Bio
I write Stirrup Queens when I'm not reading other people's blogs, cooking, or chasing after my twins. I'm the author of two books: Life from Scratch,...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

BlogHer Went to the White House

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

When BlogHer asked if I could attend the Women’s Online Summit at the White House, the answer was hells yeah. So last Monday, I went to the White House with representatives from 25 other online sites to be briefed on a wide-range of issues as well as learn about the informational resources the White house is making available to news services and the American public in general.

If you want the background story about my emergency pee break at the Shell station or shaking a certain President's hand while he gazed into my eyes, you'll have to click over to my blog. Because for once in my life, I'm going to attempt to jump directly to the heart of the matter -- what is affecting all Americans. (And for our non-American readers, I hope you still peruse this rundown of the day and give us feedback about how these same issues are dealt with in your country.)

I entered with was a vague understanding that we'd be discussing broad categories such as the economy and the Let's Move! initiative. I was worried that since the gathering was pegged as a "women's" online summit that there would be a pinking down of the information.

What do I mean by “pinking down” information — you know how tool companies put out inferior tools with a pink handle on it because they think women want pretty pink things while they repair their house? Well, I don’t want the pink version — I want the hardcore metal tools that are going to get the job done because I am serious as all get-out about home repair. Yes, I’m a woman, but I don’t need my tools to look pretty — I only need them to get the job done.

Which is different from tools that are made with my small hands in mind, that know that my body is built differently from a man and my strength is in my legs rather than my arms. Tailoring a tool to a person is not the same as pinking it down.

So I was fearful that a Women’s Online Summit could be the pinking down of information, and I didn't want the softer side of our economic crisis; I wanted to hear the facts, plain and simple. I happily realized within seconds of the day beginning that not only was the information not pinked down, but that the inclusion of the word “women” was merely a lens with which to view the same information that would be presented at any Online Summit. Major accolades to the White House for starting these conversations with various groups, answering questions, and asking for feedback and ideas for helping disseminate information to the American people. And what I learned transcended America because the ideology is applicable across the world when looking at women’s place in society.

So thank you, White House.

The day was arranged by the Office of Communications and had about 15 or so speakers covering a wide-range of topics: from education to military family outreach to the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. The first 3/4ths of the day were briefings by the speakers (everyone from the First Lady's chief of staff, Tina Tchen to Elizabeth Warren, who has to be one of the most dynamic, engaging speakers I've ever heard). The final 1/4th of the day was a discussion on how the administration is utilizing online media as well as brainstorming about how they can do it better.

Because they don't take the online world for granted. I think they know that they might not be in power right now without the grassroots ability to organize and communicate quickly which is afforded by the Internet. From day one, this administration has been about two-way communication, and while that's a difficult task with 310 million people, they have to be commended

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
theoutcast 5 pts

This sounds like an amazing experience. President Obama seems to sincerely have an understanding of what is affecting women. I like hearing his comments.

I personally think it's time for strong living wage policies. That could take alot of problems off the table. I realize this would be a battle.

I think one reason we are the only industrialized country not to have strong maternity policies is because it seems like "unfair exceptionalism" for mothers.

So, I think that working people should be entitled to sabbaticals of 6-12 months for any reason. There is quite alot to the idea involving job protections, accrued time, etc. One aspect would be to have "sabbatical accounts" that function in the same way as 401ks. This way people would be incentivized to same time and money to care for their children, an aging relative or just stop working for a year in their 20's or 30's.

Also, the 40 hour work week is killer for families. Why not 35 hours at the same rate of pay? The world will not fall apart. In fact, it may get better.

Heather blogs about Motherhood & Other Offensive Situations at http://www.ultimateoutcasts.com.

Melissa Ford 5 pts

They actually spoke about that at the summit. It's a state issue vs. a federal issue, and many states are taking up the issue and working on solutions. Those solutions sort of become a laboratory to see what works and what doesn't.

So if you're unhappy with it, you have to change it at the state level. Get your governor to take up this cause.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her novel about blogging is Life from Scratch ( http://www.life-from-scratch.com/ ).

Melissa Ford 5 pts

I think something people also don't realize is that this administration has created a cross-agency posting for women and kids issues. They did that to strengthen the outreach they're doing plus to ensure that it can't be undone in the future by other administrations. Which is sort of a cool, forward-thinking thing.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her novel about blogging is Life from Scratch ( http://www.life-from-scratch.com/ ).

Melissa Ford 5 pts

That is an excellent question. I would suspect that somewhere, embedded deep enough, you'd find it tied to the greed of large companies. Or you'd find it tied to the enormous size of the beast (I always compare the US to Israel, and it's not really fair because Israel has 7.5 million and the US has 310 million. Just as small businesses can make quick changes and large businesses change slowly because of size). But it is strange how many homes in the US are lacking broadband access all things considered.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her novel about blogging is Life from Scratch ( http://www.life-from-scratch.com/ ).

amberpagewrites 5 pts

As a young mom (well, a mom with a young one), I would dearly love to see the government address our country's ridiculous maternity/paternity leave policies. If they're serious about giving families a good start, well, they need to give moms and babies a good start.

Erin Kotecki Vest 5 pts

...and reaching out to make sure women understand and know they are at the table and the forefront of all these issues is one of the things I respect most about this Administration. They seme to 'get it' when it comes to balancing life, family, work and how THEY can help.

Thanks for repping BlogHer Melissa!

Social Media Strategist  Erin Kotecki Vest ( http://queenofspainblog.com/ )

Amelia E. Adler 5 pts

I wish *our* government was so open and two-way-ish. So far the only times they actually had some decent interactive communication was during the electoral campaign. You guys are lucky to be able to interact with your government on this level.

I've read that 59% of Poles had an Internet access in 2009. Since then, the number probably went up a few points. I don't know if that's interesting to you, but I wonder, how is that Americans, who invented the thing, are only a 10-15% better than Poland, who has Internet only since 1991 (though the real surfing hasn't started until six or seven years later)? In 2006 only 36% of Poles had access, now it's about 60% (probably more, but I can't get newer data). In 4 short years we doubled the number of households with Internet access, and the process hasn't stopped since. So how's that yours slowed down?