Bio
Unwilling to fully abandon my Chicago-area upbringing, I live in Manhattan with my husband, my teddy bear, and a 10 lb. rabbit, but insist on calling...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Charge the Archbishop with Attempted Murder

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

In Brazil, a nine year old girl who weighs 79 pounds and is under four feet tall was raped by her stepfather. She became pregnant with twins. The New York Times reported that medical treatment was sought after she complained of pain. Doctors at a state clinic 140 miles miles away from her home examined her and found that "the girl's uterus was was too small to support one baby, let alone two." They performed an abortion that saved her life.

Instead of praising doctors for saving the girl's life, Catholic Church officials went ballistic:

A Brazilian archbishop summarily excommunicated everyone involved — the doctors for performing the abortion and the girl’s mother for allowing it — except for the stepfather, who stands accused of raping the girl over a number of years.

“The law of God is above any human law,” said José Cardoso Sobrinho, the archbishop, who argued that while rape was bad, abortion was even worse.

Anonymous is a Woman asks:

Really? More serious than the fact that this man is apparently a serial rapist who also abused the girl's 14 year old handicapped sister?

The pregnant nine year old weighed 80 pounds and was carrying twins. Doctors believed her hips were too childishly thin for her to deliver the baby. The archbishop's solution - she could have had a Caesarian section.

Sally at Eternal Echoes says:

If we are to retain out humanity, we must be willing to engage with the complex questions that this case raises for us. In this case I believe that abortion was a humane act, the choice best within a a bad set of circumstances brought about by an abusive relationship. This young girl is a peson [sic]who has been violated, she is not alone. By excommunicating the doctor, his team and the girl mother, but not the step-father the Archbishop has made an astonishing statement about the value of this young life, he has effictively declared her a nonentity, suitable only for bearing children no matter what the cost might be to her. This is crazy, it reinforces patriachal structures declaring womens bodies not their own...

One more voice of outrage, dafyophi posted at Feministing, rants:

It's good to know that two fetuses are more important than the physical and psychological well-being of an actual child. I thought it might be morally reprehensible to force an eighty pound girl to give birth to twins after a grown man brutally attacks her, but clearly I stand corrected.

And here is the crux of my rage: If the law of God is above any human law, then why does José Cardoso Sobrinho have the right to condemn a nine year old girl to death? Does the Archibishop confuse himself with God? If so, perhaps he should be excommunicated for his hubris. More importantly, under state laws, he should be charged with attempted murder. This girl is a human life - I think we can all agree on that. By interferring with her right to life, he is condemning her to death. Archbishop Cardoso Sorbrinho is attempting murder. Period.

I will never, ever understand why the life of an existing child or woman does not count as a life when it comes to pregnancies that can kill the girl or woman. This is a mockery of the phrase "pro-life" that shows the true fallacy of the position: these people do not support the lives of girls and women.

Suzanne also blogs at Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants.

  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
prayforsun 5 pts

As I read this, I became more and more sickened. How can this man possibly think that saving this little girl be more of a sin than what her stepfather did to her? Does he think he is the Pope or God? Even in society today, most pro-life people agree on the exception of rape or incest. The archbishops solution being a Caesarian section shows that he does not have much credibility because the doctors pointed out that she could not carry the children at all because of the size of her uterus. I think the archbishop in Brazil needs to be reexamined in his position by the Pope.

Colormepink 5 pts

This makes me so mad.  No, mad doesn't cover it. This infuriates me and fills me with rage.  It's also one of the main reasons that I left the church. 

Christine
It's My World.  Welcome To It.
Blog: http://www.colormepink.com
Jewelry Blog: http://www.starbrightjewels.com/blog

conversemomma 5 pts

I blogged about this here http://www.ordinaryartblog.com/?p=435

This felt personal. This felt like an assault. This left me broken. This was the tipping point for something I was trying so desparately to ignore. I wanted to raise my children in the church because I was, but I can't in any good faith. I just can't.

ebyrdstarr 5 pts

I've been angry about this case since I first read about it.  I don't understand how anyone can think a 9 year-old who is pregnant is actually even pregnant in the sense of carrying a potentially viable future human.  No baby was ever going to result from that pregnancy.  The limits of her tiny body made that a certainty.  So why on earth should her mother and her doctors be required to save her little girl life just because seeds had been planted inside her that would never grow?  

Preaching to the Choir