Breast Cancer Awareness Month is Bunk
by Suzanne Reisman

Three years ago, I saw a story on the news while I was at the gym. An investigative feature on the breast cancer awareness contributions that various corporations pledged during Breast Cancer Awareness Month found that most of these promotions led to increased sales and windfall profits that dwarfed the piddling donations that the extra sales generated. Until that moment, I was gung-ho about buying products marked with pink ribbons.

My mother was only 33 when she was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1980, and I am forever grateful that a mastectomy preserved her life. Buying things that could help other women seemed like a no-brainer - the corporations had brainwashed me but good.

Once I saw the news story, I did some research. A few outlets were starting to discuss the gross exploitation of breast cancer and loose laws that allowed companies to say they were giving money to a cause to convince people to buy their products, and then give a teensy donation to a foundation. The resource for critical thinking about breast cancer awareness is a nonprofit agency called Breast Cancer Action. They launched "Think Before You Pink" in 2002 as Breast Cancer Awareness Month exploded from something to educate women about the risks of breast cancer to Corporate Profit-A-Thon. It was through BCA that I learned that many, many of the products sold to help "fight" breast cancer actually contain chemicals that are linked to the disease. I credit the evolution of my thinking on shopping/walking/whatevering for "the cure" to BCA.

Another important eye-opener for me was Samantha King's book Pink Ribbons, Inc.. King's research crystallized the link between exploiting fear of losing one's breasts or dying with the obscene amount of money corporations began raking in by affiliating themselves with "breast cancer awareness." The social cause marketers really believe that they are doing good things.

Otherwise, no one was saying much about the disgusting way Breast Cancer Awareness Month had been turned in Profit-Generating Month. I am happy to say that although the situation has only worsened, awareness of the exploitation - not only of the corporations and the marketers, but of some of the beneficiary agencies themselves - has grown exponentially. When I sat down to write this post, I found tons of bloggers and media outlets turning a skeptical (and righteously angry eye) on pink ribbon bullshit.

My friend Alex Elliot at Formula Fed & Flexible Parenting sent me a link to an article on Shine by Dory Devlin, Pink overload: Are companies taking advantage of Breast Cancer Awareness Month?. Devlin, in turn, cites articles about corporate abuse of breast cancer awareness in The Boston Globe and Daily Finance. Devlin's warning: "Buying pink does not always mean your green will go to cancer research." At the end of the article, she offers a list of places interested parties can donate to directly.

Siel at Green LA Girl has a few other suggestions for people who want to do their part in the battle against breast cancer:

So if you’d like to donate $10 to fight breast cancer, don’t buy 500 Swiffers. Instead, consider donating that money directly to groups like Breast Cancer Action, Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, and Environmental Working Group — all of which work to limit environmental exposures that put people at risk for breast cancer. That way, more money will go towards reducing the number of people who get cancer in the first place, less to companies cashing in on a do-gooder campaign.

Reminder: not only do you know exactly where your donation is going when you give directly to a charity, but you get a tax write-off. This is truly double bottom line investing!

Note that the big charities like Susan Komen, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the National Breast Cancer Foundation that benefit from most of the big campaigns are not on Siel's list. Not a mere oversight. In fact, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation was started by Evelyn Lauder. You may know her from her family's business, Estee Lauder cosmetics. What you may not know is that many Estee Lauder products contain parabens, which are estrogenic. According to BCA, "Estrogenic chemicals mimic the function of the naturally occurring hormone estrogen, and exposure to external estrogens has been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer." While it is great that Lauder wants to help find a cure for breast cancer, she could help prevent it in the first place by producing make-up that is paraben free.

As for Susan Komen, Ann Bartow at Feminist Law Professors goes one step further, and I like the way she thinks:

Meanwhile, over at the Komen Foundation website you can buy a pink feather boa for $10, and 25% of the purchase price “will benefit Susan G. Komen for the Cure® in the fight against breast cure.” But what does that mean? Komen gets $2.50 if I buy a boa but what exactly does Komen do with the money? All I learned from the most recent Komen Annual Report is that it spent the following on “Program Services” in 2008:

Research $98,548,000
Education $134,195,000
Screening $37,804,000
Treatment $22,024,000
Total Program Services $292,571,000

Based on expenditures the Komen’s biggest priority is “education” and I wonder if that includes advertising campaigns like “Punch It.”

"Punch It," by the way, features posters of women wearing t-shirts describing the fight against breast cancer like some sort of mob beating. Another poster highlights the breast-y goodness of fighting breast cancer. Back in September, my friend Suebob at Red Stapler wrote about how marketers try to get more men interested in "breast cancer awareness" by promoting titties. She noted:

To get a few more dollars for the cause, we further objectify women and, in the process, play into the idea that men are hopeless, sex-crazed goons who can't get their heads out of their asses unless a woman is shaking her boobs in their face. (Mixed metaphors our specialty)....Here's a hint for the marketers: breast cancer is a deadly, serious disease that affects a WHOLE WOMAN, not just her fun-sacks.

Really! I'm at the point where Breast Cancer Awareness Month is making me (and my at-risk fun-sacks) ill. Between the companies that sell us products that may cause cancer so they can throw some pennies to foundations that exploit women in order to fight cancer, how can I not be cynical?

If you still want to buy something to commemorate Breast Cancer Awareness Month, I suggest picking up a copy of Not Done Yet, a fabulous book by blogger Laurie Kingston. I bought a copy for my mom at the BlogHer conference in Chicago this past summer, and Laurie was kind enough to sign it, then go out for pizza with me, my mom, and an awesome group of women bloggers. She is awesome. Sure, by buying her book, no donation is going any "cause," but to me, this is one of the best ways to support women who are dealing with or dealt with breast cancer.

Suzanne also blogs at Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants. When not plugging her book about unusual things to see and do in NYC (Off the Beaten (Subway) Track, she gets her mind off the tyranny of Breast Cancer Awareness Month by posting chapters from the young adult novel she wrote when she was in 8th grade at Always.

Comments

 

Thanks for this!

I've been highly suspicious of that cute little pink ribbon on everything from Swiffer Sweepers to my can of motor oil and have wondered exactly what the standards they had to meet before being able to stick that sucker on there.

Thanks also for bringing up the sexing up of breast cancer. Gotta love that. I was asked to join a FB group called Save the TaTas! Oookay. Cause that's just what I want to hear when I'm faced with a life or death illness. Juvenilize my body parts. Go right ahead.

Always a... Willful Woman @ www.besidethestonewall.com Visitors always welcome! Bring your stories to share!

 

I Want a Gold (or Pink) Medal for My
Activisim

Fantastic article.  What I find so disheartening about the wave of "ribbon" marketing is that we eat it up, believing that we are activists standing up for a cause when we sling down a dollar at the department store counter.  How quickly we feel we should be rewarded for our activism, that without delay we get the right to pin ourselves with pride and walk around smirking that we did something good.  

We need to get to get back to the roots of activism.  It take more labor and sweat than we are led to believe.  

http://www.thecluelesscrafter.com/

 

you are awesome

I was reading through your article and thinking how brilliant and righteous and funny you are (along with your "at risk fun sacks") and was floored by your recommendation of my book.

Thanks so much. Your approval means so much to me.

And this post - brilliant. You cover it all.

 

Laurie

www.notjustaboutcancer.blogspot.com

 

I take it back, then

Now you are making me cry and my at-risk fun sacks hate when I get emotional. (Breasts are all about fun, fun, fun, as you know.) Of COURSE I recommend your book - you totally rock.

I agree with all of the comments - let's metaphorically grab our pink ribbon motor oil cans (and I know that is not funny, but I could NOT stop laughing when I read that) and Swiffer mops and cancer-causing lipsticks and yogurts (my mom told me that Yoplait can't guarantee that their yogurt is free of rBGH until this summer, but if that is not accurate, ignore this warning, and incidentally, she eats it anyway because she likes the taste) and metaphorically throw it through the windows of the companies and ad agencies that sell us this crap.

Oh, and also check out Jeanne Sather's request for financial support for her blog at Assertive Cancer Patient. Like Laurie, she totally rocks.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants

 

I'm with you on most of

I'm with you on most of that. In fact, I wrote a little about it on my own site a few weeks ago. However, I do like the kitschy phrases associated with the cause. "Feel Your Boobies" and  "Save the Tatas" are more memborable than "do your monthly self breast exam" don't you think? If a tacky saying will remind even one more woman to check for early signs of breast cancer, I think it's worth it.

 

WAHM, Montessori Mom, Scout Mom, Dance Mom, Allergy Mom and avid coupon clipper, desperately seeking my own identity; Founder of Inexpensively.

 

Big Difference

I don't think those little phrases (and I admit that they would not work for me personally, but to each her own) are so awful.  It is a lot different from using risque images or violent language to get men to donate to breast cancer research because it would be awful to lose boobs.  It's insulting to both men and women, saying that women are only worth their boobs and that all that men care about are boobs.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Oth

 

I think it is amazing what

I think it is amazing what people will do for money. I am an African American young woman and I think of the possibilities of getting breast cancer often. Before I went to college I use to walk in the Susan Kome walk for Brest cancer with my mother every year. Since I have been in college I have participated in our schools annual overnight walk, Relay for Life for people with all types of cancer. It is astonishing to learn that our money is not going to the place promised. I think that the government should take part in making sure the money goes where it is suppose to go. I genuinely feel like we would have found a cure for cancer if all the money that people donate truly went to the right spot. You should really write more on this topic because there are people such as me that are ignorant to the fact that these things are going on.

 

I have a dead mother AND pink ribbon
aggression

My mother passed away from breast cancer in 1982, when she was 36.  By the age of 28 I had my first biopsy (found benign) and I actively avoid the bogus pink ribbon campaign.

My faith collapsed about six years ago when Avon took $1100.00 I had worked hard to fundraise and then wouldn't let me be a part of their breast cancer walk for which I had raised the funds.  At the time, their minimum requirement was $1400.00 and I guess lettting me do the 26 mile, one day walk with my best friend would have been much more inconvenient than taking the money. 

That is when I realized it was all about the money, and not the disease, or the women and families that have had to struggle with it.

And as a founder of a not-for-profit, I am always happy to hear the question, "What percentage of my donation will go to the cause?"  Philanthropy is a beautiful thing, but not without a direct necessity for research.  Know what you are giving and to whom.

Why cancel out your gift and generosity with ignorance?

This is an excellent post.  Thank you for doing such extensive research. 

daniella

 

Daniella - http://www.daniellaland.blogspot.com - Free corndog if you fall off of anything.

 

Infuriating

I cannot believe that for a measley $30, they would not let you participate.  But I also can, because it costs so much to produce these damn events that if you don't raise a certain amount, the cause will actually lose money.  And that is the insanity of it all.  As anburge1 said above, it is really important for people to understand where their money goes.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Oth

 

Doubtful

Like ovaries, those are all icky innards that most people have no clue about and no desire to know about.

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

 

Thank you for writing this.

Thank you for writing this. My mother was diagnosed and successfully treated for breast cancer when I was 16. I am now 23 and I'm so grateful to have her in my life each and every day. Initially, we did the walks and everything but I always felt like she didn't really want to do it. She also hates that survivors get bright pink shirts for the Komen walks. I think she would have been happier with a regular t-shirt and a pin or something that said survivor. Eventually, we both stepped away from the breast cancer month hype. That's what it is. Hype. 

Instead, she has agreed to appear on tv shows and talk about her experience with BRCA, breast cancers and family history. She is a true activist because she gets out there and talks to people. We no longer buy the pink ribbon stuff. I will take a pink ribbon pin from my gym (they are free) just to symbolize that it has and does affect my family each and everyday. Just about every woman in my mothers family has had breast cancer. One lost the fight. I want to remember that but not support the hype. So I talk to my friends and encourage them to check themselves. I give money directly to research organizations. I will never buy another pink item during breast cancer month. There is so much more that you can do than buy things to support a cause.

 

Thank you for writing this article. 

 

Other Cancer Patients Also Resent the Pink

It isn't PC, but in chemo rooms around the country, non-breast cancer patients are getting angrier and angrier that only breast cancer gets the attention.  More people die of colon cancer or multiple myeloma than do breast cancer.  I often wonder what it says about our society that it takes the sexualization of cancer to get money.

 

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

 

Sexualizing cancer

I hear you.  I actually wonder if cervical, uterine, or endometrial cancer will eventually jump on the "save the sexy body parts" bandwagon.  It's really sick.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Oth

 

Timely affirmation

 

Great post, Suzanne! And equally compelling discussion stream.

(Daniella, I had a similar revelation with Avon. It was disappointing to say the least. Senseless to say the most.) 

This discussion was even more relevant to me this year, as I recently got involved with Gateway for Cancer Research. I was drawn to for the chance to make a real difference, but I must say, the marketer in me felt a little discouraged when Awareness month came along. It was like I missed the boat by not getting my cause looped in on this widely recognized, highly social event. And inserting Gateway into these enthusiastic streams/discussion made me feel like a killjoy. Or worse yet, smarmy. So I refrained.

But, after reading your article, I'm feeling energized again. Gateway may not be celebrated by the masses, but 99 cents of every dollar goes directly to clinical research-- patient-centric clinical trials that make real difference. Not just women, not just boobies, but individuals with all types of cancer.

So I applaud you for encouraging people to be thoughtful in their participation, and reminding people that there are ways to "make a difference" and "find a cure," but it's not always as easy as donning some pink. Cancer treatment isn't quick and dirty and neither should our interest in finding a cure.

Keep the timely discussions coming, Suzanne!

 

 

Yeah, what Suzanne said!

Thank you for writing this... I had been wondering why no one had said out loud (or blogged) what I've ben wanting to say for so long.  Cancer is horrible.  Breast cancer is horrible.  There are lots of diseases out there that are horrible.  I've been wondering for some time why the puplic can be fooled into thinking breast cancer is getting all sorts of love and money when it's mostly commerce.  I love pink and am inclined to buy the pink Starbucks travel mug, motor oil, and spatulas when available knowing that I'm doing no real good for the cause.  If I want to contribute to the boobie prize, I connect with someone with cancer through Chemoangels.com. 

Thanks again.  You rock the knockers!

 

Excellent Post

Excellent post, Suzanne!  I hadn't been aware of this until a couple years ago when reading a blog post you wrote.  After reading your post I decided that if I needed an item and if the money  for it went to research if I bought it in pink, then I would go head and buy it.  Even if only 2 cents was going towards research, I was planning on the buying the product anyway so why not give that measley two cents.  Now though I'm angry by the fact that some many corporations are using breast cancer to their advantage.  It actually bothers me when I see the pink displays in the stores.  I haven't bought anything for breast cancer awarenss month in a long time.  I would muchy rather donate money directly towards research.  Like someone else wrote though, I would wear a pink ribbon if they were handing them out at our gym or if in fact of course the money was legitimately going to research because someone like you was selling them.    Thanks for the link!

Alex Elliot, Formula Fed and Flexible Parenting