Some of you may be familiar with the Bush Administrations attempts to remove certain protection acts from our forests so that more logging, mining and oil development can produce corporate profits. It's not a new thing that most politicians are greedy and most of them own stock and/or have financial interest in large oil companies, pharmaceuticals, etc.

When our forefathers put protection acts into place, they really had something going. They were thinking about the future generations. Well, it's no surprise that with the direction our culture is moving that the Bush Administration is self-focused on what kind of life they will live.

Right along the lines of the changing the Constitution, I think that to remove protection acts should be unlawful. What do you think about this?

Thanks in advance for your comments,

Carrie