Bio
Hi - I'm Maria, nice to meet you! I've been a Contributing Editor here at BlogHer.com since 2006. I joined BlogHer as a full-time staff member after...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Court Rules Against FCC in Net Neutrality Efforts

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

A federal appeals court dealt a major blow to efforts by the Federal Communications Commission to implement principles of net neutrality. In 2008, the FCC sanctioned cable company Comcast over the practice of slowing down its subscribers' Internet access to the BitTorrent video sharing site. Comcast appealed, and the Washington, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FCC does not have authority to regulate Internet service providers in this manner.

FCC Chair Julius Genachowski Testifies On National Broadband Plan

Supporters of net neutrality were buoyed by the Obama administration's choice of net neutrality proponent, Julius Genachowski, as FCC Chairman. Building on a regulatory framework established during the previous Bush administration, Genachowski has sought to establish a firm basis for FCC regulatory authority in order to preserve equal Internet access and prevent large companies from limiting or preventing access by small or non-profit organizations, tiering access by cost, or slowing innovation.

The FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, "often referred to as the 'open Internet NPRM'" in an effort to establish its regulatory authority; however, the court's ruling means that the FCC will either have to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court or seek legislation from Congress to grant it specific authority.

Additionally, given that Comcast's acquisition of NBC Universal has yet to be approved, the court's decision could affect the outcome of the transaction.

What is clear is that, despite this big win for cable and telecom companies, the fight for net neutrality is far from over. Proponents will now need to retrench and look for new paths to pursue their goals.

What do you think about this decision? Would you like to see legislation regulating Internet access, or do you think that companies should be free to decide how to best serve their customers?

Additional Reading:

John Paczkowski at Digital Daily from D: All Things Digital: Court Rules Against FCC in Comcastic Net Neutrality Decision

John Eggerton at Broadcasting & Cable: Industry Groups Speak Out On FCC/Comcast Ruling

Grant Gross at PC World: Court Rules Against FCC's Comcast Net Neutrality Decision

Jolie O'Dell at Mashable: U.S. Court Rules Against FCC and Net Neutrality

Jason Kincaid at TechCrunch: Federal Court Tells FCC It Does Not Have Authority To Enforce Net Neutrality

BlogHer Contributing Editors Virginia DeBolt and Laura Scott have written several articles about net neutrality over the past four years to give you history and background.

BlogHer CE Maria Niles also blogs business at Fizz and politics at PopConsumer.

  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Maria Niles 5 pts

You raise good points and questions. Many laws and regulations were written to cover specific technologies, methods and business models (land line telephones, snail mail, monopoly phone companies) and it is often left to the courts to decide if they can be expanded to cover not-then-invented instances (wireless phones, internet, competitive companies building municipal infrastructures).

It is possible the Supreme Court might agree with your reading (though, the FCC cited a different aspect of their powers to argue their authority). I suspect, though, that specific legislation will have to be passed by Congress which will be difficult, at best.

Thanks so much for your comment, conellyobrien.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Maria Niles 5 pts

Let me call out a couple of the links from the main post body that delve deeper into the legal and jurisdiction questions:

Jason Rosenbaum at The Seminal on FireDogLake ( http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/39262 )

and Larry Downes ( http://larrydownes.com/a-few-words-on-comcast-v-fc... )

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

conellyobrien 5 pts

I think the court was wrong...

So I read and quote

"The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable." http://www.fcc.gov/aboutus.html

Okay the court said FCC don't have the authority to enforce net neutrality without a specific law granting them that right. In other words, it means that the FCC isn't a regulator, and just a different type of law enforcement. I believe that the court may have a misunderstanding of the intended purpose of the FCC...