<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - NSA Wiretapping Hearings Begin Today - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/node/1858</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;NSA Wiretapping Hearings Begin Today&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NSA Wiretapping Hearings Begin Today</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/node/1858</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The NSA wiretapping hearings begin today and they are being covered by C-SPAN (naturally). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will be the primary witness appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee today and there are quite a few blogs out there planning to cover the hearings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2006_02_05_firedoglake_archive.html#113923238063305800&quot;&gt;Firedoglake&lt;/a&gt; announced that they are &quot;kicking ass and taking names&quot; now that our elected representatives have finally realized that bloggers are making a real difference- so much of a difference that a lefty blogger has been called in from Brazil to brief Democratic staffers and Senators on the legal implications of the spy scandal.  Jane and Redd  will also be &lt;a href=&quot;http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2006_02_05_firedoglake_archive.html#113923866912403629&quot;&gt;blogging the hearings&lt;/a&gt; and providing some legal insight and opinion as day one of the hearings progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeralyn over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkleft.com/new_archives/013948.html&quot;&gt;Talk Left&lt;/a&gt; will also be covering the hearings and her expertise in all things criminal law will provide some essential legal insight that I am sure we can count on the mainstream media to fail to comprehend.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She also has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkleft.com/new_archives/013951.html&quot;&gt; interesting post&lt;/a&gt; noting something else the mainstream media failed to comprehend- that yesterday on the Sunday talk shows, a Dept. of Justice official was quoted as saying that it was possible that the President could legally order assassinations of suspected terrorists on US soil.  Ummm....I&#039;ll leave you to ponder that thought and it&#039;s legal implications but according to Talk Left:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
this as the logical extension of the President&#039;s claim that in essence the Fourth Amendment can be violated in the name of National Security...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And finally, the formidable Professor Althouse also has &lt;a href=&quot;http://althouse.blogspot.com/2006/02/what-gonzales-will-say-about.html&quot;&gt;thrown her hat into the NSA hearings&lt;/a&gt; blogging ring and is also looking forward to Gonzales&#039;.  Her take is that the administration&#039;s chief witness will face the challenge of answering very tough questions while the Senators face the challenge of asking those questions while not appearing soft on national security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stay tuned...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/node/1858#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/politics-news">News &amp;amp; Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/law">Law</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:54:25 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>stacyb</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1858 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
