<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - mathmatics - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/mathmatics</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;mathmatics&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>OMG, it is 1975 again</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/statistically-i-dont-know-jack#comment-42356</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Research methods first semester, statistics second... with a prof who refused to let us use calculators. I&#039;m going to be grumbling nasties here tomorrow if this comes to me in my sleep tonight! ;-) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If there is one thing that stuck somewhere between my ears, south of my hair, and north of my nasal passageways, it is that information received is only as good as the questions asked. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which takes me on a tangent, but quite ok since this is the feminism section... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;beware gender bias in research. Bitch Magazine had a wonderful article on this a few years back. If you twist my arm, I could probably locate the issue number, but it surely opened my eyes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So on top of the caveats you discuss, I add this one. After all, women are not as good as men at math. *cough*  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nelle2nelle.org/&quot;&gt;nelle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:45:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nelle2nelle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 42356 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
