What is race between friends?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/what-race-between-friends" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/what-race-between-friends</id>
    <published>2007-12-28T20:30:48-06:00</published>
    <updated>2007-12-28T20:30:48-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="friendship" />
    <category term="race" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
<p>The social construct we call race is complicated, but there are a few things about it that I know to be true. One thing is that everyone who grows up in this country absorbs some prejudice--everyone, no matter their race. Also, many people have no real relationships with anyone outside of their own culture. Most racial misunderstandings are borne of ignorance not malice. As a woman of color, I try to keep that truth in mind. Nevertheless, last year I lost a good friend. And our parting can be blamed on race--biases that I felt my friend was unwilling to examine and that I was unable to forgive.</p>
<p>There were other strains on my end of our friendship. My friend, let's call her Mona, could be overbearing and self-centered, and she possessed a frankness that sometimes crossed the line to rudeness. But to be honest, that was part of her charm. When we met, we were both working for a large public relations agency. I liked Mona the minute I met her. I have a soft spot for misfits, and she didn't fit in with the agency types--those skinny, stylish girls with their Kate Spade bags and rich daddies. Neither did I. Mona was smart, loud, sassy and a little hippie dippy. She liked to talk about past lives and "bad energy," and she would rail against the patriarchy and "the man." While I philosophically talked about politics, she would get in the trenches and volunteer to help Democratic campaigns in other cities. Mona and I became good friends.</p>
<p>It occurred to me sometimes that my friend's "power to the people" ideology was somewhat theoretical. I knew she had other friends of color, but I also knew that they were like me--educated and assimilated--friends who could slip easily into the mainstream. But aren't we all most comfortable with people who share our interests, values and likes? Race was not a precious topic between Mona and I. We discussed it openly. I explained the black women and hair thing. She talked about what it was like as a white woman to date black men. Then something changed.</p>
<p>About a year and a half into our friendship, Mona moved away to Washington, D.C. and I gradually began to sense that life in that black city was changing my friend. She seemed hardened and less tolerant. Maybe for her, familiarity bred contempt. Estrangement began with a comment here and there. There was the remark about a colleague that was a black woman but really sharp and pretty. Then something about how she usually didn't get along with Jewish women. Then, Katrina happened.</p>
<p>I was horrified watching civilization fall apart in New Orleans--people begging for water, bodies floating, towns keeping neighbors from crossing bridges to safety, the media labeling American citizens "refugees," and our president congratulating the inept crony who failed to grasp the magnitude of the whole disaster. In the aftermath, I talked to Mona on the phone. "Yeah, I sent money to the animal shelters down there," she said, adding "but I didn't send any money to those fucking people."</p>
<p>Those fucking people. Her words felt like a slap. I wondered if she meant those fucking poor people or those fucking black people. I didn't like it either way. I realize that internal and external factors affect one's situation in life. But those desperate people on my television set didn't need a lecture or contempt. They needed compassion. Though I sat warm and safe in a home more than 1,000 miles north of the Gulf, I identified with the Katrina survivors--those forgotten and inconvenient black people. And I felt attacked by my friend's inhumane position. We spoke for a long time that evening about poverty and race, but Mona failed to muster much sympathy for the victims of the hurricane. I hung up the phone feeling anxious and sad.</p>
<p>Some people would have ended the relationship there, I know. But I knew Mona as a friend who had always been generous, supportive and good to me. Her recent comments didn't square with the person I had known for years--the good liberal who had a guru and took annual treks to commune with nature in the mountains. We spoke sporadically over the following months, then it ended with one last phone call. We were speaking on the run, as long-distance friends often do. I was in the drive-thru at the neighborhood Dairy Queen and Mona was running some errand hundreds of miles away, annoyed she said by D.C.'s celebration of "fucking" Emancipation Day, a commemoration of the day the city's slaves were freed. "Everything is closed. It's ridiculous!" She said. "Between this, the Duke case and Don Imus, I'm getting really sick of this shit." I didn't have to ask what shit that was.</p>
<p>I ended that conversation quickly and I haven't spoken with Mona since, though she has left a few messages. I just let the figurative and literal distance grow between us. I feel like a coward for not confronting her and telling her why we can't be friends. Maybe she agrees. Maybe she was finding our discussions about race difficult and frustrating. I never asked. I feel guilty, like I betrayed people of color by not getting angry, not slamming the phone down at the first sign of my friend's prejudice, not immediately thinking Mona was a bad person--a racist. But what would that have solved? I am old enough to know that a lot of good people have screwed up beliefs about other races. You don't educate people and change minds by walking away. But I did walk away. It's just easier not to talk about race, isn't it?</p>
<p>I don't hate Mona. In fact, as I write this, I feel a little protective, like I've painted her too negatively. In addition to doing the things that ended our friendship, Mona wrangled the photographer at my wedding, listened to me kvetch and moan when corporate life got to me, stayed on the phone with me during a late night hysterical drive from Chicago to Atlanta (don't ask), called herself my husband's "football wife" because she likes to talk about the NFL as much as he does. She did a lot of good things. And I miss her. I tried to understand her. I tried to educate her. I just couldn't accept feeling that someone who was dear to me held my people in disdain, even as she called me friend.</p>
<p>I wish race weren't so damned complicated.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Oh, Sojourner...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/oh-sojourner" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/oh-sojourner</id>
    <published>2007-12-28T20:27:04-06:00</published>
    <updated>2007-12-28T20:27:04-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="black women" />
    <category term="hip hop" />
    <category term="marriage" />
    <category term="misogyny" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
<p>That man over there says that women need to be helped into carriages, and lifted over ditches, and to have the best place everywhere. Nobody ever helps me into carriages, or over mud-puddles, or gives me any best place! And ain't I a woman?— Sojourner Truth</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
<p>That man over there says that women need to be helped into carriages, and lifted over ditches, and to have the best place everywhere. Nobody ever helps me into carriages, or over mud-puddles, or gives me any best place! And ain't I a woman?— Sojourner Truth</p>
<p>It seems that by her 1854 speech to the Ohio Women’s Rights Convention, Sojourner Truth, evangelist, abolitionist and suffragist, was tired—tired of the indignities of being black and female in a time when African Americans were chattel and women second class citizens. More than 150 years later, I’m sorry to say, sister Sojourner, I understand.</p>
<p>I see the parade of Sapphires, stereotypes and shakin’ asses on Viacom’s unholy trinity: BET, MTV and VH1. And I wonder, “Ain’t I a woman?”</p>
<p>I hear rappers whose lyrics drip with violence and misogyny called “poets” by black intelligentsia. And I wonder, “Ain’t I a woman?”I see wall-to-wall national media coverage for tragically missing Madeleine McCann and Natalee Holloway, but none for young, black Diamond Bradley, Angelica Livingston, Crystal Gaines and Whitney Harden. And I wonder, “Ain’t I a woman?”</p>
<p>I watch the NAACP nominate R. Kelly for an Image Award. R. Kelly—at best a mediocre performer with a catalog of vulgar songs that objectify and demean women, at worst a predator facing 21 counts of child pornography, including an obscene videotaping of an assault on a 16-year-old black girl. And I wonder, “Ain’t I a woman?”</p>
<p>I hear the deafening silence of the black church over the recent arrest of an African-American celebrity preacher for beating his wife in the parking lot of an Atlanta hotel. And I wonder, “Ain’t I a woman?”I watch friends—smart, accomplished, beautiful—build their lives alone, because they are black women, and according to statistics the least likely to marry in our society. And I wonder, “Ain’t I a woman?”</p>
<p>I read that 44 percent of black households are headed by women, and those households are four times more impoverished than white households. And I wonder, “Ain’t I a woman?”</p>
<p>I am a woman. And if I may, for a moment, speak directly to my fellow female African Americans: We are women. We deserve better, must expect better, must demand better, must fight for better. We must respect ourselves and refuse to be objectified and marginalized. We must say no to media exploitation and neglect. We must stop popping our fingers to hate spit over a funky beat, and call to task so-called artists who make millions at our expense. We must demand love, commitment, support and responsibility from lovers and husbands, and choose only those who give those things to father our children. We must call out religious leaders who twist God’s words to make us count for less.</p>
<p>Sojourner said, "If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again! And now they is asking to do it, the men better let them."</p>
<p>After all, we are women. Ain’t we?</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nappy love or how I learned to stop worrying and embrace the kinks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/nappy-love-or-how-i-learned-stop-worrying-and-embrace-kinks" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/nappy-love-or-how-i-learned-stop-worrying-and-embrace-kinks</id>
    <published>2007-12-28T20:23:05-06:00</published>
    <updated>2007-12-28T20:23:05-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>whattamisaid</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Race, Ethnicity &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="beauty standards" />
    <category term="black women" />
    <category term="hair" />
    <category term="nappy" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
<p>My hair is nappy. It is coarse and thick. It grows in pencil-sized spirals and tiny crinkles. My hair grows out, not down. It springs from my head like a corona. My hair is like wool. You can’t run your fingers through it, nor a comb. It is impenetrable. My hair is rebellious. It resists being smoothed into a neat bun or pony tail. It puffs. Strands escape; they won’t be tamed. My hair is nappy. And I love it.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(Originally posted at <a href="http://www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com" title="www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com">www.whattamisaid.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
<p>My hair is nappy. It is coarse and thick. It grows in pencil-sized spirals and tiny crinkles. My hair grows out, not down. It springs from my head like a corona. My hair is like wool. You can’t run your fingers through it, nor a comb. It is impenetrable. My hair is rebellious. It resists being smoothed into a neat bun or pony tail. It puffs. Strands escape; they won’t be tamed. My hair is nappy. And I love it.</p>
<p>Growing up, I learned to covet silky, straight hair; “bouncing and behaving” hair; Cheryl Tiegs and Christie Brinkley hair. But as a young black girl, my appearance was far from the American ideal. Making my hair behave meant hours wriggling between my grandmother’s knees as she manipulated a hot comb through my thick, kinky mane. The process stretched my tight curls into hair I could toss and run my fingers through, something closer to the “white girl hair” that so many black girls admired and longed to possess.</p>
<p>My beautiful, straightened hair came at a price. It meant ears burned by slipped hot combs and scars from harsh chemicals. It meant avoiding active play and swimming pools, lest dreaded moisture make my hair “go back.” It meant having a relaxer eat away at the back of my long hair until barely an inch was left. It meant subtly learning that my natural physical attributes were unacceptable.</p>
<p>I was not alone in my pathology. Pressing combs, relaxers, weaves and the quest to hide the naps are part of the fabric of black beauty culture. It is estimated that more than 75 percent of black women straighten their hair. In the book “Hair Story: Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America,” Ayanna Byrd and Lori Tharps write: “Before a black child is even born, relatives speculate over the texture of hair that will cover the baby’s head, and the loaded adjectives “good” and “bad” are already in the air.” In the same book, a New York City dancer named Joicelyn explains: “Good hair is that silky black shit that them Indian girls be havin’…Good hair is anything that’s not crazy-ass woolly, lookin’ like some pickaninny out the bush.” Too often, black women find their hair hatred supported by media, men and the rest of the mainstream.</p>
<p>Cultural and professional pressures kept me relaxing my curls for 20 years. In the late 90s, the neo-soul movement caught fire in R&amp;B. Young, bohemian singers like Jill Scott, Erykah Badu and India Arie were rocking stylish natural looks, and I began seeing more natural heads strutting down Michigan Ave. in Chicago, where I lived. Two of my close friends took the plunge, shearing their permed hair to start anew. Suddenly natural black hair was fashionable—at least for a small group of people.</p>
<p>Seeing more women, however few, freed from the tyranny of constant straightening, inspired me.I began poring over books about the care and politics of black hair. I became a member of a popular Web site devoted to championing natural hair. I learned about the toxic ingredients in chemical relaxers and the lasting damage they do. I discovered the origins of negative myths about black hair. I learned how to properly care for natural locks and discovered the myriad styles that can be achieved. I met women of all ages who embraced “nappy” as a positive description. And I slowly came to realize the inherent foolishness of believing black women’s hair, apart from that of all other races, needs to be fixed—pressed, weaved and manipulated into something it isn’t.</p>
<p>In August 2006, after years spent admiring the growing number of nappy heads around me; fretting whether my husband would still find me attractive; worrying whether my unruly ‘fro would frighten my co-workers; I chopped my near shoulder-length hair off, leaving barely an inch of kinky curls. I was free!</p>
<p>My hair is nappy. It is soft and cottony, a mass of varying textures. My hair is fun to play with. I like to pull at the spiral curls and feel them snap back into place. My hair defies the laws of gravity. It reaches energetically toward the sky. My hair is unique. In a fashion culture that genuflects to relaxed, flat-ironed tresses and stick-straight weaves, my fluffy, puffy, kinky mane stands out. It is revolutionary. My hair is natural. It is the way God made it. My hair is nappy. And it is beautiful.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
