The beginning of a new year is a wonderful. It's bright, shiny and full of possibilities. So we dutifully fill it up with hopes and goals. There's just under seven weeks left in 2009 which makes it a good time to check in with your reading goals.
I think Amanda said it best at the Blog Jar when she said, "THE END OF THE YEAR IS FAST APPROACHING?!" Indeed it is. I know. You are simultaneously saying that you don't want to hear that we're that close to the end of the year, meanwhile you are convincing yourself that you have plenty of time to finish all those 2009 goals. You are right on both points.
There's seven weeks left in the year. You can read a lot in seven weeks, even with all the holiday hubbub. Some people will do up a detailed plan of attack of what they want to read. Others will just take stock and keep plugging away. But before you can figure out your plan of action, the first thing you need to do in order to meet your goals is revisit them so that you remember what they are.
Now I'll admit it, I get off easy here. You see, in 2009 I resolved not to make any reading resolutions. I wanted to have nothing but joyful reading this year. I've mostly succeeded. I've had reading ups and downs this year and the downs seemed so very down and the ups were not as gloriously high as I had hoped. But I'm satisfied with what I've read and how much I've read.
Pinkflipflops, who blogs at The Many Thoughts of a reader is not going meet her 2009 reading goals. She's really kind of hoping that some of you aren't either.
Every year is a learning experience. Our goals can get more or less specific depending on how the previous year went. Adrienne at CYA: Children & Young Adults Reading Blog set her goals, but she didn't set up how to track them.
had a goal this year to try and read 100 books. However, my goal did not take in account how to keep track of what I read. It is easy for me to finish a book and pick up another one without pause. And, what constituted “finishing” a book?
Word Lily faced facts earlier this month - there are just some goals she's not going to meet this year.
I have known for awhile now that I will not end up meeting some of my personal reading goals for 2009. And while this saddens me, what am I to do? For now, I’m simply laying it out there, acknowledging in public where I stand.
It's not all unsuccessful. Kailana has completed almost all of her reading challenges - something I never really could do. (I cannot read happily from a list of books. It brings out my hidden rebellious streak.Oh hush, it is too hidden.)
I love what Lezlie at Books 'n Border Collies had to say about learning from reading challenges. The important thing isn't that we complete them, it's that we open ourselves up to new things and learn and enjoy them along the way.
Fourth, I learned that not reaching my reading goals is in no way a failure. Sometimes I'm not learning what I meant to learn, but I'm finding new and fascinating topics that I didn't know I was interested in. Or I'm discovering that a big project I had mapped out isn't nearly as easy to conduct as it sounded when I started. As long as I'm reading and learning, I'm bettering myself which helps me to better the world around me.
How are you doing with your 2009 reading goals?
Contributing Editor Sassymonkey also blogs at Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.
Comments
Reading Goals
Generally my reading goals involve not running out of books from the library and uh not reading every book out of the library. The library seems to be keeping up for now.
Retro-Food.com
Those are very good goals
And I'm glad your library is able to keep up with you. lol
Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.
So Far Behind...
I had lofty goals for this year as far as reading goes and yet all of the books I ambitiously added to my Christmas list still sit beside my bed, only one of them with a crease in the spine about fifty pages in. I am ashamed and while I know I will once again set lofty goals this coming year I think perhaps I will double it in hopes that my efforts will double too :D
No shame! No shame!
Lofty goals are good, even when you don't meet them. Each time we set goals we learn something about ourselves. It might even be argued that we learn more from setting lofty goals and not meeting them, than by setting goals that are easily met.
If I had never set lofty goals like making a huge list of books that I want to read I might never had discovered that I really, really hate reading from a list. I actually can do it, I just really hate it. It was a surprise for me, someone who quite loves striking things off of their to do list...
Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.
42
I'm at 42. Well, 43 as I finished a HORRIBLE read last night. HORRIBLE. I'd actually be willing to stay at 42 if only so I didn't have to put it on my list but, dang, it was a hard-fought read and I'll keep it.
My original goal was 60. I won't hit it. But I've read 43 more books than most people this year. I'm pleased with that!
@FireMom from Stop, Drop and Blog and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land
It would be nice if
They were 43 awesome books. I think you must get at least to 44 so that you can say that the last book you read wasn't horrible! You don't want to end the year on such a sour note (though, I suppose it would be better than if you had started 2010 by reading the horrible book...).
Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.
Procrastinating...
Hey, my resolution each year is simply to record the books I've read... Seriously, though, each year I set a goal of 100 books. I'm a fast reader so I don't think that's very unreasonable.
I *think* I've read a decent number of books this year... but I didn't get around to keeping track till the tail end of August! Also I discovered Netflix streaming video....
Anyhow, I've finished 20 books since I started writing them down. That's about 6 or 7 a month. I'm going to estimate 60 - 70 (5-6 a month all year). Not bad. I don't know if I've ever gotten to a hundred. Maybe if I count things like Harry Potter (which I always feel strangely guilty about counting).
As to how one measures "finishing" a book, you have to read the whole thing straight through -- novel or nonfiction. I give myself a hard line on books of essays, short stories and poetry -- I only count them if I read them from beginning to end. In consequence, books of short stories sometimes make it... books of poems NEVER do -- I only read poetry by leafing through. Anthologies never make it, either; I see no real point in reading a "Collected Works" or a "Best of" straight through.
I don't blame anyone for not following such a strict policy... mine seems a bit harsh even to me...
I slack sometimes on recording
Originally my book blog was meant to record the books I read. Which it does...mostly. However I don't always feel the need to blog books that I reread (though I do count them, I'll get to that in a second). Even with the books I do want to blog about, sometimes I get behind. So I started a spreadsheet. In part because I kind of love spreadsheets (sad but true and mostly only when I don't have to code them, hate coding them) but also because of the sorting abilities. The second best thing I did was take it from an Excel spreadsheet and make it a google doc. That means I can access it from anywhere, whenever I think of it. It's very handy.
As for rereads, yes I count them in my total. Reading a book is reading a book. That assumes that I read it start to finish and don't just pick and choose scenes I want to read (which yes, I do sometimes). Along the same line, I don't count books I do not finish the same way I don't cross things off my to do list until they are done. I know that some people track their DNF separately (personally I never bothered to because if it wasn't good enough for me to finish it's not good enough for me to spend the time tracking it).
Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.
recording by hand
I collect notebooks... different notebooks for different things. I always have a notebook going that is called a "commonplace book" which is an old-fashioned term for a place to record, oh, quotations that you like, passages from a book you might be reading, and I include "things overheard" because I'm a horrible people-watcher/listener. Or phrases of what might become a poem. And, I always reserve a few pages for my "books finished" list.
All I really meant to say is this -- It wouldn't have occurred to me in a million years to make a spreadsheet for it! But it's an interesting idea. It might make the whole thing more efficient... I've always got the computer going anyway, so I wouldn't have to dig through my notebooks just to write one line down.
I do like the feel of a nice pen on a nice piece of paper, though... horrible as my handwriting is.
I love notebooks
And I collect them too. If I'm reading a book that makes me feel like I must write down quotes, or if it starts stirring something up that I feel I'll need to write about I'll usually grab a notebook. But just for tracking purposes I find it easier to use the spreadsheet. I'm quite fond of the sorting feature if for example I want to know how many non-fiction books I read it's easy to sort. And if I want to add in more details, such as if the book is from the library/borrowed/owned it's easy to add in a new column. Basically I like to manipulate information so that's where the value of a spreadsheet is for me versus a notebook.
Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.