- Share This Post
- submit
- 14
-
Sparkle (0)
Last week I wrote about looking for silver linings and finding gratitude even when we are feeling less than thankful. But is positive thinking always the right approach? Author Barbara Ehrenreich says no.
Barbara Ehrenreich is perhaps best known for her book Nickle and Dimed where she took several low-paying jobs and reported on the lives of the working poor. She wrote Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America after being treated for breast cancer and finding her anger being dismissed.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Barbara Ehrenreich | ||||
|
||||
Although I've not yet read the book and have just read reviews and seen interviews with the author, I think Ehrenreich raises some important points. While positive thinking and optimism can provide for greater happiness and a sense of well-being it can also be a tool for beating yourself up or for ignoring tough realities.
You are not a bad person if you think that something is hard or painful or difficult. You do not bring bad things on yourself if you say truthfully that you're having a bad day rather than cheerily proclaiming everything hunky dory! Problems will happen, you will make mistakes and some days will suck regardless of how perfectly you think good thoughts.
Ehrenreich discusses how bright-sided thinking leads workers to believe that losing their job is somehow their fault or spend time trying to convince themselves that it is a fabulous opportunity to build "brand you" while ignoring the realities of global corporate and political actions that are far beyond the reach of any individual's mind control through happy thoughts.
Some of Ehrenreich's negativity towards positivity might be driven by a type of confirmation bias. Just as the lottery winner who affirmed their win beforehand or the Oprah Show guest who had a picture of the host on her vision board might believe that they bent the universe to their will, going through treatment for cancer might have led her to want to somehow prove that it wasn't her fault she got sick and the outcome of her treatment didn't require perfect positivism.
There is no one right way to react or cope with difficult times and I think whatever approach keeps you sane and strong and gets you through to the other side is a valid choice. Neither swallowing whole or rejecting outright what the gurus are peddling gets you to Nirvana. Taking what works for you and leaving behind what does not is how we get to the truth.
Have you read Bright-Sided? What were your thoughts on the book? How do you strike a balance between positive empowerment and allowing yourself to legitimately wallow in the occasional comfort of a pint of Ben and Jerry's?
Related Reading:
Anna N. at Jezebel: Bright-Sided: The Negative Consequences Of Positive Thinking
Other forms of positive thinking, especially that imposed by employers, are far more damaging to society. Ehrenreich mentions the role of optimistic yes-men in the financial crisis and the Iraq war, but she could have condemned even more strongly the movement that seeks to convince people that losing their jobs is awesome. While















