Conservative Bloggers Round-Up
by Dana J. Tuszke

This morning I awoke with a fabulous idea: round-up some great conservative blogging women and highlight the topics they write about. I spent the day gathering links in between completing other tasks, and then discovered that Morra beat me to the punch yesterday. (And for the record, Morra is a hot, woman blogger, too. She just won't admit it.)

Since so many Republican bloggers are men, my idea became a quest for female conserva-bloggers. But I didn't just want to read their words, I wanted to know who these women are. Here's what I've discovered:

Jane of SeeJaneMom describes herself as "Artist, Wife, Mom, 'Right Rational' Conservative, Unapologetic". She wrote an eye-opening post about the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the attack that killed 333 children at a Beslan school in 2004.

I have had a ragged newspaper photo PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED ON MY DESK that I have prayed over every single day since September 3, 2004 when Islamofacists killed 333 children at their school in Beslan.

THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY THREE CHILDREN. AT SCHOOL.

I pray over it to remind me that my Government would rather appease the swine that want to bring Beslan home to Smalltown, U.S.A. on a wave of political correctness THAN SAVE AMERICAN CHILDREN'S LIVES.

Raven of And Rightly So! tells us, "I used to be a liberal but saw them for who they really are after September, 11 2001. I consider myself to be a conservative who leans a little to the far right."

She shares her thoughts about the horrible assault of 20-year-old Megan Williams (which BlogHer's Laina Dawes covers here):

Who would have thought that people [who assaulted Williams] would have a combined total of 108 criminal complaints (for six people, which averages 18 counts per person) including manslaughter (pleaded down from 1st Degree murder). WTF? These people are obviously warped individuals bent on criminal mischief to down right torture, and I would bet eventually, murder.

Right Wing Sparkle says she's a political junkie, a reading addict, and a full time volunteer and activist. "My dad was a Senator in the state legislature during the civil rights movement while I was growing up. At 20, I was a Democrat feminist Baptist. Now I am a Republican pro-life Catholic. Who says people can't change??" In a post about the decline of Rudy Giuliani, RWS writes:

I've never understood Rudy's lead. We need to nominate a real conservative. Let's get to it.

K. Priscilla Jones ("KJ") at Media Lizzy, writes about liberals running as Republicans:

When it comes right down to it, the RNC and the California GOP are suffering from the same thing: repeated hijackings by liberals posing as loyal Republicans. I don't see the attraction, as there is a thriving party in California eager to embrace more liberals. This same party is guilty of having run the state into the ground. I ask the liberal "Republicans" to expend your energy in the other party. You are the ones creating the voter apathy among conservatives. Why should they vote for you when you smell just like a Democrat?

Merri Musings tells us, "I'm Republican, although I first registered as an Independent (one step away from my Democratic parents. Heh. I’m pro-life, whether you speak about abortion or right-to-life cases that we’ve seen within the last year." She wrote about her happiness when Chuck Hagel decided not to run for re-election to the senate next year:

It would be gift enough to not have him throw his hat in the ring for president, but to not run for re-election to the Senate? That would be a two-for-one special!!!!!!

Elizabeth of Yeah, Right, Whaever says, "I am a conservative, leaning toward libertarian (except I’m too conservative socially to be one). I’m a fairly strict constitutionalist." She loves to read the news and share links with her readers. She writes:

moveon.org (no I'm not actually going to link them, you silly) got a steep discount from the NY Times for their "Betray Us" ad. Seems odd, considering how desperately the Times needs money.

I love her sense of humor.

----------

Contributing Editor Dana J. Tuszke also blogs at The Dana Files.

Comments

 

sigh

Fortunately, not all conservatives would see liberals the way one of your chosen blogs does -- the blog that said ""I used to be a liberal (cough) (choke) (gag me) but saw them for who they really are after September, 11 2001 (limp dicked wussbags)."

Liberals and conservatives are simply patriotic Americans who see the path and destiny of this country differently. I just do not think that comments like that above help to build a strong America. The more that either group engages in petty name calling and demeaning of the other, the farther away we move from opportunities for real dialogue.

I may disagree with every cell of my body with a belief that my conservative sisters out here may hold, but what does it help anyone to caricature them and ridicule them? That sort of arrogant divisiveness is part of what is weakening our country.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs liberally at Time's Fool

 

Mata, you have every right

Mata, you have every right disagree with Raven, just as she has every right to express herself and her feelings.

You are correct, not all conservatives feel the way Raven does. We all see the direction of this country differently.

I didn't feel it was my place to censor her content simply because she has an opinion that differs from others.

 

sigh

Dana

It is not her opinion I was mentioning -- it is her self-righteous and insulting name calling.

I just love this country, Dana, and when I see things like this on any side of the political spectrum, it hurts this country. I believe that we should pull together not shove apart.

I really was surprised that you singled out such remarks to feature.

To clarify:
If someone believes the war in Iraq is right and thinks the president is justified in his actions, and puts forth a fact-laden argument about it -- that person is probably a conservative. That would be a person expressing an opinion.

If, however, someone says that anyone who disagrees with them is a limp d*** wuss (among other insults) .They are being vulgar and counterproductive (not to mention sexist and homophobic) . That kind of remark is not an opinion, it is a contributing factor to the damaging divisiveness in America. A divisiveness that is made all the more ugly by its sense of entitlement, a sense that people have a "right" to act like that. Maybe they have a legal right, but what I am pointing to is a responsibility of good citizenship. And that applies to liberals AND conservatives.

I will continue to say that for a strong America, we need to treat people with respect on both sides of any issue, while working for justice and fairness in ways that express our beliefs. Those beliefs may differ, but the ugly stream of invective rancor that is developing in America is not going to help us as a country. I say that not as a liberal or conservative, but as a patriot.

 

Completely agree

Amen! Agree! Right on! You Rock! And any other ways to appreciate your comment I have omitted.

Questioning authority is crucial. However, vulger and personal attacks will ALWAYS undermine the validity of the question.

Erin
ExpectingExecutive
In order to change your life, you must first change your life.

 

it's not the difference of opinion

that I find offensive (although I vehemently disagree), it's the name-calling, the arrogance and the obvious contempt for those who view the world differently.

laurie
www.notjustaboutcancer.blogspot.com

 

Laurie, I understand your

Laurie, I understand your point. However, it does work both ways. Each political party has resorted to name-calling and has spewed their share of insults and venom. It doesn't make it right and it is equally offensive.

My intention was to share some female, conservative bloggers here, as there are so few -- and they do not receive as much publicity as blogs on the left. I wanted to keep these bloggers' words in tact.

Please understand the bloggers I have featured are women who have the same right to freedom of speech, just like you and I do.

 

Not about rights

Dana,

Mata, Laurie and I are not questioning the right of any of these bloggers to say what they say. And, yes, people of all political stripes name call and spout nonsense. So what?

You write that you want to know who these women are and to highlight their writing because its so rare. That's fantastic.

I got involved in politics at a very young age and have thoroughly appreciated discussions and debates over many years with people who hold very different opinions than mine. Intelligent, reasoned, fact-based conversations of these sort help me expand my thinking and sharpen my own perspective.

I don't appreciate or enjoy anyone (even those who agree with me) who relies on cheap, petty name calling and flabby, lazy, dishonest sound bite type of argument.

So, if what you've highlighted and presented here is indicative of who conservative women writing on the web are and have to offer in the way of intelligent debate then I'm quite sad.

Are there no conservative women bloggers who can offer a reasoned, fact based discussion of the issues important to our country's future and for the next election?

For instance, Lizzy Blackney's rant you link to is angry but not factual. The California Republican party officials are quite conservative however the state electorate is mostly not. Therefore more "liberal RINO's" like Arnold are elected Governor. If you look at House Representatives from Orange County and some of the more rural parts of the state they are amongst the most conservative members of Congress. Duncan Hunter, Ed Royce and Wally Herger for example all have well over 90 ratings from The American Conservative Union. The question she should be asking is how to translate their appeal statewide. So I'm happy that she's happy to be in the great state of Texas but she's offered absolutely nothing in the way of issues or prescriptions to think about and I as a her ideological opposite have just suggested a way to think about strategy based on the facts and haven't called her one name.

So if the best a conservative women blogger can offer is an assessment that she is superior to me and her argument is smart, persuasive and should be considered because somehow my flacid penis prevents me from thinking clearly then I'm immediately turned off from engaging with her argument since it's flawed from the start.

I hope that you find some great bloggers in the future to highlight who will challenge me and make me think.

BlogHer CE Entertainment & Books
Pop Consumer

 

It's not the women

It's the nature of the discourse. I think Conservative blogs steal a page for tone from talk radio...and we all know what that sounds like!!

I do like lefty sites like Lindsay Beyerstein and Amanda Marcotte but they can get pretty venal too. It's just that I tend to agree with them.

 

It depends

We're not all like talk radio. Just like liberals complaining about whacko rightwingers, we can all write with a certain level of histrionics.

A while back, a friend asked me to post my personal views on feminism. In no way did it reflect what other conservative women believe or speak for anyone else. I was beat up pretty savagely in the Tennessee blogosphere.

I for one, would love to see us blog less about abortion and feminism and more about other topics. I talk about them occasionally on my blog, but mostly write about conservative politics, technology and communication.

Women are far more than these two topics, yet this seems to be the focus of most political blogs.

 

Safe Places for Fact Exchanges?

It is hard to get past the firewall of partisanship. Where are the "normal" people? Not the extremes that are presented in talk radio, FOX and certain blogs. Here is my problem with a lot of conservative blogs. There are times when I want to understand what the conservative point of view on a certain topic.

I have just about given up on anyone that appears on television. Except for maybe Bill Moyers and Tavis Smiley.

So I'll go over to Sister Toldja or Heretical Librarian or a blogger/web site. There is a lot of anger in that neck of the woods. If you read long enough you'd wonder if they would support a bill to deprogram liberal tendencies out of humans. Unless I am really determined I wind up leaving because I've been damned three time to hell because of how I see the world.

I am sick to death of being called unpatriotic because I disagree with the actions of my country.

It must be the same feeling conservatives feel wandering over into liberal blogs.

So what am I saying? Maybe there should be a list of safe places that conservative and liberals can go to find out exactly what each one believes and why without demonizing the other. It must exist already right?

Something like "global warming" Liberals believe..... Conservatives believe..... Scientists believe...

Hmmm. Let me check that out and I'll report back to base.

Gena - Out On The Stoop

 

Calling Chris Matthews a

Calling Chris Matthews a "sexist blowhard" (even if it might be true) is negative and insulting, too. If we're going to have this conversation about uniting together and not resorting to name-calling, shouldn't we all start with ourselves?

I linked to one blogger who is more extreme than the others. In no way does this paint a picture about all conservative bloggers and I'm sad that people feel that way. I think it's important to give some variety. There is a broad range of conservatives out there.

Because one person has stronger words for an opposing party it does not mean he's wrong. If so, Michael Moore would have been censored ages ago.

I do hope the next time someone on the left (or right) calls our president an ape, or insults his intelligence that you'll find those remarks just as offensive and speak out against them.

 

I'll comment freely on the president's
intelligence

I don't think he's a bright person. I can't help it. I surely didn't go into this wanting to dislike him or find him lacking. He's in charge of where I live, whether I like it or not, so I would have MUCH rather felt differently. My dislike of him and his actions was not an arbitrary decision. It was a depressing, conclusion that I reached after a very short period of time. I think his beliefs and actions have caused way more harm than good during the inexplicable, unchecked years we as a PEOPLE have allowed him and those in his crew to turn "staying the course" into a euphemism for doing whatever they want.

This is my opinion. It's my right to express it as a citizen of this country, and at this point I'm hearing it from both (unfortunately this is what it amounts to) "sides". Now, do I have to share these feelings in pejorative, ugly language? No. And generally speaking, I don't. There is a difference, as Maria and others have pointed out here, between stating opinions and slinging hate speech around.

Besides, how does Raven know my dick is limp? Nice talk.

I do appreciate what you're trying to do here, Dana, and that you share your views, whether I agree with them or not. I am genuinely curious as to why and how people can still support issues and agendas that I find - intuitively and intellectually - just...wrong. I have family members who are conservative, way conservative, and we often do not discuss issues because it would be so hard to stay civil, and who wants to ruin Christmas? I'm open to other outside points of view, however. At the very least, it's interesting to know what makes other people tick.

Laurie

 

Agree once again

Just as I agreed wholeheartedly with Mata, I am in complete support of your comments Dana.

It is worth saying again - Questioning authority is crucial. However, vulger and personal attacks will ALWAYS undermine the validity of the question or discussion.

Erin
ExpectingExecutive
In order to change your life, you must first change your life.

 

Thank you all for your

Thank you all for your comments. The offensive wording has been removed per a reader request.

 

Just saw this...

I just wanted to thank Dana for including me in her post. And I agree with those who said that insults and bad language is not a good way to get one's point across. Anyone who reads political blogs knows that that stuff goes on on both sides. I personally don't allow cussing or insults on my blog, although I do make fun of politicans or those in the limelight, who doesn't? Raven has her own way of expressing herself. It's not how I would express myself and I see why some would be offended, but it's a voice, just like FireDogLake and Amanda. They choose to be crude as well.

But many of us don't, so don't paint one group with a broad brush.

Rightwingsparkle