Honduras is in turmoil. A military coup there this morning deposed Pres. Manuel Zelaya, pre-empting a controversial referendum that would have allowed the leftist ruler to run for a second term. The Honduran Congress has stripped Zelaya of his office and appointed the president of the Congress, Robert Micheletti, to be head of state. The US and the Organization of the Americas criticized the move,
While events in Honduras have not been as widely publicized as those in higher-profile states such as Iran, the coup aroused passionate, ideologically-driven debates in Latin America and the United States. Some US observers condemned the ouster of an elected president, but others applauded the removal of of a man seen as being dangerously close to such harsh US critics as Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. Chavez. along with Bolivian president Evo Morales, succeeded in getting their countries' constitutions modified in the same way.
"We thought that military coups were a thing of the past," one expert told CBC News in this report:
Tania has a summary of some of the events that have reportedly taken place in addition to Zelaya's removal from office:
Congressman Cesar Ham, from the leftist political party Democratic Unification of Honduras, was assassinated by a squad of soldiers sent to his house early on Sunday morning.
The mayor of San Pedro Sula has been kidnapped at gunpoint by masked members of the military. His whereabouts are unknown but his wife was visiting family at the time in another city and is deeply concerned about her children, who were with their father.
Martial law is in full effect in Honduras, at this hour...
In the comments below, giggey disputes this characterization of events, which she says is spin from the pro-Zelaya ranks.
Leonidas Meija reported on tensions in Honduras leading up to the coup.
Honduras is going through one of its most difficult moments of its political history. Honduran President Manuel Zelaya removed General Romeo Vásquez Velásquez as Chief of the Armed Forces [es] and accepted the resignation of Defense Minister Edmundo Orellana Mercado. The announcement was made after meeting with military leaders of the armed forces to seek protection of the polls for the referendum that has been promoted by the executive branch to be held on Sunday, June 28, 2009.
Real Clear World reported yesterday that Zelaya's referendum had aroused opposition from both the courts and the military:
* When the armed forces refused to distribute the ballots, Zelaya fired the chief of the armed forces, Gen. Romeo Vásquez, and the defense minister, the head of the army and the air force resigned in protest.
* Yesterday the Supreme Court ordered by a 5-0 vote that Vásquez be reinstated.
* Honduras's Supreme Electoral Tribunal ordered authorities to pick up all the ballots and electoral material, which were held by the country's air force.
* The country's Attorney General requested yesterday that Congress oust Zelaya.
* The courts have declared the referendum unlawful. Last Tuesday the Congress passed a law preventing the holding of referendums or plebiscites 180 days before or after general elections. Congress has also named a commission to investigate Zelaya.
The opposition within Honduras is what led Faustas blog to argue that the removal of Zelaya was not a coup at all:
The Honduran Supreme Court of Justice has confirmed that Honduran president Manuel Zelaya was detained this morning by the military in compliance with an order of the courts of law.
Newmaya has been tracking events via Twitter (some updates in Spanish.)
Larissa Alexandrovna says that as a leader, Zelaya has been a mixed bag:
Zelaya is not a traditional good/bad guy character. He pushed back against the exploitation of his country by foreign "investors," thereby making enemies of corporate interests in the US and the wealthy conservatives of Honduras. On the other side of the equation is Zelaya's attacks on the press and desire for dictatorial powers, which culminated in this coup.
The Christian Science Monitor reported that criticism of the coup crosses ideological lines:
Although Zelaya is a strong ally of Venezuela's leftist President Hugo Chávez, who said Venezuela is now "at battle" and put his armed forces on alert, criticism seemed to fall outside ideological lines. President Obama, the European Union, and Mr. Chávez joined together in a chorus of criticism. Leaders from across Central America will meet in Nicaragua tomorrow in an emergency meeting.
Laura Carlsen live-blogged an emergency meeting of the Organiatin of American States where the coup was debated. The Venezuelan representative raised suspicions of US involvement:
He went on to accuse former Bush Sub-Secretary of State Otto Reich of complicity in the coup: "We have information that worries us. These is a person who has been important in the diplomacy of the US who has reconnected with old colleagues and encouraged the coup: Otto Reich, ex sub-Secretary of State under Bush. We know him as an interventionist person... In 2002 he tried to deny the lawfulness of Pres. Hugo Chavez." Mentioning episodes of the dark history of Reich in the heisphere, he concluded, "We suffered the First Reich, the Second Reich, and now we are suffering the Third Reich." He said Reich is operating under an NGO.
But MsExPat at Corrente quotes a recent interview with Zelaya which he credits the Obama administration with helping protect his presidency:
President Zelaya told a reporter from El Pais that unknown people from the US government had "made some phone calls" to head off a coup.
Kristin Bricker says some of the leaders of the coup,Vásquez Velásquez is a graduate of the controversial US-run School of the Americas:
Congressman Joseph Kennedy has stated, "The U.S. Army School of the Americas...is a school that has run more dictators than any other school in the history of the world."
One thing is clear: the ultimate resolution of events in Honduras will have a significant impact on the stability of the region. Stay tuned.
Comments
It's a very dangerous and
It's a very dangerous and destabilizing situation. I'm not entirely convinced I would call it a coup, but remain concerned about the volatility of the situation. Excellent summary, Kim.
Agreed
It is very volatile, whatever one calls it, and it could further destabilize a region that is already on the edge in so many respects. Thanks for reading and commenting, AV.
KimBlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|
Rumors
Hi Kim, thank you for trying to inform people about the situation in Honduras. It's a small country and while for Hondurans this our life, most people outside can't really be bothered with things like this.
Unfortunately some of your post has some incorrect information and I fear will bias your readers.
1. A small fact, but worth noting is that Honduran presidents can only serve one term in office. Manuel Zelaya was trying to hold a public consult that might allow him to run for a second term.
2. Congressman Cesar Ham was not assasinated. This is a rumor spread by Zelaya's supporters so that the international community will respond.
3. People are not being kidnapped, they are being arrested for not following the law that has been set by congress and the supreme court.
I can't tell you that I agree that a democratically elected president should be removed by the armed forces (even if they were acting under congress orders). What I can tell you is that a president can not act on his own and he needs to respect the other branches of government. Even if he believe the other branches are incorrect. This is what checks and balances are for. I am incredibly proud of Vazquez, the head of the armed forces, who decided to obey the laws passed by congress and not the ideals of his commander in chief. I am incredibly proud of the other generals that stepped down in support for Vazquez. Instead of blindly following their commander in chief, these men, our congress and out supreme court stood up.
Zelaya marched with supporters to retrieve ballots that had been confiscated, ballots that had been illegally sent from Venezuela. he said this public consult was going to happen no matter what. This should raise red flags for people, that there is more to this and that a perhaps things aren't black and white and Honduras isn't being overthrown by the military. Here is a different story being told by the WSJ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124623220955866301.html
I don't know what the right step was. Should congress have let Zelaya move forward with the public consult? Or where they right to act? Was there a better way to act, that wouldn't have international communities condemming our actions? Vote was scheduled for Sunday, how far should they have let him go? Should they have let the mayor of San Pedro Sula hold the vote in his city, or where they right to arrest him?
I don't know, I'm watching from Canada and I can only hope that my friends and family are safe.
I hope your friends and family are safe, too
Thanks for the corrections, giggey. I waded into that post with a lot of trepidation because I'm not an expert and I realized very quickly that the reporting was heavily mixed with ideology. Trying to separate out the facts is a challenge!
KimBlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|
Thanks!
Thanks Kim, If there was an impeachment process in Honduras that's what would have happened. Instead the supreme court and congress gave an order to the armed forces to remove Zelaya for breaking Honduran law.
No president should be allowed to make his own decisions, even if he feels it's what the people want and in the best interest of the country. Even if he feels congress is ruled by an elite and not representing Hondurans. He just can't take matters into his own hands.
I'm scared of all the International pressure the Honduran congress is under, I'm scared of what will happen if a man that feels he is above the law is allowed to return and be a president. If he didn't respect congress or the supreme court before, can you imagine if he is allowed to return?
And if he's not allowed to return, then what? What will fe face as Honduras? Embargos and all other sorts of economical pressure from other countries.
MISREPORTING
I am from Honduras and find this article and many others misleading and guilty of irresponsible journalism. Honduras is a democracy. Zelaya was cavorting with Hugo Chavez and wanted to turn Honduras into a Vnezuela-like country. NOBODY in Honduras supports this, and VER VERY FEW people support Zelaya. Most want him out of power. The country is stable and stories of murders and kidnapping are NOT true. Everyone is going to work, to dinner, etc per usual.
So please stop with the sensationalism and I wish other countries would recognize what Zelaya is doing
The reports are conflicting
Diana,
Thanks for your comments. Perhaps you can help me understand a couple of things.
1. If Zelaya's support was so week, what was the concern about holding the referendum? Was there a suspicion that the vote would be rigged.
2. The referendum has been described as non-binding. If that's so, what was the threat?
Finally, why do you think the removal of Zelaya has attracted such criticism from the Obama administration and the OAS?
KimBlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|
Facts are facts
Hi Kim,
Lets assume the majority of the people of Honduras want Zelaya to continue as president. Even after his term is over. Lets assume his ideals are in the country's best interest and he will do his best to increase the standard of living for so many Hondurans who live in poverty. So lets remove left, right ideals from the equation. Here is what I think are the real questions:
1. Do you think a president should be given the authority to make decisions on his own? Assuming there is no left or right , can the president ignore the other branches of government, if it's in the best interest of the people. I say NO!
2. Yes, Zelaya stated the referendum was non-binding. It was nothing more than a poll, that's it. Congress, the Electoral Tribunal, our Attorney General and our Supreme Court deemed it illegal. How come Zelaya gets to produce the ballots in Venezuela, fly them into Honduras and then say the vote will take place no matter what. How come?? A president should only follow the law when he agrees with it?
It's beyond me how the international community is responding. And I think a big part of that is due to misreporting. Reports of congresmen being assassinated, people being kidnapped, military action and no report of illegal acts by a president. It's beyond me how they are asking for his reinstatement without talking about how he broke the law. Fine, put him back in, but are these organizations going to make sure he abides by our laws. Does he get to simply go back in and continue to make arbitrary decisions? He didn't respect decisions by congress before, do you think he would if he goes back? Why is this only scary for Hondurans? Who will blog, tweet, judge and support us in 5 years when Zelaya is still president? Will economic and political pressures return then?
You can go to Cuba and find supporters for Castro, go to Venezuela and find them for Chavez. You can go to Honduras and you will find them for Manuel Zelaya. Bottom line is what can a country with no impeachment process do when a president defies congress and the supreme court? How far should he be allowed to go? Firing the head of the armed forces and proceeding with an illegal referendum were the last two things he did, there is a list of things before this that no one is talking about.
Help journalists ask the right questions. Remove ideals from the reporting and focus on facts. See what's left.