Bio
Audrey Holden, a writer, photographer, and former Clear Channel air-talent and voice-over artist, is mother to four beautiful children; 22-year-old t...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Dear Tim Gunn, Does It REALLY Matter What Size Her Dress Is?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 56
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Dear Mr. Gunn,

May I call you Tim?  You can call me Audrey.   I figure the less formal we are, the better chance I have of being able to convince you that there is a real person underneath the additional 200lbs I'm carrying, and worry less about what double-digit dress size I am.

Before we move any further though, please know that I'm not comfortable at all wearing my customized fat dress around.  Up until recently there were 150 additional pounds of flesh to be heaved here and there.  It's slow going, but the point is,  it's going going and soon to be gone!   While I am one of the many morbidly obese that you see walking around,  I'm not one of these ladies who choose to flaunt my flesh so-to-speak.   I'm starting to believe that the real beauty is what's inside and how I see myself.  I don't believe there's anything beautiful about being obese.  However, I also don't believe it's what people should focus on when meeting me for the first time, or basing their initial reaction to seeing me, on.   I don't believe it's OK that they gasp in shock and horror when imagining what size I wear.  Alas, they do.   The focus is the number . . . whether it's my weight or my dress size.

So, Tim, I happened to come across a couple of comments you recently made about Kirstie Alley's dress size.   Can we take a moment just to laud Kirstie's accomplishment of achieving a healthier weight?  Can we say a little prayer that this time she's able to keep it off and has dealt with whatever demons she was battling that caused her to balloon to an unhealthy weight and then yo-yo back and forth?   Maybe we can just sit here for a minute and admire the fact that for a 60 year old woman, she looks pretty damned amazing?   Actually let's forget the fact that she's 60, it's just another number! 

Kirstie Alley looks spectacular!

kirstie alley

Now that we've established in the affirmative that Kirstie looks insanely great, let's backtrack a little to what prompted me to get up on my [industrially reinforced] soapbox and direct my thoughts your way.

Back in the October 3rd issue of  the People Magazine interview with Kirstie Alley, she claimed to now be in a size 6 dress.  You argued that she probably wasn't actually a size 6, yet closer to an 8 or a 10.  Then after making a cutting comment like that, probably realizing you sounded like a condescending superficial fashionista, you added that you thought she "looked fabulous!"   You went on to state, "People are too size conscious."  And then followed it up with another zinger, "More importantly, how do you look in your clothes?"

Why did you feel it necessary to even argue Kirstie Alley's claims about what size she wears?   You live in world dominated by men and women who don't wear realistically sized clothing anyway!   Your world consists of women like this, and then labeling it 'haute couture' . . .

skinny model

While this might be the norm in your world, in the world I live in, I can't figure out whether she's got a role in a movie about third world starvation, or if the outfit she's modeling is being marketed to anyone larger than a premature infant?  Only a man in your world would make a comment like the one you did about Kirstie Alley's dress size and thenmention how fantastic she looks! 

Your world reinforces the notion  (a notion that millions of pre-teens and teenagers the world over think is the ultimate desire)  that the number on the label is the most important thing, only then followed by how great someone looks, and of course how great they look is a direct result of that number. 

Who cares what Kirstie Alley's actual dress size is?   For that matter,  you, more than anyone should know that the American women's sizing system is skewed beyond belief.   Your world is focused on fashion that the average American woman could not even get one leg into, let alone her whole body.    A Costume National, Dries Van Noten, or Alexander McQueen creation would not be marketable to the average American woman nor is it designed to.  Perhaps that's part of the problem.  A problem which you no doubt condone when you insist on focusing on a woman's size first, rather than who

  • 56
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
MomsperimentsMom 6 pts

Very well put. However, isn't it equally sad that the only thing Kirstie Alley is known for nowadays is her weight? Once upon a time, people used to talk about her acting ability. That seems to have gone by the wayside - perhaps for good, if she can't find a decent TV or movie project soon.

Amanda_Magee 34 pts

So true. I was having a conversation about jeans and I was wearing GAP jeans. Te woman asked what size I wore, I checked the label and told her. She proceeded to tell me that wasn't my size and I shouldn't consider myself that. "Glamour sizing," she said with a wicked nod.

Luckily I don't give a flying fig, but the thing that got me was that it was a power thing. She thought I would somehow feel less for not being the size I'd stated.

Twisted.

tyeryann 10 pts

Our society focuses waaaaaay too much on appearances, especially when it comes to women. Heck, women themselves focus too much on weight and appearances, too. Even in your post you took time to explain that you don't find fat attractive and that you're trying to lose weight.

Skinny does not necessarily equal healthy and fat does not necessarily equal unhealthy, either. It's a shame that we can't just love our bodies and accept or bodies and embrace our bodies and then move on to focusing on the things that actually matter in life.

Two things:

The Body Is Not An Apology: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JrbUTI95o3U

and

Body Positive? I'll Believe You When...: http://reticentbitch.com/?p=1771

Poky Puppy ADD It Again 56 pts

Audrey, you have a spectacular smile...and the rest of you will soon follow. I recently moved to the San Diego area from Michigan, and I have a girlfriend here who is a twig...she keeps getting after me for saying negative things about myself, and reminds me regularly to be proud of the fact that I'm working on it. We actually walk together. She pushes me, but she doesn't judge me, and she's helping me to stop judging myself. I have a pretty spectacular smile, too. And while I feel like the fattest person in the room everywhere I go here, I have to say that people don't seem to focus on that. They seem to see my smile. You have to focus on the positive. Move past the anger and hurt feelings and use it to fuel your efforts to reach your goals. You can't visualize yourself in a good place if you're wallowing in the negative. Good luck to you. btw, I'm in my 8th week on Weight Watchers. I've lost 7 pounds, but my goal is 50 in a year. I will still be considered obese at that point, but I'll be able to buy a hot dress off the rack for my daughter's wedding and I won't hate looking at the pictures for years to come. If I can do more, I will, but I know I'll be 50 lbs happier with how I look, and that's huge. 150 is HUGE!! That's a remarkable accomplishment, don't discount it simply because you've got 200 more to go. A year and a half ago I lost 10 lbs and 3 points BMI after weeks of doing a Biggest Loser event at our local Y. A few weeks after the event ended I gave up when I saw a videotape of myself helping my son learn to ride his bike, because the reality of how I looked on that video wasn't in line with how I felt I looked before I saw it. I gave up, and when I started Weight Watchers I was 4 pounds heavier than I had been when I started the program at the Y. If only I would have stuck with working out before...I'd be that much farther ahead. But again, that's living in the negative, and I have to focus on the positive fact that at least I'm doing it now. And now I know better than to give up.

nearnormalcy 5 pts

If I'm remembering Gunn's comments correctly, I think you misinterpreted some of his intent. His point was to lament the fact that Alley, while looking fabulous, felt the need to lie about her size...which she clearly IS! If she's a 10, she's a fabulous 10, so why does she need to call herself a 6? Gunn was protesting the practice of "vanity sizing" where designers slap numbers on clothing that will make the wearer feel good rather than numbers that actually describe the size of the clothing based on any standard. The point: a size 10 woman can be curvy and gorgeous and beautiful, and should feel comfortable telling the world "look at me, I'm a size 10" rather than "I'm a size 6" because our country thinks you have to be a 6 or smaller in order to be beautiful. I think Tim Gunn and you had the same intent.

nearnormalcy 5 pts

Here are his full comments: http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/19/tim-gunn-kirstie-alley-is-not-a-size-4/

karabuntin 44 pts

nearnormalcy I have to agree with this. When I saw that phtoo of Kirstie in a magazine that said she was now a size 6, I laughed! She's clearly not a size 6, and regardless of who said she was (I don't know if it was her or a magazine editor) it's not true.

Vanity sizing has been around for years, and Tim Gunn is right when he says that people are too size conscious. The numbers mean nothing when every designer uses a different cutting model and you can vary in size from one designer to another. I didn't take anything that he said as being offensive, and I'm actually more offended by seeing a photo of Kirstie Alley or any other actress with the claim that they're a size (or two) smaller than they actually are. That kind if lying is what makes women feel indequate when they can't fit into a small size.

threelittlebaers 12 pts

I completely agree, health and fitness are so much more important than a number on a piece of clothing. I think that's why I love purses so much--no sizes!

lainierenee 23 pts

I understand your point of view, but at the end of the day it is up to the individual to embrace their appearance. I grew up during the 1980's and there were not very many people of color in the fashion magazines or on television for that matter. I have crazy curly hair and a broad nose. But, I chose to love myself and not allow someone's else standard beauty govern my life.

Littlebabyblog 5 pts

I'm sorry, I have a difficult time discussing the perceived realities of someone's appearance while looking at the most photoshopped picture in the history of the world. Kirstie Alley, while beautiful, is a 60 year old woman, who smoked for 20 years, and has fluctuated in weight by as much as 150 pounds throughout her life. She does not look like that. Maybe it would be easier to understand or debate Tim Gunn's comments if we were looking at an ACTUAL photo of Kirstie Alley.

JenTroester 8 pts

I am not a size 6, but I am smaller than Alley. What bothers me is when celebrities say they are a size this or that, when they clearly are not. Why? Because, frankly, it makes me feel bad! I look at her, and while she does look great, I wonder why there is this need to not just tell the truth. If she is a size 10+ why can't she just say that?! It makes me think that *I* must have a ridiculously wrong idea about my body if she is a 6...I must be way bigger than I thought (and I am very honest to myself about how I look). It's not about whether or not she looks good, b/c she DOES, and she did a tremendous amount of work to lose the weight and get into shape, what matters is not being honest at the end of the day. I have to agree with Tim Gunn...she's not a size 6, and I would like her a whole lot better as a "real" woman if she didn't say she was.

Polish Mama on the Prairie 44 pts

JenTroester

Amen! That's exactly how I feel about it! Whatever you are, OWN it! And if you can't, you need to take a good hard look at why you can't and fix that.

audreyh68 12 pts

JenTroester Like I've said since I originally wrote and posted this to my personal blog, there's a good chance, because of the vanity sizing issue, that Kirstie Alley doesn't even know what REAL size she is. And like I've said countless times over and over, it's not the size that's important...it's whether or not you're healthy.

As far as her not "owning it", I agree to a point. I think it's hard for anyone in that industry, to own up to their real weight or size. I don't think they should have to. It's none of our business. I do understand how someone looking at her, someone who might be shorter and weigh less but wear, oh a size 6 or an 8, could feel like saying, "My god! I must be a blimp is she's a size 4!" I do think there's this ludicrous pressure that society (which includes men like Tim Gunn, an integral part of the fashion industry which reinforces the message, "Thin at all costs!") places on women like Kirsite, to be a specific size...a size that indicates acceptance and their idea of beauty.

My point, when I wrote this, wasn't about Kirstie Alley's own perception of her size (she's obviously very pleased with where she is, regardless of whatever size she really is), it's the fact that Tim Gunn, knowing where the interview was going, made it the crux of the issue. *I* would have had so much more respect for him if he'd just stuck to the fact that we're too size conscious and that she looks amazing, rather than pointing out whatever HE thought she was or wasn't.

Polish Mama on the Prairie 44 pts

audreyh68JenTroester

Yeah, but that's not his job. Sorry, but it's not.

Polish Mama on the Prairie 44 pts

I'm really confused about this post. What does Kirstie Alley's size matter? What does what Tim Gun say matter? Who cares what celebrities say. Seriously.

And by the way, I think Alley looks great for her size and age. But let's not lose sight of the fact that when a person makes money off how they look, they are open to criticism about how they look. You can't model clothing targeted toward a demographic that you are not a part of. You can model it if it's targeted toward the demographic you fit into yourself.

A scientist cannot be a nuclear scientist if his IQ, training, degree, and talent lie in pharmaceutical development. That's life. Let's move on. Congrats on your weight loss and I wish you success in losing the rest.

audreyh68 12 pts

Polish Mama on the Prairie

It matters because for some reason, we, as a society LISTEN to these people and kill ourselves by trying to meet THEIR idea of perfection and beauty. Look at our daughters as they thumb through the pages of fashion magazines and then watch them look at themselves in the mirror, often with disgust, and then tell me that this conversation doesn't matter.

The fashion industry, as whole, markets itself to women who are NOT the average American woman, who is a size 14. Instead, they present us with these ridiculous outfits that only a size 0 could wear, and push our daughters (and sometimes our sons, too - a 2007 Harvard University study revealed that men account for 25 percent of people suffering from anorexia or bulimia) into trying to attain something unhealthy and often times unrealistic.

At the end of the day, it matters.

Polish Mama on the Prairie 44 pts

audreyh68

Then, here's the question, why do you allow yourself to care/listen/bother about them? Why? To me, that's the same issue as the issue Kirstie obviously has when she lies about her size. Find your sense of self worth from your inside and don't worry about what others say or do. I suggest that for Kirstie as well.

audreyh68 12 pts

Polish Mama on the Prairie It's really easy to say that, but it's not just me, or Kirstie you have to ask that question to...it's the millions of women the world over that care/listen and are bothered by it.

Finding a sense of self worth is not as simple as changing your underwear. For a lot of us, especially women like me, who have let ourselves get to the point where we're 5 years from dying, it takes time and hard work. It's not just the physical weight you have to lose, the but emotional fat that's piled up is almost as hard as the physical, to get rid of. And if you can't deal with what's eating you, there is no way you're going to be able to deal with what you're eating.

It's just not that simple. I wish it were, I genuinely do. The work I've had to do, to get to this place, where I can pretty much allow myself to think that maybe I might be worth saving, or that I'm not as ugly on the inside as I am on the outside, has been excruciating at times. It's compounded by the fact that society tells me I'm worthless, lazy, ignorant, because I'm not a "size perfect." It's hard to NOT worry about what others say and do when my value as a human is determined by a society who deems me worthless because I'm fat.

While I can't speak to Kirstie's emotional issues, I can assume that if she doesn't or hasn't worked them out, the remaining "Emotional Fat" she's dealing with is going to create a huge vacuum that's going to suck the physical fat back on.

Shelly65 5 pts

Why should someone cares or listen to what others say? How can you avoid it?? Polish Mama if you have never been obese then you can never understand that it's like to walk that road. Only someone who never struggled with this would say something like that. No offense, I know you think it should be that simple and wouldn't it be wonderful if it was, but it isn't. We all have hangups and issues, for an obese person it happens to be out there for all to see. Audrey I congratulate you on your weight loss! You are a beautiful woman!

elaine91 5 pts

We have to face it. Photos make us look ten pounds heavier then we look in real life. So people that are photographed more will want to be trim so when they see themselves in photos they look normal. Now for Kristi she is really proud of her self and wants to brag that she is a size 6 and she did it without drugs. She is finally happy and at her age and where she was last year at this time I would be screaming from the roof tops that I was a size six. Lets face it clothes look better and you can pretty much buy what ever you want and not worry about it. It pays to be healthy, fit and trim.

audreyh68 12 pts

elaine91 I'm not sure I understand your point.

I'm positive that Alley is absolutely elated to have lost all that weight. I'm finally allowing myself to be happy at the loss of 150lbs (despite STILL having 200 to go!) but it's not just about wanting to "look normal" in photographs. Well, let me rephrase that, it SHOULDN'T be what it's about...but it is. It's all about the exterior and because of that, we're killing ourselves while trying to be our "Photographic Best."

I don't want to die because I'm this fat...but I also don't want to kill myself in order to obtain some realistic ideal of what everyone else thinks I should be...whether it's a size 14, a size 6, or a size 10. I just want to be healthy and live in order to live...and not live to eat.

It does pay to be "healthy, fit and trim," . . . for the right reasons!

hellokittens 5 pts

Dress size doesn't matter and Tim was pointing that out. Sad that Kirstie feels like she has to tell People magazine what size she is now. Why can't she just say she feels good and let that photo speak for itself. Everyone knows that vanity sizes have gotten out of control to manipulate buyers. Tim gets it. Read Gunn's Golden Rules and you'll understand what a good human being he is.

audreyh68 12 pts

hellokittens I've read Gunn's Golden Rules and maybe superficially it appears he "gets it" but he really doesn't.

Like I said, I listened to the interview with Gunn in it's entirety and it was clear from the beginning that the guys interviewing him were going for the whole "size" issue, and Gunn responded in a way which made size *the* issue. The tactful thing to do, would have been to comment on how amazing she looks (I don't think anyone is going to argue that!) and then explain why SHE might THINK she is a certain size (the vanity sizing issue), but then reiterate why, at the end of the day, it doesn't matter.

My entire point is, despite Kirstie Alley herself going on about her perceived size (I'm not living in her closet, or her clothing for that matter, so I have no way of knowing what actual size she is), is that through this WHOLE THING, size has been the issue. Size 4, size 6, 8, or 10...doesn't matter! As long as it's a Size Healthy.

y2vonne 5 pts

<sigh> It is about the dress size. Because that's how you buy clothes. And, I think he was pointing out that a size 10 is equal to a size 6 - when a celebrity says that's her size. I think he wanted women who are a size 10 to feel good about themselves... that's what I think. Size is so varied, throughout the range of clothing women buy... it becomes a symbol of how we feel about ourselves. Women will forever and ever be equated to their size. For those who appreciate a woman of substance (not size but brain), dress size is just something applied to the clothing that fits. For those who think body size is what makes a woman worthy, only a size 4 or 6 will do. For most women, we just want to feel good in our clothes. So, we look for dresses in our "size" but...every store you visit will have a dress in a differing size...and I'm sorry, but I BET most women will buy a dress in a size 12 instead of 14, if they can. I do think this was a good post - very thought-provoking.

audreyh68 12 pts

y2vonne I was finally able to actually go back and LISTEN to the interview with him start started this whole ball rolling, and while I do appreciate Tim Gunn's explanation about vanity sizing; it was clear from the start that he made size the issue, and then, only later in the interview tried to soften the blow by stating that we're all too size conscious and then that the important thing was how we looked in our clothing.

Wow, sorry for the run-on sentence.

You're right, we do just want to feel good in our clothes. And the sizing issue is a major frustration I've heard uttered countless times. It's gone beyond frustrating and into the realm of "this is insane!" And yeah, you're right, it's like it is with shoes. While a size 9 is what's most comfortable, if we can manage to squish our feet into that petite looking size 7, we will. Again it's because we've equated that smaller number with somehow more validation of who we are on the inside, and put an awful lot of our self-worth into it as well.

Polish Mama on the Prairie 44 pts

audreyh68y2vonne

That's really sad. I have a size 9 1/2 shoe size and have realized that's how I was made. I mean, I'm tall for God's sake! How stupid would I look at my height with size 7 feet? I'd fall down all the time. I'm also a size 6. I'm not smug about that, that is my size and that's that. I care more about my health and eating right and exercising than a stupid number.

TBOMom 5 pts

Great post. What makes me crazy about the clothing sizes is how much they vary -- Kirstie could very well be a 6 in one outfit and a 10 or 12 in another. I know it shouldn't matter, but it is hard not to get fixated on the number. That's why I wish that if she is larger than a 6, she would just say so because she looks amazing and it would be great for those of us who aren't a 6 to see how awesome an 8, 10 or more can look.

audreyh68 12 pts

TBOMom This makes me crazy as well because now it's happening with children's clothing as well. I have a tall, very well proportioned 5 year old and the sizing issue at her age is nuts. And it shouldn't be! I've had mothers ask me what size she is - just when we're sitting around talking, and then they act like it's such a special think that they're 6 or 7 year old can still fit into size 5 bikini, or "Osh Kosh" skinny jeans from last year! Can they hear themselves? And it's all because we've been so programmed to think that stupid number on the tag is what matters most.

Hell, I'm happy when I can find skinny jeans for Gaby that are long enough, but don't fall of of her, consistently. What runs true to size at one retailers is either miles too big at another, or too small at the next.

Maybe I ought to take up sewing.

redwritinghood 17 pts

I think his comment was more about facing the reality of what size you are... if someone is really concerned about their weight and wants to lose it in a healthy way, i don't think lying to yourself or others is helpful at all. I agree with katecake that people don't have a clue what a 6 or an 8 is, but I think it also has a lot to do with deceptive clothing ... the size 10 jeans that have mostly spandex in them and bag out... I was a size 14 and I could fit into them. So was I a size 10 or a size 14?

I do agree that it's not really about the number. It's about health, but I don't think it's possible to make a positive step in the right direction to lie about the size you're wearing.

Or maybe I'm just speaking to myself. I was a size 14 last September and depending on the day am a 9 or a 10 now. Again, depending on the day and the specific jeans I'm putting on. But over the last year I've become much more obsessed with how I feel and how much healthier I am than what size I'm in.

audreyh68 12 pts

redwritinghood I am SO glad to hear you step up and say you've become much more obsessed with how you FEEL and how much healthier you are vs that number on the tag inside your blouse/jeans! That's a message that we need to be sending to not only one another, but especially to our daughters.

I don't know what Kirstie Alley's REAL size is, and I don't care. I'm sure, being that she's very close to several designers and has the money to make it happen, she could conceivably say that she wants to be in a size 4 and she's handed a "Size 4" and oddly enough, it fits.

I don't like to think that she's being intentionally disingenuous about her size or weight, because at the end of the day, it does her and the rest of us trying to not equate size with self-worth, a huge disservice. And, it shows that she really hasn't dealt with the inner, "emotional fat" that led her to gain, lose, and then regain the weight again. I hope she can keep it off, more than anything I hope this is a permanent lifestyle change, but if she's being dishonest with herself (more than to anyone else), chances are, she'll repeat behaviors that got her there in the first place.

Conversation from Facebook

Polish Mama on the Prairie
Polish Mama on the Prairie

I really don't feel like going back and quoting you countless times. I wish you luck in your weight loss endeavors and I hope that you see that I and others want to support you (I'm not really going to support Kirstie though, she's getting rich off it either way and this is her job and she made her size public business & made money off it for years) but the comments you made about the thin women were hurtful. But I know you don't see that. So, good luck with your weight loss endeavors. Whatever you do. It doesn't affect me any more than Kirstie or Tim do.

Audrey Watters Holden
Audrey Watters Holden

Polish Mama on the Prairie, I have never once made this about the emotional baggage of fat women vs. thin women. Show me where I have said that the crap we get as fat people is more worthy of consideration than the crap thin women get?

Tim Gunn wasn't making comments about an actress who went from a size -0 to a 2 and who's claiming she's a size 8. Because in all honesty, it probably wouldn't have been something anyone paid attention to.

You're taking an image I posted that I used to depict unrealistic ideals that society places on ALL women and inferring that I feel my emotional baggage, as a morbidly obese woman, is more important than someone who gets asked on a daily basis whether she's vomiting her most recent meal, or starving herself.

Audrey Watters Holden
Audrey Watters Holden

Skeeter Bess, I have never demeaned a thin woman...the point of my comment about the red outfit was that the fashion industry tries to perpetrate the myth (that all too many of us buy into, some of us killing ourselves to do it) that what I depicted by using that photo, was the norm. Those fashions are marketed to women who are often unrealistically thin and because of the industry they are in, they're forced to stay that way, often times to the detriment to their health. The fashion industry tells us that image, the one I posted, is perfect and that's the standard to which we should all attain.

What I did say, in writing this piece, and several times over, is that size SHOULDN'T matter. What mattes (and God, this sounds so cliche, but it's true!), is what's inside. Size shouldn't matter but in our society it does. Society, as a whole places our worth on it, and as long as we sit back and excuse comments about size as "catty" or "it's his job", then nothing will ever change.

Polish Mama on the Prairie
Polish Mama on the Prairie

Audrey, I have to agree with Skeeter. You do come across as saying that you and Kirstie emotional baggage as heavy people (and Kirstie's a bit because she is in the business of looking good) is more important and worthy of respect and consideration than those who are thin. Perhaps that's not what you mean. But if that is the case, then I would ask that you consider that perhaps Tim Gunn wasn't calling Kirstie a fat tub who was unworthy and then "softening the blow" than you were calling that model a worthless toothpick and making absolutely no apologies for it. It comes across as you attacking her and others who are thin and blaming them for your own issues.

Angela DiMeglio Mitchell
Angela DiMeglio Mitchell

I'm as much against the marketing of unrealistic images of women in the media as the next person, but I really draw the line when the big girls bash the small girls in an effort to make a point. As a small girl, I also didn't choose to be this way. If size is only a number, get your point across without calling the small women "malnurished" "babies" or "starving." I'm far from staving but I give really big hugs.

Polish Mama on the Prairie
Polish Mama on the Prairie

Oh, Skeeter! HUGS! HUGS!

Skeeter Bess
Skeeter Bess

If you're a fan of Project Runway you must surely know that Tim Gunn's snarkiness is a selling point for his public persona. Don't we all cringe in mock horror when he slices and dices someone's best effort? And isn't it at least a small part of the show's success? Sometimes we agree with his opinion and sometimes we don't, but his comments about Kirstie's dress size(s) merely make me shrug and think, "That's Tim Gunn being Tim Gunn." Can I address another issue, though, that seems to have flown right past you? Most who have joined this conversation are quick to point out that "size doesn't matter" and to defend larger women. I agree: size is not the measure of a woman and should be of concern only to the individual involved. You, audryh68, apparently, don't believe your own words, as evidenced by your comments about the overly-thin model. We are both in agreement that she is not the norm and I deplore, with so many others, the damage that such "ideals" inflict on women, and on young women and girls in particular. But listen to yourself describing her: "While this might be the norm in your world, in the world I live in, I can't figure out whether she's got a role in a movie about third world starvation, or if the outfit she's modeling is being marketed to anyone larger than a premature infant?" Re-read one of the comments beneath your piece: "That poor famine victim in the $10,000 bathing suit ..." Do you see your own prejudices? Believe it or not, there are those of us who hurt when we hear those words, because we know that that shape is the norm ... for us. Not a single person participating in this conversation would dream of saying "That fat woman needs enough fabric to clothe a third-world nation just to cover her butt," yet most of you feel that it's perfectly okay to ridicule those of us who struggle on the other end of the weigh-loss spectrum. At least once a week I hear from a casual acquaintance or even a perfect stranger some snide and biting (or, worse yet, "concerned") comment about my size. A little part of me died the last time I weighed in at the doctor's office because I'd lost ten precious pounds - almost ten percent of my total weight. I have the same problems as large women when it comes to finding clothes that fit - especially when I lose so much that I have to shop in the children't departments. We're more alike than we are different. So could you do me a favor please? The next time you find yourself thinking or saying that size doesn't matter, give yourself a mental picture of one of those medical charts that shows body sizes and shapes from emaciated to grossly obese. Look at all of the shapes and sizes and remind yourself that people do indeed come in all shapes and sizes. THEN remind yourself that size does not matter and is not the measure of a woman. Could you do that for me, please, and for everyone who doesn't come wrapped in whatever you picture as a normal, perfect package? Thank you.

Audrey Watters Holden
Audrey Watters Holden

I will admit, after reading and trying to respond to the comments on my original blog post, and now all the comments over on BlogHer, that I was not aware of the fact that she's had any sort of "history" of being untruthful about her weight. I also didn't know she was touting a weight loss system of some sort. However, that wasn't the point I was trying to make.

Alley talks about her size because in her superficial world, that's what matters, and it sucks that it matter. I can say that I relate [to the suckage] to a certain degree (not just because I'm morbidly obese) because all the years I spent as a DJ at commercial radio stations across the US, I learned that despite being behind a mic, my weight still affected what sort of promotional gigs I was given (that usually pay VERY WELL!) or wasn't given.

I can't even count how many times I've heard, "You're beautiful but you're fat. It's not the image we want for our radio station." Kirstie Alley lives this every single day of her life. It's not a license to fabricate how much she weighs or what size she is, but then I don't really understand why we have to make it our business to begin with, unless she's sitting there touting a system that will enable us to go from a size fat to a size fabulous. Is that what she's doing? I don't know.

When I wrote my post, it was after reading the site I cited in my post. It didn't mention the on-air interview that Tim Gunn gave, where his original comments were mined. So I went back and listened to the interview in it's entirety and it was clearly obvious what the guys interviewing him were gunning for and Tim went ahead and ran with it, emphasizing what she ISN'T and then softening the blow by stating she looked great and aren't we all too size conscious anyways. Why couldn't he have just started and ended with his explanation of vanity sizing, his compliments and left it at that? In answer to that question people have responded that it's not his job. Well, to that I say, his job - or his industry has made far too much of a focus on the superficial and being a "Size Perfect" and look where that's gotten us... look at how are daughters and sons view themselves as a result of all of this and tell me his comments don't matter.

Fat-Shaming and Size-Shaming have already done enough damage in our society and to that end, I'm still not understanding why Gunn even had to "go there" in the first place.

Jayme Kubo
Jayme Kubo

I think it would be easier to see how the whole debate about her size got started if we weren't looking at a picture where she's photoshopped to within an inch of her LIFE. She's a beautiful woman, always has been, but she doesn't look like that, and she is not a size 4 or 6, just like the hotties in the picture probably don't have stomach muscles like that IRL.

Allison Currie
Allison Currie

No one should focus on weight before anything but unfortunatley we do. There are two factors here however that led to these comments being made about her size, 1. she has been talking about her size for years now, from when she was at her heaviest to her lightest...she put that struggle out there so she has to accept the feedback. 2. As mentioned above, he is a fashion consultant...size is something you talk about when talking about clothes. I agree his comments, in the big picture, are crappy but I think that part of embracing who you are at whaever size is about letting these things roll off your back because if you are truly comfortable with yourself, these comments dont matter. I have worked hard to feel healthy and strong, have my clothes fit the way I want and although I am not a size 3 (in fact I can range from a size 6 to a size 8-10 the way all clothes fit differently these days) and never will be I am 100% confident now with how I look. For me its not about a number on a scale.

Jen Pattison Troester
Jen Pattison Troester

It is great she lost so much weight, but Alley is not being truthful saying she is a size 6. We, as woman, know what a size 6 looks like, and she is not it. I hate when celebrities lie about their size. It is always so obvious and does nothing to help regular woman feel any better about themselves. I am a 10, and I am smaller than Alley...I can be honest about what size clothes I wear, why can't she?

Polish Mama on the Prairie
Polish Mama on the Prairie

I'm going to be the one considered mean here. But his job is to be a fashion consultant. That was part of his job. Gasp. I know. Her job is to be paid for how she looks. Gasp. I know. And really, how does it affect you and I? It doesn't.

Janelle Whye
Janelle Whye

your dress size has nothing to do with the person you are! sz 6 or16 beauty has no size, wish folks werent so obsessed with fiitting a cookie cutter mold.

BlogHer
BlogHer

Y'all make an interesting point... she mentioned size to start with and she has a history of not being quite truthful. Maybe that does give others license to comment? Interesting. - Denise

Julie Kemps-Rowley
Julie Kemps-Rowley

Kudos to her but she always lies about her weight and dress size to the media. At her heaviest she said she weighed 200 lbs. Ahem. I think she forgot the additional 75 lbs on her butt. If she was honest he wouldn't have said anything. Maybe she should be more discreet about her weight.

Susan Essex
Susan Essex

I think if SHE puts her size out there, she opens herself up to commentary. When I heard her say her size, I thought "no way." I wish Kirstie would own her size instead skewing reality.

Valerie Field
Valerie Field

WOW, I remember her on DWTS and this photo she looks FANTASTIC!!!!!!!!

Kari O&amp;#39;Driscoll
Kari O&amp;#39;Driscoll

I think the fact that he pointed it out just shows that his underlying fear revolves around his physicality. Mentioning someone else's flaws is a way to point out that you don't have them. Snark!

Jessie Matthews
Jessie Matthews

It doesn't matter what size she is. She looks AMAZING! It's just more media pressure and hype to be a size 2 or a size 0 or whatever. Once again teaching women of all ages, races, body shapes and backgrounds that the number on the tag is supposed to determine your self worth. BIG thumbs down to Tim Gunn.

Female Equality Matters
Female Equality Matters

He needs to shut it. Size 10 is size awesome.