<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - Mommy-tracking? Real or not? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/mommy-tracking-real-or-not</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Mommy-tracking? Real or not?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Mommy-tracking? Real or not?</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/mommy-tracking-real-or-not</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://washwords.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/mommy-tracked/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Am I completely, completely evil, to resent the new “New&lt;br /&gt;
Parent” Community of Practice,” (CoP)set up to “help new parents and&lt;br /&gt;
managers navigate work/life balance”?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Behind the scenes I was told that the “problem”  that new parents&lt;br /&gt;
wish to see addressed in this new CoP is the “mommy tracking”: the fact&lt;br /&gt;
that they are “kept from promotions because of their parental status.”
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Le sigh. Am I the only one who thinks “Really? Are ya kiddin me?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&lt;br /&gt;
know I am not a mommy, and thus subject to all manner of attack for my&lt;br /&gt;
clear lack of understanding the perils of mommyworld, but really,&lt;br /&gt;
reaLLY!?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Being a mommy is hard, no doubt, it might be the hardest job; it&lt;br /&gt;
might mean you DECIDE to work less (part time, telecommute, longer&lt;br /&gt;
leave) but it IS a choice, right? To be a super-power career mom, you&lt;br /&gt;
give up some time at home, a choice that is a very hard one, one I&lt;br /&gt;
probably wouldn’t make, but a CHOICE. Likewise, if you DECIDE to spend&lt;br /&gt;
more time at home and less at work, while that too might be a hard&lt;br /&gt;
choice, it is one… one that comes with the consequences of less chance&lt;br /&gt;
for promotion and certain “choice” work assignments because ummm…&lt;br /&gt;
you’re not here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Likewise, some of your single gal colleagues, just so you know,&lt;br /&gt;
would be happy to have a few less “choice” assignments; a few less&lt;br /&gt;
times where its assumed they can come in, handle whatever is going on,&lt;br /&gt;
because they’re not mommies what else could they be doing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I oversimplifying? Probably. But I guess I just am finding it&lt;br /&gt;
hard to swallow that mommies are the only ones struggling to balance&lt;br /&gt;
their work and their lives, make that New Parents, as this group did. I&lt;br /&gt;
can’t actually think of a bigger oversimplification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(For sliggggghtly less oversimplifacation, &lt;a href=&quot;http://washwords.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/mommy-tracked/&quot;&gt;read more here.)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/mommy-tracking-real-or-not#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/business-career">Business &amp;amp; Career</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/life">Life</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/mommy-family">Mommy &amp;amp; Family</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/fair">Fair</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/mommy">mommy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/mommy-tracking">mommy tracking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/treatment">treatment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/work">work</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/work-life-balance">work-life balance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/topic/life/single">Single</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:29:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>washwords</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46626 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
