<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - Surfing for wisdom on the war - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/node/14614</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Surfing for wisdom on the war&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Surfing for wisdom on the war</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/node/14614</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of things I&#039;ve come to appreciate about BlogHer over the past year is the fact that there are so many women in our community who offer expert analyses of current events that I rarely see anywhere else. Right now, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/19/world/middleeast/19cnd-iraq.html?hp&amp;amp;ex=1169269200&amp;amp;en=b58b3670611f0b79&amp;amp;ei=5094&amp;amp;partner=homepage&quot;&gt;Bush administration officials scramble to sell their plan&lt;/a&gt; to send 21,000 more troops to Iraq in the face of &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070119-121557-7480r.htm&quot;&gt;ongoing  Congressional opposition,&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;ve come to depend on the insights that some of those experts have to offer. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warandpiece.com/about.html&quot;&gt;veteran international affairs reporter Laura Rozen&lt;/a&gt; has become an indispensable guide to what I ought to be reading. In the last few days, she&#039;s had me wondering whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales&#039; &lt;a html&gt; announcement the the federal government will now comply with the law requiring that it seek court orders for wiretaps&lt;/a&gt; is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/005475.html&quot;&gt;&quot;ruse.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Also, check out her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/005470.html&quot;&gt;live  blog&lt;/a&gt; of part of the Senate hearing where Gonzales made his statement:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
11:15am: Sen. Russell Feingold up. (paraphrased): what happened to all those inflammatory justifications for the terrorism surveillance program not being able to be submitted to FISA oversight? ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gonzales: Just check out the blogs today. Lots of people who think there should be no surveillance....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Feingold: (paraphrased) Falsely accusing the majority of this committee of opposing the surveilling of terrorists is not going to serve you well with this committee.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/node/14614#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/law">Law</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:13:54 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kim Pearson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">14614 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
