Bio
Hi - I'm Maria, nice to meet you! I've been a Contributing Editor here at BlogHer.com since 2006. I joined BlogHer as a full-time staff member after...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Interview: Anderson Cooper Talks to BlogHer About CNN's "Black or White: Kids on Race"

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     
Anderson Cooper outside the Ed Sullivan Theater, New York

CNN's AC 360° partnered with a team of child development psychologists to recreate and update the famous Doll Test. The results are shared in a CNN special series titled "Black or White: Kids on Race" which airs the week of May 17. CNN anchor and series host Anderson Cooper graciously agreed to answer a few questions about the special for the BlogHer community.

Maria Niles: What led you/CNN to explore re-creating the famous Doll Test originally conducted by Kenneth and Mamie Clark in the 1940s? Why is it an important conversation to have in America in 2010?

Anderson Cooper: We wanted to see what has changed, what hasn't. The methodology is different from the Clark's tests, so you can't really compare them. The team of psychologists who conducted the pilot study for us talked to both African-American kids and white kids, and the children were presented with images that had a wide range of skin colors.

In terms of why it is an important conversation to have, I think that's one of the things some of the kids' responses really demonstrate. Not having conversations with your kids about race, about perceptions of other people, doesn't stop them from forming opinions or in some cases biases. The researchers were pointing out to us that parents will often talk to their kids about gender, but race is a topic that is difficult and can be uncomfortable. Many of the parents I interviewed after the study said they had assumed their kids were colorblind and therefore they didn't really discuss the issue very often. I know many of the parents came away from the study feeling they needed to have more regular conversations with their children about race.

MN: What surprised you the most about the results? Saddened you the most? Gave you the most hope?

AC: I was personally surprised by the speed at which the younger children answered the questions. Now, there can be many reasons why a five-year-old white child immediately points to a dark skin doll when asked, "Which of these is the ugly child, or the mean child, or the dumb child?" But many responded right away and without hesitation.

What gives me the most hope? It does seem like talking with your child about race, about perceptions of other people with different skin colors, really can make a difference. As the researchers indicated to us, though, it's got to be more than just one conversation, and it's got to be more than just talk. It seems like parents really need to expose kids to a variety of cultures and people.

MN: Why should people watch the special? What do you want people to take away? What did you learn?

AC: I think it's a fascinating series of reports. Our researchers interviewed more than 130 kids in eight different schools. We all like to think we are colorblind, that we don't have biases, but to see a five-year-old child give answers which repeatedly seem to indicate some level of bias is telling.

The professionals we hired to do this pilot study will tell you, this is not a definitive study. Further research is needed, but the results are fascinating, and our interviews with the kids' parents afterwards are very moving. Many of the parents were surprised by what their kids said, and I think it makes all of us think about how we perceive others, and how those perceptions are formed, and why they are formed so early.

MN: There was a recent study that found links between color-blind ideology and an unwillingness or inability to perceive racism in imagery. Do the findings in the pilot study covered in the documentary argue for or against efforts to raise children to be color-blind? Is it even possible to be color-blind given the degree of awareness of race and racial differences even at a young age?

AC: I think many people like to believe they are color-blind, but studies show that we do perceive color. The real question, I think, is what judgements does

  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
IsleDance 5 pts

And P.S.

What are adults doing, telling children they have two choices to make - good or bad...pretty or ugly?

If adults are going to use children in this way, they need to at least ask open-ended questions that might allow children a faint chance at sharing something unadulterated.

This isn't a story about children. This is a story about adults. Who need to fix themselves. So children can live free.

One Friday night, I loaded up my life and headed out... ( http://isledance.blogspot.com )

IsleDance 5 pts

As a little girl, I had no idea there were life issues, like race or skin color.

I didn't know what those words meant.

And so I chose friends based on their kindness.

And then adults started "telling" kids what race and skin color meant. Who thought what. And why.

And then the kids started repeating it. Believing it. Living it.

And the innocence was over.

When will adults choose to allow children to grow up naturally? Innocently? Human being to human being?

When will adults realize they have the power to change the world? For the better? By remaining silent at times, so children can just be?

The two beautiful girls and the sweet boy in the video, who so eloquently knew how to look at the inside of another, must have pretty spectacular parents.

One Friday night, I loaded up my life and headed out... ( http://isledance.blogspot.com )

TheBlackTortoise 5 pts

I agree with Nordette. Still, I found it interesting what the children perceived would please the adults. Also interesting were some strong-willed and opinionated children, even when challenged by the adults.

Adela
www.oncealittlegirl.wordpress.com ( http://www.oncealittlegirl.wordpress.com )
www.theblacktortoise.com ( http://www.theblacktortoise.com )

Jo Ann 5 pts

Yes, I am familiar with the original 1947 study which was done on only black children and I think that study was very important to understand how black children saw themselves in the world at that time.

Nowadays children are exposed to numerous examples of positive black role models so if these children feel inferior the blame lies with the parents and not with society. Although Anderson should have taken issue with the negative stereotypes Hollywood keeps putting out there.

I think even Anderson knew that the discussion would appear like an attack on white children because he was the one that brought up the word "demonize" when defending his criticism of white children, so the possibility of that perception crossed his mind. At one point Anderson asked Po Bronson if a white child thinking a black child was dumb was racist, but he did not ask the same question regarding a black child thinking a white child was dumb. Obvious double standards at work here. This type of "attack" only contributes to the racial problems we already have in this country.

Yes, I know that Anderson said it wasn't a "scientific study", but on Friday night's show he and Po Bronson treated it like it was.

I wish Maria would have asked Anderson why Asian and Hispanic children were not included in this study.

Denise 9 pts moderator

If you are logged in, you should be able to see all of the comments on this post.

If you can't see the comments, please email denise@blogher.com

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager

Flamingo House Happenings ( http://www.flamingohouse.net/ )

GraceMatthews 5 pts

Is there a way to read all of the comments on the "Interview: Anderson Cooper Talks to BlogHer About CNN's "Black or White: Kids on Race"?

Nordette Adams 6 pts

It's curious that you view this report as a way to "demonize white children." What do you think of the black children who also showed a preference for white skin? Are you familiar with the original study upon which this experiment was based? I ask this since it's made clear from Cooper's answers to Maria that this is not a scientific study.

I don't think this experiment is about "horrible children" but children may be learning or not learning about race when parents don't talk about race or make an effort to teach children about differences. Some parents make the mistake of assuming their children will believe what they believe as though children don't pick up clues from other people in society and influences such as television.

The experiment is flawed. No one denies that. But I don't think there's anything malicious about its intent.

PS: My response is based on your comment before you edited it. It came to me in email.

Nordette Adams ( http://www.bookotopia.com ) is a BlogHer CE ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) & you can find her other stuff through Her 411 ( http://her411.com ).

Jo Ann 5 pts

I am disappointed that Anderson has chosen to characterize white children as deliberately cruel and unfeeling in his quest for ratings. Does any intelligent person really believe that children are racist? Children of that age are only guilty of identifying with their own race and nothing more.

As many people on the Internet, have said, this "test" is flawed. There are too many unknown variables to give the results any weight.

In addition, many of the children looked rehearsed and coached in these videos, and the questions leading. Also, Anderson said that the children were told ahead of time that they would be asked about race. One little boy even told Anderson he didn't "remember" what else he was supposed to say.

The questions were way too narrow, choices were limited to things like "good" and "bad" and "ugly" and pretty". I would think that the children would attribute positive qualities to their own race because they, in fact, would be commenting about themselves. Given only two choices, if they said a child from another race was good that would suggest that all the other "children" were bad, including themselves. Also, there was little effort made to allow the children to qualify their choices.

The value scale should have been scrambled and not set up with the white child in the first position and the black child in the last.

A pilot study of 133 children is hardly conclusive.

ShoreBookworm 5 pts

Here is this crucial, heartbreaking report and my first thoughts?

Anderson Cooper...hubba hubba!! Be still my heart.

I did move on but I had to admit my weakness.

Nordette makes an excellent point about children being savvy enough to know how to please adults. It is what we are programmed to do as children, after all. And it has been documented related to other issues, such as interviewing children about possible sexual abuse.

We definitely need more research and dialogue. It is a fascinating report. I wanted to hug all of those precious kids and tell them how beautiful they are. Children are where our hope lies.

Marie

www.nourishourselves.blogspot.com ( http://www.nourishourselves.blogspot.com )

www.theshorebookworm.blogspot.com ( http://www.theshorebookworm.blogspot.com )

Maria Niles 5 pts

Thanks, Nordette. I'm thrilled to have the opportunity.

Though some kids gave positive and self-affirming answers, this study points to the need to further research, and you propose an interesting approach.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Nordette Adams 6 pts

Jealous! You got to communicate directly with Anderson Cooper and I did not.

Second: Children are more shrewd than adults give them credit for being, and so, sometimes they seek to please the adult asking the question. I wonder if the study were repeated with different children of similar backgrounds, and the people asking the children questions were very dark-skinned African-Americans, would we see a different response to some of the questions, perhaps some dissembling?

I'm recalling the study ( http://www.livescience.com/culture/sexism-racism-s... ) in which children in general attributed more positive qualities to their own ethnic groups. Of course, I don't know how many black children were included in the study.
Normally, children show clear preferences for their own ethnic group by the age of three, if not sooner, other research has shown.

And, indeed, the children in this study without Williams syndrome reliably assigned good traits, such as friendliness, to pictures of people the same race as themselves. When asked something negative, such as "which is the naughty boy," they overwhelmingly pointed to the other race.
None of what I've said dismisses that we have a problem in the black community with colorism or that America has a racism issue.

Nordette Adams ( http://www.bookotopia.com ) is a BlogHer CE ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) & you can find her other stuff through Her 411 ( http://her411.com ).