Bio
Laura is a nonfiction writer, editor and blogger.  She is the author of The Baby Matrix: Why Freeing Our Minds From Outmoded Thinking About Pare...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

The Childfree and Early Retirement

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 2
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

retirementAt this time of year, lots of people make New Year’s resolutions. One resolution can have to do with when one wants to retire, maybe even retire “early,” and making a plan for that to happen. One thing that can give people a head start toward retirement and certainly early retirement: no kids.

Take childfree Deegee, for example, who resembles many childfree early retirees. A couple of years ago he retired at the age of 45. He recalls, “My first step toward unknowingly began when I was 20 years old. That year, I made the important decision that I did not want to ever have children.” Later in life, Deegee began to recognize the financial benefits of this decision, made and carried out a plan to retire early.

For others that are childfree, the cost of having kids influences their decision not to have them. Take childfree and early retiree Sydney Lagier on Yahoo Finance. Using figures from babycenter.com, the cost of raising and educating the “requisite 2.3 kids where I live would have set me back nearly a million dollars.”

“These figures only take into consideration the direct costs, such as feeding, clothing, and educating the kids. They don't include the hit to household income when one parent decides to give up a career or downshift for a few years in order to be home with the kids. Nor do the figures include what Ann Kingston describes as the motherhood premium in a Maclean's magazine article. The motherhood premium is the plateau and subsequent drop in salary experienced by university-educated women after having a child.” 

While Lagier says her early retirement dreams didn’t figure into her decision not to have kids, it does for other childfree. Either way, she makes the point that all childfree early retirees can relate to: “..I can’t deny the impact that my decision had on my own ability to retire at age 44. Of course, if you decide to give up the joys of parenthood, you'll have to be comfortable being out of the mainstream. But then again, that will be good practice for being out of the mainstream when you retire long before you are eligible for your first Social Security check.”

As part of her early retired life, you can find Lagier on her blog, “Retirement: A Full Time Job.” Deegee—you can find him doing volunteer work in local schools, dancing and spending time with his “lady friend.” Like the rest of the childfree, the retired childfree come from all walks of the lifestyle spectrum—and are doing retirement in a myriad of ways. But like all who are retired, they’re just not going to their job anymore!

Laura

Families of Two

http://lauracarroll.com

*first on technorati by Laura

  • 2
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
lauracarroll 5 pts

Hi tracey8800,
I am glad you would not change anything, and I hope your child is there for you when you are old. While some kids are there for their parents when they are old, it is certainly not a given. Research tell us that the elderly in nursing homes are parents, more likely than not. Some have close families that come to see them etc. but many do not. Research also tells us that childfree elderly are more likely to have stronger social support networks than elderly who are parents. Having kids is one way to potentially have someone there for us when we are old, but there are other ways to make it happen, with kids or not.
Laura
Families of Two
http://lauracarroll.com

tracey8800 5 pts

I get it,childfree not childless.I can see that sounding much better.I have a sister and a sister in law that are childfree,not because they wanted to have more money to retire but because they were unable to get pregnant and neither one is married now and both are in the 40's and they are both in long term relationships.Now my other sister could not conceive and she adopted two children and yes they are money pits but she makes really good money so she can still retire well if not early.Now me also adopted 1 then surprise had a birth child as well.Yes we had a lot more time and money before kids and have had no vacation is 15 years but when asked whether we really needed to have kids after 6 years of trying ,I told my husband that if anything happen to him it would be nice if someone would at least check on me to see if I was alive or dead,rather than dying alone.(our parents are both passed on and siblings live far away)
Even though we struggle with finances sometimes I would not change anything.

Now my husbands Aunt and Uncle decided to remain childfree and did retire early in their 50s ,they live well and do as they please,travel and have friends.But now in their eighties ,their friends have thinned out a lot,the only relatives left are neices and nephews that live far away,and have families of their own or careers.They built on a room in their house hoping a single neice would come and take care of them as they get to the point they are having trouble,but she has refused.Now it is a choice between hiring a stranger to take care of them and not rob them blind as happened to the Aunt's mother,or sell everything and live in assisted living, and they would rather not.
Every choice has a pro and a con and taking care of someone for 18 years may mean that in the last few years of life the favor is returned.
Or I guess you could hope that you dont live long enough to have to worry about it.