Democratic presidential candidates square off in South Carolina tonight in a CNN hosted debate leading up to Saturday's primary - just two weeks before 22 states hold primaries and caucuses on "Super Tuesday" February 5th.
Leading up to the debate polls indicate Senator Hillary Clinton finds herself playing catch-up to Senator Barack Obama.
The debate sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus Institute is live on CNN and certain to include many of the race and gender issues discussed here at BlogHer.com.
Join BlogHer's discussion-leave your link, comment, and thoughts as the Democrats ready for the first Southern state up for grabs.






Comments
I turned on the debate to hear BOOING
By: Erin Kotecki Vest Posted: 16 weeks 4 days ago...and I wasn't sure what had happened-CNN has the scoop.
Apparently Clinton said Obama does not take responsibility for his votes-and this crowd is very pro-Obama.
Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain
Live Blog from South Carolina
By: Erin Kotecki Vest Posted: 16 weeks 4 days agoThe New York Times Katharine Q. Seelye is live blogging from South Carolina.
Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain
Really annoying
By: Maria Niles Posted: 16 weeks 4 days agoAlthough they've made some efforts to ask issue specific questions, there is way too much questioning about the horse race aspect. I'm tired of debate moderators thinking that voters care about the nonsense about campaigning and not about issues.
PopConsumer
Beyond Help
I agree wholeheartedly Maria
By: Lisa Stone Posted: 16 weeks 3 days agoOnce, just once, I'd like to see someone moderate a debate with a focus on the issues. The debates are like a spin room to the masses and I hate spin alley. The only person I've ever seen effectively manage a debate is Gwen Ifill (PBS), who did a crack job of moderating the vice-presidential debate in the 2004 election. Here's an outtake I found on the archived blog, Tales of a Shrink -- which is obviously by a Democrat:
THIS is why we need the candidates to agree to come on-camera with one of our contributing editors and answer the questions in our Voter Manifesto.
Lisa Stone
BlogHer Co-founder
Surfette
I am so proud that John Edwards is my candidate.
By: CityMama Posted: 16 weeks 4 days agoI will support him until the bitter end and the way he conducted himself in tonight's debate is why. He consistently brings it back to ISSUES and stays on message. "It's not about us personally, it's about our country."
Seriously, the way Hillary and Barack conducted themselves tonight was disgusting. And they want to be president? Yeah, right.
Again, Edwards was declared the winner of the debate (for the kajillionth time), and again I am shocked that he's not blowing the barn doors off this entire race. I feel sick to my stomach because I know that if Hillary or Barack become president (which they won't) NOTHING will change. Tonight sealed that deal for me.
Stefania Pomponi Butler
I blog:
CityMama
Kimchi Mamas
MOMocrats
More please Stefania?
By: Lisa Stone Posted: 16 weeks 3 days agoStrong language!
I would love to know what behavior you found so "disgusting
because I had to miss the debate and tuned in here to find out what ya'll think. What did Sens. Clinton and Obama do to elicit your response? Know you're an Edwards fan, so see my outtake from his 2004 debate with Cheney above.
Lisa Stone
BlogHer Co-founder
Surfette
Certainly!
By: CityMama Posted: 16 weeks 3 days agoI don't appreciate the petty "nyah-nyah" personal attacks. As Obama said last night, no politician's hands are clean. We all know this, don't we? I think that's why I found it gross that Obama and Clinton were engaged in--what seemed to me to be--childish one-upmanship. You were on the board of WalMart! Oh yeah? You worked for a slumlord! Oh yeah? Nanny-boo-boo. We all know every candidate could dig up dirt on each other for dayzzzzz...so why not set that aside and discuss, oh, I don't know issues? As Edwards pointed out, how does that kind of bickering help to make sure people have insurance, to end poverty etc.
I'll put this out there: I think Democrats are wrapped up in the idea of picking a "historic" candidate and that's why Edwards gets shoved to the side. This isn't a game show--we don't have to pick between the car and the tropical vacation. Edwards consistently wins debates, stays on message, brings it back to issues. And yet, in every debate, he has to answer to some form of "how does it feel to be the white guy in this race." Granted, they don't have female or non-white candidates in the running, but Republicans aren't worried about being "historic." They are voting their conscience. I think that if Dems allowed themselves to view each of the Democratic candidates race/gender aside, they might be supporting a different candidate (and that includes not only Edwards, but Biden or Richardson or Gravel).
Stefania Pomponi Butler
I blog:
CityMama
Kimchi Mamas
MOMocrats
What she said
By: PunditMom Posted: 16 weeks 2 days agoStefania, you know I agree with everything you said!
I actually wasn't disgusted by the exchanges
By: Erin Kotecki Vest Posted: 16 weeks 3 days agoI LIKED them-the Obama WalMart quip? CLASSIC. Then when Hillary went back at him with the slum lord stuff?
I feel like they are finally getting it all out there. I didn't think it was a low blow-I mean she WAS an attorney on WalMart's board and he DID have ties to that guy-I feel like they are finally communicating and really getting into it.
Could they have been nicer? I don't know. I'm tired of just standing up there and everyone trading press release lines.
It did annoy me that Edwards really seems to have been pushed aside. Even the pundits after the debate were LAUGHING when they had to be reminded Edwards was there too.
Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain