“For years, cattle rancher Cliven Bundy defied legal orders instructing him to remove his cattle from a publicly owned allotment of land in the Nevada desert. Bundy, who says he does not recognize the authority of the federal government, initiated a decades-long conflict in 1993 when he began refusing to pay grazing fees related to his cattle's use of lands referred to as the Bunkerville allotment. An escalating series of judicial orders eventually led to the revocation of his grazing rights and orders to remove his cattle. In April, officers from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which stewards the land in question, began impounding the cattle in order to pay off the nearly $1 million Bundy owes in unpaid fines and grazing fees. The conflict reached a boiling point on Saturday, when Bundy and hundreds of protesters, including militia members, initiated a standoff with authorities. Violent rhetoric associated with the movement led BLM to abandon its efforts to round up the cattle.”
First, that twatwaffle Bundy does not, and has NOT EVER owned the land he claims is “his”, and he has a legal responsibility to pay the grazing fees:
“Cliven Bundy, the rancher whose cattle were rounded up and then released by the BLM over the weekend, claims that his family has used the land in question since 1880 but the Nevada Constitution pre-dates this by 16 years. When Nevada became a state in 1864, its citizens gave up all claims to unappropriated federal land and codified this in the state’s Constitution. The Nevada Constitution states: “Third. That the people inhabiting said territory do agree and declare, that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within said territory, and that the same shall be and remain at the sole and entire disposition of the United States; …..” [Furthermore] If Bundy “owns the land then where is the deed? Where are the records he paid property taxes? It’s not his land. Bundy also claims that it his “right” to graze these BLM public lands. This is not the case. The Taylor Grazing Act of 1934 specifically states that the issuance of a grazing permit does not confer any right to graze or right to own the land. The Taylor Grazing Act is the granddaddy of the U.S. laws governing grazing on federal land. “Taylor” was a rancher and a congressman from Colorado, hardly someone to want government tyranny over ranching.”
Thus, Bundy’s entire argument for “his” land is unmitigated bullshit. The asshat just doesn’t want to pay the grazing fees. The rumor going around the Far Right -- the unholy trifecta of Right Wing Fears – that Harry Reid and a Chinese company want to put a solar plant there is also bullshit.
Secondly, the militia members out there threatening the federal government with machine guns are calling themselves “patriots”, and that chaps my ass like a sandy wind. People fighting FOR their country, like members of the armed forces of that country, are patriots you dumb fucks. You all are, at best, militant separatists. Feel free to call yourself “freedom fighters” but what you are is a pack of rabid terrorists.
Terrorism is “ 1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes. 2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization. 3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.”
You threatened the government with automatic weapons to get your own way. Not only that, you delusional shit-for-brains are willing to do HORRIBLE things to “prove” how “bad” the USA is.
“A former Arizona sheriff who supported a Nevada rancher in his land dispute with the federal government says he would have put women in the frontline if officers started shooting. Richard Mack, a Bundy supporter who served as sheriff of Graham County, Ariz., between 1988-1997, told Fox News on Monday about a planned strategy if "rogue federal agents" had opened fire. “We were actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front,” he said on Fox News, according to TheBlaze.com. “If they are going to start shooting, it’s going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers.” [Mack said ]“If they’re going to start killing people, I’m sorry, but to show the world how ruthless these people are, women needed to be the first ones shot. I’m sorry, that sounds horrible. I would have put my own wife or daughters there, and I would have been screaming bloody murder to watch them die. I would've gone next, I would have been the next one to be killed. I’m not afraid to die here. I’m willing to die here … But the best ploy would be to have had women at the front. Because, one, I don’t think they would have shot them. And, two, if they had, it would have been the worst thing that we could have shown to the rest of the world, that these ruthless cowards hired by the federal government will do anything.”
Okay, so the terrorists are willing to let noncombatants die so they can “prove” the evil of their enemy? How unsurprising. Their ideologies are no different from that of Timothy McVeigh when he blew up the ATF building in Oklahoma. These wands of smelly hagfish slime are no different from the Islamic militant separatists they claim to despise. They are just as ready to resort to violence to “do the right thing” and get their way while still believing that they couldn’t possibly be the bad guys! Osama bin Laden also told his followers that they had to kill the evil people in the USA who were oppressing them. Bundy has the same spiel as Bin Laden. What patriotism!
The showdown on the Bundy ranch was a bunch of terrorists defending a liar and the only reason they weren’t blown to pieces was because our government (while containing many serious flaws) is not a despotic regime. Frankly, I think the yahoos aiming guns at federal officers need to be sent to Gitmo to serve time with their ideological brothers.