Bright Sided: When Positive Thinking Becomes a Tool of Repression
by Maria Niles

Last week I wrote about looking for silver linings and finding gratitude even when we are feeling less than thankful. But is positive thinking always the right approach? Author Barbara Ehrenreich says no.

Barbara Ehrenreich is perhaps best known for her book Nickle and Dimed where she took several low-paying jobs and reported on the lives of the working poor. She wrote Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America after being treated for breast cancer and finding her anger being dismissed.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Barbara Ehrenreich
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis

Although I've not yet read the book and have just read reviews and seen interviews with the author, I think Ehrenreich raises some important points. While positive thinking and optimism can provide for greater happiness and a sense of well-being it can also be a tool for beating yourself up or for ignoring tough realities.

You are not a bad person if you think that something is hard or painful or difficult. You do not bring bad things on yourself if you say truthfully that you're having a bad day rather than cheerily proclaiming everything hunky dory! Problems will happen, you will make mistakes and some days will suck regardless of how perfectly you think good thoughts.

Ehrenreich discusses how bright-sided thinking leads workers to believe that losing their job is somehow their fault or spend time trying to convince themselves that it is a fabulous opportunity to build "brand you" while ignoring the realities of global corporate and political actions that are far beyond the reach of any individual's mind control through happy thoughts.

Some of Ehrenreich's negativity towards positivity might be driven by a type of confirmation bias. Just as the lottery winner who affirmed their win beforehand or the Oprah Show guest who had a picture of the host on her vision board might believe that they bent the universe to their will, going through treatment for cancer might have led her to want to somehow prove that it wasn't her fault she got sick and the outcome of her treatment didn't require perfect positivism.

There is no one right way to react or cope with difficult times and I think whatever approach keeps you sane and strong and gets you through to the other side is a valid choice. Neither swallowing whole or rejecting outright what the gurus are peddling gets you to Nirvana. Taking what works for you and leaving behind what does not is how we get to the truth.

Have you read Bright-Sided? What were your thoughts on the book? How do you strike a balance between positive empowerment and allowing yourself to legitimately wallow in the occasional comfort of a pint of Ben and Jerry's?

Related Reading:

Anna N. at Jezebel: Bright-Sided: The Negative Consequences Of Positive Thinking

Other forms of positive thinking, especially that imposed by employers, are far more damaging to society. Ehrenreich mentions the role of optimistic yes-men in the financial crisis and the Iraq war, but she could have condemned even more strongly the movement that seeks to convince people that losing their jobs is awesome. While looking on the bright side of a layoff may make sense on a personal level, it also discourages any sort of collective action. Ehrenreich writes in her postscript that "positive thinking has been a tool of repression worldwide" and that "the threats we face are real and can be vanquished only by shaking off self-absorption and taking action in the world." The latter seems like the real key point of Bright-Sided — that convincing ourselves that things are already good can keep us from making them better, both for ourselves and for others — and I wish Ehrenreich had made it more forcefully throughout her book, not just in the postscript. It's a message that deserves to be heard.

Nancy Colasurdo, Life Coach at Fox Business: Why Too Much Positive Can Become Negative

Ehrenreich has effectively called us out. She was first motivated to explore the positive thinking movement while going through the ordeal of breast cancer with a three-part harmony of pink ribbons, teddy bears and upbeat chatter. It was enough to send her right over the edge and in search of sane support. In our recent interview, she recalled talking to a career coach when she was in an undercover persona researching another book, Bait and Switch.

“I said, ‘I’m a little concerned about my age as a factor in keeping me from getting jobs,’” Ehrenreich said. “And [the coach] said, ‘Your age is whatever you feel it is.’”

Janice Harayda at One-Minute Book Reviews: 'Smile or Die' - Barbara Ehrenreich's 'Bright-sided'

Ehrenreich found when she was diagnosed with breast cancer that a cult of optimism pervaded articles and books about the disease that made her feel isolated instead of supported....

She also found that “positive thinking” can exact a terrible price in self-blame if a cancer defies treatment. As the oncology nurse Cynthia Rittenberg has written, the pressure to think positively is “an additional burden to an already devastated patient.”...

In a chapter called “God Wants You to Be Rich,” Ehrenreich faults the so-called “prosperity gospel” preached by superstar pastors like Joel Osteen, whose churches offer “services that might, in more generous nations, be provided by the secular welfare state,” such as pre- and after-school programs. Certainly those ministries may foster self-blame. (If God wants you to be rich and you’re not, you don’t have enough faith.) But if the churches that promote the “prosperity gospel” are offering low- or no-cost day care that enables parents to seek prosperity by holding jobs, doesn’t that count for something? You sense that such programs are exactly kind of thing that Ehrenreich might love, if only they weren’t endorsed by pastors who wear too much gel in their mullets.

Jessie Kunhardt at The Huffington Post: Bright-Sided: Smart Analysis Or Missing Something?

Some of us like that kind of constant positivity, some of us don't. We'd like to know how you feel. Do you want to hear the platitudes about difficulties being a blessing? Or does that make you want to deck somebody? What's the best way to approach people in tough situations? And if you've read the book, does Ehrenreich do a good job of convincing you that positivity isn't everything?

Nora Ephron at The Daily Beast: Nora Ephron's Must-Reads

It’s Ehrenreich’s belief that almost everything that’s wrong in this country comes from an addiction to positive thinking. She takes on all the hucksters who travel the country insisting that optimism will cure you, change your life and/or make you rich.

Janet Maslin at The New York Times: Up to Her Neck in Pink Ribbons and Smiley Faces

“Bright-Sided” begins with Ms. Ehrenreich’s highly humanizing chapter about her illness and with her legitimate scorn for “the ultrafeminine theme of the breast cancer marketplace.” (“Certainly men diagnosed with prostate cancer do not receive gifts of Matchbox cars.”) After that it takes a downhill trajectory. The next chapter concerns the cultural validation of “magical thinking,” as in the book “The Secret,” which makes another barn-sized target. What is the real meaning of that book’s assertion that we can attract whatever we want by wishing for it? “Bright-Sided” rightly says that the meaning is twofold: that we are encouraged to override the wishes of anyone else, and that we become failures when the process doesn’t pay off.

Christine Kane: Dark-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Negativity is a Gift

Now, I come from the world of academia. I’m the youngest in a family of philosophers, professors, PhD’s and thinkers. I’ve been told at more than one Thanksgiving dinner that I’m a complete idiot. So by now, I’m so used to the voices of many Ms. Ehrenreichs that it kinda makes me smile. I’m not dismissing the very real anger that she has and that has been expressed all over the media. But I do see it as missing the point. (Plus, it’s much easier to stay angry and stuck, claiming your victim status – than it is to do the work to actually shift your thought patterns. I know this from experience.)

Here’s the thing though.

I also see this kind of thing as a gift. Every time someone “pushes up against you” or your beliefs, it’s a gift. Even cynicism, criticism, and angry siblings can be a gift because they all get you clearer in making a conscious choice of how you want to live. People don’t have to agree with you in order for you to feel okay about your heart, mind and soul.

BlogHer CE Maria Niles keeps it real at PopConsumer

Comments

 

Abosolute Thinking It Leaves Out the Middle
Ground

It is not either/or. It is a balance. A personally decided balance.

In the middle space is how you decide to navigate your life. I know growing up it was important to hear "you can do it, believe that it is possible" messages. I don't want those to stop. As I've grown older I can put them into life contexts that make sense.

Perhaps Barbara is railing at aspects of the self-help industry who do feed on fears to sell books and movies? Or misunderstanding about positive thinking, of which there are many.

On the other foot, there have been positive affirmation books that have soothe my soul.

The "Plucky kid" is a icon that is embedded in our souls. How much of this is cultural?

 

Gena - Out On The Stoop

 

This!

The balance is so important and so different for each one of us.

I'm a positive person at my very core. I have to try to be negative. UNLESS the situation calls for some tears or some rightful anger. And then I cry. Or rant. And then I go back to being my optimistic self. Repression it is not.

I like how I view the world. :)

 

@FireMom from Stop, Drop and Blog and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land

 

Optimistic Orientation

It sounds like you have a healthy balanced approach, Jenna! In the classic words of Journey, hold on to that feeling ;-)

With the caveat that I haven't yet read the book, I don't think Ehrenreich was characterizing natural optimism (which is in my experience a joy to be around) but rather the institutional, organizational and business use of positive thinking philosophy to convince people to deny their emotions, ignore reality and behave against their own interest.

Thanks so much for your comment!

BlogHer Contributing Editor PopConsumer Beyond Help

 

feeding on fear

I suspect you are correct that part of what Bright-Sided is attacking is that fear-inducing mindset many use to hawk their wares. I agree with you - I don't want messages of positive support and encouragement to go away but I also don't need or want a side dish of guilt to go along with it.

Thanks so much for your comment, Gena.

BlogHer Contributing Editor PopConsumer Beyond Help

 

Bright-Sided Was a Fascinating Read

I just finished "Bright-Sided" and enjoyed it throughly. I was fascinated by the stuff about Calvinism, megachurches, and the effects of positive thinking within our world and workplaces. I do think that there's a often pressure to not be realistic that often borders on the creepy, particularly in the workplace when employees are being treated like crap within a company run by people that own multiple houses. Positive thinking does become a form of control, and that sucks.

The thing is, I do believe in positive thinking and things like the mind/body connection - But I think of them more like vitamins. Somewhere along the way paved by The Secret, I think people started treating positive energy and the mind/body connection like the food. Hard work, education, and perseverance are the food.

 

Liz Rizzo

I blog at Everyday Goddess.

 

Vitamins vs. food

I like that idea, Liz!

Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts on the book - you give a helpful and balanced review - and for your comment.

BlogHer Contributing Editor PopConsumer Beyond Help

 

Amen

In 2008 ago I wrote a post out here about how I just couldn't get into Echhart Tolle's uber-positivism. I said then what I believe now:

This is the great chasm into which I see much NewAge thought collapse .It is written by and for comfortable persons, persons who are not AIDS orphans in Africa, not starving in Darfur, not raped in Bosnia. These are not people who have been tortured in prison, beaten because they are gay, savaged by acts of senseless violence. They are not starving, not afraid of how they will house their families, not homeless, not shot by random gunfire. If they were, they could never write such words. There are people in the world who have a right to negative feelings - who are in legitimate pain, who suffer needlessly -- not needlessly because they are indulging their egos, but needlessly because help was not given when it could have been, should have been

Everyone needs to grapple with negative feelings. But it is no crime to feel them, and it would be a sign of a dead soul in some cases who did not feel the stings and pain of injustice. Rage at injustice has caused change for the better. Ignoring it won't make it go away.

To get stuck in any feeling rut us a problem, and it would be a rut to get mired in rage as well, but there is a place and a time for the full range of feelings .

 

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool

 

A full range of feelings

To lose the ability to feel the range would be, I think, to loose an essential essence of what makes us human.

Thank you so much for sharing your post and for your comment, Mata.

BlogHer Contributing Editor PopConsumer Beyond Help

 

Love the post and the links.

Love the post and the links. I have always felt that some of the very strange positivsm borders on not only the creepy but the insane, and is hardly rational or conducive to progress. It also tends to make people who fail feel it is their fault. A much needed post. Thanks.

 

I hope to catch the book in my free time.

 

 

cooper

 

Imposing a burden of guilt

Thank you for your kind words and for sharing your thoughts, cooper. Like you I hope to have some free time to dig into this book soon.

BlogHer Contributing Editor PopConsumer Beyond Help

 

What is under our control and what isn't

The problem I have with the positive-thinking "Secret"-type folks is that they seem to make no differentiation between things that are under our control and things that aren't. People with serious illnesses and people suffering under repressive regimes aren't there because their thinking got them there. Much of life is random, and no matter how happily we think, we must deal with forces beyond our control.

I am especially passionate about this because my sister died from Multiple Sclerosis. She spent years doing affirmations and trying to figure out how her negative thought patterns had created her disease. In my mind, those who promote the idea that we can avoid all suffering if we just think correctly are guilty of great cruelty.

We need to be as positive as possible about the hand that we have been dealt and try to help others through their tough times, but haranguing people to "think positive" is often just mean.

 

Cruelty

I think that is an apt word to describe what can become a dogma for some. Sadly I think they believe themselves to be kind and doing someone a favor when they push right-thinking of any kind as the end-all, be-all, cure-all. And I think they don't realize it because they do so in an effort to mask their own fear and hide it from themselves.

I am so very sorry to hear that misguided and ignorant efforts to help your sister find ways to alleviate her pain caused her greater suffering.

Thank you so much for sharing your experience and for your comment, suebob.

BlogHer Contributing Editor PopConsumer Beyond Help

 

Power of Positive Realism

What a great topic!

I have always thought of myself as an optimist but also know that sometimes life SUCKS. I can look at my big picture and be optimistic, but also can be real. Sometimes an asshole is an asshole. Sometimes a bad day is comically bad. Sometimes it's okay to be negative when shit happens. don't shove red/purple/yellow/pink/lime green ribbons down my throat or try to sprinkle glitter and fairy dust on my pile of negativity. Let me work through the negative and I will get to a true and honest positive on my own time. 

Thx for the food for thought!

 

Robyn

www.everydayjillwentupthehill.blogspot.com

 

Honest positive

What a great way to describe your process, Robyn. Ignoring or denying negative realities doesn't make them untrue or go away. I like your approach of rejecting a false positive and working through to a true optimism. I suspect not only does it feel better but it is also longer lasting.

Thanks so much for your comment!

BlogHer Contributing Editor PopConsumer Beyond Help