Bio
I am a journalist, author, columnist, radio commentator, public speaker and now Blogger. But don't call me an elder blogger. My site is www.juicytoma...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Boomers as Burdens

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Boomer bashing, always a fun activity for some, could become an extreme sport this year now that the generation has officially hit Medicare age. Instead of just going after boomers as self important bores the trend is to paint boomers as burdens.

And who benefits from this new round of boomer bashing, we might wonder, as we see headlines such as:

Squeeze from retiring boomers starts now

Big demanding generation expected to strain resources

Baby boomers may bust plans

While it is true that the boomer generation has come up with a lot to change society, such as pushing to end racism, sexism and ageism, Medicare and Social Security are not boomer inventions. Social Security, a government run insurance program funded by payroll taxes, was started in 1935. Medicare and Medicaid were added in 1965.

Boomers have been paying into both ever since we looked at our first paycheck and wondered “what’s FICA.” Medicare began just as the oldest boomers started working, meaning that boomers have paid more into Medicare than any other generation.

But instead of being considered big contributors we’re now considered a liability.

The deal was we paid then so the government would deliver it when we needed it (which would be now).

It’s not that boomers aren’t aware of concerns over risks to funding Medicare and Social Security. The math is there. There are more older workers ready to make claims than younger workers paying into the system. Some say fix the system. Some say scrap it. In any case, boomers are made out as the big burden. The big drain.

Some even suggest boomers are asking for some fat allowance that we don’t deserve. The average monthly Social Security benefit in 2010 was $1,158, an essential safety net if you’re in the struggling class. If you’re rich, the cost of a couple pair of kick-butt shoes. Medicare does not cover lip plumping.

It’s not like boomers are a bunch of newcomers asking for special privileges.

We’re the parents and grandparents and older siblings of the younger generation. We’re not aliens who just walked in the door demanding all the good wine.

And we’re not cavalier about threats to Social Security and Medicare. Polls show that boomers are, in large part, willing to make some sacrifices by raising the eligibility age and/or paying higher Medicare taxes rather than slicing benefits. We’re as worried for the younger generation as ourselves.

No self-respecting boomer should let the propagandists get away with implying that older people want it all now, the future be damned. Who does it benefit to convince young workers that Medicare and Social Security are doomed, rather than engaging them as advocates in coming up with ways to make the system sound and fair for everyone? Who stands to gain from creating a generation war over Social Security and Medicare?

Critics say leave health care for older people to the insurance companies. Dump Social Security and let people invest in their retirement.

This would take away the government’s responsibility to its older citizens and turn it over to the private sector which some consider a one way ticket to an ice floe.

The best alternative would be to insure meaningful, well paid jobs for as long as you want to work and then to age without ever getting sick. But no one, not even a boomer, has figured out how to do that.

  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Susan Swartz 5 pts

My husband and I have always worked in the newspaper biz, not one of your most highly paid professions. We continue to work part time but we count on social security and would be up a creek without Medicare. Even our friends who did save for retirement lost a bunch in the crash. And the ones who lost jobs and are not yet 65 are just praying to stay well.

phoenixsab 5 pts

There seems to be a sweeping assumption that all baby boomers are financially well-off and will just be drawing benefits from Social Security and Medicare because they can, not because they need them. Nothing could be further from the truth.

I'm a boomer who has worked since she was 16, but although I have worked hard and been pretty frugal, rarely have I had a job that paid me much beyond subsistence wages. There was no question of trying to save for retirement. It's been enough of a struggle to keep a roof over my head and the utilities on in the present, and it still is. If I ever get to retire, and that's looking doubtful, Social Security is my only option. If it's not there for me, it's all over for me.

And some other commenters are absolutely right, the mixed messages need to stop. Industry needs to decide if they want us to retire or not. If they still want us working, then they need to take a good hard look at the subtle but all-too-real age discriminatory hiring practices that are in place and truly start realizing the value of older workers.

Melissa Ford 5 pts

I think the biggest problem has already been addressed above -- that there is a break down between private companies saying, "not my responsibility" and public Social Security saying, "but wait, we were counting on you, private companies." Social Security only worked if people were able to retain jobs and contribute up until a certain point.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her novel about blogging is Life from Scratch ( http://www.life-from-scratch.com/ ).

Susan Swartz 5 pts

I agree, Marileigh. If society wants boomers to hang in there until an older age, it will take encouragement from employers. Most boomers I know, at least the ones who love their work, hope to keep at it, at least part time.

Marileigh 5 pts

So many large corporations ask lomng term employees to take an early retirement. My husband is in aerospace, and they asked. It's really not worth it, and for my husband he loves being an engineer and the job he does. I don't see him retiring any time soon.

seattlegirluw 5 pts

I think the real issue here is the syndrome of enforced early retirement. There have been stories about people in their 50s who got laid off and may or may not get a real job (or any) again.

Those people are going to need serious financial help, along with those who didn't properly save for retirement. (Which, it seems like we're being told, is a lot of them.) Yet just $1,200 a month could be enough in a lot of states to exclude extra help with your Medicare costs. That's $4,000 per person per year that they have to pay over and above their premiums and co-pays. Youch.

But you're right -- boomers aren't asking for anything that they haven't paid into all their working lives. They shouldn't be portrayed as money-grubbing but rather expecting what they've been promised.