<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - Math Doesn&amp;#039;t Suck - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/math-doesnt-suck</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Math Doesn&#039;t Suck&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Math Doesn&#039;t Suck</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/math-doesnt-suck</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have a confession to make. It may result in my being shunned by pretty much my entire generation.  But here it goes - I really wasn&#039;t a fan of &lt;em&gt;The Wonder Years&lt;/em&gt;. It was ok, it just really didn&#039;t seem to speak to me the same way it spoke to other kids.  But I always kind of liked Danica McKellar, the girl who played Winnie Cooper (and totally loved her on the &lt;em&gt;West Wing&lt;/em&gt; too).  What I liked about her was that she seemed smart - she didn&#039;t seem like the stereotypical airhead pretty girl.  I was actually pretty good at math and was more than impressed when years later I found out that she co-authored a published proof. I was lucky that most of my female friends were good at math and never was made to feel that it was &quot;ungirly&quot;.  Unfortunately for us society wasn&#039;t really on our side. Does anyone else remember &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE7DE103AF932A15753C1A964958260&amp;amp;sec=&amp;amp;spon=&amp;amp;partner=permalink&amp;amp;exprod=permalink&quot;&gt;the talking Barbie&lt;/a&gt; that told us that &quot;Math class is tough&quot;? So I&#039;m pretty excited to see that Danica McKellar, the queen of female math geeks everywhere, has written a book for teen girls called &lt;em&gt;Math Doesn&#039;t Suck&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The book is styled much in the same way a teen magazine.  In an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/culture/education/news/2007/08/winniecooper_QA&quot;&gt;interview with Wired News&lt;/a&gt; McKellar had this to say about whether her references to making cookies and examples using cosmetics were fun or if they reinforced gender roles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What do you think? If I&#039;m teaching girls that do love to make cookies and do love fashion -- that they can use math as a part of that -- you think that&#039;s me saying, come on girls you belong in the kitchen, you belong shopping? Or, do you think it&#039;s me showing them how math is part of all their life, even the part they thought it had nothing to do with?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yay for being girly AND smart! Oh how I wish there had been more women saying this when I was a teen in a way that was actually approachable to teens. I had plenty of examples of smart women, but they didn&#039;t really speak my teenagd girl language. But that&#039;s my reaction.  What is everyone else thinking?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://haydee.vox.com/library/post/suck-at-math.html&quot;&gt;My Thoughts Exactly&lt;/a&gt; is interested to see if it will really help students who are struggling. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freakgirl.com/blog/math-doesnt-suck/9797&quot;&gt;Freakgirl gives her two thumbs up&lt;/a&gt; and there&#039;s a great conversation in the comments about why math is useful. &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/2007/07/interview_with_math_whiz_autho.php&quot;&gt;Aetiology also has an interview with McKellar&lt;/a&gt;. In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/2007/07/danica_mckelllars_math_doesnt.php&quot;&gt;post written the previous day&lt;/a&gt; the interviewer mentioned that she bristled at the examples that used clothing, babysitting, etc. and would address this in the interview. McKellar&#039;s reply?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Girls can enjoy being &quot;girly&quot; and &quot;fabulous&quot; alongside developing their brain - and in fact, in the book I develop the thesis that their brain happens to be their most important tool in becoming a fabulous young woman someday. They&#039;re not at odds; they can fit perfectly together. And the more they can be seen to fit together, the more girls will be attracted to math.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m really loving her answers. And I&#039;m sure I&#039;m not the only one that would have appreciated a word problem or two that dealt with makeup or cooking or shoes instead of about when two trains would meet each other (I lived on an island - we didn&#039;t even &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; trains). I am girly. I am smart. Deal with it.  Danica, you keep talking. I&#039;ll be the one in the back of the room wearing a fabulous pair of pumps and cheering you on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Contributing Editor Sassymonkey also blogs at &lt;a href=&quot;http://sassymonkey.ca&quot;&gt;Sassymonkey&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://sassymonkeyreads.wordpress.com&quot;&gt;Sassymonkey Reads.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/math-doesnt-suck#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/entertainment-books">Entertainment &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/books">books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/danica-mckellar">Danica McKellar</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/gender-roles">Gender Roles</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/gender">Gender</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:37:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sassymonkey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23687 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
