<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - The LPGA Forced to Rethink Controversial &amp;quot;English-Only&amp;quot; Policy - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/lpga-forced-rethink-controversial-english-only-policy</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The LPGA Forced to Rethink Controversial &quot;English-Only&quot; Policy&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The LPGA Forced to Rethink Controversial &quot;English-Only&quot; Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/lpga-forced-rethink-controversial-english-only-policy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Ladies Professional Golf Association recently announced a new policy. The new rule stated that players had to pass an English language efficiency exam or face suspension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Understandably the players, fans, sponsors and the blogosphere freaked out. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Asian American Justice Center has a slight problem with this&lt;br /&gt;
requirement, though, and are organizing a boycott to try and overturn&lt;br /&gt;
this new ruling:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are currently 45 South Koreans on the tour and many see this&lt;br /&gt;
new requirement — which is ostensibly designed to “satisfy sponsors” —&lt;br /&gt;
as an act of discrimination against this sizable minority in the &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;LPGA. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://guanabee.com/2008/09/lpga-demands-athletes-learn-en.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Guanabee&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.golf.com/top100/2008/09/english-require.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;some people agree&lt;/a&gt;, but most saw the policy as offensive and probably directed at the large segment of South Korean payers on the tour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Women’s golf has been stuck in an unwelcome PR whirlwind for weeks&lt;br /&gt;
in the wake of their new proposed regulations that would require&lt;br /&gt;
professional women golfers to speak English by 2009. Not all the time,&lt;br /&gt;
just when players are giving speeches and talking to the press and&lt;br /&gt;
impressing donors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most news reports agree that the South Korean players were the prime&lt;br /&gt;
target of this rule change, even though players from 26 nations are on&lt;br /&gt;
the tour this year. Rumor has it that the issue boiled over when&lt;br /&gt;
Eun-Hee Ji could not deliver her victory speech in English after&lt;br /&gt;
winning a major tournament.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://caminopr.org/2008/09/03/a-pr-mulligan/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Elizabeth Toledo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or even worse:  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lawyers can debate whether the LPGA&#039;s edict is unconstitutional. But I&lt;br /&gt;
know this much: It&#039;s un-American. It represents a potential assault on&lt;br /&gt;
the idea of merit, and an insult, not just to golfers, but to all&lt;br /&gt;
athletes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Mark Kriegel, Fox Sports &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t want to defend this policy decision, but I think that I would be remiss not to mention the fact that most of the LPGA&#039;s money comes from Pro-Ams. (A Pro-Am is a tournament that pairs up amateurs and professionals on a team. The amateur pays a premium to play with the stars.) Unlike the PGA, the LPGA&#039;s male counterpart, the ladies tour is not rich. In fact, they are far from it. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/sports/columnist/brennan/2008-09-03-lpga-policy_N.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The LPGA really needs the money from these weekly pro-ams to stay afloat&lt;/a&gt;.  I guess I can understand why they would want their player to able to communicate with the people funding the organization, but the policy still came off as harsh and xenophobic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not that surprisingly this morning Carolyn F. Bivens, Commissioner of the LPGA, announced that they were going to have to rethink their new policy. From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lpga.com/content_1.aspx?pid=17168&amp;amp;mid=4&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LPGA website&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;The LPGA has received valuable&lt;br /&gt;
feedback from a variety of constituents regarding the recently&lt;br /&gt;
announced penalties attached to our effective communications policy. We&lt;br /&gt;
have decided to rescind those penalty provisions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;After hearing the concerns, we believe there are other&lt;br /&gt;
ways to achieve our shared objective of supporting and enhancing the&lt;br /&gt;
business opportunities for every Tour player. In that spirit, we will&lt;br /&gt;
continue communicating with our diverse Tour players to develop a&lt;br /&gt;
better alternative. The LPGA will announce a revised approach, absent&lt;br /&gt;
playing penalties, by the end of 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;I read that as: We got a lot of hate mail and in order to restore out reputation we&#039;re going to take a mulligan. Well, that and maybe some our corporate sponsors. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Well, not maybe. &lt;a href=&quot;http://adage.com/article?article_id=130699&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;State Farm&lt;/a&gt; specifically had a thing or two to say about it and I suspect they may have been a large source of that &amp;quot;valuable feedback&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;I guess good for the LPGA for recognizing the mistake. I hope they find a way to work something out that is less offensive, or more inclusive.  Can&#039;t they just provide free English tutors? Maybe they could score some interns and offer college credit and a summer on the LPGA tour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;I am not going to sit here and say that women&#039;s professional sports&lt;br /&gt;
organizations have it easy. I know that golf patrons are still much&lt;br /&gt;
more likely to attend a PGA event than a LPGA event the same way there&lt;br /&gt;
isn&#039;t much of an NBA/WNBA crossover audience as much as I wish there&lt;br /&gt;
were. It just seems like there must be a better solution. Hopefully the LPGA will come up with something and that no permanent damage has been done to one of the more successful endeavors in women&#039;s sports. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Contributing Editor Sarah also blogs at &lt;a href=&quot;http://sarahandthegoonsquad.com/&quot;&gt;Sarah and the Goon Squad&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://ronmexicosblog.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Draft Day Suit&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.blogher.com/lpga-forced-rethink-controversial-english-only-policy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/entertainment-and-culture-tags/entertainment/sports-fitness">Sports</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/carolyn-f-bivens">Carolyn F. Bivens</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/english-only-policy">English-Only policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/golf">Golf</category>
 <category domain="http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/lpga">LPGA</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:46:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">53197 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
