<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - Pondering the Chick Flick - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/pondering-chick-flick</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pondering the Chick Flick&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Mmhmm.</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/pondering-chick-flick#comment-44085</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I hear that!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:49:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bianca Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 44085 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You Are So Right</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/pondering-chick-flick#comment-40833</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Whoever came up with the &amp;quot;chick flick&amp;quot; term must have been a man.  Unfortunately Hollywood is always more worried about appealing to 14 year old boys than they are to any of the women in the audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I touched on this same topic in a post I wrote a few weeks ago called &lt;a href=&quot;/tv-kids-sexism-and-me&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;TV, Kids, Sexism and Me.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the men in Hollywood spent more time worrying about making &lt;em&gt;good &lt;/em&gt;movies instead of just making movies that appeal to their latest test audiences, we&#039;d all be treated to a better and wider range of movies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, how about hiring more women screenwriters and directors?  We&#039;ve got a long way to go on that score as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Megan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/blog/msmith&quot;&gt;BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.megansminute.com/&quot;&gt;Megan&#039;s Minute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.womenonwomenblog.com/megan/&quot;&gt;Video Runway&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:17:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan Smith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 40833 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pondering the Chick Flick</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/pondering-chick-flick</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Most women who work in the film business in any capacity absolutely&lt;br /&gt;
hate the term &amp;quot;chick flick.&amp;quot; They all wish the term had never been&lt;br /&gt;
invented (who should we blame for this?) since it seems that even films&lt;br /&gt;
made before the term was coined in the late 1980s with this definition&lt;br /&gt;
-- &amp;quot;a motion picture intended to appeal especially to women&amp;quot; (Webster&#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
On-line Dictionary) -- have been shoved into this category. And let&#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
make no mistake about this: the chick flick is a pejorative and&lt;br /&gt;
demeaning. And to take it a step further: by assigning films that star&lt;br /&gt;
women or are about women as &amp;quot;chick flicks&amp;quot; we take away any power the&lt;br /&gt;
women might have since quite frankly we can&#039;t say anything of import in&lt;br /&gt;
a &amp;quot;lite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;chick flick&amp;quot; film.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It used to be the women could star&lt;br /&gt;
or co-star in romantic comedies, but the reality in Hollywood today is&lt;br /&gt;
that most movies that star women and are about women are no longer&lt;br /&gt;
coined romantic comedies, they seem to be stuck with the chick flick&lt;br /&gt;
moniker. We all know that there are other movies and stories that star&lt;br /&gt;
women and deal with issues of substance, but most of those films now&lt;br /&gt;
have to go the indie route and will usually not get seen by a large&lt;br /&gt;
audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The studios are not in the business anymore of making&lt;br /&gt;
movies that star women because quite frankly they don&#039;t play well&lt;br /&gt;
overseas and the international market has become a huuuge priority for&lt;br /&gt;
the studios. Just look at the handful of recent releases starring women&lt;br /&gt;
from this year: You have Nim&#039;s Island (which I have not seen yet and is more targeted at kids even though it stars Jodie Foster); The Other Boleyn Girl; and the one true success this winter 27 Dresses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The others like Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day, Penelope, Mad Money, Bonneville, some better than others, all struggled, with Miss Pettigrew (the best movie of the lot doing the best with $10 m so far.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you can tell I am ambivalent at best with regard to the chick flick and so when I saw the NY Times story&lt;br /&gt;
this morning with the Title &amp;quot;Wary Hollywood Plans More Chick Flicks&lt;br /&gt;
(and Hopes to Lure the Guys) it made me want to tear my hair out. The&lt;br /&gt;
premise is that Hollywood is all nervous about two movies now shooting Confessions of a Shopaholic starring Isla Fisher and directed by P.J. Hogan (a guy) based on the Sophie Kinsella novel, and Julia &amp;amp; Julia starring Meryl Streep and Amy Adams directed by Nora Ephron and based on the best selling memoir of the same name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The&lt;br /&gt;
male producers of the film are really trying to make it clear that&lt;br /&gt;
these films are for a wide audience not just women. Uber producer Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckheimer said about his film Shopaholic: “We all have spending habits, a lot of us do,” and Laurence Mark said about Julie &amp;amp; Julia: &amp;quot;We hope this will be a movie for everyone who likes eating.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What&lt;br /&gt;
pissed me off about this is that they never have these conversations or&lt;br /&gt;
issues with movies that star men. Why is everyone so nervous about&lt;br /&gt;
movies that star women? It&#039;s probably because that Hollywood is&lt;br /&gt;
predicated on the fact that women will go see movies that star men and&lt;br /&gt;
that men won&#039;t go see movies that star women.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But women go to&lt;br /&gt;
the movies, we bought over 50% of the tickets in 2006 (according to the&lt;br /&gt;
MPAA) and in fact older women are growing as an audience. It&#039;s just&lt;br /&gt;
that we don&#039;t run out on opening weekend because maybe we have other&lt;br /&gt;
priorities and also maybe because the theatres are too crowded. I think&lt;br /&gt;
that Hollywood should a) make better movies that star women cause no&lt;br /&gt;
one wants to see a stinker; and b) stop worrying about getting men to&lt;br /&gt;
come see movies about women and try and figure out how to get WOMEN to&lt;br /&gt;
see these movies cause we all know they are doing a bad job at that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/movies/09roma.html?ref=todayspaper&quot; title=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/movies/09roma.html?ref=todayspaper&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/movies/09roma.html?ref=todayspaper&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/pondering-chick-flick#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/entertainment-books">Entertainment &amp;amp; Books</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:52:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>melsil</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">39178 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
