<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Kim Pearson's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/kim-pearson"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogher.com/blog/29/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.blogher.com/blog/29/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2009-05-12T19:57:32-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Can VIBE magazine be resurrected? And should we care?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/can-vibe-magazine-be-resurrected-and-should-we-care" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/can-vibe-magazine-be-resurrected-and-should-we-care</id>
    <published>2009-07-01T14:22:09-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-01T19:30:39-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="business models" />
    <category term="hip-hop" />
    <category term="magazine industry" />
    <category term="Michael Jackson" />
    <category term="music" />
    <category term="publishing" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="MSM" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Oh the irony. In a week that saw a jaw-dropping <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/album-sales-television-ratings-soar-after-jacksons-death/">surge</a> in music sales, television ratings and internet traffic in response to the death of Michael Jackson, <a href="http://www.wicksgroup.com/fund3_portfolio/vibe.htm">VIBE</a>, one of the nation's leading music magazines, abruptly stopped publication Tuesday.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Oh the irony. In a week that saw a jaw-dropping <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/album-sales-television-ratings-soar-after-jacksons-death/">surge</a> in music sales, television ratings and internet traffic in response to the death of Michael Jackson, <a href="http://www.wicksgroup.com/fund3_portfolio/vibe.htm">VIBE</a>, one of the nation's leading music magazines, abruptly stopped publication Tuesday. Magazine staffers received the news in a <a href="http://gawker.com/5304647/vibe-folds-updated">memo</a> from CEO Steve Aaron as they labored to produce a special issue on the death of the King of Pop. </p>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=34]</p>
<script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/Javascripts/PicAppTracker.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">PicApp.Tracker.WidgetImpression.Report({iid:"4770607", sterm: "Blogher", apikey:"4d12d99c-0499-4fd6-a991-ea8e4f53d80b"});</script>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
In some ways, the news shouldn't have been a surprise. Rumors about the magazine's impending demise had been swirling for months.  There had been staff and salary cut. A slew of magazines have gone down the tubes in the past year, including popular music magazines such as Blender. However, the announcement came with stunning suddenness. </p>
<p>
And as the <a href="http://www.journalism.org/index_report/pej_news_coverage_index_june_22_28_2009">news lens has shifted</a> from Jackson’s home to the BET Awards to the tribute at the Apollo and the upcoming public viewing at the Neverland Ranch, millions of people continue to chatter, twitter and facebook about every detail. Watching all of this, I can’t help but wonder, could VIBE have modified its business model to have been better poised for such moments? </p>
<p>Obviously a media enterprise can’t base its survival on single spectacular news events. However, the use of  Facebook and Twitter as a place for sharing news and making meaning of Michael Jackson’s death is significant.  Blogher CE Virginia DeBolt <a href="/spreading-news?from=promo"> noted </a>that the patterns of  recent news coverage demonstrated the shift in the roles between the old and new media:
</p>
<blockquote><p>
In the next news cycle or during the next big story, will mainstream media remain inclined to wait for confirmation from the AP or The New York Times? Or will we begin to accept the word of sources that may be regarded as sleazy some of the time? Is news turning into the world according to Twitter?</p></blockquote>
<p> [PicApp_Gallery:id=35]</p>
<script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/Javascripts/PicAppTracker.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">PicApp.Tracker.WidgetImpression.Report({iid:"5182020", sterm: "Blogher", apikey:"4d12d99c-0499-4fd6-a991-ea8e4f53d80b"});</script>
<p>
VIBE’a magazine’s founder, entertainment mogul Quincy Jones, seems to think so. According to Ebonyjet.com, Jones , 76 , is <a href="http://www.ebonyjet.com/culture/index2.aspx?id=13696"> working n a way to regain control</a> of the 16-year-old enterprise. VIBE was sold to its current owner, Wicks Media Group, in 2006. Jones’ plan is to turn VIBE into an exclusively online enterprise, “because print and all that stuff is over.”</p>
<p>
While going online will relieve the VIBE media group of the cost of print production, observers are quick to point out that the magazine already had, in Aaron’s words, “a profitable digital operation.” As Natasha at Young, Black and Fabulous put it:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Can VIBE pull it off even if they come back with a strictly online presence and Quincy Jones buys it back?  Their latest editions haven’t been what they used to be.  But time will tell…
</p></blockquote>
<p>
What would it take for a magazine such as VIBE to succeed in this new media environment? I was prompted to think about this as I reflected upon how I and throngs of other viewers used social media to register our visceral reactions to the BET awards Sunday night. Of the dozens of facebook and twitter entries I scanned that night, I can’t recall a single reference to VIBE’s live-blogs of the event.  (You can check them out <a href="http://blogs.vibe.com/speakeasy/2009/06/live-blogging-the-2009-bet-awards"></a>here and <a href="http://blogs.vibe.com/rapidshare/2009/06/the-live-blog-bet-awards-09"></a>here). Obviously, I’m not pretending that my feeds were exhaustive, or that I caught everything that came past, but I follow both VIBE and its editor in chief on Twitter.  What could VIBE have done that night to draw my attention that night?
</p>
<p>
My curiosity is more than personal. Popular music is one of the United States’ major exports. At the time of its founding in 1993, VIBE had a winning formula that was rooted in the popularity of hip-hop, but that provided content that crossed demographic boundaries. That earned it favorable comparisons to <i>Rolling Stone</i>, among other kudos. (Check out TheRoot.com’s <a href="http://www.theroot.com/multimedia/losing-vibe">retrospective</a> of notable VIBE covers to get a sense of its impact over the years. ) VIBE’s failure is partially the result of the faltering economy – the loss of key advertisers, such as the auto industry and the seizing up of the capital and credit markets. But it’s also the result of the same shifting patterns of media use that have decimated the record industry and the traditional news media. Writing for TheRoot.com, Todd Boyd <a href="http://www.theroot.com/views/rip-vibe-1993-2009?page=0,1"> acknowledged</a> that VIBE’s star has been fading for a long time:
</p>
<blockquote><p>
For those who never took to the shiny suits and the advent of bling culture, Vibe probably began to lose its luster a long time ago. Like “Kwame and them fuckin’ polka dots,” the magazine began to be played out around the same time that the music industry started to take a dip and the point at which the Internet began stealing the thunder of all those monthly publications that couldn’t supply information fast enough in the new 24/7 news cycle.
</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
Dr. Sybril Bennett <a href="http://www.themultimediamaven.com/?p=433"> blogged about her experience</a> of watching the BET Awards while connecting with friends via Facebook:</p>
<blockquote><p>
As more and more people joined the conversation about the BET Awards, from the opening number featuring New Edition including Bobby Brown, I slowly realized what was about to transpire.  I didn’t have to watch the show alone or make a phone call. I didn’t have to text. All I had to do was remain on facebook and participate.
</p></blockquote>
<p>
Based on her reflections and suggestions from her online friends, Bennett came up with tips that any news organization can use to make a collective experience more interactive.  Among her tips: use existing tools such as <a href="http://www.coveritlive.com/">CoverItLive</a> and <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/">Ustream</a>; have someone on the television show staff monitoring social media and engaging with the online audience.
</p>
<p>
Bennett’s tips got me thinking about other innovative ways in which magazine publishers can merge the best of what they have to offer – expertise, credibility and contacts in a particular field – with the community-building power of social media. Amy Gahran <a href="http://poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=165833">says</a> the key for news organizations to join the conversations in which your audience already participates, rather than trying to initiate conversations from scratch: </p>
<blockquote><p>
Just as with journalism, to do social media right you've got to get out there and talk to people on their turf.
</p></blockquote>
<p>
If I had a chance to advise Quincy Jones, I’d tell him to hire some smart programmers to create a widget that would allow readers to integrate their facebook twitter and youtube conversations. Then for special events such as award shows, hall of fame inductions or the occasional spectacle of a megastar’s funeral, make it easy for your readers to use your tools to share the experience the experience with their friends – whether on your site, Facebook, or Twitter.  Make an API available and allow readers to remix your coverage.  Come up with a strategy for  highlighting the strongest content from the community on the main site. </p>
<p>
And I’ll add one thing that no one has mentioned – encourage game development. A Michael Jackson trivia game, crossword or word jumble would have been a simple way of engaging readers while conveying information about the late singer’s life and achievements. As Facebook and Yahoo Games have amply demonstrated, such games are popular social media platforms.  But beyond that, a content sharing partnership with a game publishing outlet might be worth exploring. </p>
<p>
The challenge in all of this, of course, is how any of these ideas would have insulated VIBE from the reported 42 percent drop in advertising revenue in the first quarter of 2009 in comparison to a year ago. No one could have predicted the sudden surge in sales of Jackson’s music and memorabilia, and the thought of trying to make book on the next celebrity death is grotesque. But those aren’t the only kinds of events that can draw a crowd. For starters, how about a roster of virtual album release parties with celebrity live-chats and promotional offers on their music and memorabilia?
</p>
<p>
Even if you aren’t a hip-hop fan, the fate of VIBE matters if you care about what happens in the magazine industry. If an enterprise such as VIBE, designed to serve a niche that is passionate invested in hip-hop music and culture, can’t survive, what media organization can?</p>
<p>Cross-posted at <a href="http://kimpearson.net/?p=122">KimPearson.net </a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Coup in Honduras: What does it mean for Latin America, the US, and the world?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/coup-honduras-what-does-it-mean-latin-america-us-and-world" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/coup-honduras-what-does-it-mean-latin-america-us-and-world</id>
    <published>2009-06-29T00:53:19-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-29T12:13:15-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="demcracy" />
    <category term="history" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Latin America &amp; Caribbean" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Honduras is in turmoil. A military coup there this morning deposed Pres. Manuel Zelaya, pre-empting a controversial referendum that would have allowed the leftist ruler to run for a second term. The Honduran Congress has stripped Zelaya of his office and appointed the president of the Congress, Robert Micheletti, to be head of state. The US and the Organization of the Americas criticized the move,  </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Honduras is in turmoil. A military coup there this morning deposed Pres. Manuel Zelaya, pre-empting a controversial referendum that would have allowed the leftist ruler to run for a second term. The Honduran Congress has stripped Zelaya of his office and appointed the president of the Congress, Robert Micheletti, to be head of state. The US and the Organization of the Americas criticized the move,  </p>
<p>While events in Honduras have not been as widely publicized as those in higher-profile states such as Iran, the coup aroused passionate, ideologically-driven debates in Latin America and the United States. Some US observers condemned the ouster of an elected president, but others applauded the removal of of a man seen as being dangerously close to such harsh US critics as Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. Chavez. along with Bolivian president Evo Morales, succeeded in getting their countries' constitutions modified in the same way. </p>
<p>&quot;We thought that military coups were a thing of the past,&quot; one expert <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAJ7a3PBbWg">told </a>CBC News in this report: </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aAJ7a3PBbWg" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aAJ7a3PBbWg"></embed></object> 
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Tania has a <a href="http://news.northxsouth.com/2009/06/28/urgent-military-coup-in-honduras-marks-a-sad-day-for-latin-america/">summar</a>y of some of the events that have reportedly taken place in addition to Zelaya's removal from office:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>Congressman Cesar Ham, from the leftist political party Democratic Unification of Honduras, was assassinated by a squad of soldiers sent to his house early on Sunday morning.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The mayor of San Pedro Sula has been kidnapped at gunpoint by masked members of the military. His whereabouts are unknown but his wife was visiting family at the time in another city and is deeply concerned about her children, who were with their father.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Martial law is in full effect in Honduras, at this hour... </p></blockquote>
<p> In the comments below, giggey <a href="/coup-honduras-what-does-it-mean-latin-america-us-and-world#comment-108021">disputes</a> this characterization of events, which she says is spin from the pro-Zelaya ranks.</p>
<p> Leonidas Meija <a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/06/27/honduras-political-crisis-over-controversial-referendum/">reported </a>on tensions in Honduras leading up to the coup.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Honduras is going through one of its most difficult moments of its political history. Honduran President Manuel Zelaya removed General Romeo Vásquez Velásquez as Chief of the Armed Forces [es] and accepted the resignation of Defense Minister Edmundo Orellana Mercado. The announcement was made after meeting with military leaders of the armed forces to seek protection of the polls for the referendum that has been promoted by the executive branch to be held on Sunday, June 28, 2009. </p></blockquote>
<p>Real Clear World <a href="http://www.realclearworld.com/blog/2009/06/honduras_in_turmoil_1.html">reported</a> yesterday that Zelaya's referendum had aroused opposition from both the courts and the military:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p> * When the armed forces refused to distribute the ballots, Zelaya fired the chief of the armed forces, Gen. Romeo Vásquez, and the defense minister, the head of the army and the air force resigned in protest. </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>* Yesterday the Supreme Court ordered by a 5-0 vote that Vásquez be reinstated. </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>* Honduras's Supreme Electoral Tribunal ordered authorities to pick up all the ballots and electoral material, which were held by the country's air force.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>* The country's Attorney General requested yesterday that Congress oust Zelaya. </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>* The courts have declared the referendum unlawful. Last Tuesday the Congress passed a law preventing the holding of referendums or plebiscites 180 days before or after general elections. Congress has also named a commission to investigate Zelaya.</p></blockquote>
<p> The opposition within Honduras is what led Faustas blog to <a href="http://faustasblog.com/?p=13639">argue</a> that the removal of Zelaya was not a coup at all:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Honduran Supreme Court of Justice has confirmed that Honduran president Manuel Zelaya was detained this morning by the military in compliance with an order of the courts of law. </p></blockquote>
<p> Newmaya has been <a href="http://twitter.com/newmaya">tracking events</a> via Twitter (some updates in Spanish.) </p>
<p>Larissa Alexandrovna  <a href="http://www.atlargely.com/atlargely/2009/06/coup-in-hondurasviolent-reacton-might-come-from-south-america.html">says</a> that as a leader, Zelaya has been a mixed bag:</p>
<blockquote><p>Zelaya is not a traditional good/bad guy character. He pushed back against the exploitation of his country by foreign &quot;investors,&quot; thereby making enemies of corporate interests in the US and the wealthy conservatives of Honduras. On the other side of the equation is Zelaya's attacks on the press and desire for dictatorial powers, which culminated in this coup. </p></blockquote>
<p>The Christian Science Monitor <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0628/p06s13-woam.html">reported</a> that criticism of the coup crosses ideological lines:</p>
<blockquote><p> Although Zelaya is a strong ally of Venezuela's leftist President Hugo Chávez, who said Venezuela is now &quot;at battle&quot; and put his armed forces on alert, criticism seemed to fall outside ideological lines. President Obama, the European Union, and Mr. Chávez joined together in a chorus of criticism. Leaders from across Central America will meet in Nicaragua tomorrow in an emergency meeting.</p></blockquote>
<p>Laura Carlsen <a href="http://americasmexico.blogspot.com/2009/06/extreme-alert-military-coup-in-honduras.html">live-blogged</a> an emergency meeting of the Organiatin of American States where the coup was debated. The Venezuelan representative raised suspicions of US involvement:</p>
<blockquote><p>He went on to accuse former Bush Sub-Secretary of State Otto Reich of complicity in the coup: &quot;We have information that worries us. These is a person who has been important in the diplomacy of the US who has reconnected with old colleagues and encouraged the coup: Otto Reich, ex sub-Secretary of State under Bush. We know him as an interventionist person... In 2002 he tried to deny the lawfulness of Pres. Hugo Chavez.&quot; Mentioning episodes of the dark history of Reich in the heisphere, he concluded, &quot;We suffered the First Reich, the Second Reich, and now we are suffering the Third Reich.&quot; He said Reich is operating under an NGO. </p></blockquote>
<p>But MsExPat at Corrente <a href="http://www.correntewire.com/coup_honduras">quotes</a> a recent interview with Zelaya which he credits the Obama administration with helping protect his presidency:</p>
<blockquote><p>President Zelaya told a reporter from El Pais that unknown people from the US government had &quot;made some phone calls&quot; to head off a coup.  </p></blockquote>
<p> Kristin Bricker <a href="http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/kristin-bricker/2009/06/coup-honduras">says</a> some of the leaders of the coup,Vásquez Velásquez is a graduate of the controversial US-run School of the Americas:</p>
<blockquote><p>Congressman Joseph Kennedy has stated, &quot;The U.S. Army School of the Americas...is a school that has run more dictators than any other school in the history of the world.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>One thing is clear: the ultimate resolution of events in Honduras will have a significant impact on the stability of the region. Stay tuned.  </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Health Care Reform, Who&#039;s Watching the Watchdogs?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/health-care-reform-whose-watching-watchdogs" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/health-care-reform-whose-watching-watchdogs</id>
    <published>2009-06-23T21:30:23-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-23T21:52:11-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Health &amp; Wellness" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="journalism ethics" />
    <category term="Issues" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <category term="MSM" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It seems the top domestic news story in the United States this week is the concern among Congressional leaders that draft legislation aimed at overhauling the health care system is <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/health-care-reform-doa/">doomed</a> because of its <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc10310/06-15-HealthChoicesAct.pdf">projected $1 trillion price tag</a> (.pdf) But the Obama administration hasn't even offered its plan, so the <a href="http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/06/23/why-healthcare-reform-is-still-alive-despite-killer-cost-estimates/">hard bargaining hasen't begun yet</a>. When it does, one of the big challenges for consumers seeking reliable information will be a dearth of independent, knowledgeable reporters.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It seems the top domestic news story in the United States this week is the concern among Congressional leaders that draft legislation aimed at overhauling the health care system is <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/health-care-reform-doa/">doomed</a> because of its <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc10310/06-15-HealthChoicesAct.pdf">projected $1 trillion price tag</a> (.pdf) But the Obama administration hasn't even offered its plan, so the <a href="http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/06/23/why-healthcare-reform-is-still-alive-despite-killer-cost-estimates/">hard bargaining hasen't begun yet</a>. When it does, one of the big challenges for consumers seeking reliable information will be a dearth of independent, knowledgeable reporters.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Part of the problem, of course, is that news organizations have been decimated, and the ranks of reporters with deep knowledge of any particular beat have been seriously depleted. Desperate for resources, news organizations and professional organizations have been accepting financial support from foundations associated with the health care industry. Journalism professor Gary Schwitzer <a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/schwitz/healthnews/2009/06/journalism-orga.html">finds that troubling</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Why don't journalists see any problem with these arrangements? Actually journalists did see problems with such activities - at one time. The ones who wrote the [Society of Professional Journalists] code of ethics. Something about &quot;Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment....avoid conflicts real or perceived...etc.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>For more than a year now, Columbia Journalism Review writer Trudy Lieberman has been tracking the questions journalists ought to be asking about the progress of health care legislation. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont) who chairs the Finance Committee, has received her special scrutiny. Lieberman has been <a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/baucus_watch_part_xi.php">urging attention</a> to the impact that Baucus and other leaders' ties to the health insurance industry might be having on the draft legislation: </p>
<blockquote><p>In January, we praised ABC Nightly News for its story about Washington lobbyists and their cozy relationships with legislators. Brian Ross reported Baucus's claim that lobbyists just want the best for America, and captured him on camera saying: &quot;They really care about our country.&quot; The first peek at what the Finance Committee has in mind certainly looks like they've listened to the lobbyists. The insurance industry's fingerprints are all over the document. </p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed, searches on OpenSecrets.org disclosed that several of the key Senators in the health care reform effort have received substantial campaign donations from pharmaceutical, insurance and other health care related interests. For example, here's <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/01/power-players-with-health-sect.html">a bit</a> of what they had to say about Baucus:</p>
<blockquote><p>Since 1989, Baucus's top donors have been American International Group (AIG), Goldman Sachs and New York Life Insurance--in the 2008 election cycle alone, these companies' employees and PACs contributed $148,550 to his campaign chest. After law firms, securities and investment companies and insurance companies, the most generous industries to Baucus's campaigns have been health professionals and pharmaceuticals. The health sector has given Baucus at least $2.8 million during his career, more than any other sector with the exception of finance, insurance and real estate companies, which have given him $4.6 million. </p></blockquote>
<p> Ranking Finance committee member Charles Grassley's  (R-IA) <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2010&amp;cid=n00001758&amp;type=I">list of top donors</a> is dominated by insurance companies, suppliers and law firms associated with the health care industry. Although health care interstest don't figure as prominently in Sen Dianne Feinsten's r<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/industries.php?cycle=2008&amp;cid=N00007364">oster of donors</a>, she did receive more than $180,000 from the insurance industry in 2008.</p>
<p>As this debate moves forward, it will be important to dig into the details of whatever legislation is proposed to ensure that lobbyists for special interests aren't able to determine the course of the debate. We've all got to become the watchdogs now.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Related: Taxgirl <a href="http://www.taxgirl.com/fat-tax-on-the-scene-again-this-time-in-the-senate/">&quot;Fat Tax&quot; on the Scene Again </a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Neda: A young woman&#039;s murder becomes the symbol of Iranian resistance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/neda-young-girls-murder-becomes-symbol-iranian-resistance" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/neda-young-girls-murder-becomes-symbol-iranian-resistance</id>
    <published>2009-06-22T00:13:16-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-23T05:47:42-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="#irarnelections" />
    <category term="Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani" />
    <category term="Ayatollah Ali Khamenei" />
    <category term="elections" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="iran" />
    <category term="Mahmoud Ahmadinejehad" />
    <category term="Mir Hossein Mousavi" />
    <category term="protests" />
    <category term="Breaking News" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <category term="Middle East" />
    <category term="MSM" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>By now you might have seen the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?&amp;next_url=/watch%3Ffeature%3Drelated%26v%3DrFFY28X5p38">wrenching YouTube vide</a>o: A young woman shot dead on the streets of Tehran as she and her father (some <a href="http://iran.whyweprotest.net/victims/1709-neda-agha-soltan.html">reports</a> say he was one of her professors) watched a crowd of protestors on Saturday. You see her standing; you see her fall; you see the desparate effort to save her as blood spurts from her nose and mouth and streams down her beautiful, youthful face.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>By now you might have seen the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?&amp;next_url=/watch%3Ffeature%3Drelated%26v%3DrFFY28X5p38">wrenching YouTube vide</a>o: A young woman shot dead on the streets of Tehran as she and her father (some <a href="http://iran.whyweprotest.net/victims/1709-neda-agha-soltan.html">reports</a> say he was one of her professors) watched a crowd of protestors on Saturday. You see her standing; you see her fall; you see the desparate effort to save her as blood spurts from her nose and mouth and streams down her beautiful, youthful face. Allegedly, her killer was a member of the Iranian B<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basij">asi</a>j, a paramilitary force that reports to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.  According to news reports, her name was <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2009/06/iran-nedas-friends-family-describe-woman-who-became-an-icon.html">Neda Agha Soltan</a>, a 26-year-old philosophy student. And now, she is the symbol of Iranian resistance. </p>
<p>BagNewsNotes <a href="http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/06/neda.html">posted</a> the still image of the moment after the murder:</p>
<p>Of course, the way her eyes happen to focus in the direction of the camera after being hit -- as if she's still sentient -- is what makes the image so powerful. That, and her name (Neda, which I've seen translated as &quot;the voice&quot; or &quot;the &quot;calling&quot;) makes for the most potent image of the standoff so far.</p>
<p>In California on Sunday, protestors took the the streets with posters bearing Neda's image:</p>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=32]</p>
<p> The killing of Neda Agha Soltan, like everything that has happened in Iran over the last few days, has only become public because of the reports of citizen journalists on the ground. The Iranian government has ordered international news organizations to obtain government approval for anything they report. Iran's Supreme Leader, <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/203010">Ayatollah Ali Khamenei </a>warned the nation on Friday that any protests would be dealt with harshly. Despite efforts to shut down internet and text-messaging networks, <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23iranelection">Twitter</a>, Facebook and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/browse?s=rf">Youtube</a> continue to supply a steady stream of news, and they have become the source of mainstream media reporting. Whether paid or volunteer, those who are trying to get the news out of Iran face imprisonment or worse -- a point underscored by the <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/203036">arrest</a> of Newsweek magazine reporter Maizar Bahari.</p>
<p>NPR's On the Media has a report on the struggles facing journalists in Iran, including an interview with a professor at University of California San Diego, Babak Rahimi, about the isolation in which Iranian citizens live. </p>
<div width="350" height="36">
<div name="movie" value="http://www.onthemedia.org/flashplayer/mp3player.swf?config=http://www.onthemedia.org/flashplayer/config_share.xml&amp;file=http://www.onthemedia.org/stream/xspf/134756"></div>
<div name="wmode" value="transparent"></div>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" id="OTM_Mp3_Player_134756" name="OTM_Mp3_Player_134756" width="350" height="36"><br />
<param name="id" value="OTM_Mp3_Player_134756" />
<param name="name" value="OTM_Mp3_Player_134756" />
<param name="width" value="350" />
<param name="height" value="36" />
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.onthemedia.org/flashplayer/mp3player.swf?config=http://www.onthemedia.org/flashplayer/config_share.xml&amp;file=http://www.onthemedia.org/stream/xspf/134756" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" id="OTM_Mp3_Player_134756" name="OTM_Mp3_Player_134756" width="350" height="36" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" src="http://www.onthemedia.org/flashplayer/mp3player.swf?config=http://www.onthemedia.org/flashplayer/config_share.xml&amp;file=http://www.onthemedia.org/stream/xspf/134756" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> It remains to be seen how these images will affect the course of the protest movement. A galvanizing image such as the killing of Neda Soltan can have a deep political and cultural impact without affecting the power structure of a regime. After all, it was 20 years ago this month that the image of another young, unarmed person riveted the world's attention to another human rights crisis:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9-nXT8lSnPQ" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9-nXT8lSnPQ"></embed></object> 
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Twenty years later, we still don't know how many protesters died in the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/4/newsid_2496000/2496277.stm">brutal government crackdown</a> at Tiananmen square. Scholars <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tiananmen+Square&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;btnG=Search">have documented</a> the impact of the massacre on tourism to China, as well as attitutes among the Chinese people. Of course, Iran has not sought the kind of economic ties to the west that China was cultivating in 1989. No doubt, the Iranian regime is <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2996958.stm">hoping</a> that its militant response will quell the protests, as they did in 2003. However, as with China in 1989, the Iranian regime has not been able to keep the world from watching what it is doing to its own citizens. When we look back at this time 20 years from now, we may find that this moment made all of the difference.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Clinton meets with bloggers on climate change, health care and more</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/bill-clinton-meets-bloggers-climate-change-health-care-and-more" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/bill-clinton-meets-bloggers-climate-change-health-care-and-more</id>
    <published>2009-06-17T00:02:53-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-17T08:38:34-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="climate change" />
    <category term="NGOs" />
    <category term="no child left behind" />
    <category term="Feminism" />
    <category term="Issues" />
    <category term="Economy" />
    <category term="Environment" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Former President Bill Clinton says he likes blogs and bloggers.That's why he had his staff invite 15 of us to his Harlem, New York office for an hour-long chat Monday about the work of the Clinton Foundation, his recent appointment as special <a href="http://www.clintonfoundation.org/news/news-media/transcript-joint-press-conference-by-united-nations-secretary-general-ban-ki-moon-to-announce-william-j-clinton-as-special-envoy-for-haiti">UN envoy to Haiti</a> and a range of other current political issues.  </p>
<p><b>Energy policy</b> </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Former President Bill Clinton says he likes blogs and bloggers.That's why he had his staff invite 15 of us to his Harlem, New York office for an hour-long chat Monday about the work of the Clinton Foundation, his recent appointment as special <a href="http://www.clintonfoundation.org/news/news-media/transcript-joint-press-conference-by-united-nations-secretary-general-ban-ki-moon-to-announce-william-j-clinton-as-special-envoy-for-haiti">UN envoy to Haiti</a> and a range of other current political issues.  </p>
<p><b>Energy policy</b> </p>
<p>Global warming is one of Clinton's major concerns. He lamented the media's scanty coverage of a <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/roulette-0519.html">recent study</a> from MIT that projects that global warming stands to be worse than anyone has previously projected. He lauded his Foundation's recent announcement that the Empire State building is going to be remodeled with energy-saving technologies. Clinton wants to see laws changed to allow utility companies to create favorable financial terms for these kinds of major renovations.  Specifically, he wants them to ba able to get use the costs savings from green renovations to repay the bondholders and debtors who financed the construction.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Rcgd6XxkHDE" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Rcgd6XxkHDE"></embed></object> 
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>According to Clinton, investing in solar power and renewable fuels creates ten times the number of jobs than, say, investments in a coal or nuclear plant. That's why he wants to see a greater investment in those technologies in any energy legislation that emerges from the President and Congress this year.</p>
<p><b>Health care</b> </p>
<p>He also wanted to talk about health care. The Clinton foundation, he noted, is providing anti-retroviral medications to about 2 million people around the world. (<a href="http://www.clintonfoundation.org/what-we-do/clinton-hiv-aids-initiative/">Details</a> are available on his foundation website.)  People no longer die for lack of medicine, he said. However, people are dying for lack of access to health care. Still, he said, Pres. Obama <a href="http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2009/06/clinton-be-bold-on-health-care.html" style="text-decoration: none; color: #383e77">has a better shot</a> at getting a health care reform bill passed. Chris Bowers, who was also at the meeting, got the most accurate notes explaining Clinton's position. &quot;I'd be surprised if we don't get health care this year,&quot; Clinton said. If we don't however, he said allowing uninsured Americans to enroll in the federal employees' health program would be a good compromise. He also echoed the Obama administration's <a href="/white-house-critics-wage-battle-control-health-care-debate?wrap=free-tagging/health-care-reform">focus</a> on reducing administrative costs. </p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/16/clinton-health-care-meeting/" style="text-decoration: underline; color: #383e77">Think Progress</a> has a transcript of this part of the exchange. Here is an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;The other thing that people keep talking about is how complicated my bill was. You know, there's a reason President Obama hasn't presented a bill here. The fact is, my bill replaced hundreds of more pages of federal law than it added. It was a net simplification of the current system. The current system looks like Rube Goldberg on steroids. And so - But he's not going to have to worry about - I think we're going to get past the filibuster, and I think they'll be tough enough to go to 51 votes. But they would prefer, for his long-term relationships with Congress, it would be better if we could get the 60 votes. So what I think they'll do is go for the 60, but if it seems that people are just dug in taking positions that don't make any sense, then I think they'll go back to plan B. That would be my preference, because he's got to think about what it's going to be like next year, and the year after, and the year after, and all of that.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=29] </p>
<p><b>Haiti</b> </p>
<p>Clinton also reflected about his <a href="http://www.clintonfoundation.org/news/news-media/transcript-joint-press-conference-by-united-nations-secretary-general-ban-ki-moon-to-announce-william-j-clinton-as-special-envoy-for-haiti">recent appointment </a>as UN Special Envoy to Haiti. Noting that the small island nation has been &quot;ignored or oppressed&quot; for most of its history, Clinton expressed optimism that the country was about to turn itself around, partially because of his confidence in  Haitian president Rene Preval. At a press conference with UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, Clinton elaborated on his plans:</p>
<blockquote><p>This job, as I see it, will involve the following elements. First, have to support the Government in the implementation of its program, &quot;Haiti: A New Paradigm&quot;, to generate new jobs and enhance the delivery of basic services. Second, we have to assist the recovery effort with the same fervor that was brought to the tsunami-affected nations to build back better. That is to say, better schools; better hospitals; better housing; better public facilities; better infrastructure. And, we have to do a better job of disaster prevention and mitigation.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I'm encouraged that I've had a number of people who know a lot about this call and offer their services just to try to help. We know from experience in other places that we can do a lot to mitigate disasters, and we can do a lot in Haiti. We're about to face another storm season without that sort of mitigation and I don't want go another year without it.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Third: we want to encourage more international private sector investment in Haiti and to make Haiti more competitive to attract such investment. When the Secretary-General and I visited the industrial park, for example, the people we talked to said this is a really good place to do business, the people work like crazy and they're very productive, but because there's not a broad-based revenue collection system, and because the power system is unreliable, it costs too much to get into the industrial park and the power is too expensive. We can fix that. And I intend to do everything I can to do that.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Fourth: we want to encourage the donors to honor the commitments they have already made at the donors' conference. We'll do just what we did before: I'll have a grid, and we'll match the donors to the Haitian plan and the work that needs to be done. It'll be a totally transparent process so all of you can keep up with what is going on as we go forward. We also want to do everything we can to make sure these donor commitments are aligned as closely as possible with the Haitian program we have been given.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> </p></blockquote>
<p><b>Women's rights </b></p>
<p>Asked what he would do to expand women's rights, Clinton talked about the empowering role that education can play in women's lives. Emily Douglas at RH Reality Check has <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/15/id-be-surprised-if-we-dont-get-it-this-year-president-clinton-speaks-bloggers-health-care-reform">more</a>. </p>
<p><b>Education</b> </p>
<p> My question had to do with the upcoming debate over the re-authorization of <a href="http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml">No Child Left Behind</a> Act, which uses standardized tests to determine whether school districts are meeting student achievement goals. The Obama administration has signaled that they will push for changes in the law, and although the precise nature of those changes is not clear, Pres. Obama's <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-of-the-President-to-the-United-States-Hispanic-Chamber-of-Commerce/">criticism</a> of assessments &quot;simply measure whether students can fill in a bubble on a test&quot; has led a number of states to reconsider their standards and assessment measures.  Clinton said that he had always been an advocate of national standards, because allowing states to pick their own standards and assessment tools creates incentives for states to set the bar low in order to preserve their funding. </p>
<p>I reminded Pres. Clinton that at his September, 2008 meeting with bloggers, he <a href="/bill-clinton-economic-revival-depends-mortgage-moratorium-push-green-economy">told me</a> that his administration's efforts to c<a href="http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/digitaldivide/">lose the digital divide</a> had not achieved the anticipated results. At that time, he told me, &quot;perhaps we were not sufficiently flexible in our approach.&quot; (This exchange occured as we were taking a picture, not as part of the group meeting. At Monday's meeting I asked him to elaborate, referring especially to Jane Margolis' <a href="/civil-rights-computational-thinking-thoughts-100th-anniversary-naacp">findings</a> that many urban schools, particularly, are &quot;technology rich&quot; but &quot;curriculum poor.&quot; Clinton agreed, but expressed concern that new curriculum standards could lead to the same kind of dumbed down of curriculum and stunted teaching that has resulted from similar efforts in other disciplines. In addition, he said, he didn't know how to integrate computer science education into an already overburdened curriculum. </p>
<p>I confess that at that moment, I stepped outside of my blogger role and took the opportunity to tell him about the <a href="http://ijims.blogspot.com/2009/02/slides-from-presentation-at-scratchmit.html">positive preliminary results</a> that we are getting at TCNJ with our efforts to infuse basic computer science education into the middle school language arts curriculum. We are in the process of analyzing all of our data; results will be posted to our <a href="http://www.tcnj.edu/~ijims">project website</a> over the next few weeks.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Other blogs attending this meeting were: <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/16/742856/-Bloggers-(me-too)-meet-with-President-Clinton.-His-51-vote-healthcare-warning.-[Update-wphoto]">Daily Kos</a>, <a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/6/16/81532/7938">TalkLeft</a>, <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/016143.html">Feministing</a>, <a href="http://www.treehugger.com">Treehugger</a>, <a href="http://www.susiemadrak.com">Susie Madrak</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>  <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_s_ch-qqi_X8/SjhoLIEdqoI/AAAAAAAAALM/NuTjlkOiqqA/s1600-h/clintonbloggers.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_s_ch-qqi_X8/SjhoLIEdqoI/AAAAAAAAALM/NuTjlkOiqqA/s320/clintonbloggers.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5348139097856518786" border="0" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 240px" /></a><i> (cross posted at </i><a href="http://professorkim.blogspot.com/2009/06/former-president-clintons-latest.html"><i>Professor Kim's News Notes</i></a><i>)</i></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protests rock Iran as Ahmadinejad claims re-election landslide </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/protests-rock-iran-ahmadinejehad-claims-re-election-landslide" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/protests-rock-iran-ahmadinejehad-claims-re-election-landslide</id>
    <published>2009-06-14T17:04:39-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-16T07:56:21-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="democracy" />
    <category term="elections" />
    <category term="Hossein Mousavi" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="protests" />
    <category term="women&#039;s rights" />
    <category term="Feminism" />
    <category term="Gender" />
    <category term="Issues" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <category term="Middle East" />
    <category term="Social Action" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The streets of Iran are now quiet after thousands of protestors took to the streets there for a second day after Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed a landslide victory in last week's presidential election. The results, which put Ahmadinejad ahead of his rival, former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi by a margin of 67 to 34 percent, have sparked widespread charges of voting irregularities. Voter turnout was reportedly as high as 80 percent; analysts had thought a high turnout would benefit the opposition.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The streets of Iran are now quiet after thousands of protestors took to the streets there for a second day after Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed a landslide victory in last week's presidential election. The results, which put Ahmadinejad ahead of his rival, former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi by a margin of 67 to 34 percent, have sparked widespread charges of voting irregularities. Voter turnout was reportedly as high as 80 percent; analysts had thought a high turnout would benefit the opposition.</p>
<p>The results dashed hopes of both reform-minded Iranians and many outside observers who had hoped the Mousavi would make good on campaign promises to improve Iran's standing in the international community, expand <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/sundaysoapbox/2009/06/women_rights_factors_in_irans.html">women's rights</a>, and loosen restrictions on the press. </p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/14/world/main5087285.shtml">press conference</a> Sunday, Ahamadinejad defended the election process, called for Iranians to unite behind him and called protestors &quot;hooligans.&quot;  Later, throngs of Ahmadinejad supporters showed up for a victory rally where he again asserted that the elections had been free and fair.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, opposition leader Mousavi has lodged <a href="http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2009/06/14/75900.html">a formal complaint </a>challenging the vote, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/UKNews1/idUKTRE55D04V20090614">asking</a> the nation's Guardian Council to invalidate the results. Phillip Weiss has what <a href="http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2009/06/just-thought-id-let-you-in-quickly-on-what-has-happened-in-the-last-24-hoursso-some-of-these-reports-are-still-in-farsi-and.html">he says</a>are English translations of Farsi reports that Mousavi had been told that he had actually won the election, and that he had subsequently been placed under house arrest.He is also encouraging his supporters to peacefully protest. His protest letter is <a href="http://tehranbureau.com/2009/06/13/mousavi-letter/">here</a>.(h/t Juan Cole)</p>
<p>The Iranian government appears to be cracking down on dissent the flow if information. Ahmadinejad told reporters at his press conference that some opponents had been arrested for traffic violations. The al-Arabiyah television network says its bureau in Iran's capitol city of Tehran has been <a href="http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2009/06/14/75922.html">shut down</a> byt he government for a week.  On Thursday, Global Voices Online r<a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/06/11/iran-sms-is-blocked/">eported</a>that SMS messaging from Iran had been blocked and several political blogs were unavailable. They had p<a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/06/11/mapping-iran’s-blogosphere-on-election-eve/">reviously reported</a> on a Harvard University study of the Iranian blogosphere that found greater support for Mousavi than Ahmadinejad among bloggers.</p>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=25] </p>
<p>Despite these efforts by the government, protestors are getting images and sounds of protest out via blogs, <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23iranelection">Twitter</a>, and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=all&amp;q=iran+election+2009&amp;m=text">Flickr</a>. International supporters of the protests mounted demonstrations in several cities in the US, Canada and elsewhere, many chanting, &quot;Where's my vote?&quot; The Iranian-American blog <a href="http://niacblog.wordpress.com/">NiacINsight</a> has running updates. Tehran Bureau is <a href="http://tehranbureau.com/2009/06/13/alerts-from-tehran/">another</a> good running source of information, especially about opposition activity. On Facebook, my friend Ila Griffith Forster suggested that this could be a watershed moment:</p>
<blockquote><p>My Iranian friends here on FB have been posting YouTube clips of protests and other incidents on the ground. YouTube may indeed be the &quot;Emmett Till open-coffin&quot; image for Iranian voter outrage... </p></blockquote>
<p> Emmett Till was the 15-year-old murdered by racists in Mississippi in 1955. Historians say that Till's mother's decision to allow news organizations to publish photographs of his mutilated body in an open casket helped mobilize civil rights protests against Jim Crow.</p>
<p>CNN's Christiane Amanpour, a reporter of Iranian and British descent who spent part of her childhood in Iran and who has covered the country many times since the Iranian revolution, has been provided coverage from the streets. Here she is questioning Ahmadinejad at today's press conference:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vC3Zq1hYDkU" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vC3Zq1hYDkU"></embed></object> 
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here is some recent video on YouTube.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hoymRtrGdq8" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hoymRtrGdq8"></embed></object> 
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JhyRayk_tmI" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JhyRayk_tmI"></embed></object>
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> <b>Are the election results plausible?</b></p>
<p>Meanwhile, there's an active online debate about the plausibility of Ahmadinejad's victory. One YouTube poster defending the results put up a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSH8-LYJ9nM">video</a> reporting on a poll taken before the election that put Ahmadinejad ahead of Mousavi by a 2-1 margin. In the notes accompanying the video, the poster wrote:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;[T]his poll actually shows that Ahmadinejad landslide victory is reliable.  This source did indeed questioned the biased reporting of Media before 12 june 2009. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the election results are fraud. We need hard evidence, don't we? This is how we learn and do research. Please be critical! You do not have to agree, but being biased and uncritical to what we hear or read is not good for world society! We need facts supported by evidence. The media has forgotten this simple rule!</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>According to a June 8 report from Voice of America, the telephone survey was commissioned by &quot;two Washington-based public policy institutes,&quot; Terror Free Tomorrow and the New America foundation. Indeed, the study, which is available <a href="http://www.terrorfreetomorrow.org/articlenav.php?id=5">here</a>, notched support for Ahmadinejad at 34 percent, while only 14 percent supported Mousavi. Respondents also expressed a desire for better relations with the US and the opportunity to elect the nation's Supreme Leader, who actually has more power than the President in the Iranian political system. However, 27 percent said they didn't know who they would vote for. The survey's sponsors said it was difficult to assess the reliability of the results, since public opinion polls are not common in Iran and respondents might not have felt safe speaking freely due to real or suspected government monitoring of their communicatiions.</p>
<p>Political science professor Juan Cole compared the reported results from the 2009 elections to those of 2005 and <a href="http://www.juancole.com/2009/06/9-killed-in-extremist-bombings-of.html">concludes</a> that there is good evidence that the election was stolen: </p>
<blockquote><p>I am aware of the difficulties of catching history on the run. Some explanation may emerge for Ahmadinejad's upset that does not involve fraud. For instance, it is possible that he has gotten the credit for spreading around a lot of oil money in the form of favors to his constituencies, but somehow managed to escape the blame for the resultant high inflation.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>But just as a first reaction, this post-election situation looks to me like a crime scene.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Cole has additional posts <a href="http://www.juancole.com/2009/06/class-v-culture-wars-in-iranian.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.juancole.com/2009/06/post-election-demonstrations-violence.html">here</a> that provide additional data in support of his analysis and respond to critics of his position.  </p>
<p><b>The Election and the Obama Administration</b></p>
<p>Pres. Obama has not issued a formal statement on the election results, but on Friday, he <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Remarks-on-Passage-of-Kids-Tobacco-Legislation-an-Answer-on-Iranian-Elections/">responded</a> to a reporter's question by saying,  </p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;[W]hoever ends up winning the election in Iran, the fact that there's been a robust debate hopefully will help advance our ability to engage them in new ways.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p> However, Vice President Joe Biden <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/13/iran-demonstrations-viole_n_215189.html">expressed</a> &quot;real doubts&quot; about the legitimacy of the election results in an interview Sunday with NBC news. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton was quoted in the London Times as <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6493623.ece">hoping</a> that the outcome reflected &quot;the genuine will and desire of Iranian citizens.&quot;</p>
<p>Still, Cole maintains that the election results should not deter Obama's efforts to seek detente with Iran.  Still, an anonymous administration official was quoted in the New York Times on Saturday as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/us/politics/14diplo.html?ref=world">saying</a> that it's still possible that Ahmadinejad will see the wisdom of pursuing greater cooperation with the US:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Ahmadinejad could feel that because of public pressure, he wants to reduce Iran's isolation,&quot; said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the delicacy of the matter. &quot;That might also cause engagement to proceed more swiftly.&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p>Some observers say that Pres. Obama's overtures to Iran specifically and Muslims generally might have affected the results. A number of news reports and blog posts were looking for an &quot;Obama effect&quot; on the election similar to what was observed in the recent election in Lebanon where moderate candidates gained ground against those backed by Hizbollah. In her London Times article, Sarah Baxter reported <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6493623.ece">this accusation</a> by Lawrence Korb from the Center for American Progress: </p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;The mullahs were afraid that if they went 2-0 down, the United States and Europe would have taken a tougher line with them on the nuclear issue,&quot; he said.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Korb argued that the regime had rigged the vote in response to Obama's success in reaching out to Muslims on a visit to the Middle East this month. &quot;It shows how concerned the regime is about his popularity in the Muslim world. They didn't have to fake the results of the previous election.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p> Rannie Amin is among those who <a href="http://www.alarabonline.org/english/display.asp?fname=2009\06\06-14\zopinionz\960.htm&amp;dismode=x&amp;ts=14/06/2009%2002:09:39%20ã">dismiss</a> the very notion of an &quot;Obama effect' as an arrogant Western media fiction:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Of note was how the American media's coverage of the race seemed to be continuously punctuated by mention of the &quot;Obama Effect&quot; and how it might influence its outcome.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Completely ignored were the vigorous, contentious and often downright nasty campaigns of the two major candidates and their supporters or the multiple, lively televised debates conducted during it. In a country purported to be a regional threat, this was never contrasted with the sorry state (or non-existence) of elections among the U.S.-allied Arab regimes, particularly Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia (the latter recently cancelled municipal elections).&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=26]</p>
<p><b>Woman and the Iranian election</b></p>
<p>It hasn't been easy to find reporting and commentary on the elections from women, especially given the government crackdowns on media. That's especially striking because <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/world/candidates-in-iran-eye-votes-of-women-20090603-bvnv.html">women were more visible</a> in this election than in any previous vote since the Iranian revolution of 1979. All of the candidates' wives campaigned in this election, and the candidates made a particular appeal for women's votes. Mousavi's wife, Zahra Rahvanard, was a particularly visible and popular figure that some observers <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/11/zahra-rahnavard-iranians_n_214554.html">likened</a> to US First Lady Michelle Obama -- a characterization <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE55A6PR20090611">she disputed</a>. Ahmadinejad  singled Rahavanard out as a particular target, claiming that her graduate school credentials were bogus.Rahvanard, who has two master's degrees and a Ph.D., t<a href="http://www.payvand.com/news/09/jun/1050.html">hreatened</a> a defamation suit against Ahmadinejad. Rahavanad had promised supporters that women would have a place in a Mousavi administration, and that the cases of women prisoners would be reviewed. Assuming that Mousavi's challenge to the election results is rejected, the push for womens' rights in Iran will, once again, be at a daunting crossroads.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bloggers Join Call for Release of Journalists Imprisoned by North Korea</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/bloggers-join-call-release-journalists-imprisoned-north-korea" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/bloggers-join-call-release-journalists-imprisoned-north-korea</id>
    <published>2009-06-09T22:30:37-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-09T22:55:14-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="activism" />
    <category term="Current TV" />
    <category term="Euna Lee" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="Laura Ling" />
    <category term="north korea" />
    <category term="press freedom" />
    <category term="roxana saberi" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="Asia" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, in a closed trial, the a North Korean court convicted two American journalists, Euna Lee and Laura Ling, of &quot;grave crimes&quot; of an unspecified nature and sentenced to 12 years of hard labor. The women have been detained since March 17 as they worked on a story for <a href="http://www.current.tv">Current TV </a>about Chinese refugees in North Korea.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, in a closed trial, the a North Korean court convicted two American journalists, Euna Lee and Laura Ling, of &quot;grave crimes&quot; of an unspecified nature and sentenced to 12 years of hard labor. The women have been detained since March 17 as they worked on a story for <a href="http://www.current.tv">Current TV </a>about Chinese refugees in North Korea. The Women's Space blog <a href="http://www.womensspace.org/phpBB2/2009/06/08/us-journalists-euna-lee-and-laura-ling-investigating-sex-trafficking-in-north-korea-arrested-sentenced-to-12-years-at-hard-labor/">says</a> the women were actually investigating sex trafficking. Bitten and Bound said <a href="http://www.bittenandbound.com/2009/06/08/laura-ling-euna-lee-convicted-sentenced-photos-video/">they were reporting </a>on defectors living along the border between North Korea and China.  </p>
<p>US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton <a href="http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/06/124461.htm">told reporters</a> yesterday that the US government continues to work through the Swedish Embassy to negotiate the two women's release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obviously, we are deeply concerned about the length of the sentences and the fact that this trial was conducted totally in secret with no observers. And we're engaged in all possible ways through every possible channel to secure their release.   </p>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=24] </p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to a <a href="http://www.aaja.org/news/Headliners/2009_05_15_01/">story</a> posted to the website of the Asian American Journalists Association, Swedish officials have had two visits with the Lee and Ling, and have been able to carry letters from the women to their families. Clinton refused to respond to questions about whether Current TV founder and former Vice President Al Gore is involved in the negotiations. </p>
<p>However, the New York Times has a blog post quoting Gore as saying that Gore is deeply involved. The post also notes that Current TV has no references to the two women's imprisonment. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.lisaling.com">Lisa Ling</a>,<br />
Laura's sister, a well-known journalist in her own right, was quoted in<br />
the New York Times as saying the families have been quiet because of<br />
the delicacy of the negotiations, but that she would speak out soon. </p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/localnewsheadlines/ci_12556303">story</a> in the San Jose Mercury News, as the managing editor of Current TV's Vanguard investigative division, Ling routinely reports from dangerous places. Most recently, she had gone to Mexico to cover the violent drug gangs there. Ling's <a href="http://current.com/users/lauraling.htm">page</a> on the Current.tv website has links to that package of stories and others, along with this statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;We’re trying to provide knowledge and<br />
context about what’s happening in our world as opposed to just covering<br />
random news events.&quot; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Tennessee Guerilla Women <a href="http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2009/06/us-journalists-laura-ling-and-euna-lee.html">points </a>to an Amnesty International report on conditions in North Korea's prisons that says that beatings and starvation are common occurences.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.lisaling.com"><br /></a></p>
<p>Expressions of support and concern for the two women are pouring in from around the world.  One particularly powerful message came from <a href="/why-roxana-saberi-prison">Roxana Saberi</a>, the Iranian-American journalist freed last month from an Iranian prison after four months in detention. Saberi <a href="http://cpj.org/blog/2009/06/saberi-to-lee-and-ling-you-are-not-alone.php">told</a> the Committee to Protect Journalists what she imagined Lee and Ling are going through, and what she would say to encourage them, if she could:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Perhaps you are stronger than I was during the early days of my detainment, when I felt scared, weak, and alone. Over time, I learned several lessons, which you may already know well. In any case, I would like to share them with you: Try to turn the challenges you are facing into opportunities. Do not fear but love, have hope and courage, and stand up for what you believe in. No one can hurt your soul. You are not alone. You have a whole world of supporters who are rallying and praying for you. &quot; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Chicago Tribune blogger Lynne Sweet posted a <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/06/north_korea_release_journalist.html">statement</a> from the Journalism and Women's Symposium that reads, in part:</p>
<blockquote><p> &quot;JAWS implores Secretary of State Clinton, the U.S. State Department and all diplomatic parties to step up efforts to secure the release of Lee and Ling and separate this case of journalists, doing their jobs, from continuing geopolitical issues suffusing the region in recent weeks. It calls upon the North Korean government to reconsider this severe sentence given for &quot;hostile acts&quot; still unspecified and allow the journalists to be returned to their families, from whom they have been separated for nearly three months.&quot; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>In additon to its <a href="http://www.aaja.org/news/Headliners/2009_05_15_01/">statement of condemnation</a>, the Asian American Journalists Association posted video of a vigil held in San Franciscon on behalf of Lee and Ling.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, Ann at Feministing <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/015949.html">has links</a> to an online petition, twitter account and facebook group in support of Lee and Ling.While noting that some experts expect that North Korea is using the women as a bargaining chip in its effort to extract concessions from regional and international power brokers, such as the United States, Ann insists, &quot;[W]e should still keep the pressure on.&quot; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Attack on Arkansas Recruiting Station Highlights Challenges Facing Military Recruiters</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/attack-arkansas-recruiting-station-highlights-challenges-facing-military-recruiters" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/attack-arkansas-recruiting-station-highlights-challenges-facing-military-recruiters</id>
    <published>2009-06-07T22:56:57-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-08T15:16:22-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <category term="Code Pink" />
    <category term="Iraq War" />
    <category term="Michelle Malkin" />
    <category term="Pvt. William Long" />
    <category term="terrorism" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="War" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I<a href="/cheney"> reported</a> that conservative bloggers were taking Pres. Obama, the news media and other bloggers to task for their paying more attention to last Sunday's murder of abortion provider Dr. George Tiller than to last Monday's murder of military recruiter Pvt. William Long, and the wounding of his comrade, Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I<a href="/cheney"> reported</a> that conservative bloggers were taking Pres. Obama, the news media and other bloggers to task for their paying more attention to last Sunday's murder of abortion provider Dr. George Tiller than to last Monday's murder of military recruiter Pvt. William Long, and the wounding of his comrade, Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula. The suspect in the murders, Adulhakim Muhammad, is an American-born Muslim convert who recently travelled to Yemen.This June 2 salvo from Michelle Malkin, prompted by Obama's announcement of his nominee for Secretary of the Army, is a <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/02/obama-condemns-muslim-attack-on-arkansas-army-recruitersnot/">good example</a>:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>Not a word about the jihadi attack on the two Army recruiters in Arkansas. No condemnation of the heinous attack and senseless violence. No condolences for the families of the targeted men or praise for the military recruiters who have been under increasing attack on U.S. soil. No statements from the DOJ or Pentagon, either. </p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Malkin did <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/03/finally-obamas-limp-statement-on-the-jihadi-attack-in-arkansas/">note</a> Obama's June 3 statement that he was &quot;deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe.&quot; There Department of Justice website has two statements on the military recruiter attacks dated <a href="http://littlerock.fbi.gov/pressrel/2009/lr060309.htm">June 3</a> and June 5</p>
<p>But I was omterested om Malkin referene to increasing attacks on military recruiters Malkin referred to. Specifically, Malkin cited: </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/nyregion/07bicycle.html">2008 bombing</a> of the Times Square military recruting station as an example.</li>
<li>Code Pink's <a href="http://www.codepinkalert.org//article.php?list=type&amp;type=373">counter-recruitment campaign</a></li>
<li>A Feb. 2008 <a href="http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/142455/index.php">report</a> on an anarchists trashing a military recruiting station in Washington, DC. Video of a March 19, 2008 protest is here (explicit language warning):</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QtSHNimtYXE" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QtSHNimtYXE"></embed></object>     
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It should go without saying that murder, bombing and vandalism are unacceptable ways of making a political point. That said, I'm not sure how the handful of incidents cited here adds up to an &quot;escalating trend.&quot; </p>
<p>Assuming that Abdulhakim Muhammad is found guilty of the murder of Pvt. Johnson and wounding of Pvt. Ezeagwula, we don't yet know whether he acted alone or was part of a larger conspiracy. While Abdulhakim's <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/blogs/arkansasblog/2009/06/the_yemenis_made_him_do_it.aspx">reported travel</a> to Yemen  is certainly suggestive, I'm reminded that presidential assassin Lee Harvey Oswald traveled to Cuba and Moscow, but federal investigators still concluded that he was the sole killer of Pres. John F. Kennedy<a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/An-Iraq-Veteran-s-Reasons-by-Jesse-Hamilton-090505-668.html">. </a>(Abdulhakim's lawyer is already <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gQACNshVFYt6M9CDykHq6DKqPhiwD98K2KV81">spinning a narrative</a> about his clients actions and motivations that differs from previously published reports. Jane Nowak, who blogs about human rights in Yemen, is <a href="http://armiesofliberation.com/archives/2009/06/07/english-teacher-dammaj-student-american-jihaddist/">unimpressed</a> by the lawyer's tale.)</p>
<p>Ideally, Pres. Obama should have issued a statement sooner about the attack on the Arkansas recruiting station, and As Blogher CE Gena Haskett <a href="/cheney#comment-103861">commented</a>, the media should be as aggressive in covering it as they have been in covering Tiller's murder. I'm frankly less concerned about that than I am about why Pvt. Long was murdered in the first place, given that his alleged killer was already under FBI investigation because of his trip to Yemen and detention there. </p>
<p style="display: inline ! important">Military recruiters have had a tough time throughout this war. For s<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/19/AR2005081900815_pf.html">everal years</a>, they were having trouble meeting recruitment targets. Not only pacifist organizations, but also some Iraq War <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/An-Iraq-Veteran-s-Reasons-by-Jesse-Hamilton-090505-668.html">veterans</a> were actively discouraging young people from joining the armed forces. This essay by former drill seargant Jesse Hamilton explains why some vets are protesting:
<blockquote><p>Over the last eight years, Soldiers have been forced to transition from defenders of the Constitution, to defenders of dividends for corporations such as Lockheed Martin and Halliburton. It is what a sagacious Dwight Eisenhower warned of when he spoke of the military industrial complex almost 50 years ago, and a concept preached by Smedley Butler when he correctly stated that &quot;War is a racket.&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p>This 2006 video, &quot;Before You Enlist&quot; accises military recruiters of misleading young people:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZFsaGv6cefw" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZFsaGv6cefw"></embed></object> 
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In 2007, I <a href="/node/22335">reported</a> that the military was making increasing use of controversial  &quot;moral waivers&quot; -- exceptions for enlistees with criminal records or psychological problems -- to meet their enlistment quotas. Recent <a href="http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20090512/OPINION01/305129958">news reports</a> are that the situation has changed because of the poor economy. </p>
<p>However, anti-military protests and the pressure to meet monthly recruitment targets aren't the only pressures recruiters face.  A Jan. 2009 National Public Radio <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=98913061">report</a> found that Army officials are concerned about suicides among recruiters. Many of the recruiters are Iraq and Afghanistan veterans still struggling with the trauma of their war-time experience, the report found. Veterans' advocates are c<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/us/06suicide.html?_r=1&amp;scp=3&amp;sq=Army%20suicides&amp;st=cse">alling for improvements</a> in mental health treatment for service personnel. </p>
<p>Finally, some activists are protesting the growing trend toward <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jvAebx483rSYOZNjhJtQ-tGKLY9gD98JQ5J01">military-style public high schools</a> and alternative education programs. School districts are hoping military culture will help instill discipline and character in students, but critics worry that the schools will be another way of recruiting naive young people into the Armed Forces. The schools have achieved mixed results so far: while some schools report improvements in student test scores, others have a disappointing track record.  Even with all of that, the fantasy of being able to ship an unruly teen off to boot camp has comforted many an unruly parent, as Suburban Mom noted in a<a href="http://mid-centurymodernmoms.typepad.com/midcenturymodernmoms/2008/11/teen-manual.html"> post</a> on parenting adolescents.</p>
<p> Related: <a href="http://www.chicagovfp.org/CounterRecruitment/VEOP_RG_Final.pdf">pamphlet</a> from Chicago Veterans for Peace</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>As President Obama Seeks Accord With Muslims, Events at Home Highlight America&#039;s Persistent Dilemmas</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/cheney" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/cheney</id>
    <published>2009-06-03T21:21:23-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-04T07:14:31-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <category term="Cairo" />
    <category term="Dick Cheney" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="Iraq War" />
    <category term="Islam" />
    <category term="middle east" />
    <category term="Breaking News" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <category term="Middle East" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A few minutes ago, in Cairo Egypt, Pres. Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/04/obama-speech-in-cairo-vid_n_211215.html"></a><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/The-President-in-the-Middle-East/">gave a speech</a> that many hope will  set the stage for a more constructive relationship with Muslim nations. He said, &quot;I have come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect....&quot;</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A few minutes ago, in Cairo Egypt, Pres. Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/04/obama-speech-in-cairo-vid_n_211215.html"></a><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/The-President-in-the-Middle-East/">gave a speech</a> that many hope will  set the stage for a more constructive relationship with Muslim nations. He said, &quot;I have come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect....&quot;</p>
<p><!--break-->International affairs specialist Patricia Kushlis <a href="http://whirledview.typepad.com/whirledview/2009/05/obamas-speech-to-the-muslim-world-.html" style="text-decoration: none; color: #383e77">hopes</a> that the speech will mark a renewed commitment to diplomacy, because,<br />
<blockquote>&quot;The US cannot deal with the world only through the sites of a gun: the previous administration proved that approach a lie.&quot; </blockquote></p>
<p>Obama's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/04/obama-speech-in-cairo-vid_n_211215.html">speech</a> was closely watched around the world over network, cable and web video, as well as <a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/multiple-channels-for-obamas-cairo-speech/?ref=global-home">social media channels</a>. A White House-sponsored Facebook page captures some of the <a href="http://apps.facebook.com/whitehouselive/">reactions and discussion</a>. </p>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=15] </p>
<p>During the speech, Obama acknowledged Islam's contribution to civilization, and stressed values common to the world's major monotheistic religions. He committed himself to combatting stereotypes about Islam in the US, and urged his audience to reject the false idea that America is at war with Islam or Muslims.</p>
<blockquote><p>Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire. The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known. We were born out of revolution against an empire. We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal, and we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words - within our borders, and around the world. We are shaped by every culture, drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept: E pluribus unum: &quot;Out of many, one.&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p>He said that although he believed that the Iraqi people were better off without former dictator Saddam Hussein, the Iraq War was a &quot;war of choice,&quot; and he reiterated the timetable for the removal of American troops. By contrast, he said, the war in Afghanistan was provoked by the attacks of Sept. 11. </p>
<p>Obama drew distinctions between the tactics and rhetoric of violent extremists claiming the mantle of Islam and the teachings of the Holy Koran. He called for compromise in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on recognition of the suffering on both sides and need for a two-state solution.  On Iran, Obama acknowledged the role of the United States in toppling the democratically-elected Mossadegh regime during the 1950s, as well as Iran's role in fomenting violence over the past generation. The question, he argued, is whether we will continue to be bound by the past, or whether Iran will commit to a more peaceful and prosperous future.</p>
<p>Obama also called for a broader commitment to human rights in Arab countries, including protections for free speech and the protection of educational and economic opportunities for women.  </p>
<p>While speculation is rife about how the speech will be be received, the policies of the previous administration are continuing to divide Americans here at home.  </p>
<p>For example, in an interview with Fox News this week, former Vice President Dick Cheney said that there was never any proof of a link between former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and the terrorists attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. This, despite the fact that Cheney <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/982713/posts">suggested</a>that there was a link in 2003, and <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/18/cheney.iraq.al.qaeda/">scolded the press</a> in 2004 for failing to document alleged links between the Hussein regime and al-Qaeda.</p>
<p>Reflecting on Cheney's revelation, Pam Spaulding <a href="http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/11282/cheney-oopsthere-wasnt-anything-tying-iraq-to-911-after-all">asked</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>And how many died because of your lies, Darth?</p>
<p> <span style="font-size: small; font-family: verdana" class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; font-family: 'times new roman'">[PicApp_Gallery:id=13]</span></span></span> </p>
</blockquote>
<p> Arianna Huffington <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/when-will-dick-cheneys-to_b_210627.html">called Cheney's statement</a>: &quot;less of an admission than a PR move.&quot; </p>
<p>Meanwhile, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, who commanded US forces in Iraq during 2003-4, is calling for a &quot;Truth Commission&quot; to determine &quot;accountability&quot;for the use of interrogation tactics widely considered to be torture.  Sanchez resigned from the Army in 2005 in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. Now he <a href="http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=C1D18E5B9B656F848A6BAD626FF13356?diaryId=2839">warns</a>, &quot;If we do not find out what happened,&quot; continued the General, &quot;then we are doomed to repeat it.&quot; </p>
<p> </p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="350" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1b8F5kuUS2g" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1b8F5kuUS2g"></embed></object>
</p><p> </p>
<p>Chris Le Jeune at VetVoice.com <a href="http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=C1D18E5B9B656F848A6BAD626FF13356?diaryId=2839">agrees</a> with Sanchez:</p>
<blockquote><p>I do believe that these actions must be investigated and those responsible for them brought to justice so that this never happens again.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Finally, we were reminded this week that home grown terrorists are real and persistent threat, On Sunday, an attack on a military recruiting office near Little Rock Arkansas Pvt. William Long dead and Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula wounded. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/us/02recruit.html">According to prosecutor</a>s, the gunman was Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad a 23-year-old Muslim convert who said he was upset with the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Some bloggers are complaining because Pres. Obama didn't make a statement denouncing the murder, as he did when late-term  abortion provider Dr. George Tiller was murdered Sunday. LaShawn Barber <a href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2009/06/02/military-recruiter/">wondered</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>Are the media to blame for failing to cover whatever official statements of condemnation exist, or are there no such condemnations to be found?</p></blockquote>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Sonia Sotomayor and the Process of Inclusion</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/sonia-sotomayor-and-process-inclusion" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/sonia-sotomayor-and-process-inclusion</id>
    <published>2009-06-01T00:07:33-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-01T16:48:56-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Feminism" />
    <category term="Race &amp; Ethnicity" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="Civil Rights" />
    <category term="diversity" />
    <category term="ethnicity" />
    <category term="feminism" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="Princeton University" />
    <category term="Supreme Court" />
    <category term="Third World Center" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have thought long and hard about writing this post about Judge Sonia Sotomayor and the racial debate touched off by what I think is a misreading of her 2001 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/politics/15judge.text.html?_r=1">speech</a>, &quot;A Latina Judge's Voice.&quot;</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have thought long and hard about writing this post about Judge Sonia Sotomayor and the racial debate touched off by what I think is a misreading of her 2001 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/politics/15judge.text.html?_r=1">speech</a>, &quot;A Latina Judge's Voice.&quot;</p>
<p>By now,you know the speech I'm talking about -- the one including the quote, &quot;I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.&quot;  My fellow BlogHer CE Dana Loesch is <a href="/sotomayor-isnt-worst-he-could-do?wrap=blogher-topics/politics-news">among those</a> who see the quote as either evidence of Sotomayor's incompetence or racism. As BlogHer CE Miguelina <a href="/sotomayor-isnt-worst-he-could-do#comment-103105">pointed out</a> in commenting on Dana's post, that statement was immediately followed with:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let us not forget that wise men like Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Cardozo voted on cases which upheld both sex and race discrimination in our society. Until 1972, no Supreme Court case ever upheld the claim of a woman in a gender discrimination case. I, like Professor Carter, believe that we should not be so myopic as to believe that others of different experiences or backgrounds are incapable of understanding the values and needs of people from a different group. Many are so capable. As Judge Cedarbaum pointed out to me, nine white men on the Supreme Court in the past have done so on many occasions and on many issues including Brown.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>However, to understand takes time and effort, something that not all people are willing to give.</p></blockquote>
<p>My reluctance comes not just because I knew the Judge in college and came to think highly of her. I wasn't one of her close friends, and we haven't talked since her graduation from Princeton University in 1976. She and I served together on the governance board of the <a href="http://etcweb.princeton.edu/CampusWWW/Companion/third_world_center.html">Third World Center</a>, a unit of Princeton University's student affairs office that provided resources for academic, cultural and social programming centered upon the needs and interests of students of color. (The TWC is now known as the <a href="http://www.princeton.edu/~caf"></a>Carl Fields Center for Equality and Intercultural Understanding, in honor of the University's first administrator of color.)Back then, I was impressed by her ability to calmly sort through contentious arguments and tedious bureaucratic details. Considering the sweep of her accomplishments in the 33 years since she finished second in her class at Princeton, I have <a href="http://professorkim.blogspot.com/2009/05/sonia-sotomayor-for-supreme-court.html">every reason</a> to believe that she will be a fine Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=11] </p>
<p>I have some concern about adding to the focus on Sotomayor's public comments and her participation in organizations in organizations concerned with racial justice, to the exclusion of her substantial judicial record. Tom Goldstein as the SCOTUSblog conducted a <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayor-and-race">systematic analysis</a> of 50 of Sotomayor's decisions related to race and found no evidencethat she placed racial empathy or identification above the law. Goldstein said his numbers &quot;decisively disprove the claim that she decides cases with any sort of racial bias.&quot;Reflecting on Goldstein's analysis, Prof. Ann Althouse <a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2009/05/given-that-record-it-seems-absurd-to.html">notes</a> that in one of her dissents on a race-related case, she argued for the free-speech rights of a white employee who was fired for disseminating racist material. Althouse adds:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Stop jumping ahead to the assumption that Sotomayor stretches the law to decide cases in favor of people who tug her heart strings and look at the record.&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p>But I do think that there is a contribution I can make to this discussion that hasn't been made, and that is to look at Sotomayor's speech, and her past involvement in racial advocacy groups such as the Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund as part in the context of an intraracial process of leadership development. </p>
<p> Where others worry that Sotomayor's interests intimate racial chauvinism, I see the organizations in which she has participated, and others like it, as deliberative spaces where people of color who had the privilege of education and entree to the professions could contemplate the meaning of their positions, and the responsibilities that inhere in the privileges that we had been accorded. </p>
<p>I understand this as part of a tradition that goes back to the days of the <a href="http://www.blackpast.org/?q=aah/american-negro-academy-1897-1924">American Negro Academy </a>where a small cadre of African American intellectuals caucused about the conditions of African Americans in the Jim Crow era.</p>
<p>What We Did at the Third World Center </p>
<p>When Sotomayor and I colabored at the Third World Center, much of the work concerned mundane matters common to all student organizations:constructing budgets, building a calendar of speakers, career workshops, films, cultural festivals and parties, making sure the building was maintained. And yes, there were also protests against university policies -- labor practices, investments in companies doing business in South Africa, and other issues. But, as a group, we also debated the efficacy of affirmative action, shared stories about our respective heritages, and contemplated the world we wanted to create.</p>
<p> Personally, these conversations and activities were integral to my Princeton education. Chatting with Chinese-American students about how their families fled Mao's China enriched my Chinese politics class and helped me see the weaknesses in the arguments of some of the academic Maoists on campus. The Native American students told me about their responsibilities to their tribal governments, which included, in one case, writing arguments to help get decent water and electricity on their reservations. The Puerto Rican students taught me about Jose Marti. I tasted sushi and ground nut stew for the first time. I listened to my Haitian friends' struggle to figure out how to help their struggling homeland suffering under the boot of the Duvalier dictatorship and other attendant ills. I brought my own worries about gang warfare in my home town, police brutality, and unequal access to quality education, jobs and health care.  </p>
<p>My recollection is that Sonia was optimistic about the opportunities that were opening up in corporate America and other sectors of power. Indeed, her ascent demonstrates that her faith were not displaced. It's been amazing for me to watch many of my fellow TWC members ascend to leadership positions in government, industry, the arts, sciences and professions. Even our First Lady, Michelle Obama '85, is a former member of the TWC governance board. Our activism was a springboard into the wider world across campus and outside of Princeton.</p>
<p>The World in Which We Came of Age </p>
<p>Truthfully, in the mid-1970s, many of us did not know what was possible. I have <a href="/patriotism-wrights-jeremiads-and-michelle-obamas-pride"> written before</a> that those of us who are the children of the Civil Rights Movement have spent most of our lives testing the boundaries of America's promise of equality. DocJess has <a href="http://www.demconwatchblog.com/diary/1631/perspective-on-sonia-sotomayor">a letter</a> from an attorney, Karen Porter, that reminds us of what some of the obstacles were:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;As a newly minted lawyer in 1974, I was hired as director of a Philadelphia corporate legal department; and my first priority was to hire two lawyers. When I told my superior that I had chosen, for the first position, a Latina lawyer who had been tops in her class at her American college and law school, his first question was: &quot;But how is her English?&quot; That Latina lawyer went on to become &quot;the first&quot; in so many roles in public service and private law practice that I lost count of all her achievements years ago. (She's also a friend of Judge Sotomayor's.) I told her this story recently, and she said I'd never told her before - and she cried. She also said that no one else would hire her then.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Porter, racism and sexism persists in the legal profession to this day:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;These were my experiences in only my first five years out of law school (1974-79) - I won't even attempt to cover the next 30 years in this letter.  The list goes on and on. Even today, people ask why I haven't worked in a law firm or for local government. But that question is usually asked not by women or minorities because they know what we were and are up against.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>Sotomayor's Berkeley Speech </p>
<p>This is the context in which I see Sotomayor's 2001 speech. It was given at  a Berkeley Law School symposium &quot;Raising the Bar: Latino and Latina Presence in the Judiciary and the Struggle for Representation.&quot; It was republished in the <a href="http://www.boalt.org/LRLJ"></a>Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, described as &quot;one of four journals in the United States that focus on Latina/o conditions, communities, and identities in the U.S. and abroad—and the sociolegal conditions of other communities of color.&quot;In other words, she was speaking to fellow members of the legal community about what it means to be Latina and a judge. She noted her expectation that one purpose of the conference is to propose strategies for addressing the underrepresentation of Latino/a judges, particularly in the circuit and Federal appeals courts.</p>
<p>The &quot;wise Latina&quot; quotation comes 4/5ths of the way through the speech -- toward the end of a complex meditation on whether women or people of color in the judiciary function differently as judges.  Earlier in the speech, she contemplates what it is that makes her a Latina, sorting through historical,linguistic and cultural definitions of ethnicity in ways that remind me of academic discussions of <a href="http://www.duke.edu/~ldbaker/clippings/williams.html">Franz Boas</a> or Du Bois' <a href="http://www.webdubois.org/dbConsrvOfRaces.html">Conservation of Races.</a>She acknowledges ethnic identity that can be deeply felt, but not easily defined. </p>
<p>Sotomayor questioned whether it is possible or desirable for those women and people of color who are on the bench to complete set aside their identities when they are on the bench. But what does she mean by this? Here, I think,is the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/politics/15judge.text.html?pagewanted=4&amp;_r=1">core</a> of her argument:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;The aspiration to impartiality is just that--it's an aspiration because it denies the fact that we are by our experiences making different choices than others. Not all women or people of color, in all or some circumstances or indeed in any particular case or circumstance but enough people of color in enough cases, will make a difference in the process of judging.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>That said, she adds, as part of her conclusion:&quot;I am reminded each day that I render decisions that affect people concretely and that I owe them constant and complete vigilance in checking my assumptions, presumptions and perspectives and ensuring that to the extent that my limited abilities and capabilities permit me, that I reevaluate them and change as circumstances and cases before me requires.&quot;</p>
<p>She ends with a call to the lawyers in the audience to reflect on how their identities affect their professional practice.The speech is not an attack on white men. It is a call to an audience of attorneys of color to think about the difference they want to make in the world. She's looking at the misjudgments by the Holmes' and Cardozos and saying, in effect: They had blind spots as a result of their experience. Let's hope that we can use our experience to see more clearly. (To that list, by the way, I would have added former Chief Justice Rehnquist, who <a href="http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/5277.html">wrote a memo</a> defending Plessy v. Ferguson in the 1950s and helped deny black citizens' voting rights in the 1960s.)</p>
<p>That kind of conversation doesn't divide us. It helps us think about the basis on which we come together.</p>
<p><i>Cross-posted at Professor Kim's News Notes<i></i></i></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Live-blog: White House Announcement of  Sonia Sotomayor&#039;s nomination to the Supreme Court</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/live-blog-white-house-announcement-sonia-sotomayors-nomination-supreme-court" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/live-blog-white-house-announcement-sonia-sotomayors-nomination-supreme-court</id>
    <published>2009-05-26T08:23:56-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-05-26T09:57:20-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="Breaking News" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.google.com/news?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS305US305&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;q=sonia%20sotomayor%20supreme%20court&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wn">Multiple news sources</a> are confirming that Pres. Obama will announce this morning that he is nominating Federal Appeals Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the third woman and first Hispanic on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor, 54, was first nominated to the Federal bench by Pres. George H.W. Bush, and re-nominated by Pres. Clinton.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.google.com/news?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS305US305&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;q=sonia%20sotomayor%20supreme%20court&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wn">Multiple news sources</a> are confirming that Pres. Obama will announce this morning that he is nominating Federal Appeals Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the third woman and first Hispanic on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor, 54, was first nominated to the Federal bench by Pres. George H.W. Bush, and re-nominated by Pres. Clinton. Join us for a live blog discussion of the announcement, which is expected at 10:15 EST.<iframe src="http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=8910d65954/height=550/width=400" scrolling="no" height="550px" width="470px" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>To the Dismay of Many Supporters, Obama Mulls Preventive Detention </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/dismay-many-supporters-obama-mulls-preventive-detention" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/dismay-many-supporters-obama-mulls-preventive-detention</id>
    <published>2009-05-24T17:27:57-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-05-24T17:38:00-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="civil liberties" />
    <category term="Guantanamo Bay" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="national security" />
    <category term="preventive detention" />
    <category term="War on Terror" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/21/obama-national-archives-s_n_206189.html">speech on national security</a><br />
last Thursday at the National Archives, Pres. Barack Obama said he<br />
would work with Congress to create a &quot;legal framework&quot; enabling the<br />
indefinite detention of some detainees currently being held at<br />
Guantanamo Bay. The announcement has prompted vocal criticism from<br />
civil libertarians and prompted others to note remarkable similarities<br />
between Pres. Obama's terror policies and those of the Bush</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/21/obama-national-archives-s_n_206189.html">speech on national security</a><br />
last Thursday at the National Archives, Pres. Barack Obama said he<br />
would work with Congress to create a &quot;legal framework&quot; enabling the<br />
indefinite detention of some detainees currently being held at<br />
Guantanamo Bay. The announcement has prompted vocal criticism from<br />
civil libertarians and prompted others to note remarkable similarities<br />
between Pres. Obama's terror policies and those of the Bush<br />
administration. What's more, critics assert that Obama' proposed legal<br />
framework is not only unworkable, it sets a dangerous legal precedent<br />
that could endanger the very liberties that the President swore he'd<br />
protect. </p>
<p>Obama said that as he seeks to make good on his<br />
promise to close the notorious Guantanamo Bay prison camp, preventive<br />
detention might be the only option for a group of prisoners who, in his<br />
words, &quot;cannot be prosecuted yet who pose a clear danger to the<br />
American people.&quot; </p>
<p>Who are these people?</p>
<p>The President described them as:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;[P]eople<br />
who have received extensive explosives training at al Qaeda training<br />
camps, commanded Taliban troops in battle, expressed their allegiance<br />
to Osama bin Laden, or otherwise made it clear that they want to kill<br />
Americans.&quot; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>In a widely-cited, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/05/22/preventive_detention/index.html">detailed attac</a>k<br />
on Obama's legal reasoning, Salan's Glenn Greenwald argued a doctrine<br />
of preventive detention could allow the government to cast a<br />
dangerously wide net:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;After all, once you accept the<br />
rationale on which this proposal is based -- namely, that the U.S.<br />
Government must, in order to keep us safe, preventively detain<br />
&quot;dangerous&quot; people even when they can't prove they violated any laws --<br />
there's no coherent reason whatsoever to limit that power to people<br />
already at Guantanamo, as opposed to indefinitely imprisoning with no<br />
trials all allegedly &quot;dangerous&quot; combatants, whether located in<br />
Pakistan, Thailand, Indonesia, Western countries and even the U.S.&quot; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Greenwald<br />
also scoffed at the claim that the detainees who would be targetted for<br />
preventive detention can't be charged and tried, asking, &quot;how do you<br />
know they are dangerous if they haven't been tried?&quot; </p>
<p>[PicApp_Gallery:id=7] </p>
<p>Propublica, the non-profit investigative research group, has a <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/obamas-preventive-detention-problem-breaking-it-down-522">helpful backgrounder</a><br />
by Chisun Lee with possible answers to that question. According to that<br />
article, there are cases intelligence operatives have collected<br />
evidence that a detainee is dangerous, but revealing that evidence in a<br />
criminal trial would expose intelligence sources and methods. </p>
<p>According<br />
to the Lee, detention without trial is generally considered legal under<br />
the laws of war. Prisoners of war can be imprisoned without charges or<br />
trial. But if Guantanamo detainees are moved to US prisons,</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;[T]hey'll likely be able to invoke greater legal protections than they've got now, according to a <a href="http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40139_20090122.pdf">January analysis</a><span class="printOnly"> [5]</span><br />
by Congressional Research Service lawyers. Possibly, some will even be<br />
able to seek political asylum under immigration laws. Long-term<br />
preventive detention would therefore require a new law and possibly<br />
amendments to others.&quot; 
  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>While the President insisted that his anti-terror would uphold Constitutional values and the rule of law, <a href="http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/05/21/us-drop-plan-detention-without-trial">Human Rights Watch</a> and the<a href="http://aclu.org/safefree/detention/39653prs20090521.html"> American Civil Liberties Union </a>issued statements accusing him of betraying that commitment with by advocating for preventive detention. </p>
<p>Among the President's critics, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow was particularly direct:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div width="425" height="344">
<div name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1uuWVHT1WUY&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1"></div>
<div name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></div>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="344"><br />
<param name="height" value="344" />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1uuWVHT1WUY&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="344" width="425" allowfullscreen="true" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1uuWVHT1WUY&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1"></embed></object></p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In advancing his detention policy Jeralyn Merritt said Obama was &quot;<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/5/20/232934/391">just like [former Pres. George W.] Bush</a>.&quot;  Ann Althouse also <a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2009/05/american-people-are-not-absolutist-and.html">noted the similarity</a> between Obama and his predecessor, but with more amusement than chagrin:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Obama<br />
the moderate pragmatist. He's oh-so-different from Bush and also -<br />
let's not be rigid and ideological - really also exactly the same.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Digby<br />
at Hullabaloo is <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/bipartisan-terror-policy-by-digby-heres.html">not only unhappy</a> with the President's policy position,<br />
she's displeased that it's garnered the approval of columnists such<br />
as the Washington Post's Ruth Marcus:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Here's some good news for President Obama. The villagers have<br />
decided that he's getting terrorist policy juuuuust right. Dick Cheney<br />
and his pals on the right believe in torture and no due process at all<br />
while the &quot;far left&quot; believes that torture is immoral and everyone is<br />
entitled to basic human rights, so the proper course is to split the<br />
difference and only rip up half the constitution instead of the whole<br />
thing. </p>
</blockquote>
<p> Actually, here's a bit of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/22/AR2009052201894.html">what Marcus had to say</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama<br />
inherited a minefield of difficult legal issues entwined in the war on<br />
terrorism, and he has picked his way carefully, intelligently and --<br />
for the most part -- correctly through them. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Asp at Xpostfactoid <a href="http://xpostfactoid.blogspot.com/2009/05/obama-preventive-detention-yes-unitary.html">argues</a><br />
that Obama's commitment to seek Congrssional approval is one important<br />
distinction between Pres. Obama's positions and that of ex-president<br />
Bush:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> Here Obama embraces a controversial Bush practice - preventive<br />
detention - but abjures the sole authority to executive that practice.<br />
He is asserting an extraordinary authority yet diffusing it among the<br />
three branches. He implicitly acknowledges the danger inherent in<br />
granting this extension of government authority by proposing that it be<br />
checked and balanced.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Asp is skeptical that effective checks and balances can really be<br />
created. What do you think? Is the President right to continue the<br />
policy of preventive detention?Or are his critics right?  </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Maureen Dowd Gets a Pass, But in Journalism, Plagiarism Still Matters</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/maureen-dowd-gets-pass-journalism-plagiarism-still-matters" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/maureen-dowd-gets-pass-journalism-plagiarism-still-matters</id>
    <published>2009-05-19T21:03:55-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-05-21T08:08:45-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="Jayson Blair" />
    <category term="journalism ethics" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="MSM" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd dodged a bullet this week. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd dodged a bullet this week. </p>
<p>With the <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0509/NYT_defends_Dowd_in_TPM_flap.html?showall">announcement</a> that her <a href="/whats-columnist">use of text from a Josh Marshall blog post</a> without attribution was simply &quot;an error,&quot; a spokeswoman from the New York Times declared an end to the controversy that had engulfed the Pulitzer winning writer since Sunday. Dowd also got a pass from Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz, who <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/05/15/DI2009051501277.html">said</a> the quote-lifting was &quot;probably an inadvertant mistake.&quot; </p>
<p>Why were they so willing to excuse Dowd?</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0509/NYT_defends_Dowd_in_TPM_flap.html?showall">email</a> published by Politico's Michael Calderone, New York Times' spokeswoman Diane McNulty said Dowd's effort to correct the error, and the fact that Marshall hadn't called for any further action meant that &quot;There is no need to do anything further...&quot; Kurtz said that if Dowd had meant to steal from someone, she would have been slicker about it. Besides, he said, </p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;what Dowd did, while clearly an embarrassment, hardly falls into the same category as the serial fabrications of Jayson Blair that I exposed six years ago.&quot;  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jayson Blair, it will be remembered, is the former NYT reporter who in 2003, was found not only to have plagiarized repeatedly, he made up stories out of whole cloth. The discovery of his fabrications led to the departure of former editor in chief Howell Raines and managing editor Gerald Boyd, sparked an <a href="http://www.nytco.com/pdf/committeereport.pdf">internal inquiry</a> that led to an overhaul of management practices, and set off a national debate over ethics and affirmative action. (A 2006 New York magazine investigation <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/40647/index5.html">concluded</a> that Boyd, who died that November, had been scapegoated.) </p>
<p>Back in 2004, Roy Peter Clark, a senior scholar at the Poynter Institute, <a href="http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=70511">shared lessons learned </a>from 20 years of ferreting out cases of plagiarism. One of those conclusions was that &quot;Not all cases of plagiarism are equal.&quot; He continued: &quot;With guidance, supervisors can exercise discretion and match punishments to the severity of the crime.&quot; </p>
<p>Taking Dowd's explanation that a friend told her Marshall's words without telling her who had written them on its face, Poynter ethics expert Kelly McBride <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=67&amp;aid=163826">called</a> Dowd's actions &quot;understandable,&quot; but &quot;inexcusable,&quot; adding:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;when Dowd lifted what she thought were her friend's words, she was actually re-stealing something. But because this is Dowd, the high liberal priestess of biting political criticism, the woman who excoriated Joe Biden for plagiarism, her crime is further stained by an air of hypocrisy.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p> Of course, questions continue to be raised about the truthfulness of Dowd's explanation. Kenneth Thomas, another blogger at Josh Marshall's site, Talking Points Memo, <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kenneth_thomas/2009/05/more-to-the-maureen-dowd-plagi.php?ref=reccafe">found</a> that both Dowd's column and the pilfered Marshall post use the phrase &quot;Old fashiond POW.&quot; Thomas contends that that Dowd's explanation was already &quot;implausible,&quot; but this with this new parallel, &quot;its plausibility disappears to the vanishing point.&quot;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>More on past plagiarism scandals in journalism:</p>
<ul>
<li> In 2007, acclaimed writer and journalism professor James Merrill <a href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/newspapers/journalism-professor-loses-column-over-plagiarism">lost his column</a> when it was discovered that he had lifted text from student newspaper articles.</li>
<li>Freedom Forum has a <a href="http://catalog.freedomforum.org/FFLib/JournalistScandals.htm">compendium</a> of plagiarisms, fabrications, and other acts of journalistic fraud over the last 30 years. </li>
<li>Plagiarism is apparently a <a href="http://loot-ninja.com/2009/02/02/plagiarism-in-gaming-journalism-running-rampant/">pervasive problem</a> in journalism about videogames. </li>
<li>Cases such as Dowd's are a teachable moment for journalism educators. Here's a good <a href="http://www.macloo.com/cheat/journalism.htm">guide</a> for students about what plagiarism is and why it and other fabrications are unacceptable. </li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Maureen Dowd to John Yoo: What&#039;s a columnist for?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/whats-columnist" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/whats-columnist</id>
    <published>2009-05-17T21:30:38-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-05-18T13:53:57-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="News &amp; Politics" />
    <category term="Charles Murray" />
    <category term="Ethics" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="John Yoo" />
    <category term="Maureen Dowd" />
    <category term="Philadelphia Inquirer" />
    <category term="torture debate" />
    <category term="Breaking News" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <category term="MSM" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p> UPDATE May 18 9:47 am EDT: The reactions to the <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/thejoshuablog/2009/05/ny-times-maureen-dowd-plagiari.php?ref=fpd">discovery</a> that New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd used an excerpt of blogger Josh Marshall's post have been coming in steadily last night and this morning. Here's a roundup:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p> UPDATE May 18 9:47 am EDT: The reactions to the <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/thejoshuablog/2009/05/ny-times-maureen-dowd-plagiari.php?ref=fpd">discovery</a> that New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd used an excerpt of blogger Josh Marshall's post have been coming in steadily last night and this morning. Here's a roundup:</p>
<ul>
<li>The New York Times has appended a correction to the original column and closed comments. </li>
<li>The TPM reader who broke the original story notes that Dowd was involved in exposing Vice President Joe Biden's plagiarizing of a speech back in the 1980s, and calls her explanation for the gaffe, &quot;a line.&quot; <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/fail_/nyts_dowd_accused_of_plagiarism__116729.asp">May 17: 3:57 pm</a> TPM reader Satya <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/satya/2009/05/hey-nyt-instead-of-a-correctio.php?ref=reccafe">calls on</a> the NYT and other outlets to worry less about the correction and apology, and more about investigating Marshall's &quot;underlying claim.&quot; </li>
<li>Editor and Publisher, <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003973894">May 17, 8:55 pm: </a>Dowd's explanation that the words came from a friend does not clarify, &quot;why the rather lengthy sentence... matched Marshall's writing virtually word for word&quot;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>FishbowlDC makes fun of Dowd's explanation. <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/fail_/nyts_dowd_accused_of_plagiarism__116729.asp">May 18, 8:51 am</a></li>
<li>On Sunday, William K. Wolfrum <a href="http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/05/17/my-original-response-to-maureen-dowd-plagiarism-allegations/">lampooned</a> Dowd by copying and pasting her 1987 column on Biden's plagiarism then appending a correction. This morning's <a href="http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/05/18/plagiarize-from-josh-marshall-monday/">post</a> is &quot;Plagiarize Josh Marshall&quot; Monday. </li>
<li>Hot Air's Allahpundit has a <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/17/wow-maureen-dowd-plagiarizes-lefty-blogger/">&quot;reasonable explanation&quot;</a> from a reader for what might have happened. Dowd said the quote came from a conversation with a friend. Allahpundit suggested that perhaps the &quot;talk&quot; was actually an IM chat, with the friend copying and pasting the quote. </li>
<li>However, the Columbia Journalism Review's Liz Barrett Cox <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/17/wow-maureen-dowd-plagiarizes-lefty-blogger/">says</a>  was a phone conversation, pointing Michael Calderone's May 17 <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0509/Dowd_lifts_TPM_passage_updates_column.html?showall">post</a> on Politico.com. Calderone reports an email from Dowd saying that she got the Marshall quote from a friend with whom she has regular phone and email correspondence. He also said he sent a follow-up email asking whether she regularly quotes her friends without attribution. </li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>NOTE: As I was writing this post, news broke about New YorK Times columnist Maureen Dowd's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/17/maureen-dowd-admits-inadv_n_204418.html">admission</a> that her <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/opinion/17dowd.html">latest column</a> contained a near-verbatim, unattributed quote from blogger Josh Marshall. I am trying to get comments from Dowd, Marshall and the Times, and I will follow up on Tuesday, along with a look at the Times' <a href="http://www.nytco.com/press/ethics.html">ethics policy</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://view.picapp.com/default.aspx?term=maureen dowd&amp;iid=1719121" target="_blank"><img src="http://cdn.picapp.com/ftp/Images/3/c/2/c/de.jpg?adImageId=1153333&amp;imageId=1719121" width="500" height="678" border="0" alt="Meet The Press" /></a></p>
<p>ORIGINAL POST: Before there were blogs, there were columnists. For many daily journalists, making it to the editorial board, or snagging a column at a major paper was considered a career-crowning achievement. For non-journalists seeking to esablish themselves as public intellectuals, a column was a useful career steppingstone. Either way, it meant that you were considered so knowledgeable, and such an accomplished writer, that you could be trusted to regularly distill complex problems to their essence and present their solutions about 700 words. You were given a personal key to the gate that bounded the public square, and you helped determine the range of views that constituted legitimate grounds for public debate. </p>
<p>That's why it's not surprising that the appearance of University of California Berkeley law professor John Yoo's byline as a columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer raised hackles. Yoo is best known for writing <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/documents/olc-memos.htm">memos</a> justifying interrogation tactics widely considered to be torture during his tenure as assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel during the Bush administration. What might be surprising is that the protests were started by Will Bunch, a blogger at the Inquirer's sister paper, the struggling Philadelphia Daily News. In a May 11 <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/Inquirer_defends_the_indefensible_Its_contract_with_torture_architect_John_Yoo.html">post,</a> Bunch called on the Inquirer to fire Yoo: </p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;While Yoo is a free man who is thus free to utter his detestable viewpoints on any public street corner, the Inquirer has no obligation to so loudly promote these ideas that are so far outside of the mainstream. People should write the Inquirer -- <a href="mailto:inquirer.letters@phillynews.com">inquirer.letters@phillynews.com</a> -- or call the newspaper and tell them that torture advocates are not the kind of human beings who belong regularly on a newspaper editorial page, officially sanctioned.&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p>Bunch's revelation triggered a torrent of criticism of Yoo and the Inquirer. At the <i>Atlantic</i>, Andrew Sullivan <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/rewarding-a-war-criminal.html">accused</a> the Inquirer of &quot;rewarding a war criminal.&quot; Diane Eviatar <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/42539/philly-inquirer-hires-john-yoo-as-columnist">called it</a> a &quot;sad sign&quot; for newspapers. At AlterNet, Lilian Segura noted <a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/139974/outrageous:_torture_lawyer_john_yoo_gets_a_column_at_the_philadelphia_inquirer/">her reaction </a>to reading Yoo's column: </p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;I reached that inevitable moment, the Wait, why am I even reading this? moment. The This is the scum whose enthusiasm for torture and zeal for unfettered executive power is so extreme, he once responded to the theoretical question &quot;If the president deems that he's got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person's child, there is no law that can stop him?&quot; with &quot;I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that&quot; moment.&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p>Bunch said he first noticed Yoo's byline on a <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20090510_Obama_needs_a_neutral_justice.html">May 10 column</a> criticizing Pres. Obama for saying that he wanted an &quot;empathetic&quot; jurist as his Supreme Court nominee, but the paper's editorial page editor, Harold Jackson, explained in <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/columnists/20090517_Uproar_over_Inquirer_s_Yoo_ignores_opinion_page_purpose.html">his own column today</a> that the law professor has been a contributor for several years, and was contracted to write a regularly late last year. Jackson justified the decision by saying that Yoo added ideological balance to what is generally considered a liberal editorial page: </p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Allowing Yoo to have his say has not changed our Editorial Board's opinion that torture can never be justified. In each editorial that mentions the torture memos, we note that Yoo wrote some of them, and that he writes for The Inquirer. Yoo has written on other subjects in which he and The Inquirer are in disagreement, including affirmative action (he's opposed to it in most cases) and what qualities the next Supreme Court justice should possess. In the last two years, The Inquirer has consciously added other conservative voices to our daily op-ed page and Sunday opinion section to counter criticism that our editorials and columns always lean left.&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p>In an <a href="http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/news-and-opinion/Why-is-John-Yoo-Writing-for-the-Inquirer-44792482.html">interview</a> with the Philadelphia Weekly, Jackson reportedly took pains to note that Yoo hasn't been indicted or convicted of war crimes, although he conceded that's not a settled issue: </p>
<blockquote><p>“We have not reached that point. The description of him as a war criminal would not be accurate. He’s a member of a distinguished university faculty with interesting things to say,” Jackson said. “If at some point it goes beyond that, we’ll have more concern about our relationship to him.” </p></blockquote>
<p>The Columbia Journalism Review said hiring Yoo could be considered &quot;a good faith effort&quot; to spark dialogue. </p>
<p>Ultimately, the Inquirer's reasoning for hiring Yoo is thin. According to Jackson's article, the idea to hire Yoo came from Inquirer publisher Brian Tierney, and Jackson went along, despite some initial misgivings. Now, Jackson says, they'll continue to publish Yoo because they have a contract to uphold. The New York Times reports that Tierney has cast the issue as a matter of free speech,<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/13/business/media/13yoo.html?ref=media">saying</a>: &quot;The most important speech to defend is the speech you hate.&quot;</p>
<p>In this economy, it's hardly a surprise that Jackson would accede to his boss. And it's legitimate to inform readers about Yoo's defense of his legal writings. That could easily, have been accomplished with an interview, of course, and did not require a contract for a monthly column that gives him the opportunity to hold forth on a range of topics. However, Bunch is right; if the Inquirer editorial board believes that the policies that Yoo justified were illegal, it doesn't make sense to hire the man who rationalized that illegality.</p>
<p>By the way, Disgrasian found Tierney's <a href="http://www.disgrasian.com/2009/05/disgrasian-of-weak-philadelphia.html">free-speech defense of Yoo ironic</a> in light of a snippet from the professor's writings: </p>
<blockquote><p>In a 2001 memo, Yoo actually suggested that free speech and free press were maybe not all that, in the words of Tierney, &quot;important&quot; and worth &quot;defending.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>The strange part of all of this is that the Inquirer feels compelled to provide ideological balance on its editorial board. Time was that the news and editorial sections of a paper were understood to be separate. For example, the <i>Wall Street Journal</i> has a longstanding reputation for a conservative editorial board that has even included regular contributions by eugenicist pseudo-scholar <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200704040003">Charles Murray</a>, but its news pages were widely respected for the quality and breadth of its reporting. I've never known the Journal or other papers with conservative-leaning editorial pages to feel compelled to &quot;balance&quot; their op-ed pages with &quot;liberal&quot; perspectives. Food for thought, don't you think?</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>White House, Critics Wage Battle for Control of the Health Care Debate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogher.com/white-house-critics-wage-battle-control-health-care-debate" />
    <id>http://www.blogher.com/white-house-critics-wage-battle-control-health-care-debate</id>
    <published>2009-05-12T19:50:36-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-05-12T19:57:32-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kim Pearson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="economics" />
    <category term="economics" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="lobbying" />
    <category term="political strategy" />
    <category term="public relations" />
    <category term="rhetoric" />
    <category term="rhetoric" />
    <category term="Media &amp; Journalism" />
    <category term="Law" />
    <category term="MSM" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Any political or business strategist knows that half the task in winning a contentious policy debate is controlling the terms of that debate. Since health care reform is arguably the most contentious domestic policy debate confronting Pres. Barack Obama, it's not surprising that the White House tried to make the most of <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Coming-Together-Bringing-Down-Costs"></a>yesterday's pledge by health care industry leaders to cut health care spending growth by 1.5% annually over the next ten years.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Any political or business strategist knows that half the task in winning a contentious policy debate is controlling the terms of that debate. Since health care reform is arguably the most contentious domestic policy debate confronting Pres. Barack Obama, it's not surprising that the White House tried to make the most of <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Coming-Together-Bringing-Down-Costs"></a>yesterday's pledge by health care industry leaders to cut health care spending growth by 1.5% annually over the next ten years. According to the President, this means that spending growth will be curtailed by 2 trillion dollars. Senior administration officials say that in five years, the average family of four will save $2500/year on their health care costs.</p>
<p>The pledge to reduce costs was delivered in a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/05-11-09_Health_Costs_Letter_to_the_President.pdf">letter</a> (.pdf)to the President. The letter promises to reduce costs through administrative efficiencies achieved by changing billing practices and upgrading information technology, emphasizing prevention, and pushing for regulatory changes that would permit streamlined billing practices, among other measures. Senior administration officials acknowledge that the pledges are voluntary and unaccompanied by an action plan. The only enforcement mechanism is the prospect of public shaming in the media. </p>
<p>It's also important to remember that the pledges aren't promises to cut costs -- they are <b>promises to cut the rate of cost increases</b>. That's clearly demonstrated on this chart supplied by the White House:<img src="http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/images/Health_Expenditures_Final2_Blog.jpg" align="center" /></p>
<p>Still, a senior administration official who spoke to reporters and bloggers Sunday on background insisted that the savings would go a long way to making more money available to families and the government to meet other needs. According to the Department of Health and Human Services' <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/proj2008.pdf">National Health Expenditure Projections</a>, public and private spending on health care will amount to $4.4 trillion by 2018, amounting to 20.3 percent of our gross domestic product (GDP) -- the monetary value of all of the goods we produce. (For comparison's sake, 2008 spending on health care amounted to 16.6 percent of GDP, and the projected rate for 2009 is 17.6 percent of GDP.</p>
<p>The official called the pledge a &quot;game changer&quot; that increases the likelihood that Congress will pass comprehensive health reform this year.</p>
<p>However, it's no surprise that some observers question both the validity of the projected savings and the <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/05/health-care-industrys-pr-scam-will-obama-fall-it">motives</a> of the industry and union representatives making the pledges. Here's Mother Jones' James Ridgeway:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;None of these changes would make a dent in the industry’s bottom line--and what’s more, they could even enhance profits, by encouraging government-funded programs to help private companies streamline their bloated bureaucracy (much of which would instantly become superfluous under a public, single-payer system). The letter to Obama suggested this when it said: “We are committed to taking action in private-public partnership to create a more stable and sustainable health care system.” We all know by now that “private-public partnership” usually means public investment for private profit.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>Healthcare Economist <a href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2009/05/11/letter-to-obama-were-gonna-save-2-trillion"></a>called the letter &quot;a lot of cheerleading, but not a lot of action.&quot; </p>
<p>One thing is for sure, though. As he stood flanked by leaders of organizations representing doctors, the pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies and the nation's largest hospital employee union, the President made a strong pitch for his argument that he is a post-partisan leader, capable of bringing people together who are normally at odds:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;...The groups who are here today represent different constituencies with different sets of interests. They've not always seen eye to eye with each other or with our government on what needs to be done to reform health care in this country. In fact, some of these groups were among the strongest critics of past plans for comprehensive reform.</p>
<p>But what's brought us all together today is a recognition that we can't continue down the same dangerous road we've been traveling for so many years; that costs are out of control; and that reform is not a luxury that can be postponed, but a necessity that cannot wait....&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<div height="344" width="425">
<div value="http://www.youtube.com/v/N_yt9GT-Mas&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" name="movie"></div>
<div value="true" name="allowFullScreen"></div>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="344"><br />
<param name="width" value="425" />
<param name="height" value="344" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/N_yt9GT-Mas&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/N_yt9GT-Mas&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p></div>
<p>While everyone at Monday's meeting cast their participation in idealistic terms, it's clear that everybody involved has a dog in this hunt. Pres. Obama's is to make good on his campaign pledge to achieve a reform package this year that expands coverage, maintains or improves quality, and is affordable. To that end, yesterday's meeting was one event among many over the last several weeks. Others have included April's health care summit and private lunches with key Senators such as Max Baucus, the Democratic majority's point man on health care reform, and Charles Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee. Grassley has been <a href="http://tweetcongress.org/people/charles-grassley">tweeting</a> about his meetings on health care issues, and <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21937.html">blogs his optimism</a> that a bi-partisan accord can be reached.</p>
<p>Not to be outdone, a <a href="http://www.conservativesforpatientsrights.com/">group opposing Obama's proposed reform package</a> also launched its television campaign this weekend, raising the specter of government-mandated health care that will cost more and deliver less.</p>
<p>The Columbia Journalism Review's Trudy Lieberman offered <a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/will_health_care_providers_rea.php">smart set of questions</a> that journalists should be asking -- such as whether union leaders will urge their members to forgo raises, or whether pharmaceutical companies will reduce drug costs. Lieberman issued a call to arms to the fourth estate:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;[W]e urge the media to strike out on their own and use the industry letter as a departure point for exploring some real cost containment questions, and the disconnect between reality and a PR stunt.&quot;</p></blockquote>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
