CPSIA Update - A Possible Glimmer of Hope for Small Businesses and Crafters Right Before Christmas?

Banning children's books from libraries, trombones from grade school bands, hand-whittled natural wooden trains, and hand-sewn quilts from little old ladies at church fairs: If that all sounds like some sort of Orwellian plot twist, no such luck. These are actual headlines that have appeared in 2009, in response to the CPSIA.

It's now been a year since I first wrote here about the Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act, an absurd piece of legislation that was intended to make toys safer for children twelve and under, after months of recalls of lead-rich toys imported from China. Sounds reasonable at first glance. But instead what it has done is created testing certification standards for items that are so nonsensical, and so cost-prohibitive, that a $9 pair of of locally sourced organic cotton baby booties could cost upwards of $300 to test (thats uh, each pair, every time) while an 11 year-old's motorcross bike might be banned altogether. Just in case a child decides to disassemble the gear shaft, discover some brass bearings, and suck on them.

I am all for making our children safer. I've got two of them myself. But I've never entirely understood who Congress thought the law was actually protecting. Besides the major toy manufacturers, who will have less competition because only they can afford to test every Asian-imported rivet and grommet and v-chip. (Or, perhaps, just lobby their way out of third-party testing altogether.)

Jill Chuckas writes on behalf of the Handmade Toy Alliance, a group of small business owners that's been instrumental in offering thoughtful recommendations to Congress and the Consumer Products Safety Commission this year:

We believe in the intent of the law, but feel that the narrow wording (specifically the use of the word “any lead”, rather than “de minimis risk of lead”), eliminates the ability to utilize risk assessment in the implementation process.

Our member businesses only want the opportunity to continue crafting beautiful, safe products for children. It is as simple as that.

As a publisher of a website that recommends handmade toys and children's gifts, and as a consumer who likes to support the little guy and gal when I can, it's absolutely dismaying to read about the number of CPSIA casualties in the last year. Especially when so many of them are women just trying to support their families with lovingly made handmade items in a pretty crappy economy.

ETSY crafter Kim Payne describes a crumpled piece of paper posted in a photo on her blog:

I just found this paper. It's a list of ideas for my business, from the days when I made and sold toys; the days when I thought our government was by the people and for the people; the days when I thought that members of congress actually represented the voters who elected them. Days of blissful ignorance, before I found out about CPSIA.

So I promptly crumpled it into the condition you see here. If it can't be used for the ideas written on it, it might as well be used for therapy.

While Kim has rechanelled her amazing creativity into other projects, I find her story heartbreaking. A similar post comes from Tammy Bowles who runs Storyblox, one of the very first companies I ever featured on Cool Mom Picks.

The way the law reads right now, a company selling a perfectly safe toy – which complies with all lead, phthalates, small parts and flammability requirements – that has not labeled the toy correctly, or cannot provide a proper 3rd party testing certificate for that toy, can still be fined hundreds of thousands of dollars, at the whim of the CPSC. As a small business without the resources of a major corporation, we cannot afford the testing, or the risk of fines for not testing. As a disabled woman living on a meager income, I certainly cannot take this risk.

But hallelujah, just as the deadline for compliance was drawing near, a tiny beacon of hope has shone in the direction of small businesses: A one-year stay for certification of many toys and children's products. In other words, you still have to make safe products. You're still liable for huge fines if you don't. It's just that now, you have until February 2011 until you have to tap your entire life's savings to be able to prove it.

Here's to hoping the next thirteen months give members of Congress a chance to scrap the whole darn thing and start over. Or at minimum, lose some of the "We're doing it for the children!" grandstanding, and inject a lot more reasonable thinking in its place.

Or as Tammy says,

I hope that this is not the end for us. Hopefully, in a year or two, common sense will win out, and the law will be amended so that it actually protects our children, while encouraging, rather than destroying, small businesses like ours that have been producing safe products from the get-go. If and when that happens, hopefully I will be in a place where I can re-open the business.

I am rooting for her.

----

For more information on the CPSIA check out:

CPSIA-Central Ning group

Handmade Toy Alliance

The Smart Mama Blog

Kathleen Fasinella's Fashion-Incubator

Rick Woldenberg's Learning Resources Blog

ETSY forums (search CPSIA)

Cool Mom Picks' Save Handmade Resource Page

 

Liz Gumbinner is a contributing editor to BlogHer, the publisher/editor-in-chief of Cool Mom Picks and is the author of Mom-101, which she has yet to prove is not harmful to children. It probably is.

Comments

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with Connect

You've done a great job of explaining the problem.

December 21, 2009 - 6:52am

I think there's still a lot of confusion for the mainstream consumer about CPSIA. I would never think of handmade products when I think about lead in toys. The side effect of a well intended law has been so sad. I hope 2010 brings big changes and more common sense, as you do.

 

Rita Arens writes at Surrender Dorothy and BlogHer and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

 

It's confusing to more than the consumer!

December 21, 2009 - 10:43am

I think that honestly congress is flummoxed. And the CPSC is unable to provide better direction. Part of the reason they granted a stay for bicycles is because there simply aren't enough third party testing facilities to get all of the bikes tested in time. It's all ust nuts.

Making millions at Mom-101

Cool Mom Picks

 

The age limits of this law are also a problem.

December 21, 2009 - 8:31am

Great article. Another serious problem with the bill is treating the toys and belongings of 12 year olds the same way as those for three year olds. So a 12 year old's books, ball point pens, shoes, jackets, bikes, and toys have to meet the same testing requirements as those of an infant, even though, as I have said on my blog, 12 year olds do not suck their socks. During the early stages of the bill, it actually did apply only to younger children, but litigation groups such as PIRG and Public Citizen lobbied intensely (and, unfortunately, successfully), for the age limits to be raised to 12. One important fix would be to reduce the age limits back to their original levels. It's interesting, because when promoting the bill, and later the law, PIRG and Public Citizen and other litigation oriented groups would insist that these are the same safety limits that Europeans have passed- except when I researched it I found that their limits do NOT apply to products intended for children as old as twelve. Mostly, it is a more reasonable limit of 3 and under. Children older than that are not still eating their books and licking their bikes. European countries also gave businesses more time to meet the new requirements (whereas here they were retroactive), and the testing and paperwork newly required here are so much more draconian that European toy companies like Selectra withdrew from the American market as they could not afford the paperwork costs. So I hope that Congress does indeed take the time to revisit the law and make some common sense changes.

 

Never thought I'd be on the opposite side of PIRG

December 21, 2009 - 10:49am

I remember reading a while back that the rationale for the 12 year-old limit is that toddlers may be exposed to their older sibling's toys which makes NO sense at all - because then shouldn't we be regulating everything in the home more stringently, from chemicals in carpets to PVC shower curtains to brass doorknobs?

And thanks for the sad reminder about Selecta. They along with toymakers like BRIO and some toys and accessories from HABA are all gone from US shelves. It makes no sense at all.

Making millions at Mom-101

Cool Mom Picks

 

Don't forget libraries!

December 21, 2009 - 10:10am

The law also applies to books published before 1985! Think of your library. Think of that much beloved copy of Nancy Drew, or Mr Poppers Penguins or Pippi Longstockings or most of Judy Blume oeuvre. You know the one I mean - the hardcover one with the *right* cover. In a a short time they could be gone.

The jury - and Congress - is still out on whether those books will be able to remain accessible to kids. Publishers Weekly posted CPSIA: The Year in Review with a specific focus on books. It's a must read.

Contributing Editor Sassymonkey also blogs at Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.

 

laws...

December 21, 2009 - 4:35pm

Was wondering if adding "as-is" as a temporary solution would help? I haven't read the new law and am concerned about the wording as well.

I understand most of this is a reaction to overprotecting/people suing, etc. I think it's a balancing act and some laws are valid (protecting from lead, etc) and others do need to have a limit to how they can effect people's choices (in regards to small businesses/home businesses).

 

Great job explaining the mess!

December 23, 2009 - 2:17am

This crazy law has made 2009 a devastating year for so many. Thank you for bringing it to light again.

 

Susan (5 Minutes for Mom)

http://www.5minutesformom.com

http://twitter.com/5minutesformom

 

 
BlogHer ConnectionsBlogHer Connections

ConferencesConferences

Upcoming Events

BlogHer Food '10

October 8-9, 2010

San Francisco, CA


BlogHer '11
August 5-6, 2011
San Diego, CA
Register Now!

Sponsor Promotions

How to Blog (Better)How to Blog (Better)

Don't Miss ...Don't Miss ...

Back to School
Must Read Moms