<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - When Elizabeth Edwards is Speaking at BlogHer, I’m a Conservative - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/when-elizabeth-edwards-speaking-blogher-i-m-conservative</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;When Elizabeth Edwards is Speaking at BlogHer, I’m a Conservative&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The issue of steering the</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/when-elizabeth-edwards-speaking-blogher-i-m-conservative#comment-24940</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The issue of steering the conversation would be much simpler if the keynote speaker were not a political figure. Not all blogs are political in nature, why must all the speakers be? How about a well-known personal blogger? A writer? A motivational speaker? There is a lot of truth in what Ms Edwards said about just answering the questions she got. If you book the wife of a candidate in an election year, of course they are going to get questions mostly about election issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the notion of &quot;standing up and saying so&quot; if you disagree is naive at best. The format was question and answer, not stand up and say what you think. I didn&#039;t ask any questions because I wasn&#039;t going to give her the last word on any issue that was important to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought you did beautifully with your comment and question, and with this post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeana&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://laughter4daystocome.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Link Text&lt;/a&gt;www.daystocome.net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:52:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Days To Come</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24940 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m not a conservative but I agree with you</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/when-elizabeth-edwards-speaking-blogher-i-m-conservative#comment-24938</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that we don&#039;t see many conservative points of view here, though Dana does a fine job of trying to present them when she can. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also do not agree with several of Mrs Edwards&#039; ideas and I am a sane and intelligent person.  ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good for you for making this post.  I hope you will continue to post your thoughts. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;~Denise&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fasttimes.clubmom.com&quot;&gt;Fast Times @ Homeschool High&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flamingohouse.net&amp;lt;/a&quot;&gt;Flamingo House Happenings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:33:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24938 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Excellent post, Kathryn.  </title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/when-elizabeth-edwards-speaking-blogher-i-m-conservative#comment-24936</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I, as a conservative, am growing increasingly weary of the assumption that all women in the blogosphere believe the same things.  To assume such is to be quite narrow-minded, which is ironically the same thing our liberal sisters accuse us of sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:12:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rocksinmydryer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 24936 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When Elizabeth Edwards is Speaking at BlogHer, I’m a Conservative</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/when-elizabeth-edwards-speaking-blogher-i-m-conservative</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At church I’m a liberal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am repeatedly amazed at the complex nuances of personal political identity and the bizarre need we feel to categorize each other along party lines.  This becomes confusing because the way I’m categorized changes dramatically depending on whom I happen to be sitting next to.  In an LDS Sunday School class, I’m fairly liberal.  In the BlogHer organization, I feel like some sort of right wing extremist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/15955706@N00/976983023/&quot; title=&quot;Photo Sharing&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1249/976983023_2911b11fe7_m.jpg&quot; width=&quot;180&quot; height=&quot;240&quot; alt=&quot;elizabeth-edwards&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Elizabeth Edwards was the closing keynote speaker for the conference on Saturday afternoon.  I knew in advance that I wouldn’t agree with many of her political views but was fascinated to hear her speak.  She is an intelligent, strong, candid and passionate woman who has long been involved in blogging and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.johnedwards.com/Elizabeth&quot;&gt;maintains a blog&lt;/a&gt; on her husband’s campaign website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wanted to hear about how she balances personal opinion with the consolidated public message of a presidential campaign.  I wanted to hear detailed examples of how the blogosphere is shaping political policy and how politicians are trying to carve out a niche online.  I wanted to hear about her personal struggles with cancer and how she and Senator Edwards decided to carry on with the campaign.  There were so many non-partisan issues I wanted her to cover in her speech.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However the questions very quickly turned to policy and much of the time was spent discussing her husband’s platform.  The meeting came to feel very much like a campaign stop, with talk of how Senator Edwards’ positions differ from other leading democrats and even a statement that she assumed everyone in the room believed pretty much the same things with regards to women’s issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You cannot talk to a diverse room of women about your plan for universal healthcare and assume we all believe the same things.  Growing up in Canada, I watched a friend’s mother die BECAUSE of socialized medicine.  Although I want everyone to have access to health care, I’m not convinced that John Edwards’ plan is viable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You cannot talk to a diverse room of women about your views on abortion, the Iraq War, gay marriage and other highly divisive issues and assume we all believe the same things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anytime we create an assumption of political consensus in a group of intelligent thinking adults, we’re headed for trouble.  By saying, “I’m sure we all agree,” in essence what you’re saying is, “Any sane intelligent person would agree with me,” and I have a problem with that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So although I vote for various parties at election time, register as a Democrat in the primaries and consider myself an independent, I raised my hand to speak to the fact that the discussion was being dismissive to conservatives.  There was time for one more question and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogher.com/member/elisa-camahort&quot;&gt;Elisa Camahort&lt;/a&gt; handed me the mic, potentially annoying several other eager people in order to let a conservative have a voice.  I’m very grateful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m not actually sure what I said since I was shaking at the time, standing in front of several hundred people and directly addressing the possible future first lady.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogher.com/updated-video-invite-elizabeth-edwards-ask-your-question-shell-answer-here&quot;&gt;The session video&lt;/a&gt; was uploaded to the BlogHer site but my question is strangely missing, an occurrence I assume was no more sinister than the video blogger running out of tape at the end of the session, but which strikes me as an odd coincidence. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basically, I pointed out that the session had been dismissive to conservatives and that since I wasn’t planning on voting for her husband, I’d rather talk about blogging and technology than the specific policy of the Edwards campaign.  My question was, “How many people review your blog entries before you post them to the internet?”  Her answer was, “ZERO!”  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was amazed.  With all the spinning and planning and message management that goes on in a presidential campaign, I am completely blown away that she is given total freedom to express herself on the Edwards 2008 website.  Now I’m sure she is in constant contact with John and his many advisors and she’s smart enough to know which way the wind is blowing and where she should funnel it.  Nonetheless, it was refreshing to hear this response from her.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regardless of our political differences, I have great respect for Mrs. Edwards and feel strongly that she is sincerely doing what she feels is right and standing up as a bold force to promote her beliefs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I approached her at the cocktail party later that evening, she said, “I was just answering the questions in the room,” and it was true.  She was just answering the questions in the room.  I had a problem with the whole direction of the discussion, not her responses, and not the fact that she was a Democrat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A friend (not a conservative, if that makes any difference) came up to me after and said she had the same problem.  The whole discussion was too political and party-specific for such a diverse group, especially for the closing keynote of a blogging conference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She gave the analogy that it was similar to inviting the head of Google to be the closing speaker and then letting him spend most of the time fielding questions about how to use Blogger software.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the end of the closing session, someone asked me, “If a Republican had been the speaker and the conversation had gone the same way, would you have called her on it too?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Absolutely yes.  Although it’s hard to imagine that I’d need to.  With the number of bold articulate women of the left in that group, people would have been tripping all over themselves to bring the discussion back on track.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve heard &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogher.com/member/lisa-stone&quot;&gt;Lisa Stone&lt;/a&gt; say that BlogHer is a nonpartisan organization and that if you have a different opinion, you should stand up and make it known.  I often think those of us with leanings to the right feel so outnumbered that we’re afraid to speak up.  I for one do not want to turn my site into a political blog because I enjoy the fact that I have a diverse group of readers and I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daringyoungmom.com&quot;&gt;DaringYoungMom&lt;/a&gt; as a place for us all to come and be silly together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However I’d like to be more of a catalyst for diverse political discussion among female bloggers in the future, if not on my personal site, then elsewhere.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is cross-posted at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daringyoungmom.com/elizabeth-edwards&quot;&gt;daringyoungmom.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/when-elizabeth-edwards-speaking-blogher-i-m-conservative#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/blogher-conferences/07-sessions-speakers">&amp;#039;07 Sessions/Speakers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/politics-news">News &amp;amp; Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/closing-keynote">closing keynote</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/conservative">conservative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/daring-young-mom">daring young mom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/elizabeth-edwards">Elizabeth Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/kathryn-thompson">kathryn thompson</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:52:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daring Young Mom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23500 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
