<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - Pay Per Post Changes Disclosure Policy - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/node/13605</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pay Per Post Changes Disclosure Policy&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I know quite a few people who are doing PPP</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/node/13605#comment-13278</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;and they have always been very clear that it IS a PPP ad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And PPP have not had a problem with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have one friend who uses her dog as a pitcher...very cute.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It hasn&#039;t taken away from their readership either..go figure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:52:05 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Crunchy Carpets</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13278 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pay Per Post Changes Disclosure Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/node/13605</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.payperpost.com/2006/12/disclosure-announcement.html&quot;&gt;Pay per Post&lt;/a&gt; is scheduled to announce a change in their disclosure policy and will require bloggers to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/16/payperpost-does-something-right/&quot;&gt;Techcrunch&lt;/a&gt; has an advance copy of the press release and notes that &amp;quot;FTC&amp;quot; is mentioned a number of times thereby indicating that the change was no doubt inspired by the recent FTC announcement on word of mouth marketing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On December 11th the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/11/AR2006121101389.html?nav=rss_technology&quot;&gt;FTC &lt;/a&gt;took the position that companies engaging in word of mouth marketing must disclose the financial relationships that they have with those endorsing their products.Â  They declined to field a full scale investigation of word of mouth marketing practices as requested by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commercialalert.org/buzzmarketing.pdf&quot;&gt;Commercial Alert&lt;/a&gt;. This announcement highlighted the prominence of the word &amp;quot;disclosure&amp;quot; in a world where traditional advertising has become less less believable than personal recommendations and consumer generated media and brandÂ  &amp;quot;ambassadorships&amp;quot;Â  are becoming increasingly common.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://womma.org&quot;&gt;WOMMA&lt;/a&gt; (Word of Mouth Marketing Association) distinguishes between word of mouth marketing, which involves disclosure of relationships, and stealth marketing, which does not. &lt;a href=&quot;http://womma.org&quot;&gt;WOMMA &lt;/a&gt;recently issued an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.womma.org/pages/2006/11/press_release_e.htm&quot;&gt;Ethics Adoption Toolkit&lt;/a&gt; for use by companies to develop ethical policies and guidelines for their word of mouth marketing efforts. They have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.womma.org/pages/2006/12/womma_commends.htm&quot;&gt;endorsed &lt;/a&gt;the FTC position. (Full disclosure: I blog for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.womma.org/womnibus.htm&quot;&gt;WOMMA&lt;/a&gt; and receive comped conference fees and hotels)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Â &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commercialalert.org/&quot;&gt;Commercial Alert&lt;/a&gt;, a consumer advocacy group, &lt;a href=&quot;http://adage.com/article?article_id=113749&quot;&gt;believes &lt;/a&gt;that word of mouth marketers are &amp;quot;perpetuating large scale deception&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot; word of mouth, or buzz marketing as it&#039;s also known, {is} &amp;quot;fundamentally fraudulent and misleading.&amp;quot; They petitioned the FTC to require paid &amp;quot;agents&amp;quot; to disclose their relationships and financial compensation with those whose products and services they are endorsing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Â The FTC already has a policy on commercial endorsements and deceptive advertising but according to Mary Engle, the FTC director of advertising practices as quoted in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/11/AR2006121101389.html?nav=rss_technology&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;, the FTC wanted to be clear on disclosure in light on the increase in word of mouth marketing and the likelihood that consumers would make decisions based upon a presumed independence on the part of product recommendations that was in fact, not independent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, it would seem that the Pay Per Post announcement, which is a reversal of their&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/29/payperpost-is-now-officially-absurd/&quot;&gt; prior positions&lt;/a&gt; on disclosure,Â  indicates that the FTC message was heard as the warning it seems intended to be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marianne Richmond also blogs at &lt;a href=&quot;http://resonancepartnership.com&quot;&gt;Resonance Partnership&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;//conversationalmediagroup.com&quot;&gt;Conversational Media Group&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/PayPerPost&quot;&gt;PayPerPost&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/FTC&quot;&gt;FTC&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/WOMMA&quot;&gt;WOMMA&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/Commercial+Alert&quot;&gt;Commercial Alert&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/disclosure&quot;&gt;disclosure&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/Marianne+Richmond&quot;&gt;Marianne Richmond&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/ethics&quot;&gt;ethics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/blogs&quot;&gt;blogs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Powered by&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qumana.com/&quot;&gt;Qumana&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/node/13605#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/law">Law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/media-journalism">Media &amp;amp; Journalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/technology-web/social-media">Social Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/technology-web">Technology &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:24:43 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Marianne Richmond</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13605 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
