<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogher.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BlogHer - speech - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/free-tagging/speech</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;speech&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Implications Has Got Me Nervous</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/language-political-speech-and-power#comment-43401</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When I get time I will post more of his speech on my blog. If PR/media  people are some of the folks that are setting the tone for national conversations no wonder we are in the trouble we find ourselves. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a basic human instinct is routinely manipulated as a means of demonstrating power/control then how do we connect with other groups to say you have been chumped?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The good news is that PR/media power can only extend so far, there is a limit where the society will set up and say &amp;quot;No, this is not acceptable.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wish this could have happened seven years ago. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gena - &lt;a href=&quot;http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Out On The Stoop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:12:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gena Haskett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 43401 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gena, you bring me to reflection</title>
 <link>http://www.blogher.com/language-political-speech-and-power#comment-43400</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;First, yes, indeed to what T said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, I am reminded of Toni Morrison&#039;s amazing and controversial 1993 Nobel prize speech, which is worth reading in its entirety, but which &lt;a href=&quot;http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1993/morrison-lecture.html&quot;&gt;says, in part&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oppressive language does&lt;br /&gt;
  more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than&lt;br /&gt;
  represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge. Whether&lt;br /&gt;
  it is obscuring state language or the faux-language of mindless&lt;br /&gt;
  media; whether it is the proud but calcified language of the&lt;br /&gt;
  academy or the commodity driven language of science; whether it&lt;br /&gt;
  is the malign language of law-without-ethics, or language&lt;br /&gt;
  designed for the estrangement of minorities, hiding its racist&lt;br /&gt;
  plunder in its literary cheek - it must be rejected, altered and&lt;br /&gt;
  exposed. It is the language that drinks blood, laps&lt;br /&gt;
  vulnerabilities, tucks its fascist boots under crinolines of&lt;br /&gt;
  respectability and patriotism as it moves relentlessly toward the&lt;br /&gt;
  bottom line and the bottomed-out mind. Sexist language, racist&lt;br /&gt;
  language, theistic language - all are typical of the policing&lt;br /&gt;
  languages of mastery, and cannot, do not permit new knowledge or&lt;br /&gt;
  encourage the mutual exchange of ideas. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Thanks for the dimension that you have contributed to this discussion. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogher.org/blog/kim-pearson&quot;&gt;BlogHer Contributing Editor&lt;/a&gt;|&lt;a href=&quot;http://professorkim.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Professor Kim&lt;/a&gt;|&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:51:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kim Pearson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 43400 at http://www.blogher.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
