Bio
The short version: Jill Miller Zimon writes the topical blog, Writes Like She Talks (www.writeslikeshetalks.com) and often highlights the paucity of...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Clinton Clarion Call: Global Data On Women & Girls Shows "Grim" Portrait

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a speech today to commemorate the 15th Anniversary of the first International Conference on Population and Development. That gathering included a total of thousands of delegates from 179 countries.

You can watch the entire presentation here on CSPAN-2 (and it includes remarks by the first ever Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's Issues, Melanne Verveer as well as Secretary Clinton's remarks) or the 22 minute version with just the Secretary's remarks, courtesy of RHRealityCheck's coverage of the event. I've yet to see a transcription or text of the speech, but here is a near live-blog from The Frisky with quotes for those who, like me, really like to see the remarks in writing.

The first ICPD occurred in Cairo in 1994 and set up goals to be reached in 20 years. Today, Clinton reviewed where we stand in regard to the progress the Cairo gathering envisioned and what must be done to accomplish the goals set 15 years ago. 

From The Frisky's steno of Clinton's address:

The good:

The use of contraceptives was less than 10 percent in the ‘60s to 42 percent in 1998; efforts have also increased child survival rates and the number of girls enrolled in schools around the world. They are also working to address gender-based violence in areas of conflict (such as women and girls who are raped in Darfur).

The bad:

  • ”[Women and girls] still are the majority of the world’s poor, unschooled, unhealthy, and unfed ... we’ve seen that from The Congo to Bosnia to Burma.”
  • “Far too many women still have little to no access” to reproductive control. What does it mean for lost productivity and lost lives?
  • More than half of women in the developing world deliver babies without a nurse or doctor.
  • “One woman dies every minute of every day in pregnancy or childbirth, and for every woman who dies, another 20 suffer from injury or infectious disease. Every minute!”
  • Many women lack access to modern forms of contraception, which contributes to the 20 million unsafe abortions that take place every year.
  • Other threats to the health of women in the developing world include STDs, including HIV/AIDS; obstetric fistula kills millions, especially young girls; and an estimated 70 million women and girls worldwide have been subjected to female genital cutting, which not only leads to infections but also makes childbirth more dangerous.

The action needed:

  • “Investing in the health of women and girls is not only the right thing to do, it’s the smart thing to do.” To achieve this goal, governments are integrating Cairo’s goals by encouraging entrepreneurialism in Latin American and working with religious leaders in Afghanistan and Pakistan. When women have access to family planning and can bring financial stability to their loved ones, “they flourish and so do the people around them.”

The conclusion:

  • “There is a direct line between a woman’s reproductive health and her ability to lead a productive and fulfilling life.”
  • ...let’s try to create institutional and structural change that does not get wiped away when the political winds blow.”

I watched the video of the speech and must say, Clinton presented as so incredibly strong and committed. Just as a pundit, it's fascinating to see her command this material, and audience.

The reactions around the blogosphere:

Michelle Goldberg at The Daily Beast focuses on the political change this signals:

During the Bush years, the United States went from being a major force for women’s rights worldwide to the most powerful member of the fundamentalist alliance. Indeed, at a time when the United States was excoriating Iran as part of the axis of evil, it was grimly ironic to watch American diplomats collaborate with that regime against women’s rights at various UN gatherings.

That’s why it was such a joy to hear Clinton enthusiastically reaffirm Cairo’s goals. “When I think about [Cairo], and the thousands of people who were part of it, who came together to declare with one voice that reproductive health care is critical to the health of women, and that women’s health is essential to the prosperity and opportunity of all, to the stability of families and communities and the substantiality and development of nations, it makes me nostalgic for conferences that are held that actually produce results,” said Clinton. She continued, “There is no doubt in my mind that the work that was done and the commitments that were made in Cairo are still really the bulwark of what we intend to be doing and are expected to do on

  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

What a great set of astute observations - I agree with them all.

I think you are right on and I think the difference, and I'm just typing from my head as I think about what you wrote, is related to Clinton and others thinking that 1) in order to be heard, these problems may need to be framed in a different way and 2) in order to get $ from governments and others, framing it this way may be more successful.

Because as your comment implies, there are many main reasons for these conditions: poverty, sexism, health care/prevention/knowledge failures, unstable governments, power hunger, I'm sure we could think of at least five more.

And so when trying to appeal to people to 1) care about the issue 2) do something about the issue, we strategize about what gets us on the map and what leads to contributions (not just $) and what leads to change.

When people move into the realm of exploitation (like parents who pretend their kids are sick and collect money for the made-up disease, or make up a group of people somewhere far off that doesn't exist with problems that don't exist - you know, outright fraud), then that throws a palor on the entire effort - people won't trust, can't trust any effort.

Health, I think, as a concept, is less maleable than oppression, especially for government types.  We can define health more concretely, with numbers and statistics.  Defining oppression, without pissing off allies or otherwise precarious diplomatic relationships can be difficult and not necessarily worth the effort.

However, I think the fact that we're getting people like Nicholas Kristoff and I just read this yesterday by Peter Daou ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-daou/2010-pred... ), in addition to all the usual suspects who always have supported these efforts no matter what gloss was put on them, indicates, I think, that inroads are being made - that this message, Clinton's message, is being heard.

If framing it as a health issue helps get us there, I'm all for it. But I think you raise a very important boundary - we need to also be sure that we're recognizing the etiology of the poor health: crappy governments in places that are not developed, have low education attainment, poverty and so on.  All of which leads to constant power struggles and the root of a power struggle is oppression, period.  When that's the role model for how you run an entire nation well... the dots are not hard to connect, IMO.

Thanks for reading and commenting. Great points.

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

Clamo88 5 pts

Hi Jill!

Thanks for this engaging and informative post! I am glad to see our re-commitment to ending inequality around the globe for women. I applaud Sen. Clinton's remarks and the focusing on how women's freedom and equality overall is tied into their reproductive/sexual freedom. After all, that is how women have been controlled in the past, enacting inequality out on/with their bodies.

The only thing I do not like about how violence against women, abortion and things are framed is with this "health" lens. I know they are health related issues obviously, women die from complications, pregnancy, HIV, FGM and such. But I sometimes feel always framing it as a "women's health issues" over an inequality issues, sexism or just plain old patriarchy takes away the "gender" part of inequality and sometimes makes women therefore invisible. Who is against women being healthy!? But frame women's unequal access in the lens of oppression and domination, it is less palatable... I guess. This happened with my school's production of the Vagina Monologues over the years. It became less about raising awareness about rape, violence, sexism and more about getting women healthy. Not a bad thing!!!  But like I said, it kind takes the "oh, wow" out of it sometimes.

Anyways, I guess what I am trying to say is go Sen. Clinton! Go women of the world fighting to end inequality! Go you and your awesome post! I just sometimes wish we could just get people to care about women without making it something nice and pretty to talk about. Isn’t that kinda sexist in itself? Having to “sell” women’s equality it nice terms in the first place?

Emily

http//www.jukboxheroines.com/ ( http://www.jukeboxheroines.com/ )

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

Great advice, thank you so much. Yes - and BlogHer provides constant reminders and avenues to allow people to make an impact as individuals and as a group, through their own projects and by supporting others. I'm sure that is a big part of BlogHer's success and will continue to be a part of their work (and no one told me to write or say that by the way!).

Like I wrote several months ago right here on BlogHer when I was getting started in my run for city council ( http://assets2.blogher.com/road-election-day-part-... ), isn't it all activism and organizing? So hard to understand why people malign those things.

Thanks for reading and commenting, and doing and encouraging. :)

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

Expat Mum 5 pts

Superb post. Thanks for bringing me up to date. While I sincerely applaud taking a look at our own lives and the abuse we might tolerate in our "westernized" world, there is a lot we can do personally to bring about change in "developing countries". As someone who is directly involved in supporting one tiny little school in Ghana (and thereby helping AIDS widows, their children and the related health problems), I know my limited work here in the US is making a big difference to the school family in Ghana.

If you really want to feel your own impact half way across the world, find a cause and get cracking! From bake sales to walk-a-thons, the American dollar goes a long way in many of these countries. And, if you have children, what better way to model global compassion than for them to see you rolling up your sleeves?

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

Thanks for taking the time to read this entry and leave such a thoughtful comment, Tre. I completely agree with your approach:

So I bring it completely home to me:

Is there any form of abuse to myself I"m tolerating (and i don't care if that means condemning myself or being obsessed over something or not having balance in my self care....

If so can I take a step toward not 'hurting' myself this way?

How we treat ourselves and what we tolerate of others' treatment of themselves matters so much.

So while nations are reassessing how they're doing re: Cairo's agenda...we should each follow suit and ask ourselves how are we doing with ourselves and each other to stop violence toward women and girls...and the indirect subtle silent violence is often right infront of us....

Let's please be there for ourselves and each other...

I believe it really is all about that. We're all actors in our spheres and in different spheres - whether it's at home with a significant other, a pet, our kids, customer service people we have to deal with, co-workers, law enforcement and on and on.  This is what it is to be internally consistent.  And we aren't always going to succeed and there are reasons why it's not always going to be possible, but to guide our behavior, our actions and our thoughts that way - I believe it's infectious in the best possible way, just like anything else:

We see people doing it, we know we can do something too, at some level.  That's all - encouragement.

And as I thought about it, it was really amazing to me to realize just what power the U.S. has when it gets involved - and I mean power in the most positive sense of influence, convincing others that this is a priorty and something we must do - an imperative.

Obviously I feel strongly about this too. ;)

Thanks again, happy new year and if you have any lingering interest about my run (and win!) for city council, you can follow my new blog, In The Arena ( http://jillmillerzimon.blogspot.com ). ;)

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

Tre - 5 pts

Jill,

Your post is so comprehensive for offering Clinton's remarks and coverage but such diverse follow up commentary.

I kept asking though as I read "Where are the engaged men in the conversation?"

Of course they're involved.

I wondered how Eve Ensler would respond to Hilary's comments.

This topic is one that I'm passionate about..and yet on a practical basis, day to day golly sometimes it's hard to know how your individual efforts can curtail female genital mutilation or other grave conditions.

But I will defend this always. How we care for our own health, our daughters' health, our sisters' our neighbors' their daughters our friends and their daughters...in other words how we stay aware and connected....will always be everyone's issue.

We may not have a culture that tolerates fgm but how many silent sufferers are there who can't find words to amit they don't want to go on or they are desperately in need of help.

How can we live in a culture that allows women actresses and neighbors to waste away in front of us....

I'm passionate. It's late. We all have a role to play.

Women's health is everyone's issue.

This is not there problem over there. Cairo's agenda is everyone's.

So I bring it completely home to me:

Is there any form of abuse to myself I"m tolerating (and i don't care if that means condemning myself or being obsessed over something or not having balance in my self care....

If so can I take a step toward not 'hurting' myself this way?

How we treat ourselves and what we tolerate of others' treatment of themselves matters so much.

So while nations are reassessing how they're doing re: Cairo's agenda...we should each follow suit and ask ourselves how are we doing with ourselves and each other to stop violence toward women and girls...and the indirect subtle silent violence is often right infront of us....

Let's please be there for ourselves and each other...

Hugs.

Jill, this rocked. Thanks so much and good luck w/ your campaign. I'm embarrassed to admit I haven't followed that at all just learned you were running.

Tre~

tw:   @tresha ( http://twitter.com/tresha )

fb:    http://facebook.com/treshathorsen

e:     tre@thoughtbythought.net

blog: http://thoughtbythought.net