<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>ClizBiz's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/clizbiz"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/287/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.blogher.com/blog/287/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2009-07-23T21:29:21-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Post-Rapture Pet Care: So, it&#039;s the End Times but Max still needs to be let out</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/post-rapture-pet-care-so-its-end-times-max-still-needs-be-let-out" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/post-rapture-pet-care-so-its-end-times-max-still-needs-be-let-out</id>
    <published>2009-11-04T15:05:43-06:00</published>
    <updated>2009-11-04T19:09:13-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Pets" />
    <category term="Religion &amp; Spirituality" />
    <category term="Christianity" />
    <category term="natutre and spirituality" />
    <category term="pets" />
    <category term="Rapture" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It's a Saturday Night Live skit waiting to happen, right? <a href="http://eternal-earthbound-pets.com/Home_Page.html">Eternal Earth-Bound Pets</a>: A service that promises to care for your pet after you have ascended to heaven to join The Almighty. Like the company's co-founder, Bart Centre, I laughed at first. Surely, this can't be for real. But after speaking with Bart, and a few close friends who believe in the Rapture, I stopped laughing and started thinking. <br /></p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It's a Saturday Night Live skit waiting to happen, right? <a href="http://eternal-earthbound-pets.com/Home_Page.html">Eternal Earth-Bound Pets</a>: A service that promises to care for your pet after you have ascended to heaven to join The Almighty. Like the company's co-founder, Bart Centre, I laughed at first. Surely, this can't be for real. But after speaking with Bart, and a few close friends who believe in the Rapture, I stopped laughing and started thinking. <br /><br />First, let's review: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapture">The Rapture</a>, also known as "The End Times", is the basic belief (with varying tribulational differences) that Jesus is coming back and only taking His devout followers back up the Holy Elevator with Him. Evidently, the heathen losers "left behind" will be screwed. (Although it would surely strengthen the job market if 40-50 million Americans suddenly vacated …)</p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/rapture.jpg" alt="" height="388" width="391" /></p><p>When I began my interview with Bart, he asked upfront, <em>"Are you a believer?"</em> I responded in the negative (to the Rapture, specifically) and we begin to chat. After hanging up, I realized the conversation would have been very different if I had answered in the affirmative. <br /><br />Bart Centre is a devout atheist and is, in fact, the author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Atheist-Camel-Chronicles-Arguments-Non-Believer/dp/1439236976/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1257363626&amp;sr=8-1">"The Atheist Camel Chronicles: Debate Themes &amp; Arguments for the Non-Believer (and those who think they might be)"</a> which is currently #6 on Amazon for atheist titles. Not bad for a self-published first-time author. <em>"It's been quite an amazing ride,"</em> said Bart, who used the pseudonym, Dromedary Hump. <br /><br />The book published this past June and a month later, his buddy, Brad, sent Bart a news link about a UK woman who promises to care for cats post-Rapture. They both had a good chuckle over it but it got Bart to thinking. <br />&nbsp;<br />One of his book chapters talks about the End Times and that looming Mayan calendar date of 2012. <em>"I realize a lot of Christians are jumping on that boat,"</em> said Bart, <em>"and asked myself, ‘What can I do that can help ease the concerns of Christians and make some money?'”</em></p><p>And so, Bart and Brad teamed up to launch <a href="http://eternal-earthbound-pets.com/Home_Page.html">Eternal Earth-Bound Pets USA</a> in July. Their tag-line: "The next best thing to salvation in a post-Rapture world." <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><em>&nbsp;</em></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"> </span></span>(Brad, a Minnesotan who doesn't want to use his last name, handles the Western US, while Bart oversees the East.) Bart believes it comes down to a Christian asking themselves a few questions: <em>"'Do I believe in the Rapture?', ‘Do I believe my pets won’t go to heaven?’ and ‘Can I trust these atheists?’ If the answer to these three things is ‘yes’, then this will help." </em><br /><br />Here's how it works: A prospective customer submits a contract via the site and pays $110, which covers one animal for a 10-year period. (An additional animal in the same household is an additional $15.) Bart and Brad review the contract and determine if they can truly execute the contract within 18-24 hours of the Rapture. <br /><br />The company has 16 'representatives' located through the US, committed atheists who have actively blasphemed the Holy Spirit (Mark 3:29: <em>"But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of an eternal sin."</em>) and therefore, won't be going anywhere on Rapture Day. Bart or Brad will confirm with the reps in the region whether or not they would be able to adopt and care for the animal listed in the new contract. (Both customers and reps remain anonymous; no contact is allowed.)</p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://blogs.pitch.com/plog/rapture.jpg" alt="" height="361" width="250" /></p><p><br />Let's face it, for many of us heathen types, the concept is ripe for comedy. In fact, the first question on the site's <a href="http://eternal-earthbound-pets.com/FAQ_s.html">FAQ page</a> asks, <em>"Is this a joke?"</em> Bart confirmed that this usually the initial reaction:<br /><br /><em>"We’ve gotten about 4,000 emails through the site. The largest percent are atheists who think this is the funniest thing they’ve ever seen and also, they want to be pet rescuers. Then, there are about 10 percent Christians who also think it is funny but don’t believe in Rapture and wish us well. We also get a few Christians who are really, really angry and use some rough language …Then, there is a small percentage, about 1 percent, who take us seriously and confess that this has been on their minds. They explore it with us and see that we are for real. Considering that most Christians don’t trust atheists far as they can throw us, these are people who recognize that we will to exercise our contracts should the Rapture occur." </em><br /><br />Though Bart would not confirm how many customers they have signed up, he did say it was a double-digit number. Not bad considering the highly specialized business is just four months old.</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"It doesn’t make a difference what we think. Do we have the resources to take care of the pets? That’s what matters. What we believe is superfluous. In fact,&nbsp; just because we don’t believe the Rapture won’t happen, doesn’t mean it won’t. I’m not an absolutist on anything.<br /><br />I am not 100 percent set in my non-belief.&nbsp; I reserve approx. 0.000000000001 percent possibility that my non-belief is wrong, that a god may exist. That’s about the same percentage of possibility I reserve for Evolution being wrong and Creationism being right. It's the same degree of doubt I'll save for Big Foot, and alien abductions existing. <br />&nbsp;<br />It is the fundamentalist religionists who are absolutists.&nbsp; They put 100 percent belief in a God; 100 percent belief in anything is absolutism and is indicative of unyielding commitment to a single thought with no room for evidence or input that could devalue it."&nbsp; </em><br /><br /><strong>--Bart Centre, co-founder, Eternal Earth-Bound Pets USA</strong></p></blockquote><p>It's worth noting that Bart's wife is Christian (<em>"more like Episcopal Light going on agnostic"</em>) and that he resides in New Hampshire, the second least-religious state.(Vermont is #1). About 42 percent of New Hampshire residents are non-believers. <br /><br />In an effort to humanize this story and bring it back to Earth, I interviewed two close friends on the matter, women I trust implicitly and love wholeheartedly. These are not acquaintances - they have either seen me drunk, sick, crying or actively playing with Barbies. As animal lovers, devout Christians and believers of the Rapture, I asked if they would consider using this service:<br /><br />From my sister-like pal, Diane Drake-Laing: <br /><br /><em>"No. Absolutely not. God loves Kimba (her late kitty) but she’s an animal. Lots of people are upset about the idea of pets not being in heaven. Some people love their pets like children, it’s just that animals don’t have a spirit like humans do. <br /><br />Someone is going to make a lot of money off of this. I’m not saying it’s not legitimate but what are the chances of it happening? Only God knows. If Heaven is our idea of perfection, then maybe our pets will be there. <br /><br />It’s going to be Hell on Earth - they’re only going to be worried about their own survival. You think they’re going to be worried about their own pets? Let alone somebody else's? There’s not going to be food and water. There are going to be different priorities.&nbsp; <br /><br />If it buys someone piece of mind, then I guess it’s worth it. People want to believe that they are going to see their animal in heaven. I hope I see Kimba in heaven, I really do." </em><br /><br />From my very First Friend, Cindy Russell: <br /><br /><em>"I think it’s a crock. It’s a way to steal money from gullible people. Because for me, if I’m in heaven, I’m not too concerned about where my dog is. I love my dog but I just don’t think it’s that important of a thing. It kind of sounds cold-hearted doesn’t it? <br /><br />It's an ingenuous idea for people that are trying to make money off of people that are heaven-bound. I wouldn’t pay for it.&nbsp; I guess I don’t believe that they have souls like us. <br /><br />If they do have souls, they don’t have capability of sinning. They can’t lie. The only sin they could commit would be stealing food, but that's survival. They couldn’t confess. They couldn’t repent …Wow, I never really thought about it! <br /><br />I don’t think there’s anything in the Bible that talks about animals, other than a sacrifice as a tool for atonement, like an unblemished a lamb. You don’t see animals as pets in the Bible. <br /><br />The people who are left behind are not going to care whether the dogs are eating … 'Hey, where did all the people go? Oh my gosh, what I didn’t believe has come true, now what?' They will be more concerned about their own eternal soul rather than worrying about animal care." </em><br /><br />I also corresponded with Terry James, editor of <a href="http://www.raptureready.com/">RaptureReady.com</a> and author of "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/American-Apocalypse-United-States-Prophecy/dp/0736925058">The American Apocalypse:&nbsp; Is the United States in Bible prophecy?</a>", who offered his perspective on the post-Rapture pet service: <br />&nbsp;<br /><em>"Pets will stay behind when the Rapture occurs, because they are not human, and only humans --those who have accepted Jesus Christ as Savior-- will go to be with Christ when He calls them in the Rapture. This is found in 1 Corinthians 15: 51-55, 1 Thessalonians 4: 13-18, and is implied in other passages in the Bible.<br />&nbsp;<br />It's understandable that those who love their pets&nbsp; would feel sad, worried, even panicked about their pets being left behind on a world that will be Judged with the very Wrath of God. This 'service,' as presented in the website to which you directed me, however, is, I believe, a sham. It is actually a tongue-in-cheek mockery of those who believe that Christ will Rapture His believers. It is a scam at best, and a scam cleverly laced with scathing sarcasm&nbsp; intended to bilk the gullible at worst.<br />&nbsp;<br />When the people of the Rapture are gone the Bible says in 2 Thessalonians Chapter 2 that God the Holy Spirit will remove as Restrainer of evil. That means that mankind will lose its conscience --individually and collectively. The most horrendous kinds of vile activity will take place. With absolute chaos and fear causing panic around the world, the last thing the people who offer this so-called 'service' will want to do is go around rounding up 'insured' pets left behind. They will just be trying to take care of themselves as best they can. My advice: don't be a sucker.<br />&nbsp;<br />The other thing --the most important advice anyone can take: Accept Christ for Salvation now, while there is opportunity. One does that by confessing sin to God, asking forgiveness, and asking that Jesus come in to save one's soul."</em></p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/images/2008/06/03/rapture.jpg" alt="" height="366" width="250" /></p><p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p><p>Bart made an important counter-point about this: <br /><em><br />"Some of those irate Christians say, ‘You are taking advantage or making fun.’ We did not invent concept of Rapture. We do not promote the Rapture. The people that promote it are Christians themselves. All I’m saying is, ‘If you’re right, what’s going to happen to your pet?' If your wrong, we’ll never know. I’m only offering something to people who believe it already." </em><br /><br />I keep thinking about what my pal, Gins, said when I described the business model: <em>“Hmmm. That’s religion right there, accepting things that are unacceptable.” </em><br /><br />Honestly, I got way in over my head on this one but ultimately, it doesn't come down to belief or non-belief in the Rapture but the question of whether or not animals have souls. And that, my friends, is a blog post for another day …<br /><br />***<br />Canadian Pastoral Minister <a href="http://murraylincoln.blogspot.com/2009/10/guaranteed-help-born-agains-pet-rapture.html">Murray Lincoln</a> posted a meaty think-through on his blog and ended up engaging Bart in the comments sections - verrrry interesting:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"When the Rapture takes place the people go and the animals stay behind. In one quick twinkling of an eye the people that are ‘Born Agains’ are exiting earth… and their little puppy will be staying behind in that big old lonely house. The thought of that happening almost makes me choke up with sadness. Worse yet – isn’t it almost animal cruelty for a ‘Born Again’ to own a pet if they all are not going to be looked after when they are gone?"</em></p></blockquote><p>Daniel Florien opines on his blog, <a href="http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/08/17/eternal-earth-bound-pets/">Unreasonable Faith</a>:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"It’s very similar to the church business model — take people’s money on the basis of a future promise that’s most likely bunk." </em></p></blockquote><p>Finally, Max Pearson over at <a href="http://www.progressivepuppy.com/the_progressive_puppy/2009/10/post-rapture-pet-care-service-run-by-atheists.html">The Progressive Puppy</a> has a few thoughts relating to the business venture above but most of all, he's concerned for his own dog:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"I raised Little Brother, pictured above, in the Unitarian Universalist Church.&nbsp; But then last year he converted to Buddhism, hoping in the next life to be reincarnated as a show dog.&nbsp; Kids. They always break your heart."</em></p></blockquote><p>~ClizBiz <br /><br /><strong>(Image Credits: Top - <a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/02/26/the-new-handbook-of-how-to-go-crazy-on-purpose/">TheBooch</a>; Middle - <a href="http://blogs.pitch.com/plog/2008/07/daily_briefs_golfballsized_hai.php#more">ThePitchBlog</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://absolutelyeverythingelse.blogspot.com/2008_06_05_archive.html">AbsolutelyEverythingElse</a>) </strong><br />&nbsp;<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Halloween and Other Autumn Pet Hazards </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/halloween-and-other-autumn-pet-hazards" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/halloween-and-other-autumn-pet-hazards</id>
    <published>2009-10-28T18:48:56-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-10-29T15:09:07-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Pets" />
    <category term="animals" />
    <category term="Halloween" />
    <category term="Halloween" />
    <category term="pet toxins" />
    <category term="plants" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Beyond the dignity-defying costumes (oh, but so entertaining!), there are numerous seasonal dangers that threaten our animal friends. You may already know that chocolate won't jive with Fido's innards, but what about chewing gum or raisins? Bad (for) doggie. Furthermore, with the onset of winter, use of anti-depressants goes up and more than 50 percent of all pet poisonings involve human drugs.&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Beyond the dignity-defying costumes (oh, but so entertaining!), there are numerous seasonal dangers that threaten our animal friends. You may already know that chocolate won't jive with Fido's innards, but what about chewing gum or raisins? Bad (for) doggie. Furthermore, with the onset of winter, use of anti-depressants goes up and more than 50 percent of all pet poisonings involve human drugs.&nbsp;</p>
<p> \</p>
<p><a href="http://www.petpoisonhelpline.com/">Pet Poison Hotline</a> (PPH) is a Minneapolis-based 24-hour hotline (1-800-213-6680) for humans panicking over a possibly poisoned animal - dogs, cats, birds, horses, lizards - you name it.&nbsp; <span style="letter-spacing: 0px;">PPH is one half of the world’s largest industry poison control center so their phone number is listed on various product labels: <em>“If your child or pet ingests this product, please call ...”&nbsp;</em> (The office is divided - one side for human poison emergencies, the other side for animals.)&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><em><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/cm/goodhousekeeping/images/Fx/oliver-witch-fb.jpg" alt="" width="325" height="325" /></em></p>
<p>I chatted with Dr. Ahna Brutlag, assistant director of veterinary services of the PPH, who described the average PPH caller. <span style="letter-spacing: 0px;"><em>"The calls are about 70 percent from pet owners, the rest from vets. Usually, the owner just came home from work and a bottle of medication has been chewed on and may have been ingested by their pet.&nbsp; About half of pet owner calls can be managed at home, other half need to be referred to by vet. We talk to a lot of frantic pet owners, many who didn’t know that certain things were poisonous."</em></span></p>
<p><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://spoilurpets.com/images/Happy%20Tails%20Cowboy%20Pet%20Costume.JPG" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p>The PPH does have a $35-per-case charge. This means you can call back as many times as need until the issue is resolved. I'm told some cases are resolved quickly while others drag on for weeks.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>"Chewing gum - the problem is xylitol is a sweetener in sugar-free gum. It’s a natural sweetener but in gum, it becomes a problem. In dogs, it makes their blood sugar drop, sometimes to life-threatening levels, and can also cause liver problems. The most dangerous gums are ones that contain 100 percent xylitol. If it lists xylitol as first ingredient - those are the ones to be most worried about."&nbsp;</em><br />
<strong>--Dr. Anna Brutlag, Pet Poison Hotline</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, every holiday brings certain pet risks (4th of July, anyone?) but there are specific dangers with Halloween.&nbsp;"<em>A lot of pets love Halloween but the #1 problem is candy and candy wrappers,"</em> said Dr. Brutlag. "<em>We also tend to get a lot of calls for glow sticks - cats they love to chew on them and that oozy material can cause a lot of irritation in their mouth. It can look very dramatic - lots of drooling." </em>(I'm picturing glow-in-the-dark cat mouths - freaky.) Not surprisingly, lit candles are also a big problem, especially kittens, puppies and dogs with wagging tails.</p>
<p>Dr. Justine Lee, associate director of veterinary services at PPH, and author of two humor pet care books, (It’s a Dog’s Life… but It’s Your Carpet' and 'It’s a Cat’s World… You Just Live In It') offers up her thoughts on Halloween costumes for pets: <em>"I don’t recommend dressing up pets, they generally don’t get it."&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://www.clicksitebuilder.com/home2/gs/gotogails.com/images/p/pumpkin1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Species-specific toxins:</span>&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p><strong>DOGS:</strong><br /> &nbsp; 1 Chocolate<br /> &nbsp; 2 Insect bait stations<br /> &nbsp; 3 Rodenticides (i.e., mouse and rat poison)<br /> &nbsp; 4 Fertilizers<br /> &nbsp; 5 Xylitol-containing products (i.e., sugar-free gums and candies)<br /> &nbsp; 6 Ibuprofen (Advil® or Motrin® in brand name or generic form)<br /> &nbsp; 7 Acetaminophen (Tylenol® in brand name or generic form)<br /> &nbsp; 8 Silica gel packs<br /> &nbsp; 9 Amphetamines, such as ADD/ADHD drugs<br /> &nbsp;10 Household cleaners <br /> &nbsp;11 Grapes and raisins (Dr. Brutlag says: <em>"</em><span style="letter-spacing: 0px;"><em>There is some individual sensitivity there with grapes and raisins but since we don’t know which dog will be affected, you have to treat them all conservatively."</em>)&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><strong> CATS:</strong><br /> &nbsp; 1 Lilies (Easter, Asiatic, Day lilies).<br /> &nbsp; 2 Canine permethrin insecticides (topical flea and tick medicine designed for dogs but erroneously placed on cats)<br /> &nbsp; 3 Household cleaners<br /> &nbsp; 4 Rodenticides<br /> &nbsp; 5 Paints and varnishes<br /> &nbsp; 6 Veterinary non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (Rimadyl®, Deramaxx®)<br /> &nbsp; 7 Glow sticks/glow jewelry<br /> &nbsp; 8 Amphetamines (such as ADD/ADHD drugs)<br /> &nbsp; 9 Acetaminophen (Tylenol® in brand name or&nbsp;generic form)<br /> 10 Ibuprofen (Advil or Motrin®&nbsp;in brand name or generic form)</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Seasonal Pet Threats:</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Mothballs:</strong> Those benign little buggers usually contain either paradichlorobenzene or naphthalene - both can be deadly. Symptoms include: vomiting, severe abdominal pain, tremors, weakness, possible kidney or liver failure, and severe abnormality of red blood cells.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mushrooms:&nbsp;</strong> While most 'shrooms are harmless, certain types can be life-threatening, such as the Amanita phalloides or 'death cap' mushroom, which is all over the U.S. Assume that all mushrooms as toxic until proven otherwise and only trust experts to make an accurate mushroom ID. Toxic mushroom symptoms include: vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, depression, tremors, and seizures, with liver and kidney damage occurring later. Scour your yard frequently to get rid of any mushrooms.</p>
<p><strong>Antifreeze:</strong>&nbsp; As folks gear up for winter, pets may inadvertently be exposed to antifreeze. It only takes one teaspoon to kill a cat; two for dogs.&nbsp; Signs of early poisoning include acting drunk or uncoordinated, excessive thirst, and lethargy. While signs may seem to improve after eight to twelve hours, internal damage is actually worsening, and crystals develop in the kidneys, which result in acute kidney failure. Immediate treatment with an antidote is vital.</p>
<p><strong>Rodenticides (mouse/rat poisons):</strong> Make sure to place poisonous baits in areas where your pet can't get them.&nbsp; <em>"</em><span style="letter-spacing: 0px;"><em>We see a lot of these cases, especially in dogs. People put out blocks of poison and the dogs are following along behind them, eating the blocks of poison,"</em> </span>said Dr. Brutlag.<span style="letter-spacing: 0px;"> </span>Also, if your dog eats a rodent that has been poisoned, they can also suffer secondary effects.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Compost: </strong>As much as you love your decaying organic matter, be aware that compost piles have may contain ‘tremorgenic mycotoxins’, meaning molds which cause tremors. Even small amounts ingested can result in tremors or seizures within 30 minutes to several hours. And we know how much dogs like to sift through garbage …</p>
<p><strong>Red Maple Leaves:</strong> Sure, they make great photographs but horse lovers, beware. As little as one pound of dried maple leaves blowing into your horse’s pasture can be toxic. If your horse eats these leaves, it can result in severe hemolytic anemia (rupture of red blood cells), causing weakness, pale gums, an elevated heart rate and shock. Just stick to hay, oats and grass.&nbsp;</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Peg posted over at <a href="http://www.thriftyfun.com/tf10743758.tip.html">ThriftyFun</a> about her own experience with pet poisoning:&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>"Last night we had a terrible scare. Our 1 1\2 year old chihuahua, Bruiser, came out of the garage with a forgotten rat bait. We thought we had thrown them all away. It didn't look like he ate it but just carried it in to show us. We immediately called the emergency vet. We were told to induce vomiting with either hydrogen peroxide or salt."&nbsp;</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Lindsey Wolko at the <a href="http://blog.caninecommuter.com/halloween-safety-for-your-pet/">CanineCommuterBlog</a> offers some additional tips for calming the family pet on Halloween Night:&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>"Ringing doorbells and costumed children can also&nbsp;cause stress in the family pet.&nbsp; If your dog barks at the doorbell, like mine do, you will&nbsp;want to confine him&nbsp;on Halloween night.&nbsp; This will allow the&nbsp;pet&nbsp;to feel safe&nbsp;and you can rest easy knowing that he won’t run out the front door&nbsp;or jump&nbsp;on the neighborhood children.&nbsp;&nbsp;Place your pet’s crate in&nbsp;a&nbsp;quite room with&nbsp;a distraction, radio or&nbsp;television work well.&nbsp; For those pets&nbsp;that are full of anxiety, you can partially cover the crate to create more of a den.&nbsp; Soft lighting helps calm them as well.&nbsp;&nbsp;Reassure your pet with a calm, soothing voice.&nbsp;&nbsp;As a responsible pet owner, you must also&nbsp;know that if something causes that level of anxiety in your dog, you&nbsp;may want to forego the events altogether.&nbsp;&nbsp;There is nothing&nbsp;wrong with turning out the lights and&nbsp;deciding not to participate in Halloween.</em>"&nbsp;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Amy at <a href="http://lovemeow.com/2009/10/signs-that-your-cat-might-have-been-poisoned/#more-4290">LoveMeow</a> offers additional tips on dangerous plant life for your kitty:&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>"Outdoor plants can also pose much of the same risks and some of the indoor plants. Symptoms can include, but are not limited to diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, pain, and weakness, breathing difficulties and seizures and convulsions. Some of these plants and shrubs include larkspur, skunkweed, daffodils, foxglove, castor bean, almond plants, wild cherry, English holly, spinach, rhubarb, Jasmine, and pigweed. Other plants that can cause your cat to experience hallucinations include marijuana, nutmeg, peyote, and morning glories."&nbsp;</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>~ClizBiz&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>(Image Credits: Top - </strong><a href="http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/family/pets/popular-pet-halloween-costumes"><strong>Good Housekeeping</strong></a><strong>; Middle - </strong><a href="http://www.spoilurpets.com/happy-tails-cowboy-pet-costume-p-240.html"><strong>SpoilUrPets</strong></a><strong>; Bottom - </strong><a href="http://www.gotogails.com/products6815.html"><strong>GoToGails</strong></a><strong>)</strong></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pet CPR: Are You Up For Mouth-to-Snout?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/pet-cpr-are-you-mouth-snout" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/pet-cpr-are-you-mouth-snout</id>
    <published>2009-10-21T18:57:59-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-10-21T18:57:59-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Pets" />
    <category term="cpr" />
    <category term="medical emergency" />
    <category term="pets" />
    <category term="Pets" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091021/ap_on_re_us/us_fea_pets_ap_poll_safety">new AP poll</a> reveals that 63 percent of dog owners would give CPR to their pet in case of medical emergency. My initial thought, 'What's wrong with that other 37 percent?' Too queasy?' Even worse, only 53 percent of cat owners would do the same. Shame on the other 47 percent. Pussies. <br /><br />Though I've never been called into CPR action myself, the poll brings to mind a special story - when my dinky little personal blog managed to save a life.</p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091021/ap_on_re_us/us_fea_pets_ap_poll_safety">new AP poll</a> reveals that 63 percent of dog owners would give CPR to their pet in case of medical emergency. My initial thought, 'What's wrong with that other 37 percent?' Too queasy?' Even worse, only 53 percent of cat owners would do the same. Shame on the other 47 percent. Pussies. <br /><br />Though I've never been called into CPR action myself, the poll brings to mind a special story - when my dinky little personal blog managed to save a life.</p><p>I'd asked an old friend of mine, Kath, to - once and for all - write up the story of Stanley the Tortoise. Her family's reptile was not only a part of my childhood but probably many other childhoods as well. Stanley is approximately 126 years old, likely born around 1883, during the Chester A. Arthur administration. <br /><br /></p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_FPQ-EveLB2E/SAYkvKTnh8I/AAAAAAAAA3M/RQMx2MxPGgs/s320/Stan-Rose.JPG" alt="" height="240" width="320" /></p><p>Stanley's many near-death experiences were the stuff of legend and I was anxious to have them documented in my wee corner of the blogosphere. Kath obliged and I posted <a href="http://clizbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/stanley-desert-tortoise-more-lives-than.html">Stanley's story</a> in April 2008. Some months later, the post received a grateful comment from "Brady":</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"This is an awesome story about your tortoise Stan, but I have to say thank you first because this was the first result on Google for 'tortoise fell in pool,' as our desert tortoise Tommy, just did 2 hours ago. While my sister jumped in to get him off the bottom of the pool, I sprinted up to my room, did a quick internet search, and ran back outside to tell my sister to do the things you had done to Stan after he fell in. He looked simply dead, but after doing what you posted, like turning him to drain the water, and racing him to our nearby vet he became responsive again and is expected to come back home in a few days completely fine. Once again, thank you so much, and your tortoise sounds invincible!"</em></p></blockquote><p>Of course, I let Kath know immediately that she had not saved one special tortoise but now, two. Her family was moved to tears, big smiles all around. Stanley, however, had no apparent thoughts on the matter and continued munching on rose petals.</p><p>The message here (other than how much love and devotion can be inspired by a tortoise) is obviously, never give up when it comes to your non-human friend. If your dog, cat, bird or tortoise is in dire straits, ignore the ick factor and just try your best.<br /><br /></p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://sccredcross.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/unset.jpg" alt="" height="275" width="400" /></p><blockquote><p><em>"It's not rocket science. The mechanics are the same as humans. Size is the biggest difference."</em><br /><br /><strong>--Tammy Parks, pet owner who recently took a pet first aid class</strong><br /><br /></p></blockquote><p>Henceforth, some very basic* Animal CPR:</p><blockquote><p><br />If Fido is not breathing, use a finger to clear any mucus or other objects from the mouth. Much like human CPR, tilt the head back to straighten the airway passage.<br /><br />Hold the mouth shut with one hand, and place your mouth over the animal's snout, beak or whatever, making sure the seal is tight. Blow into the nose and watch to see if the chest expands.<br /><br />If the chest doesn't expand, start over again by clearing the mouth. If the chest does expand, release the animal's mouth so it can exhale.<br /><br />Repeat the breathing procedure every five seconds until the animal is breathing normally.<br /><br />If you detect no heartbeat, you need to do CPR along with cardiac resuscitation. <br /><br />Start by putting the animal on its right side. Place the heel of your hand on the ribcage just behind the elbow. Place your other hand on top of the first hand.<br /><br />Firmly press on the ribcage in quick, smooth movements. Depending on the size of the animal, press down 3-4 inches using both hands. The compression should last no longer than 1/2 second. The smaller the dig the fewer inches of compression and less force are needed. Be careful not to damage the ribcage. Repeat this procedure 10 times.<br /><br />Then, if the animal is still not breathing, perform CPR as described above.<br /><br />Alternate between the chest compressions (10 in a row), and one breath into the nose. <br /><br /><em>(*Please note that there are slight variances in CPR approach depending on species and size.</em></p></blockquote><p>Check out this excellent <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AFrUiRIeVo">how-to video</a> 'starring' Elaine Acker, CEO of Pets America, who demonstrates pet CPR on a doggie mannequin.<br /><br /></p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/qctimes.com/content/tncms/assets/editorial/7/2f/74b/72f74b30-c897-5321-be81-5ac8d8d07f00.preview-300.jpg" alt="" height="332" width="200" /></p><p>Much like human CPR, a person can also become certified in animal CPR. Talk to your vet about classes or check with your local animal shelter. Also, your local chapter of the <a href="http://www.redcross.org/">American Red Cross</a> might provide classes in pet CPR. <br /><br />***<br />Tampa-based <a href="http://manateens.blogspot.com/2009/07/new-manateen-training-opportunity.html">ManaTEEN Club</a> - an incredible volunteer organization with over 10,000 active teen members - offered animal CPR to their members last summer</p><blockquote><p><em>"That's right, for the first time in ManaTEEN history, youth had the opportunity to become certified in dog and cat CPR. The participants were informed about procedures for handling animal poisoning, practiced performing compressions on dogs and cats of various sizes, and tested their new life-saving skills in a disaster simulation. It is always good to know how to deal with certain disaster situations and whether you are a pet owner or not, the skills can come in handy."</em></p></blockquote><p>Mary Oquendo over at <a href="http://groomwise.typepad.com/pet_first_aid_care/2009/09/benny-the-boxer.html">Groomwise</a> stresses how pet groomers need to know their animal CPR, and for good reason:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em><br />"Benny the Boxer is alive because of Laurie and Donna. Benny has cardiomyopathy and went into heart failure at their shop. He was fortunate because his groomers were trained in Pet CPR and First Aid.&nbsp; They knew what to do and in five minutes Benny had a heart beat and was breathing again."</em></p></blockquote><p>Finally, Wes Howenstein, who blogs over at <a href="http://whohenstein.myncblogs.com/2009/07/09/carolina-man-saves-drowning-dog-with-cpr/">RainingCatsandDogs</a>, posts a video about a Carolina man who quickly saved his dog using CPR:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"This story revolves around a man, his two dogs, a backyard swimming pool, a surveillance camera and a CPR class three decades ago." </em></p></blockquote><p>All in all, worth knowing. <br /><br />~ClizBiz<br /><br /><strong>(Image Credits: Top - Kathleen Teager; Middle - <a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/">ICanHasCheezburger</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://www.qctimes.com/topic/?q=pets&amp;t=&amp;l=25&amp;d=&amp;d1=&amp;d2=&amp;f=html&amp;s=&amp;sd=asc">Quad City Times</a>)</strong> <br /><br /><br /></p><p><br /><br /></p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A &#039;HAPPY&#039; Tax Break for Pet Owners? </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/happy-tax-break-pet-owners" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/happy-tax-break-pet-owners</id>
    <published>2009-10-14T19:21:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-10-14T19:21:00-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Pets" />
    <category term="pets" />
    <category term="Taxes" />
    <category term="Pets" />
    <category term="Taxes" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Better sit your furry 'tocks down for this one. Introduced on July 31, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113791908">a proposed bill</a> (HR 3501), Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years, or 'HAPPY Act,' would give pet owners a sizable tax break. The primary sponsor, <a href="http://mccotter.house.gov/HoR/MI11/Home/">Rep. Thaddeus McCotter</a> (R-Mich), reasons that the economic crisis has negatively affected all Americans and pets should not be excluded in tax relief solutions.&nbsp; <br /></p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Better sit your furry 'tocks down for this one. Introduced on July 31, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113791908">a proposed bill</a> (HR 3501), Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years, or 'HAPPY Act,' would give pet owners a sizable tax break. The primary sponsor, <a href="http://mccotter.house.gov/HoR/MI11/Home/">Rep. Thaddeus McCotter</a> (R-Mich), reasons that the economic crisis has negatively affected all Americans and pets should not be excluded in tax relief solutions.&nbsp; <br /><br /><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.3501.IH:">The bill</a> would basically amend the IRS code to allow an individual to deduct up to $3,500 in a taxable year for qualified pet care expenses. The bill defines qualified deductions as <em>"amounts paid in connection with providing care (including veterinary care) for a qualified pet expense other than any expense in connection with the acquisition of the qualified pet."</em></p><p>The bill's language specifically defines a qualified pet as a <em>"legally owned, domesticated, live animal."</em> Evidently, the bill does not include research animals or those used in a business, such as breeders or lion tamers.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://media.npr.org/assets/news/2009/10/14/mccotter.jpg?t=1255533876&amp;s=2" alt="" height="225" width="300" /></p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Well, we've had reports of people having to turn in pets because of the economic recession. And when you think about the relationship between people and pets and the humane way that it helps people think, it seemed to me to be a good idea, and we dropped it in."</em><br /><br /><strong>--Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) in an interview with YouTube's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_uiSuy7TR8&amp;feature=player_embedded">DoggyTV</a></strong><br /><br /></p></blockquote><p>I really have to hand it to Rep. McCotter, who is likely to face resistance from non-pet owners who will cry unfair advantage. He is taking a brave, unprecedented stand on human-animal relationships and putting his money where his food bowl is. The congressman is clearly (ahem) <em>non-neutered. </em><br /><br />On the other hand, owning a pet is an option and, yes, an economic luxury. God knows I'd love to have a horse of my own (and came close a few times) but just can't stomach the $700 per month care and feeding of such an animal.&nbsp;</p><p>I have also had to put off getting a doggie companion until my income stabilizes. And yes, it's pretty awful being without a pet - excruciating, actually. Of course, if I already had a dog, we'd find a way to make it work - like any family in a pinch.<br /><br />Shhh. You hear that? It's the fair and inevitable question ringing through the air: <strong>"Why should non-pet owners be subsidizing pet owners through the taxes they pay?" </strong><br /><br />And a possible-added-benefit question ringing in my own head: <strong>"Might such a tax break encourage people who have thought about adopting a pet to act on it?"</strong></p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_FPQ-EveLB2E/SsWYtgMn-QI/AAAAAAAACJA/MehTHxGBHs8/s400/IMG_0092.JPG" alt="" height="200" width="300" /></p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Providing pet owners the opportunity to deduct pet care expenses is an important step towards ensuring that pet owners provide adequate veterinary and other necessary pet care. It encourages responsible pet ownership and will hopefully reduce the abandonment of pets by people struggling as a result of the economic downturn."</em><br /><br /><strong>--<a href="http://www.pijac.org/">Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC)</a></strong></p></blockquote><p>I've read some rumors that the tax break would not be available to all pet owners but only those who make over a certain income. Still, I couldn't find this in the bill brief and have not seen it confirmed anywhere trustworthy. <br /><br />The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means and it will be interesting to see what happens to it. (If you want to actively support the bill, go <a href="https://secure2.convio.net/aspca/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=2605">here</a> or call your local House rep and bark in their ear.)<br /><br />No matter the outcome, I definitely got a weird thrill reading an official puppy-love acknowledgement in that famously clinical congressional-ese:</p><blockquote><p><br /><strong>SEC. 2. FINDINGS.<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Congress finds the following:<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (1) According to the 2007-2008 National Pet Owners Survey, 63 percent of United States households own a pet.<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (2) The Human-Animal Bond has been shown to have positive effects upon people's emotional and physical well-being.</strong></p></blockquote><p>Huzzah! The Obvious has finally found its way into the hallowed halls of our nation.&nbsp; Rick DeBowes, commenting on <a href="http://blogs.vetmed.wsu.edu/Dean/post/2009/08/10/The-HAPPY-Act.aspx">Washington State University's College of Veterinary Medicine blog</a>, summed it up nicely:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Interesting, as I have long wondered how long it would take for the human-pet-veterinarian bond to reach into society so far that federal legislation would be forthcoming to support it. The pendulum continues to swing." </em></p></blockquote><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/12/22/business/22pettoys_600.jpg" alt="" height="244" width="373" /></p><p><br />***<br />A fine suggestion from Wenchypoo over at <a href="http://wenchwisdom.blogspot.com/2009/10/this-just-in-ever-hear-of-happy-act.html">WenchWisdom</a>:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Maybe a better way to write off animals would be to give a tax credit for every animal adopted from a shelter--that way, it would offset the cost of getting the animal out (spaying/neutering, shots, dental, etc.) and getting it home. In some shelters, it's almost as expensive as a pet store." </em></p></blockquote><p><br />Mother, blogger, pet owner and Steelers diehard, Blackandgoldfan, takes issue with the whole idea over at her blog, <a href="http://therightstuffbng.blogspot.com/2009/09/happy-act.html">TheRightStuff</a>:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Right now, the IRS allows a taxpayer to deduct medical and dental expenses that exceed 7.5% of their adjusted gross income. If you spend less than that, you can't deduct your medical expenses. But you can sure deduct expenses for the care of your pet under this legislation! Am I the only one who has an issue with this lunacy?" </em></p></blockquote><p>However, That One Girl at <a href="http://thecharwoods.blogspot.com/2009/09/hr-3501-happy-act.html">LifeAlongTheWay</a>, is pretty much wagging her tail:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"This makes me very happy, as I'm sure that it will make other responsible pet owners happy as well! We love our dogs and, for us, they are a part of the family. I'm glad that they are finally thinking of pets as part of the family!"</em></p></blockquote><p>~ClizBiz <br /><br /><strong>(Image Credits: Top - <span class="creditwrap"><a href="http://awards.gettyimages.com/awards.cfm?display=photographer&amp;photographerID=10"><span class="credit">Chip Somodevilla</span>/</a><span class="rightsnotice"><a href="http://awards.gettyimages.com/awards.cfm?display=photographer&amp;photographerID=10">Getty Images</a>; Middle - <a href="http://clizbiz.com/">ClizBiz</a>; Bottom - </span></span><a href="http://www.peterthompsonphoto.com/Artist.asp?ArtistID=10829&amp;Akey=7LWHJGQ9">Peter Wynn Thompson</a>) </strong></p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Free Speech vs. Animal Cruelty Videos</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/free-speech-vs-animal-cruelty-videos" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/free-speech-vs-animal-cruelty-videos</id>
    <published>2009-10-07T18:54:37-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-10-07T18:54:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="animal cruelty" />
    <category term="dog fighting" />
    <category term="free speech" />
    <category term="Supreme Court" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Marked by bizarre hypotheticals, the Supreme Court <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20091007/court07_st.art.htm">struggled yesterday</a> with a law banning videos depicting animal cruelty. At question is not animal cruelty itself (which is already illegal) but how the law might impinge on that most sacred of American rights: Free speech.</p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Marked by bizarre hypotheticals, the Supreme Court <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20091007/court07_st.art.htm">struggled yesterday</a> with a law banning videos depicting animal cruelty. At question is not animal cruelty itself (which is already illegal) but how the law might impinge on that most sacred of American rights: Free speech.</p><p>Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit cited freedom of speech and struck down the 1999 law which applied to illegal acts of torturing or killing animals. The law's aim was to eliminate the underground market in 'crush' videos which show small squealing animals, such as mice or kittens, being stomped by women in high heels. (Yet another sexual fetish I wish I'd never heard of.)<br /><br />However, the law has been utilized recently in prosecuting people who sell videos of dog fighting, specifically Robert Stevens from Virginia - the case at hand in <em>United States v. Stevens</em>.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://imgs.sfgate.com/blogs/images/sfgate/ybenjamin/2009/10/06/lady_justice1237476470-1.jpg" alt="" height="192" width="200" /></p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"It's not up to the government to tell us what are our worst instincts." </em><br /><br /><strong>--Justice Antonin Scalia </strong></p></blockquote><p><br />Most of the justices seemed wary of reviving the law, fearing that it might be used against legal activities, such as hunting or fishing. Their remarks suggest that the disputed statute was too broad and dangerously vague for their comfort. <br /><br />Justice Antonin Scalia wondered aloud whether the law would cover videos of bullfights while Justice John Paul Stevens asked whether images of animals hunted with bow and arrow might be covered.</p><blockquote><p><em><br />"What is the difference between . . . bullfighting, cockfighting, dogfighting? You say dogfighting is included, but bullfighting? And I don't know where you put cockfighting."</em><br />&nbsp;<br /><strong>--Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg&nbsp; </strong></p></blockquote><p><br />But the sound bite of the session undoubtedly came from Justice Samuel Alito who asked whether laws could target videos of Roman gladiators fighting to the death or even a <em>"human sacrifice channel"</em> on cable TV. (Sam obviously missed his calling as an innovative TV exec.)</p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/ap/wx10212230005.hmedium.jpg" alt="" height="273" width="374" /></p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Live. Pay-per-view, you know, on the Human Sacrifice Channel. That's OK?"</em><br /><br /><strong>--Justice Samuel Alito</strong></p></blockquote><p><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;">To clarify: This case tests government's ability to ban images of abhorrent conduct with regards to animal cruelty, not the conduct itself. </span></p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"The fact conduct is repulsive or offensive does not mean we automatically ban the speech." </em><br /><br /><strong>--Patricia Millett, lawyer for Robert Stevens, charged with selling dogfighting videos</strong></p></blockquote><p><br />Exceptions to the law are images with <em>"artistic or social value"</em> which, as Justice Stephen Breyer noted, is open-ended and ripe for endless debate. <em>"People … have to know what to do to avoid being prosecuted,"</em> he said.<br /><br />In fact, a jury rejected Robert Stevens' claim that his dogfighting videos had social value. He was convicted of selling depictions of animal cruelty and sentenced to 37 months in prison which he hasn't served a day of because of this appeal.<br /><br />Chief Justice John Roberts brought up an important question.&nbsp; <em>"How can you tell that these aren't political videos?"</em> he asked, noting that PETA often uses pictures of animal abuse <em>"to generate support for efforts to prohibit"</em> such cruelty. While the law has not yet been used against videos with such political or social value, the justices clearly believe that stronger language is needed to clarify these exceptions.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://www.acc-tv.com/images/globalnews/ogco_peta_060908.jpg" alt="" height="240" width="352" /></p><p><br />A final decision on the case is not expected for at least several weeks so expect more sticky wrangling.<br /><br />***<br />If you are a law nerd, enjoy fascinating analysis from the <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-animal-cruelty-law-in-trouble/">Supreme Court blog</a>:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Despite efforts by an Obama Administration lawyer to show that Congress wrote carefully and narrowly, most of the Justices strongly implied that the law probably goes too far — or at least was so vague that no one can know just what is illegal.&nbsp; Only one Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., seemed tempted to support the law as is."</em></p></blockquote><p><br />Cole, over at the <a href="http://catsworking.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/animal-cruelty-entertainment-to-supreme-court/">Cat Working Blog</a>, makes an interesting point:</p><blockquote><p><br /><br /><em>"Dissecting the law, which the Obama administration and 26 states support, the justices played verbal games, implying it could ban educational films about hunting or nature….The justices miss the point. To make these films, film-makers need 'actors' — animals who can’t protest being thrust into dangerous or deadly situations."</em></p></blockquote><p><br />Septimus at <a href="http://whigblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/supreme-court-hears-animal-cruelty-case.html">The Whig </a>shares concerns with the Court and has a few hypotheticals of their own:</p><blockquote><p><em><br />"Not to defend dog-fighting videos, but where do you draw the line? A few years ago, I watched a PETA video with actor James Cromwell that exposed animal cruelty at a pig farm. It had very graphic depictions of animal cruelty in an effort to change people's attitudes. Would such a video be prohibited under this statute? Who decides? The courts after a long and expensive legal battle? What about the show Animal Cops on Animal Planet? Again, it contains some upsetting depictions of cruelty."</em></p></blockquote><p>Holly at <a href="http://potomafever.blogspot.com/2009/10/free-speech-vs-animal-cruelty-today-in.html">Potomac Fever</a> cautions anyone whose interest has been piqued by 'crush' videos:</p><blockquote><p><br /><br /><em>"I warn you against googling them or attempting to find them as they are extremely offensive and upsetting to anyone who has even an ounce of sympathy for animals. If the Court overturns the decision and rules the law that bans this sort of material unconstitutional, then I'm afraid more of these types of things will surface.</em></p></blockquote><p>~ClizBiz</p><p><strong>(Image Credits: Top - <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ybenjamin/detail??blogid=150&amp;entry_id=49079">SFGate</a>; Middle - <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/ap/wx10212230005.hmedium.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10586849/&amp;usg=__Q9K7O8f1AuoqnTm38lOQBW8rijU=&amp;h=273&amp;w=374&amp;sz=12&amp;hl=en&amp;start=17&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=7rMdKWesteog3M:&amp;tbnh=89&amp;tbnw=122&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsamuel%2Balito%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26um%3D1">Kauren Victoria Burke, AP</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://www.peta.org/">PETA</a>) </strong><br /><br /></p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tsunamis and Other Animal Predictions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/tsunamis-and-other-animal-predictions" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/tsunamis-and-other-animal-predictions</id>
    <published>2009-09-30T19:27:33-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-09-30T19:27:33-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="animal behaviors" />
    <category term="nature" />
    <category term="science" />
    <category term="seizures" />
    <category term="tsunamis" />
    <category term="Environment" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>With the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/world/asia/01pacific.html?_r=1&amp;ref=world">recent tsunami tragedy in the Samoas</a>, I can't help but recall the disastrous Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 which claimed nearly 230,000 human lives but very few animals. By all accounts, beasties in the region sought higher ground hours before the massive waves hit land, including an elephant who immediately broke free of the chains she'd been wearing for years. <br /></p>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>With the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/world/asia/01pacific.html?_r=1&amp;ref=world">recent tsunami tragedy in the Samoas</a>, I can't help but recall the disastrous Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 which claimed nearly 230,000 human lives but very few animals. By all accounts, beasties in the region sought higher ground hours before the massive waves hit land, including an elephant who immediately broke free of the chains she'd been wearing for years. <br /><br />Was it the earthly vibrations that tipped them off? Their keen hearing? A text message from God? Certainly, mankind's current disconnection with the natural world doesn't do us any favors in these situations.</p><p><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/animals-predict-weather-2.jpg" alt="" height="166" width="300" /><br /><br />(It's worth noting that in the remote Andaman Islands, of the six native tribes only the Nicobarese, who had converted to Christianity, taken up agriculture in place of their previous hunter-gatherer ways, and adapted to a more Western lifestyle, suffered significant losses. The aboriginal tribes that had retained their ancient ways quickly evacuated and suffered few or no losses.)<br /><br />It's too early to know if the same phenomena occurred in the Samoas but it does raise&nbsp; interesting questions: What can animal behaviors tell us about the future? Enough to save us? Maybe just enough to keep us dry? <br /><br />The concept certainly isn't new to us. After all, we play the well-worn shadow game every year on February 2, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groundhog_day">Groundhog Day</a>. (Whether Punxsutawney Phil sees his shadow or not determines how much longer winter will last. If he does, it's six more weeks of winter and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107048/">Bill Murray</a>.)</p><p><span class="credit"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/uploads/image/big_bill_in_groundhog-731047.gif" alt="" height="324" width="445" /></span><br /><br />And speaking of bad weather, here are some animal behaviors unscientifically proven to predict a storm before it hits the horizon:</p><ul><li>Birds fly lower to the ground. </li><li>Dogs and cats act up and eat grass.&nbsp; </li><li>Roosters crow later in the day. </li><li>Pigs squeal more and collect nest materials. </li><li>Fish jump out of the water to snack on low-flying insects. </li><li>Frogs croak longer and louder than froggy-normal. </li><li>Cows lay down in the field to make sure they have a dry spot ahead of the storm. Otherwise, they might scamper around, tails raised high, swatting flies. </li><li>Bees and butterflies go AWOL and spiders leave their webs unattended. </li><li>Ants will build up protective 'walls' around the mouth of mounds, possibly even covering them. </li><li>Dolphins hang out in sheltered bays. </li><li>Seagulls come inland. </li><li>Humanoids have pain in their joints, clogged noses, require hot cocoa and 'Twilight Zone' marathons. </li></ul><p><br />Then there's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_%28cat%29.%20">Oscar</a>, the cat featured in the New England Journal of Medicine for his uncanny ability to predict the death of patients at a Rhode Island nursing home within hours. Various human explanations abound but nevertheless, a new protocol has been put in place for the staff: <strong>When Oscar naps with a patient, call the family. </strong></p><blockquote><p><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://canadianchristine.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/farkdethloldh3.jpg" alt="" height="273" width="410" /><br /><br /><em>"Within a half hour the family starts to arrive. Chairs are brought into the room, where the relatives begin their vigil. The priest is called to deliver last rites. And still, Oscar has not budged, instead purring and gently nuzzling Mrs. K. A young grandson asks his mother, 'What is the cat doing here?' The mother, fighting back tears, tells him, 'He is here to help Grandma get to heaven.' Thirty minutes later, Mrs. K. takes her last earthly breath. With this, Oscar sits up, looks around, then departs the room so quietly that the grieving family barely notices."</em><br /><br /><strong>-- David M. Dosa, M.D., M.P.H., <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/4/328">The New England Journal of Medicine</a></strong><br /><br /></p></blockquote><p>And what about seizure dogs? These are dogs that have been specially trained to hone their unique canine abilities and predict an oncoming seizure in their two-legged partner. Nobody knows how or why, only that this is increasingly becoming a lifesaving solution for many.</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"Nobody knows how the dog is able to detect an oncoming seizure. Some people have suggested that there may be a change in the owner's behavior or scent before a seizure happens and that is what the dogs are responding to, but it's still a mystery."</em><br /><br /><strong>--<a href="http://www.epilepsyfoundation.org/epilepsyusa/seizuredogs.cfm">Epilepsy Foundation</a><br /></strong></p></blockquote><p>Well, I tell you what. No matter what is coming at us down the road, I'm keeping my eye on the furry, feathered, buzzing ones. When they hit the road, I'll be right behind 'em. No questions asked. <br /><br />***<br /><br />Blogger Ai Shiang has a ladybug tip over at <a href="http://aislim.blogspot.com/2009/09/ladybugs-predicting-future.html">It's Raining Ice Cream</a>:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"There are over 5000 species of ladybugs and the most capable of them all is the orange ladybug….When the weather begins to turn cold, these ladybugs will look for the best shelter. Sometime you might see over 100 bugs choosing the same spot. The ladybug is the first insect you'll see when the cold winter is over." </em><br /><br /></p></blockquote><p>Read the moving story of Turk, a special doggie being trained for a special purpose at <a href="http://epstorm.blogspot.com/2009/09/turk-newfoundland-is-more-than-pet.html">Seizure Alert Dogs For Life</a>:</p><blockquote><p><br /><em>"His name is Turk. He’s a seven-month old Newfoundland puppy and his purpose in life is to save Ruth Ann Goodfield’s life." </em></p></blockquote><p>Meanwhile, James, over at <a href="http://cubiksrube.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/can-sealions-predict-the-lottery/">Cubik's Rube</a>, is quite skeptical about Darren Brown's ability to predict lottery numbers using sea lions:</p><blockquote><p><br /><br /><em>"This isn’t some quirky thing about zoo animals telling people’s fortunes, so that the punters can chuckle to their friends, 'Ooh, Tarka says I’m going to meet someone tall, dark and handsome this weekend, I hope he’s right!' And it’s not just that these sea lions are interacting with people in a way that makes you feel like there’s a 'real connection' there. Lottery numbers are an objectively measurable thing. And you’re saying that Biffo and Max can predict them. And they are 'rarely known to be wrong'. I just don’t get it." </em></p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p>~ClizBiz <br /><br /><strong>(Image Credits: Top - <span class="credit"><a href="http://pertwee.com/splash">Charles Pertwee</a>/<a href="http://howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=animals-predict-weather.htm&amp;url=http://www.gettyimages.com">Getty Images</a></span>; Middle - <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0325837/">Louis Goldman</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://canadianchristine.wordpress.com/category/animals/">Canadian Christine</a>)</strong></p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dear Pig, </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/dear-pig" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/dear-pig</id>
    <published>2009-09-16T15:55:57-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-09-16T15:55:57-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Conditions &amp; Ailments" />
    <category term="cows" />
    <category term="family" />
    <category term="heart valve surgery" />
    <category term="medical" />
    <category term="pescatarianism" />
    <category term="Pigs" />
    <category term="Vegetarianism" />
    <category term="Surgery" />
    <category term="Vegetarian" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Though we never met,&nbsp; I want you to know how much I appreciate you giving up your heart valve so my mom could live longer and breathe easier. Mama Iva's aorta was busted but thanks to you, it's working fine now. I meant what I said the night before in my dead-of-night conversation with God, that I would give up meat (especially pork) if your valve could pull her through. I'm keeping the fish though. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Though we never met,&nbsp; I want you to know how much I appreciate you giving up your heart valve so my mom could live longer and breathe easier. Mama Iva's aorta was busted but thanks to you, it's working fine now. I meant what I said the night before in my dead-of-night conversation with God, that I would give up meat (especially pork) if your valve could pull her through. I'm keeping the fish though. </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://www.fantastic-farm-and-country-photos.com/image-files/istock_000003162997xsmall.jpg" alt="" height="310" width="468" /></p>
<p><br /><br />As long as your valve is working so smoothly, I certainly can't break my end of the deal. So far, so good. I managed to attend a BBQ over the weekend thrown by a studly firefighter. I was worried about meaty temptations until I discovered that both he and his wife have been vegetarians for 30 years and so, there was a shrimp option. </p>
<p>I am reserving the right to two exceptions: </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><br /><strong>#1</strong> - My mother's meatloaf - because it is holy and made with so much love. If ever I faced the gallows, this would be my Last Meal. <br /><br /><strong>#2 </strong>- Anything my brother kills. I know this man and his heart - he is respectful of nature and a fair huntsman. He's a good shot but many a time he's gotten up at 4 a.m. to sit in the bush for hours and come home with nothing. This is much harder than simply buying a tray of steaks from Costco and so I respect his effort to even up the score. And he never hunts pigs. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />I understand there are different valve options –mechanical or animal (pig or cow.). Evidently, your heart valve is strikingly similar to ours. We've been using your valves in this procedure for nearly 20 years now mainly because they are less likely to be rejected by the body than mechanical valves. Also, it means that the patient does not have to take blood thinners for the rest of their lives - a big plus.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.topnews.in/health/files/Open-heart-surgery2.jpg" alt="" height="276" width="354" /></p>
<p>I recently saw actor/comedian Robin Williams <a href="http://www.wowowow.com/entertainment/robin-williams-heart-surgery-david-letterman-video-296111">discuss his experience</a> with the surgery (he got a cow valve) on David Letterman. Of course, its his job to make light of the ordeal - and he did - but you could tell he was so humbled by it and the hard realizations that came with it: "Wow. I <em>am</em> old.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"I have one new valve and a repaired valve. I have a<br />
cow valve — which is great, and the grazing has been fun. The mechanical valve is great, but if someone uses the remote control, you fart."</em></p>
<p><strong>--Robin Williams<br /></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://www.wowowow.com/files/imagecache/300x/2009_0514_robin_williams_david_letterman.jpg" alt="" height="282" width="300" /></p>
<p><br />I'm told that in about 10-20 years, Mama Iva will likely need a replacement as your valve wears out. Knowing her, she'll still be working - 'retirement' is a dirty word in her family. She has numerous relatives in their 80s and 90s still farming fields in North Dakota and chasing 'girls' at the local nursing home. She is a tough mix of restless prairie grit, mashed potatoes and laughter, which comes easily for her. <br /><br />So, thanks again for the sacrifice. This family drama has lit a fire under my pescatarian goals, previously met with a lackluster half-assedness. All those smarty pants books are right - pigs are mighty clever. It's just the mud that throws us off. <br /><br />Your friend, <br /><br />~ClizBiz <br /><br />P.S. It just might be time to re-read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm#Pigs">Animal Farm</a> again ….<br /><br />***<br />I present the most beautiful tribute to a pig valve I may have ever read. In fact, the letter above was inspired by Duston Todd's blog post: <a href="http://dustontodd.blogspot.com/2009/08/story-about-pig.html">"A Story About A Pig."</a> He felt such strong gratitude towards the animal that saved his wife, he had artwork commissioned in honor of the pig. </p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"It is entitled "to fill the measure"....(if i can explain the context of the piece and the title)...i believe god has put animals on the earth for their own individual destinies. that they were created by his hand just as we were and that they were commanded to fill the measure of their creation. i believe the pig did in fact 'fill the measure' of it's creation. that it blessed my life, my wife's life, and our children's lives...the pig literally gave it's life that we might live." </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />As a Canadian married to an American, Rob, over at <a href="http://inthecrease.blogspot.com/2009/09/obamacare-versus-nobamacare.html">Holy Goalie</a>, tends to be smug about healthcare. That is, until he found himself in a fascinating healthcare debate with an American man proudly sporting a scar down his chest:</p>
<blockquote><p><br /><br /><em>"'A pig valve in my heart. I've got a piece of a pig in my heart. And,' he went on, 'the way I see it, if I'm living in the United States, and I need a repair to my heart, I'm going to get it.'" </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />Meanwhile, <a href="http://valve-replacement-surgery.blogspot.com/2009/05/valve-replacement-surgery-cardiac.html">Lanie Dills</a> blogs an account of her heart surgery dramas with a warning to pig valve recipients: Get ready for the jokes.: </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><br /><br /><em>"He wants to do a repair if possible, but a pig valve will be used if repair of my own valve isn't possible. In that event, as some of the valve replacement surgery patients recounted in Adam Pick's book,<a href="http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/aff-book.php?hop=recruiter"> The Patient's Guide To Heart Valve Surgery</a>, you will be inundated with oink oink jokes from friends and family. <br /><br />"Barbara Bush, (we're in good company), recently had one of her heart valves replaced with a pig valve, and she said that good natured joking was one of the unexpected hazards of choosing the pig valve replacement option. Personally, I'd rather have my heart steadily ticking along with a pig valve than not ticking at all; how about you?" </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>~ClizBiz </p>
<p><strong>(Image Credits: Top - <a href="http://www.fantastic-farm-and-country-photos.com/farm-animal-pictures.html">Fantastic Farm and Animal Photos</a>; Middle - <a href="http://www.topnews.in/health/diseases/heart?page=1">TopNews.in</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://www.cbs.com/late_night/late_show/">CBS</a>) </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Ugly Omelet: Hard-Cracked Realities of the Egg Industry </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/ugly-omelet-hard-cracked-realities-egg-industry" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/ugly-omelet-hard-cracked-realities-egg-industry</id>
    <published>2009-09-09T18:43:22-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-09-09T18:43:22-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Food Politics" />
    <category term="agribusiness" />
    <category term="egg industry" />
    <category term="Mercy for Animals" />
    <category term="vegan" />
    <category term="Vegan" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, a disturbing <a href="http://www.mercyforanimals.org/hatchery/">video</a> landed in my inbox from Mercy for Animals (MFA), an animal-rights organization. Shot with a hidden camera by an undercover worker at Hy-Line Hatchery in Spencer, Iowa, (the largest hatchery for egg-laying breed chicks in the US), the footage shows thousands of tiny baby chicks - all males - being ground up alive. Sadly, this is standard industry practice and considered humane by several regulatory agencies.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, a disturbing <a href="http://www.mercyforanimals.org/hatchery/">video</a> landed in my inbox from Mercy for Animals (MFA), an animal-rights organization. Shot with a hidden camera by an undercover worker at Hy-Line Hatchery in Spencer, Iowa, (the largest hatchery for egg-laying breed chicks in the US), the footage shows thousands of tiny baby chicks - all males - being ground up alive. Sadly, this is standard industry practice and considered humane by several regulatory agencies.</p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span><object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/JJ--faib7to&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="344" width="425"><br />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JJ--faib7to&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p>Male chicks are targeted because they don't lay eggs and don't grow big enough to produce meat so ... off they go. At the Hy-Line Hatchery, 150,000 male chicks are ground up every day - 130 million a year. This daily butchering is just business-as-usual to get those cheap eggs to market. Exhibit A:<br /><br /><strong>Average price of a dozen eggs in 2009 - $2.89. <br />Average price of a dozen organic eggs in 2009 - $4.89.</strong></p>
<p><strong><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.moyerschicks.com/MC-Web/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/baby_chicks.jpg" alt="" height="303" width="250" /><br /></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"Since the undercover video by Mercy For Animals, a vegan advocacy and animal rights organization, was made public, many have expressed shock that male chicks, considered non-profitable to the egg industry, are killed shortly after hatching. The practice, however, is not news within the agricultural industry where 'instantaneous euthanasia' is carried out daily. Rural experts contend that most Americans are too far removed from family farming, much less the agricultural industry, to know and/or understand why certain practices which appear cruel are continued."</em><br /><br /><strong>--Lynda Waddington, <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/19590/hy-line-acknowledges-problems-at-iowa-hatchery">Iowa Independent</a></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />The video also shows a debeaking machine where surviving female chicks are inserted, dangling by their beaks, into a laser cutter where burns are inflicted to make the beak fall off in a week. Now that the video has made the rounds, feathers are flying. <br /><br />While I knew intellectually that this type of thing went on, seeing it on film is a whole other matter. I couldn't get over how the workers roughly handled the baby chicks like they were apples or potatoes. There is a specific position called a "sexer" that separates the boys from the girls - flipping the boys (I assume) by their heads into a giant metal chute. I'm sorry, but if you can't empathize with a newborn baby - a baby <em>anything</em> - then I have to assume a bit of your soul has died somewhere along the way. The video did not make me proud of my species, to put it lightly. <br /><br />But it does no good to demonize the workers, who are merely doing a job to provide for their own families. Nor does it help to crucify the egg producers who are in the business of providing what the market (me, you and that guy over there) demand: <strong>Cheap eggs. </strong>This is the ugly side of corporate agriculture and .... actually, I have yet to find a pretty side. </p>
<p><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.fueledbyeggs.com/layout/images/logo.gif" alt="" height="300" width="300" /><br /><br />Since the video's release, an independent audit commissioned by the corporate owners of the Spencer hatchery has concluded that some of the practices depicted by an undercover video are, in fact, not standard operating procedure and are in violation of the company’s animal welfare policy. The (nameless) auditor's concluding statement: </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"In conclusion, I am impressed with the commitment to animal care by Hy-Line and its employees here in Iowa. The equipment, practices and handling of chicks at the Hy-Line hatchery in Spencer, Iowa are consistent with customary industry husbandry practices and exceed animal welfare standards in a number of areas.</em><br /><br /><em>However, these independent audits confirm that some of the practices at our Spencer, Iowa facility depicted in the undercover video did not reflect the standard operating procedures of our company and are in direct violation of our animal welfare policy. One scene in the video depicted a bypass of the instantaneous euthanasia process and was a direct and clear violation of both the authorized animal handling procedures and our welfare policies." </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />Yeesh. <br /><br />So, while the industry deals with being naked and exposed, what can consumers do on our end? As Americans, we all know that money talks. What are our options here? <br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>#1- Go Vegan: </strong></span>While I get lots of help from my own garden, the amazing <a href="http://blog.fatfreevegan.com/">SusanV</a>, <a href="http://www.traderjoes.com/labels_and_lists.html">Trader Joe's Vegan Trail Mix cookies</a> and <a href="http://www.cafegratitude.com/">Cafe Gratitude</a> - I can't see myself taking this road until I fully conquer the vegetarian thing. If you are looking for info, check out <a href="http://www.goveg.com/">GoVeg</a> - a fantastic resource. I'm always surprised how many yummy options there are. <br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>#2 - Know Your Egg Source:</strong></span> Next time you pick up some eggs, try reading beyond the price and check out the label. Where did the eggs come from? Organic? Cage-free? Once you determine the company, call or email them asking about the hatchery source. You might find, as egg sleuth <a href="http://www.fakeplasticfish.com/2009/09/male-chicks-macerated-for-our-eggs-but.html">Beth Terry</a> did, that just because you are buying something labeled "humane" does not mean you don't have beak blood on your hands. Ask questions. I've started doing this already and there's a lot of squirming going on - a healthy sign. <br /><br /><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
<blockquote><p><em>"What I learned is that <a href="http://www.glaumeggranch.com/">Glaum Ranch</a> doesn't engage in this practice because it doesn't hatch its own eggs. In fact, few egg producers do. They buy their eggs from pullet producers which buy their eggs from hatcheries. Which means that humane egg producers may be inadvertently supporting this practice through the chicks they buy!" </em><br /><br /><strong>--Beth Terry, <a href="http://www.fakeplasticfish.com/2009/09/male-chicks-macerated-for-our-eggs-but.html">FakePlasticFish</a></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>#3 - Write a letter:&nbsp;</strong></span> Further along in her egg adventures, Beth suggests writing a letter to the Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack - who is a pretty cool open-minded guy, from what I hear:</p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>Honorable Tom Vilsack<br />U.S. Department of Agriculture<br />Room 200-A The Whittenberg Building<br />Washington, DC 20250<br /><br />Dear Mr. Secretary:<br /><br />I am appalled by the practice of live male chick maceration that is routinely practiced in hatcheries. There is promising research on sexing embryos which would eliminate the current methods of male chick euthanasia. The USDA can help end this inhumane practice by putting funds toward research into sexing embryos. I would like to see this procedure developed as soon as possible to end the suffering and waste created by the painful destruction of so many live birds.<br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br />Beth Terry </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Feel free to follow Beth's lead on this, dovetailing on her suggestion or offering up your own. <br /><br />Meanwhile, MFA has been writing letters of its own and asked the nation's top 50 grocery chains to post a label on their egg packages stating: <strong>"WARNING: Male chicks are ground-up alive by the egg industry." </strong><br /><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" src="http://strikingattheroots.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/hatchery_warning_color.gif?w=320&amp;h=213" alt="" height="213" width="320" /><br />Unfortunately, the wording makes it sound as if there are health risks to the product when this is not the issue at all. However, MFA's letter by Executive Director Nathan Runkle makes the case for humane handling. An excerpt: </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"The violence that you will see is standard and acceptable within the egg industry, and consumers have a right to know about this cruelty so that they can make informed and compassionate purchasing decisions ...Chickens' cognitive nervous systems are fully developed at the time of hatching, as a fact of neurophysiology, the young chicks are likely suffering extreme pain as they are being cut up alive by the grinder blades. Yet, the public has been kept in the dark by the egg industry about its painful disposal of male chicks. If egg producers threw, mutilated, and ground up puppies or kittens in the manner that they do baby chicks, they could prosecuted for cruelty to animals." </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />(You might recall that <a href="http://www.blogher.com/oprah-and-proposition-2-its-whats-dinner">the issue was widely explored</a> last November when Californians overwhelmingly passed Prop. 2, the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act, an animal welfare measure that polices humane issues in the state's agribusiness.)<br /><br />We all have our conscious to deal with on this but at the very least, make the effort to know where your food comes from and try to understand the long and often sordid road it takes to your plate. It's a real eye opener. <br /><br />****<br />Mark Hawthorne runs a terrific blog (well-written, sane, resourceful) over at <a href="http://strikingattheroots.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/new-investigation-exposes-the-horrors-of-egg-production/">Striking The Roots</a>, which follows animal activism around the world: </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"One of the agribusiness cruelties that has always made me shudder is the practice of killing newborn male chicks, whom egg producers deem as having no monetary value. Each year in the US, 200 million male chicks are killed shortly after hatching, and many of these birds are ground up in large machines called macerators while still alive. Taking these innocent babies, fresh from their eggs and searching for their mothers, and subjecting them to such a callous execution is one of the dirty little secrets of agribiz."</em><br /><br /></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, Reenee, over at <a href="http://hastalosgatosquierenzapatos.blogspot.com/2009/09/eggs-anyone.html?zx=22942dd7226ac50d">Hasta Los Gatos Quieren Zapatos</a>, isn't exactly won over by Runkle's arguments:</p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"People are going to eat eggs, no matter what. If Runkle doesn't want to eat them, then so be it, but he has no right to try to bully people into refusing eggs with scare tactics. He's as bad as those right wingnuts with their bullshit tactics."</em> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Meet Kelly, an omnivore who blogs at <a href="http://howkellysgardengrows.blogspot.com/2009/09/egg-industry-exposed.html">How My Garden Grows</a>, who could not even bring herself to watch the actual video but makes a great point about wasted food:</p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"I am not a vegetarian, nor will I ever be. (Though sometimes I want to be.) I read this and wanted to post it, I have read many horrific scenarios about the chicken industry. As a result I try to make better decisions as to where my food comes from, but this I was unaware of. Please read and form your own opinions. Mine are that I am so thankful I can buy eggs from local farms, that we as a human race are the most cruel creatures on earth, and that there are people dying from starvation around the world and we grind up chicks like unwanted yard waste because when pumped with artificial growth hormones they don't grow fast enough. Oh, and these ground up chicks are probably then fed to their own species. Nice." </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>~ClizBiz<br /><br /><strong>(Image Credits: Top - <a href="http://www.moyerschicks.com/MC-Web/DesktopDefault.aspx">Moyers Chicks</a>; Middle - <a href="http://www.fueledbyeggs.com/us-egg-industry.html">Fueled By Eggs</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://www.mercyforanimals.org/hatchery/">Mercy For Animals</a>) </strong></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Animal Sanctuaries Suffer in LA Fires </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/animal-sanctuaries-suffer-la-fires" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/animal-sanctuaries-suffer-la-fires</id>
    <published>2009-09-03T01:52:31-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-09-03T01:52:31-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Life" />
    <category term="animals" />
    <category term="los_angeles" />
    <category term="southern california" />
    <category term="wild fires" />
    <category term="Country Living" />
    <category term="Exotic Pets" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The recent <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/la-me-fire3-2009sep03,0,2110651.story">spate of fires in Southern California</a> (eight, at last count) has created an especially hard challenge for numerous wildlife sanctuaries. In any natural disaster (except <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0104_050104_tsunami_animals.html">tsunamis</a>, evidently), animals face a disadvantage of not knowing what the hell is going on.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The recent <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/la-me-fire3-2009sep03,0,2110651.story">spate of fires in Southern California</a> (eight, at last count) has created an especially hard challenge for numerous wildlife sanctuaries. In any natural disaster (except <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0104_050104_tsunami_animals.html">tsunamis</a>, evidently), animals face a disadvantage of not knowing what the hell is going on. While Los Angeles is overstocked with humans, the fires reminded us it is also home to many exotic beasts with strange pasts who managed to find peace here.</p>
<p><img src="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0120a59570f6970c-600wi" alt="Tigers await transport at the Wildlife Waystation. " title="(Photo by Al Seib/LA Times) " class="mceItem" height="388" width="600" /></p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"We moved llamas. We moved ostriches, emus, rheas. Sheep goats, various types of pigs, wild boar. Wild pigs are extremely dangerous."</em><br /><br /><strong>--Hugh Briefman, Los Angeles city animal control officer</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sure, it's easy enough to pack a Chihuahua in your evacuation satchel, but try getting a horse, tiger or bear loaded up and gone as angry wildfires threaten your property. As our incredible fire crews work day and night to put out the blazes, those who care for large animals face the daunting task of evacuating large, frightened beasts that may or may not want to cooperate. </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"The Wildlife Waystation is currently weathering the storm. All of our animals are safe. Although the fire is dangerously close, we are fully staffed and prepared to care for our more than 400 animals and our sanctuary built more than 33 years ago. Emergency crews have worked around the clock to preserve our safety."</em><br /><strong><br />--<a href="http://www.wildlifewaystation.org/">Wildlife Waystation</a> (Despite the calm assurance, some animals have indeed been evacuated.)</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />In fact, while evacuating a batch of chimpanzees from Wildlife Waystation to the LA Zoo, two female chimps escaped.&nbsp; One chimp wandered to another exhibit at the zoo and was tranquilized and recaptured in about 20 minutes. Meanwhile, the other wily girl was pursued and eventually captured in nearby Griffith Park about an hour later - with a great story to tell her fellow chimps, no doubt.</p>
<p><img src="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0120a5957326970c-600wi" alt="Chimpanzees being loaded up from the Wildlife Waystation - headed for the LA Zoo. " title="Photo by Al Seib/LA Times) " class="mceItem" height="293" width="400" /></p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"Anyone able to provide the hard-to-come-by large cages the sanctuary needs to continue its evacuation is encouraged to call (818) 899-5201.&nbsp; The cages must be able to hold a lion or tiger approximately 400 pounds, and smaller ones are no longer needed for the evacuation effort."</em><br /><br /><strong>--LA Times</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>At this posting, the fires have blackened 140,000 acres (nearly 219 square miles) destroyed 92 structures, killed two firefighters and forced thousands to flee. Worse yet, the blaze was evidently human-caused (though not yet determined if it was accident or arson) and the official Southern California fire season, which arrives with the infamous Santa Ana winds, has yet to begin. </p>
<blockquote><p><em>“We are safe and all animals have been relocated… The past two days,<br /><br />
volunteers have installed wire lines directly to the animal enclosures,<br /><br />
constructed additional pen areas, and moved cleaning, health care, and feed<br /><br />
supplies and equipment to the evacuation site — as it now appears that the<br /><br />
sanctuary animals will not be able to return until September 15 or later.“</em><br /><br /><strong>--Lorri Houston, <a href="http://animalacres.org/">Animal Acres</a> Founder</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>For more information about how to help - both animals and humans - check out the LA Times often-updated '<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-howtohelp1-2009sep01,0,6459379.story">How to Help Page</a>.' </p>
<p><img src="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0120a5399fb1970b-600wi" alt="A piglet awaits rescue at Animal Acres. " title="(Photo by Lawrence K. Ho/LA Times) " class="mceItem" height="370" width="600" /><br /><br />***<br />Brenda Shoss and her dedicated crew over at <a href="http://kcdisasteraid.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/animals-in-california-fires-an-overview/">Kinship Circle Animal Disaster Aid Blog</a> have put together a comprehensive list of animal sanctuaries threatened by the fires and included updates for each, plus resources for concerned pet owners who face evacuation. </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"Wildlife Waystation tells Kinship Circle they’re doing fine — except for a<br />continuing need for LARGE, STURDY CAGES for lions, tigers, bears. They also<br />need monetary donations to sustain animals during the evacuation and return<br />transport. Wildlife Waystation, in Little Tujunga Canyon, is a 160-acre home<br />to over 400 animals, including tigers, lions, bears, chimpanzees."</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Vegan baker, Kim Garr, over at <a href="http://www.cestlavegan.com/">C'est La Vegan</a> gives the background info on the Animal Acres benefit gala:</p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"Animal Acres has a very special place in my heart, and I’ve really been looking forward to the Gala.&nbsp; Unfortunately, due to the fires that are currently burning in the Los Angeles area, they’ve had to evacuate all of the animals and can’t return until at least September 15th. The Gala was going to be held at the sanctuary this Saturday (Sept. 5th), but because of the evacuation they’ve had to find another venue, as well as change the date." </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />T.T. Thomas over at <a href="http://ttthomasopinionhead.blogspot.com/2009/09/making-progressand-helping-out.html">Opionhead blog</a> sums it all up: </p>
<blockquote><p><br /><em>"In every fire and natural disaster, it's the faces of the vulnerable and helpless, people and animals, that strike a chord within us." </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>~ClizBiz </p>
<p><strong>(Photo Credits: Top &amp; Middle - <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2009/09/animals-waystation-fires.html">Al Seib/LA Times</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2009/08/animal-acres-acton-station-fire-evacuate.html">Lawrence K. Ho/LA Times</a>.) </strong></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Interview with Matthew Gasteier, creator of &quot;F U, Penguin&quot; blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/interview-matthew-gasteier-creator-f-u-penguin-blog" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/interview-matthew-gasteier-creator-f-u-penguin-blog</id>
    <published>2009-08-26T11:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-08-26T16:23:33-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="animal blog" />
    <category term="book" />
    <category term="Food" />
    <category term="penguins" />
    <category term="Books" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Last October, 27-year-old Matthew Gasteier got fed up with all the cuteness of animal blogs such as <a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/">ICanHasCheezburger</a> and <a href="http://cuteoverload.com/">CuteOverload</a>. The result was the creation of the devastatingly funny <a href="http://www.fupenguin.com/">&quot;Fuck You, Penguin&quot;</a> - &quot;A blog where I tell cute animals what's what.&quot; Flash forward to present day, where the blog gets 10-20,000 hits daily and Matthew's blog-based book, &quot;FU, Penguin&quot; hit store shelves yesterday.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Last October, 27-year-old Matthew Gasteier got fed up with all the cuteness of animal blogs such as <a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/">ICanHasCheezburger</a> and <a href="http://cuteoverload.com/">CuteOverload</a>. The result was the creation of the devastatingly funny <a href="http://www.fupenguin.com/">&quot;Fuck You, Penguin&quot;</a> - &quot;A blog where I tell cute animals what's what.&quot; Flash forward to present day, where the blog gets 10-20,000 hits daily and Matthew's blog-based book, &quot;FU, Penguin&quot; hit store shelves yesterday. BlogHer's Animal Concerns Editor caught up with the busy boy to find out what his deal is. </p>
<p><b>So, Matthew, what's your problem with cute animals? </b></p>
<p><i>I don't have a problem with cute animals on their face. I just think that there's a certain way that cute animals should carry themselves that shows a certain level of respect to the person that is looking at the cute animal. If an animal is interacting with me on a normal level where, say we can discuss intellectual viewpoints on the geopolitical climate, then that's fine. But if they are going to just roll around on the ground and show me their belly, then I have I problem. </i></p>
<p><b>Are you not cute? I heard you were handsome, which is not even remotely the same thing. </b></p>
<p><i>I've gotten my share of compliments ... from made-up interviewers. The blog isn't about me, it's about what I've done for the world, which is the blog. </i></p>
<p><b>The blog is what you've done for the world?</b></p>
<p><i>Did I need to do anything else? </i></p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2042/2478107696_4228b6d0fd.jpg" align="top" height="400" width="324" /><br /><b><br />Does your entire human family have a heart of stone or just you? </b></p>
<p><i>I guess I should probably take offense to the idea that I have a heart of stone. I love animals and I love people. Just as there are good people and bad people there are good animals and bad animals. For example, I love krill. Krill are hardworking and trying to make their way in the world and penguins come along and eat them. Also, penguins love pyramid schemes. </i></p>
<p><b>Did you always have a potty mouth? Did you eat a lot of soap as a kid? </b></p>
<p><i>I try to keep the blog as clean as possible but the animals make me upset and I lose control. At a certain point, it becomes so ridiculous that I can't help myself. When you are dealing with something that is so dark and depraved, you really have to fight with fire. </i></p>
<p><b>Have you received any threatening letters - perhaps with hearts over 'i's' and smiley faces in the margins - from pro-cute sites like 'ICanHasCheezburger' and CuteOverload?' </b></p>
<p><i>I did have a brief battle with Cute Overload but that played out mostly in the comments section. I did, at one point, compare them to Nazi Germany but it's all in good fun. </i><br /><b><br />What animals pisses you off the most? Who is the most manipulative? Is it indeed the penguin? </b></p>
<p><i>I named the site obviously after the penguin but after I've receiving lots of emails and looking through my own collection, I've concluded that it may be the panda, ultimately, because they are so entitled. They just sit around all day, eating bamboo while they wait for us to set them up with attractive women to have sex with. I don't appreciate it. </i></p>
<p><b>Yeah, it does sound like a pretty sweet deal. And what about the Red Panda? </b></p>
<p><i>Red panda is a complete farce -  it's not even an actual panda. Its other name is the Firefox and it is not actually a fox so I don't understand what the panda is going for there. If there is one thing I'm not looking for in my pandas, it's a smaller version of them. </i></p>
<p><img src="http://www.hickerphoto.com/data/media/40/pictures-F76T7426.jpg" align="top" height="212" width="311" /></p>
<p><b>Are some animals more uppity than others? </b></p>
<p><i>The #1 uppity animal is the dolphin. It thinks that it's better than everybody else. It will never hesitate to point out that you are not shooting that basketball the correct way or bouncing that beach ball in the correct way. I just don't appreciate their attitude. </i></p>
<p><b>Also, they do seem to have a permanent smirk ...</b></p>
<p><i>Absolutely. Overall, think that they are better than us. Even though it is probably is true, they should keep it to themselves and be more discreet. After all, I don't go around to a sloth telling him all the things I did today. </i></p>
<p><b>Thoughts on cross-species canoodling? </b></p>
<p><i>I am opposed to it. That's all I have to say on the matter. A lawsuit is still pending. </i></p>
<p><b>Do you think there is an evolutionary reason for cuteness? Do you even believe in evolution? </b></p>
<p><i>Yeah, I believe in evolution although I never really thought about it. Reason? I guess so in the same way that there an evolutionary reason for lying. It's not that I don't respect the effort that these animals are putting up. I understand. </i></p>
<p>For example, I like cookies, I'm a big fan. I will do pretty much anything to get a cookie. When I see a puppy roll around on its back to get a cookie, I'm thinking, &quot;Touche&quot; but that doesn't mean I'm going to accept that from the puppy. I would hope that if I were in that situation I wouldn't resort to that. Then again, if the situation were reversed, I would hope that that were someone as equally as wonderful as me to set them straight. I'm here to keep the animals honest. </p>
<p><b>I notice in the book (pp. 96-97) that you were basically won over by the incredibly plump prairie dog, admitting that his fat folds were <i>&quot;as cute as shit&quot;</i> and you go on to say, <i>&quot;Damn you and your scheming ways.&quot;</i> Is this a crack in your steely snarky armor? </b></p>
<p><i>I think occasionally an animal will get to me for a moment but I've shown time and time again and that I will return to where I am firmly in control of the situation. I think that's why people come back to reading the site because they know they can trust me because they know that it is 100% literally how I feel. </i></p>
<p><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_xPRJcY91HB4/SpHzDDwZKTI/AAAAAAAAAiI/V3l2ELO7yfY/s400/beaver.jpg" align="top" height="400" width="263" /></p>
<p><b>Do you know any cute animals personally? Do you live with any? </b></p>
<p><i>I don't live with any cute animals. I have known a few on occasion. Recently, I had a puppy stay with me but it left to go back to its owners and it's okay. I've moved on ... kind of. Things have been hard in life but I'm putting the pieces back together. </i></p>
<p>I'm looking for a dog right now and I've met a few applicants but I haven't really found one that has clicked with me on an inter-personal basis. I mean, you want a dog that you can walk up to, shake hands with and say 'How do you?' and I think people have stopped demanding that from dogs. People have really lowered their puppy standards. </p>
<p><b>It's almost a dumbing down of puppy-dom. </b></p>
<p><i>Yes, and I really think that the TV and the Internet are to blame. Most of the kids these days can't even spell cheeseburger, which is really strange. </i></p>
<p><b>Especially considering it is a major food group for them. </b></p>
<p><i>Very odd.</i></p>
<p><b>Do you ever visit zoos or circuses just to yell at animals in person? It seems kind of cowardice to only insult them online. </b></p>
<p><i>I haven't left my house in awhile so .... but sometimes I take virtual zoo tours online which is basically the same thing. </i></p>
<p><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51EmdRhagPL._SL500_AA240_.jpg" align="middle" height="240" width="240" /></p>
<p><b>Isn't your book just a republish of your blog? Is there anything new here? </b></p>
<p><i>There actually is. 1/3 of the posts are new and I've spent years in the field doing research coming up with nano-facts for each animal. There's cold hard truths about penguins. There's also a whole suggestion section for domestic animals - a 'Try this at home' section. It's a how-to on the proper way to raise an animal. There's pitfalls that the conventional books don't teach you and I want to make sure you don't fall into those traps. </i></p>
<p><b>To make sure you don't have an asshole for a pet? </b></p>
<p><i>Absolutely. </i></p>
<p>****</p>
<p>(The rest of the interview Matthew kindly conducted out of out-of-character.)</p>
<p><b>How much time per week do you spend on your FU blog? </b></p>
<p>When I first started, it was every day. Some posts will take 5 minutes and others will take an hour and half, including moderating comments, answering emails and such. I probably spend two to three hours per week on the blog, maybe four. </p>
<p><b>Do you have a day job? </b></p>
<p><i>Yes, I do film market research. I even called myself a 'soul sucking vampire' today. </i></p>
<p><b>Where do you get the photos for the blog? </b></p>
<p><i>I pull them off web for the blog but for the book, everything was cleared. I've been using a stock photo house that's been pretty good to me. All the domestic animals are from people - readers send them in, pet owners - and you'll notice I call those animals by their real names. These days, about one-third are specific photos sent in from owners.</i></p>
<p><b>How many readers? </b></p>
<p><i>It ranges - somewhere around 10-20,000 hits a day. </i></p>
<p><b>Can you quit your job?  </b></p>
<p><i>No! I don't see myself quitting my job. It's a nice thing to do but ... </i></p>
<p>Here's one piece of advice to anyone thinking of starting something like this: Use user-submitted material! Cheezburger posts 200 times a day - all from readers. It's a lot harder to keep it fresh when it is all you. Fortunately, I still producing funny work and people seem t like it but who knows when it will no longer be funny? I want to make a good site but I don't want to make a career out of it. </p>
<p><b>Where do you see you and the blog a year from now? Do you expect to run out of annoying beasts to vilify? </b></p>
<p><i>I have no idea. I didn't think it would last this long, to be honest. When I was approached about a book, I didn't think the blog would last through all the way to publication. I don't know where any of this comes from so I don't know how long it will last. </i></p>
<p><b>When did you know it was big? </b></p>
<p>It all happened really really fast. The blog started last October and the book came together in late January, when I was approached by publishers. It got popular in early December. The first big thing was being linked by <a href="http://www.veryshortlist.com/home/index.cfm">VeryShortList</a>. It was building before then but that day I got 80,000 hits or something ridiculous. That's when I realized. Agents and publishers started contacting me - which was weird and silly. Being on <a href="http://jezebel.com/">Jezebel</a> and in <a href="http://www.wired.com/">WiRED</a>! You're thinking nothing else big is going to happen and then something else happen. </p>
<p><b>Why do you think it is so popular? </b></p>
<p><i>People like cute animals and cursing - two of the most popular things on the Internet. It does seem like this weird combination of things. I didn't know that there were so many people out there who share that sense of humor and to see it on a website was exciting. </i></p>
<p><b>Is it the same people who love Cheezburger and Cute Overload? </b></p>
<p><i>It's a sliver of those people who like that kind of stuff but also have this other side to them that is snarky. There's also people who read my blog who hate that kind of stuff and they see it as a response to that. As long as people are laughing, it doesn't really matter. </i></p>
<p><b>Have you heard from PETA? </b></p>
<p><i>It was funny - I got followed by PETA on Twitter, that was surreal, but I haven't heard from them. I have received submissions from people who work in other animal rights groups. I think they are in on the joke. </i></p>
<p><b>Matthew Gasteier, 27, lives in Massachusetts with his wife. He also wrote another book, this one about music: &quot;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nas-Illmatic-33-1-3/dp/0826429076">Nas' Illmatic</a>&quot;  Evidently, Matthew was a hip-hop music critic for awhile and the book is part of a series on classic hip-hop albums.</b></p>
<p>'FU, Penguin' can be purchased at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345518160?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=fuyope-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0345518160">Amazon</a>, <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=1&amp;ISBN=9780345518163&amp;ourl=F%2DU%2DPenguin%2FMatthew%2DGasteier&amp;itm=1&amp;afsrc=1">Barnes &amp; Noble</a>, <a href="http://www.borders.com/online/store/TitleDetail?sku=0345518160">Borders</a> and <a href="http://www.indiebound.org/book/9780345518163">Indie Bound</a>.  </p>
<p>~ClizBiz</p>
<p><b>(Image Credits: Top - CuterByTheHour; RedPanda - <a href="http://www.hickerphoto.com/">Rolf Hicker</a>; Beaver - FU Penguin; Bottom - Villard Publshing)</b> </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Michel Vick: In the Doghouse Forever?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/michel-vick-doghouse-forever" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/michel-vick-doghouse-forever</id>
    <published>2009-08-19T19:25:06-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-08-19T19:25:06-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment &amp; Culture" />
    <category term="animal cruelty" />
    <category term="apology" />
    <category term="dog fighting" />
    <category term="football" />
    <category term="Michael Vick" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Like so many animal lovers, I found it incredibly easy to hate Michael Vick. His despicable acts of violence and cruelty against innocent dogs were heinous. I wanted to punch him, to sic an angry cat on him or maybe set fire to his lawn. I was thrilled to hear of his conviction, imprisonment and loss of his $130 million contract with the Atlanta Falcons. However, I'm finding myself <a href="http://theconversation.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/michael-vicks-apology/?scp=2&amp;sq=michael%20vick&amp;st=cse">at increasing odds</a> with those who continue to malign him post-prison. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Like so many animal lovers, I found it incredibly easy to hate Michael Vick. His despicable acts of violence and cruelty against innocent dogs were heinous. I wanted to punch him, to sic an angry cat on him or maybe set fire to his lawn. I was thrilled to hear of his conviction, imprisonment and loss of his $130 million contract with the Atlanta Falcons. However, I'm finding myself <a href="http://theconversation.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/michael-vicks-apology/?scp=2&amp;sq=michael%20vick&amp;st=cse">at increasing odds</a> with those who continue to malign him post-prison. </p>
<p>When Vick was recently signed to the Philadelphia Eagles, another wave of rage was unleashed. (I say let the man play - if nothing else - so we can keep an eye on him.) All the public anger was revived, rehashed and Vick was roasted anew for his crimes. Then, the apologizing began. (Check out Sarah's recent sports-perspective post on Vick right <a href="/its-back-football-season">here on BlogHer</a> while <a href="/michael-vick-aside-its-not-easy-get-job-felony-conviction?wrap=blogher-topics/business-career">Elana Cantor posts</a> from the jobs/career perspective.) </p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.bet.com/news/playahater/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/michael-vick.jpg" align="top" height="210" width="350" /></p>
<p>Still, all the calling-for-his-head made me wonder just how long someone - anyone - should pay for their mistakes? None of us are saints and we all make small, medium and large messes in this world. If you know anyone who claims a life that is fuck-up free, they are either lying or very, very boring - a crime in and of itself. At this point, we're only holding up ourselves. </p>
<p>Vick recently issued <a href="http://globalgrind.com/content/912587/What-I-Did-Was-Horrendous/">a blog post apology on Global Grind</a> - bad grammar, misspellings and all - for the world to ponder. An excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Sitting in a prison cell didn't make me feel remorse.  It was meeting so many animal lovers, speaking with them and looking them in their eyes. Staring at them.  Looking so deep into their eyes that I began to feel their pain. Allowing that pain to enter into my body is when I started to understand how bad it really was.   I have been trying hard to connect with people who feel this pain, because for my whole life I was disconnected from the suffering of animals.  And you might say, &quot;come on Mike, how could you do those things to those dogs?&quot;  And you're right...I ask myself those questions every day.  What kind of person does this?  How does a human-being treat dogs or any animal with such pain and cruelty? And the hard part for me is the answer to these questions.  Because the answer is ME.  And I am trying so hard right now to become a better person, because who I was, I am ashamed of.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>The sentence where I started to feel forgiveness was: <i>&quot;What kind of person does this?&quot;</i> Asking that question (Answer: A bad one.) is the one we've been asking all along. He had step all the way outside of himself - was forced, really - to see the whole picture and that separation isn't always so easy. Also admitting a 'disconnection to the suffering of animals' explains a lot, though excuses nothing.  In fact, it may even be up for 'Understatement of the Year.' </p>
<p><img src="http://www.complex.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/375_guilty.jpg" align="middle" height="463" width="275" /></p>
<p>When Vick appeared on <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5245553n&amp;tag=contentMain;contentBody">'60 Minutes'</a> last Sunday, he wisely blamed no one but himself. He admitted everything, denied nothing and gave some insight into how dog fighting was a standard part of his childhood, which actually shocked the hell out of me. I guess I was naive about how common - and how old - dog fighting is.  </p>
<p><i>&quot;No one ever talked to me about loving animals,&quot; </i>he said. The local cops in his Newport News town looked the other way, which <i>&quot;put a stamp on it&quot;</i> in the mind of 8-year-old Vick, telling him it was <i>&quot;not as bad as it seemed.&quot; </i></p>
<p>This isn't a 'maligned childhood' as some are calling it, this is a cultural acceptance. I have a friend who still litters because she was raised that it <i>&quot;provides people with jobs.&quot; </i>Drives me fucking nuts. Mentalities - unhealthy or otherwise - get seared into our brains early and until that practice or thought is questioned, it is never really confronted. </p>
<p>Evidently, Vick is now working directly with the <a href="http://www.hsus.org/">Humane Society of the United States</a> to help put an end to dog fighting by talking to young kids, using his life as a bad example. <a href="http://www.hsus.org/about_us/board_and_staff/experts/experts/wayne_pacelle/">Wayne Pacelle</a>, the society's president, is hopeful but understandably skeptical. </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;If we just punish Mike indefinitely and don't pivot to this problem in the communities where kids are victimizing these dogs and then going down a dead-end street themselves, because there are no heroic dog fighters, we will not be doing our job. I felt we needed to get involved, we need to do some creative things to reach these kids, so that why we have our community-based programs. I'm really hopeful that Mike sticks with this because and really reaches these kids because he can really turn some of them around.&quot; </i><br /><b><br />--Wayne Pacelle, president of the Humane Society, on '60 Minutes' </b></p></blockquote>
<p>As Pacelle points out in the broadcast, animal rights folks were well aware of the dog fighting phenomena well before Michael Vick. Pacelle estimated that there are 40,000 professional dog fighters and approximately 100,000 street fighters in every part of America. <i>&quot;It's an industry,&quot;</i> he said. <i>&quot;People enjoy watching animals compete - they get excited by the bloodletting.&quot; </i>He's got high hopes that Vick can help bring attention to this issue. </p>
<p>As someone who has spent a good chunk of my career media-training executives, I well understand the behind-the-scenes negotiations and messaging sessions that go on before an interview like this. To his credit, reporter James Brown, covered that and alluded to Vick's well-rehearsed answers. Vick sighed heavily and again proclaimed, <i>&quot;This is just me.&quot; </i></p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;What Vick did is, obviously, senseless and reprehensible. But I believe Vick, as a wealthy and talented athletic superstar who performs his job out in the open before crowds of amped-up and highly opinionated fans, suffers an unfair disadvantage as compared to, say, the heads of a meatpacking plant or the directors of a medical research lab where animals are suffering the cruelest imaginable abuses behind walls and doors that remove them from our sight and, therefore, judgments. Vick did horrific things and he deserved to be punished. He served his time and now I wonder what good does it do to exile him in shame and not let him show his example of how one can be rehabilitated after that kind of behavior.&quot; </i><br /><b><br />--Alec Baldwin, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alec-baldwin/michael-vick-black-sheep_b_260990.html">excerpted from Huffington Post </a></b></p></blockquote>
<p>Conveniently, Vick found God in prison - where He always is. I certainly hope Vick sticks with a faith that led him to change his perspective, his life and most importantly, his treatment of animals. </p>
<p>Whether Vick plays ball or not, I'll be cheering him on from the sidelines, knowing that the more 8-year-olds he talks to, the more likely it is that dog fighting will die as a subculture. Fact is, if Vick hadn't made such a profound mess of his life by harming other beings, what better tool would we have to put an end to it? Let's hope that even bad role models can serve a purpose. </p>
<p>Vick is certainly right about one thing, he is going to have to back up his words of apology and regret with real heartfelt actions for a long, long time before the public believes him. If Vick ultimately proves to be sincere, his plays off the field could surely be a worthwhile legacy. </p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.inlandsocal.com/pets/assets_c/2009/05/Vick_Dogs_03-thumb-200x140-31282.jpg" align="bottom" height="140" width="200" /></p>
<p>***<br />Joni Hudson-Reynolds, over at <a href="http://ebonymompolitics.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/michael-vick-appears-on-60-minutes-as-the-apology-tour-continues/">EbonyMomPolictics</a>, hopes that Vick's apology isn't money-based: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;What is becoming more apparent is there really is nothing Vick can say to satisfy his critics. For the rest of the football season he will be asked the same questions and he better not flinch when he answers.  The other thing that I have learned is if you say Vick has served his time now let him work you too are also accused of sanctioning his acts of cruelty. So when Brown sat down with Vick one had to wonder would he simply ask questions or would it be another opportunity to see if Vick was truly remorseful or was his remorse generated by the need for money?&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Debra, at <a href="http://fourangelsmomma.blogspot.com/2009/08/legacy-of-michael-vick.html">FourAngelsMomma</a>, has little empathy for Vick, especially when considering the life of, Micah, the family's loving dog - <i>&quot;Fifty percent Rottweiler, twenty-five percent Doberman Pincer, and twenty-five percent Pit-Bull&quot;</i>: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Yes, I understand that Mr. Vick went to jail and served out most of his twenty-three month sentence, but what does all of that mean if he is then released from prison and accepted back into society, as if nothing ever happened? Shouldn't the NFL Commissioner and everyone else who thinks that Vick is such a worthy talent deserving of another chance, wait to see what he does to right his own wrongs? He went to prison. That was societies way of punishing Mr. Vick. An apology, more than likely composed by spin-doctors, worded in a way that should make us feel sorry for him, is just not enough. This man should be shunned, and shunned in a huge way. Talent in one area of someone's life should not excuse them from being a kind and decent and moral human being. Michael Vick is none of those things. He is a cold, heartless, vicious victim of his own circumstances, just like Micah would have been had Vick gotten a hold of him. The major difference is that Vick had a choice. But he decided to become everything that he, himself, disdained about his own upbringing.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Finally, Anne Johnson over at <a href="http://godsrbored.blogspot.com/2009/08/frank-talk-about-torturing-rover.html">GodsRBored</a>, isn't buying one bit of Vick's alleged remorse: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;He said the right things, but his eyes gave him away. Cold, hard stares, not even a blink when asked challenging questions. I saw a dude who would give all the right answers just to get back into the chips. Not a truly repentant felon. Even the inevitable fallback to his &quot;Lord and savior&quot; seemed forced and unconvincing.....If he had been Michael Vick, desperately poor citizen of Camden, New Jersey, trying to make money any way possible, he'd be standing in line at the employment agency ... and coming up empty. No one's gonna hire a dude who electrocuted dogs, unless he's boffo with a pigskin.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>~ClizBiz </p>
<p>(Image Credits: Top - <a href="http://blogs.bet.com/news/playahater/tag/michael-vick/">PlayaHater</a>; Middle - <a href="http://www.complex.com/blogs/2007/11/01/artist-tackles-michael-vick/">Ian Kim</a>; Bottom - <a href="http://www.hsus.org/">HSUS</a>) </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Animal Rights Groups Have a Bone to Pick with Helmsley Trust</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/animal-rights-groups-have-bone-pick-helmsley-trust" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/animal-rights-groups-have-bone-pick-helmsley-trust</id>
    <published>2009-08-12T18:38:07-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-08-12T18:38:07-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Pets" />
    <category term="dogs" />
    <category term="lawsuit" />
    <category term="Leona Helmsley" />
    <category term="New York" />
    <category term="trust" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>While the late Leona Helmsley's number one beneficiary - her beloved Maltese, Trouble - naps quietly in Florida, a different trouble is brewing around the Queen of Mean's estate. Earlier this week, <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/mutts/blog/2009/08/helmsleys_estate_not_going_to.html">three of the country's largest animal welfare groups accused the trustees of Helmsley's estate</a> of a <i>&quot;scheme to deprive dog welfare charities&quot;</i> of their slice of the real estate baroness' remaining pie. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>While the late Leona Helmsley's number one beneficiary - her beloved Maltese, Trouble - naps quietly in Florida, a different trouble is brewing around the Queen of Mean's estate. Earlier this week, <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/mutts/blog/2009/08/helmsleys_estate_not_going_to.html">three of the country's largest animal welfare groups accused the trustees of Helmsley's estate</a> of a <i>&quot;scheme to deprive dog welfare charities&quot;</i> of their slice of the real estate baroness' remaining pie. </p>
<p><img src="http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2007/09/24/amd_leona-helmsley.jpg" align="top" height="346" width="240" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hsus.org/">The Humane Society of the United States</a>, the <a href="http://www.aspca.org/">American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals</a> and <a href="http://www.maddiesfund.org/">Maddie's Fund</a> (a charitable foundation created by the former chief executive of the business software company PeopleSoft), filed a petition in Manhattan Surrogate Court arguing that Helmsley, who died in 2007, specified in her will that her multibillion-dollar estate should be used to help dogs and that the trustees have flat out ignored these wishes.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>“Who are these trustees to second-guess either Mrs. Helmsley’s wishes or the legitimacy of kindness and compassion for animals?” </i><br /><b><br />--Wayne Pacelle, president and chief executive of the Humane Society</b></p></blockquote>
<p>The groups want the court to throw out a judge's February decision that gave the trustees for the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust sole authority to determine which charities would benefit from her estate.</p>
<p>Last spring, the trustees gave away $136 million to hospitals, foundations and the homeless. They also gave $1 million to animal charities, including $100,000 to the ASPCA and groups that train guide dogs for the blind. The groups point out that seeing-eye dogs serve people, not vice-versa, and once again, this was not Helmsley’s intention.</p>
<p><img src="http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08_04/lhelmsleyDM2908_468x490.jpg" align="middle" height="290" width="268" /></p>
<p>The trust has issued a statement on <a href="http://www.helmsleytrust.org/">their web site</a> insisting that Helmsley never intended her fortune to be spent entirely on doggie care:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Did Leona Helmsley intend for this charitable trust to focus on the care and help of dogs, rather than people? Absolutely not. Have the trustees of this vast fortune acted improperly and ignored Mrs. Helmsley's instructions? Again, absolutely not.&quot;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Law watchers claim that the lawsuit faces significant hurdles due to the fact that none of three groups are specifically named in Helmsley’s will or in the mission statement.<br />
<blockquote><i>“There’s no question this is a huge hill to climb. This phenomenal wealth is being redirected at the behest of male trustees who have chosen to ignore the direction and wishes of their benefactor.”</i></blockquote></p>
<p><b>--Rick Avanzino, president of Maddie’s Fund</b></p>
<p>The hotel heiress left behind $5-8 billion when she died age 87, including a $12 million trust fund for Trouble, although a judge has since reduced the trust to $2 million. I mean, how many dog bones can a tiny Maltese eat, y'know? (Word was that Helmsley cut her grandchildren entirely out of her will because that none had named any of their children after her<br />
late husband, Harry, who died in 1997.)</p>
<p>In any case, the bad-tempered Trouble was last spotted living the high life (including $100,000-a-year security staff) at the <a href="http://www.helmsleysandcastle.com/">Helmsley Sandcastle Hotel</a> in Sarasota, Fla., oblivious to anything beyond his gold-plated doggie bowl. </p>
<p> <img src="http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/31500/Millionaire-Dog--31616.jpg" align="bottom" height="240" width="300" /></p>
<p>***</p>
<p><a href="http://justonemorepet.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/leona-helmsleys-will-to-give-1-million-to-dog-causes-down-from-12m/">Just One More Pet</a> thinks we should all butt out:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;I say… Who is this judge to over rule someone’s will?  This money should all go to the charities and Leona’s designations, which means all to animals or the dogs if that was Leona’s wish!  Leona was a tough old bird and knew what she wanted!!!!  And if she wanted to disinherit her grandkids… so be it!  Why even a make will????&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Carly over at <a href="http://carlysviews.blogspot.com/2009/08/leona-helmsley-left-12-million-to-her.html">Carly's Views</a> tries to get her arms around the massive will: <br />
<blockquote><i>&quot;When Trouble's days on Earth are over, she is to be buried next to her mistress in the $1.4 million mausoleum in Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in Westchester County, New York. Talk about a pampered pooch. She was less generous to her late son Jay Panzirer's children, cutting Craig and Meegan Panzire out completely for &quot;reasons which are known to them&quot; and leaving a relatively paltry $5 million each to David and Walter Panzirer.&quot;</i></blockquote></p>
<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://petsunlimitedblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/animal-charities-fighting-for-right-to.html">Pets Unlimited</a> plays Devil's Advocate: <br />
<blockquote><i>&quot;Seems like more people just fighting over the famous Helmsley fund at this point. To be honest, the woman only passed away two years ago, just recently the courts had to deal with the whole millions of dollars to her dog thing and it really does take time to give away lots of money. Plus, the trustees had given another $900,000 to groups that train guide dogs for the blind. So, they’ve actually donated one million dollars towards dog related causes.&quot;</i></blockquote></p>
<p>~ClizBiz</p>
<p><b>(Image Credits: Top - Graylock/AP; Middle - Splash News; Bottom - <a href="http://www.freakingnews.com/">FreakingNews.com</a>) </b></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ringling v. PETA: Elephant Debate Heats Up</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/ringling-v-peta-elephant-debate-heats" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/ringling-v-peta-elephant-debate-heats</id>
    <published>2009-08-05T11:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-08-05T11:41:58-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Life" />
    <category term="elephant" />
    <category term="PETA" />
    <category term="ringling bros" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's mail brought a bright colorful advertisement for the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp; Bailey show, &quot;Zing Zang Zoom&quot;, coming to my friendly neighborhood coliseum. Unfortunately, I have also been reading the <a href="#mce_temp_url#">wires,</a> articles, blogs and tweets about an undercover <a href="#mce_temp_url#">PETA video</a> that shows Ringling's employees mistreating elephants. Not great timing for the circus. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today's mail brought a bright colorful advertisement for the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp; Bailey show, &quot;Zing Zang Zoom&quot;, coming to my friendly neighborhood coliseum. Unfortunately, I have also been reading the <a href="#mce_temp_url#">wires,</a> articles, blogs and tweets about an undercover <a href="#mce_temp_url#">PETA video</a> that shows Ringling's employees mistreating elephants. Not great timing for the circus. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Now, I always take PETA's claims and campaigns with a grain of salt. They are an extremist group and while I applaud their mission, I'm not always down with their tactics. But after viewing the video in question, I have to agree that something smells very bad here. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span"><img src="http://www3.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Circus+Elephants+Parade+Through+DC+Streets+OdYqngN4tK4l.jpg" width="394" height="174" align="top" /></span> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What you see in the video (taken by a PETA spy) is two or three macho men whipping elephants for no apparent reason. The animals are merely standing there, not misbehaving or acting out. These men not only whip the animals, one of them yells directly at one elephant, <i>&quot;Fuck you, fat ass.&quot; </i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In certain situations, Ringling might be able to explain away the whippings as 'handling for safety' or some such thing but the expletive somehow reveals a depth of sickness here that cannot be PR'd away. How small-minded do you have to be to berate a docile elephant? </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Ringling Bros. &amp; Barnum and Bailey loves its elephants.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><b>--Circus spokeswoman Amy McWethy</b></p></blockquote>
<p>In a statement, Feld Entertainment Inc., which owns Ringling, called the PETA video <i>&quot;questionable in its context regarding the portrayal of circus animal handlers&quot;</i> and said the circus was in compliance with federal, state and local regulations:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Ringling Bros. is proud of its efforts to care for and increase the population of the endangered Asian elephant and we encourage people to come see for themselves that the animals are thriving in our care.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><b>--Felt Entertainment Inc.</b> </p></blockquote>
<p>The last time I went to the circus was November 2007. I had become a Big Sister to 10-year-old Velrene and she'd never been. We sat there watching the big cats and the elephants and we clapped. I'd seen these magnificent beasts in their natural context and watching them perform tricks in our in our seamy human world made me cringe.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>   <span class="Apple-style-span"><img src="http://blog.peta.org/archives/RinglingElephantsScottWintrow170x169.jpg" width="169" height="170" align="middle" /></span> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Still, I said nothing. I didn't want to ruin the experience for Velrene. And then, halfway through the elephant act, she said unexpectedly, <i>&quot;They look sad.&quot;</i> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><i>&quot;They do,&quot;</i> I said quietly. I then recalled my own elephant experiences and realized I had a handful. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On my 29th birthday - one of my favorites - my fellow campers and I were stormed by pygmy elephants in Mikumi National Park in Tanzania. A bull was protecting his harem and didn't like us hanging out. He flapped out his big ears and trumpeted his best <i>&quot;Buzz off, humans!&quot;</i> message. We took his advice and made haste. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One early morning in Botswana, I was taking my morning pee against one of the many giant termite mounds and trying to wake up. Along the horizon, I could see one palm tree after another quiver and then topple over. Quiver, topple. Quiver, topple. A bull elephant was also up early, making his trail for the day. He appeared to be eating up the landscape and I couldn't help but be impressed. He was Master of his Universe.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Then there was Jimmy, the lovelorn teenager. When we set up camp in Zimbabwe, a local fellow warned us that Jimmy was a young pygmy elephant who fancied female humans - preferring blondes. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><i>&quot;If Jimmy likes you, be careful. He may throw things and try to get your attention,&quot;</i> said the guide, looking straight at me. I was blonde at the time.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sure enough, one day while walking to my tent - WHAM! I got an orange on the side of my head. <i>&quot;Yee-ow!&quot;</i> I yelped.  I turned around and Jimmy eyed me flirtatiously, lifting his trunk and batting his eyes. Romance on the playground all over again - getting punched in the arm by Tommy Bootsma. It was hard to stay mad at Jimmy so I hung out with him the rest of the day, holding a cold beer bottle to my head wound. My brief romance with Jimmy gave new meaning to the word &quot;crush.&quot; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>  <span class="Apple-style-span"><img src="http://www.africapoint.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/african-elephants-300x300.jpg" width="300" height="300" align="bottom" /></span> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>All these images floated through my mind as I watched the once-proud beasts, 'dressed up' in red and gold brocade. They paraded around the stage and performed tricks for our collective delight. Even without the bull hooks and the verbal abuse, it looks like a certain kind of prison. These guys should be trampling trees, I kept thinking, not standing on their hind legs in party hats. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One thing is certain, this <a href="#mce_temp_url#">battle between Ringling and PETA is not new</a> and certainly isn't going away any time soon. Still, some have come around to the animals point of view. Bolivia recently became the first nation in the world to <a href="#mce_temp_url#">ban the use of animals</a> in circuses. While I doubt the U.S. will be on board anytime soon, the government may be forced to intervene. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>PETA has, in fact, filed formal complaints with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and prosecutors and law-enforcement officials in seven states where the alleged abuses took place. PETA cites 85 incidents that it believes violated the Endangered Species Act and the Animal Welfare Act. <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Protests are planned</a> along the Ringling performance route and several local human societies are calling for a boycott. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Undoubtedly, more to come. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>***</p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span"><a href="#mce_temp_url#">Blogs Monroe</a></span> makes a case for human-only circuses: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;The true essence of a circus does not necessarily dictate that animals of any sort be involved anyway. A circus is a troop of performers that entertain whether by acrobatic feats, walking tightropes, juggling, tumbling, clowning around or any of many other types of entertaining stunts. Watching humans perform highly skilled acts appears to be much more mesmerizing to current generations of people too. The proof is the many productions of Cirque de Soleil. Consumers are willing to pay a good deal to see a Cirque show because the human performances are truly amazing, and something we can relate to better.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Debbie Abrams over at <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Frisco Kids</a> blogs about family travel in the Bay Area. Every year, she takes her kids to the circus and this year is no different, though she does pause for thought:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Now I can’t post this without mentioning the circus controversy. Each year we see protesters decry the treatment of these animals, especially the elephants. I’m not sure what the truth is, so I’ll print both sides. Animal welfare activists are suing the circus, claiming the elephants are chained up far too long, and claim the trainers use inhumane bull hooks on them. The circus argues that they treat the animals well. You can judge for yourself.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, Emily G. takes a scientific point of view at <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Posterous</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;As an anthropology major, I am absolutely fascinated by humans. We pride ourselves on being the MOST humane creature to exist. After watching undercover video footage shot in Ringling's Red Unit, I question if we are a different order or just another species of cruel creatures?&quot;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>~ClizBiz</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>(Image Credits: Top - Alex Wong/Getty Images North America; Middle - Scott Wintrow/ Getty Images; Bottom - </b><a href="#mce_temp_url#"><b>Africa Safari Travel Guide</b></a><b>.) </b></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Top Ten Animals That Attack Pets</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/top-ten-animals-attack-pets" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/top-ten-animals-attack-pets</id>
    <published>2009-07-29T18:39:32-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-29T18:39:32-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Pets" />
    <category term="backyard wildlife" />
    <category term="pet safety" />
    <category term="pets" />
    <category term="Pets" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When I moved to Colorado, I was warned by my pet sitter not to let my cat outside. <i>&quot;I've lost more clients to foxes around here,&quot; </i>he said. The thought of my best friend getting eaten freaked me out but Mother Nature is not always the best babysitter. Ask <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Ozzy Osbourne</a> who lost his beloved Pomeranian, Little Bit, to a coyote as he and Sharon watched the Michael Jackson tribute on TV. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When I moved to Colorado, I was warned by my pet sitter not to let my cat outside. <i>&quot;I've lost more clients to foxes around here,&quot; </i>he said. The thought of my best friend getting eaten freaked me out but Mother Nature is not always the best babysitter. Ask <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Ozzy Osbourne</a> who lost his beloved Pomeranian, Little Bit, to a coyote as he and Sharon watched the Michael Jackson tribute on TV. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The reality is, they are making more humans but not more land. As the human population steadily moves in on wildlife environments, the beasties are doing their best to survive, even if it means eating Fido. </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;That's who I do this for. They can't defend themselves, so it's up to me.&quot;</i></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><b>--Jerry Welch who resolved to hunt coyotes in retribution for his cat's death </b></p></blockquote>
<p>Other than other cats and dogs, here are the top ten creatures that attack pets, according to Veterinary Pet Insurance (VPI): </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>                          <b>1. Snake</b></p>
<p><b>                          2. Coyote</b></p>
<p><b>                          3. Raccoon</b></p>
<p><b>                          4. Squirrel</b></p>
<p><b>                          5. Scorpion</b></p>
<p><b>                          6. Javelina</b></p>
<p><b>                          7. Porcupine</b></p>
<p><b>                          8. Ground Hog</b></p>
<p><b>                          9. Skunk</b></p>
<p><b>                          10. Rat</b></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Of course, it depends on where you live. I notice that foxes didn't even make the list. </p>
<p>For example, javelina and scorpion claims were exclusive to the state of Arizona. Javelinas, or peccaries, are feral pig-like omnivores native to the southwestern United States. I'm told they are clinically known as &quot;vicious motherfuckers.&quot; </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Whether in urban or rural areas, pet owners should be aware of the danger posed by wild animals. VPI's data reveals that not all members of the animal kingdom observe backyard fences, or appreciate the curiosity of a pet that may enter their territory. Always make sure that a pet's rabies vaccine is up to date and if you know that potentially dangerous wild animals are present, or you're in an unfamiliar area, take extra care to keep your pet close and secure.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><b>--Dr. Carol McConnell, vice president and chief veterinary medical officer for VPI</b></p></blockquote>
<p><span>Some wildlife are not content in staying outside and waiting. In nearby Boulder,</span> hungry bears have recently broken into three houses - while residents were home - all within a week. And since he already knew where the kitchen was, <b>one bear visited the same home twice in one week. </b></p>
<blockquote><p><i>“Dogs and cats — those are tasty tidbits for creatures.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><b>--Jake Goheen, assistant professor of zoology at the University of British Columbia</b></p></blockquote>
<p>***</p>
<p>Dogman2 over at <a href="#mce_temp_url#">What A Dog Would Do</a> is extra careful: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;I live in an area where there are many coyote’s and at times my two dogs wouldn’t even go out the door knowing that the coyote’s were out there just waiting. So I always walk out with my two little guys to be safe.&quot; </i></p></blockquote>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span"><a href="#mce_temp_url#">Big Cat Rescue</a></span> out of Colorado Springs responds to a bobcat problem:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;If you have small dogs and live on the west side of the city you’re advised to keep them in at night, bobcats usually feed at dawn and dusk. If you let them outside, it's a good idea to keep them on a leash or if they are in a kennel the DOW says it needs to have a cover over the top to keep the bobcats out. The DOW says bobcats are usually scared of humans and it's actually unusual for bobcats to attack pets.&quot;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Helen Bennett Harvey relays a tragic local story on <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Tesla's Love</a>:  </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&quot;Losing a pet is always heartbreaking and for one Woodbridge family that pain is compounded by the fact that their dog, Teddy, might have been snatched by a coyote. The adorable 6-pound Yorkshire Terrier has been missing since July 6 and the Leibowitz family saw a coyote near their house that night. The local animal control officer says coyotes, fishers, bobcats and raccoons also are in the area and can pose a threat to pets, so he can't be sure what occurred.&quot;</i></p></blockquote>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Animals in Space </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/animals-space" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/animals-space</id>
    <published>2009-07-23T21:29:21-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-23T21:29:21-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ClizBiz</name>
    </author>
    <category term="animals" />
    <category term="NASA" />
    <category term="space" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There is much celebrating this week over the 40th anniversary of man's landing on the moon in 1969. Not to diss mankind's giant leap, but animals have been pulling duty in space since the 40s. Five national programs have flown animals into space: Soviet Union, France, Japan, China and the U.S.  We're talking insects, reptiles, rodents, fish, animal embryos, primates and mammals, including dogs and cats. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There is much celebrating this week over the 40th anniversary of man's landing on the moon in 1969. Not to diss mankind's giant leap, but animals have been pulling duty in space since the 40s. Five national programs have flown animals into space: Soviet Union, France, Japan, China and the U.S.  We're talking insects, reptiles, rodents, fish, animal embryos, primates and mammals, including dogs and cats. <br />Starting with the humble fruit fly aboard a U.S.-launched V2 in 1947, the reasoning behind such missions was clear, to answer one Big Question: Could living things survive up there? Once the fruit flies returned alive, man determined that the answer was <i>&quot;Yes!&quot;</i> So, they went ahead with monkeys, which changed the answer to <i>&quot;Okay, maybe sometimes.&quot; </i><br />
<blockquote><i>&quot;Taking animals into space requires great planning. For example, what would mice need on a Space Shuttle mission? Space mice have wire mesh cages so their toes can grip a rougher surface. This way, they won't be floating all of the time. Wood chips couldn't be used for bedding. They wouldn't stay in place. Gravity-fed water bottles wouldn't work. Pressurized water containers are needed instead. Food bars are provided for the animals. A special waste containment system is used to clean cages.&quot; </i></blockquote></p>
<blockquote><p>--<a href="#mce_temp_url#">NASA website</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The first space monkey, named Albert, was put under anesthesia during a 1948 launch - as most animals are. Albert died during the process due to breathing complications. (From there on, every male monkey sent into space was named for Albert.) Albert II was the first mammal launched in space - he made it up to 134 km - but died upon return when his parachute didn't open. <br />Albert VI, who went into space in 1951 with mice, was the first to survive but died two hours after arriving home. Alternatively, Miss Baker, a female monkey who went into space in 1959 along with a companion, lived for 25 years after she came home. (She also wrote a book, went on tour and launched her own line of cosmetics but that's another story...) <br />
<blockquote>&quot;Amazingly, they adapt very quickly. Within 5 minutes, mice are floating in their living spaces, grooming themselves and eating, just as they would on Earth.&quot; </blockquote></p>
<blockquote><p>--Laura Lewis, member of NASA's animal care committee</p></blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, the Russians preferred dogs for their space experiments, sending 57 dogs into space from 1950 to 1960. In fact, the first animal in true orbit was Laika the dog, which launched aboard the Soviet Sputnik 2 in 1957. <br />Sadly, Laika died during the flight and once Communism fell, Oleg Gazenko, the scientist who had worked directly with Laika made the following statement: <br />
<blockquote><i>&quot;Work with animals is a source of suffering to all of us. We treat them like babies who cannot speak. The more time passes, the more I'm sorry about it. We shouldn't have done it. We did not learn enough from the mission to justify the death of the dog.&quot; </i></blockquote></p>
<p>The Russians launched at least 10 more dogs before they sent Yuri Gagarin - the first human - into the great beyond in April 1961. (It's just hitting me now how difficult it must have been for Yuri to even walk with his GIANT BALLS OF STEEL.) Eventually, the Russians got a handle on things and space dogs, Veterok and Ugolyok, spent 22 days in orbit in 1966 aboard the Cosmos 110. <br />And on it goes through the decades. With more knowledge of space and no shortage of humans eager for rocket time, the primates and mammals have not launched much lately. These days, it's the lower life forms that pull duty. <br />Before its tragic ending in 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia played host to a number of exotic critters. In the 90s, it carried crickets, mice, rats, frogs, newts, fruit flies, snails, carp, medaka, oyster toadfish, sea urchins, swordtail fish, gypsy moth eggs, stick insect eggs and quail eggs.  The final flight of Columbia, its 28th mission, carried silkworms, golden orb spiders, carpenter bees, harvester ants and Japanese killifish. It's a sad, strange fact that the only organisms to survive the Columbia disaster were gol' dern nematodes - parasitic roundworms. <br />***<br />SSK offers up some factoids on the blog, <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Rabbits And Ducks</a>: <br />
<blockquote><i>&quot;In November 1970, the USA's orbiting Frog Otolith satellite launched two bullfrogs into orbit for a week. Arabella, a garden spider, went to the US Skylab-3 in July 1973. She spent almost 60 days in orbit in experiment to test the effect of the weightlessness on her web-weaving skills.&quot; </i></blockquote></p>
<p>Eroswings over at <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Eros Den</a> had some sharp - but funny - anger about the entire topic:<br />
<blockquote><i>&quot;The French sent cats into space. Why? Because they're French, that's why! And also because they sent rats into space in an earlier mission.&quot; </i></blockquote></p>
<p>Valli Sarvani pondered the history of animals in space and the difficult circumstances on the <a href="#mce_temp_url#">Scienceray</a> blog last year: <br />
<blockquote><i>&quot;Hard training: Before sending the animals into space they are given a hard training. Dogs are made to stand on two legs in a narrow box and tested how many days they can bear this position. They are kept in a revolving pressurized space cabins and observed how much pressure they can bear. Chimpanzees are given electric shocks in small doses to train them to operate levers. If they are successful they are rewarded with bananas. While travelling they have to bear the pressure 38 times more than the pressure on the earth.&quot; </i></blockquote></p>
<p>--ClizBiz </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
