Bio
For now, I can only marvel that I am still here. I am fairly grumpy, willfully sardonic but have occasional outbreaks of perkiness - though I underst...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Death of Oprah's Puppy Raises Questions, Such As ...Is This News?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Between Oprah's dog, Gracie, choking to death on a ball last summer and Martha Stewart's chow, Genghis Khan, recently perishing in a kennel fire - it's been a hazardous stretch for celebrity pooches. Now, Oprah has also lost one of her 8-week-old puppies, Ivan, to Parvovirus. Oprah had adopted two puppies from the PAWS Chicago shelter and introduced them on her March 6 show. Sad, of course, but the media coverage has also raised some questions about priorities during a time of national crisis.

First, some info on Parvovirus, an infectious disease that attacks the gastrointestinal tract. It is transmitted from dog to dog through contact with feces, usually when the animal steps in it and then licks its paws. Parvo symptoms resemble the effects of cholera in humans and early signs are lethargic behavior and diarrhea. The veterinarian blog, Dolittler, has a wonderfully fair and informative post on this matter:

"It’s a subject veterinarians hate to raise. But it’s a fact: Shelter dogs can harbor diseases we’d rather not think about when recommending shelter adoptions over other means of pet acquisition. Not if we want the unwanted to be granted loving homes. Mitigating the pet overpopulation crisis through increased adoptions from shelters and rescues is crucial to these efforts. That’s why when Oprah’s pups get Parvo it’s not exactly welcome news––on many levels."

Fact is, anything related to Oprah - and her dogs - is news. Whether you are a bookseller or a cattle rancher, many welcome and/or fear what messages may come out of that powerful mouth. Animal folks are hoping that she educates the masses on the dangers of Parvo but continues to adopt from shelters, a gesture much needed during this era of 'foreclosure pets'.

 

 

Fact is, anything related to Oprah - and her dogs - is news. Whether you are a bookseller or a cattle rancher, many welcome and/or fear what messages may come out of that powerful mouth. Animal folks are hoping that she educates the masses on the dangers of Parvo but continues to adopt from shelters, a gesture much needed during this era of 'foreclosure pets'.

However, 70 percent of the reader comments of the Chicago Sun-Times' Oprah blog - people that read it because they so love all things Oprah - have a different viewpoint. A sampling of comments:

"Why is this a top story? Front page news?"

"who cares"

"If she would just stop eating all of their food"

"Sorry, but this time I have to add my 2 cents. Why is this worthy of more than a passing sentence in a gossip column? This simply is not news. It's not even interesting."

"This is a joke right? American's losing their jobs, their homes and this is what passes for news?"

"Pathetic."

"This is not news. Just because it is Oprah it is in the newspaper."

"Are we sure she didn't eat him?"

"I love dogs, I have dogs - but since when is this a Front Page news breaking story?!"

"Slow news day?"

Many of the reader comments at the Chicago Tribune's Breaking News blog (mixed in with those expressing true sympathy) echo this confusion and, in some cases, rage:

"Why is the death of Oprah's puppy being given as much attention as the shooting death of another Chicago teenager? How insensitive and irresponsible can you be? Don't journalists have standards?"

"I wonder if Col. Tribune would call this "Breaking News". Great one more story that affects 1 person..... how is that news."

"the tribune should be ashamed of themselves for actually calling this news. People are losing jobs, we are in a recession and this is news?"

Of course, among my least-favorite things, sick and/or dead puppies - regardless of owner identity - is pretty high up there. However, even when crafting a serious attempt at this post, I had to ask myself: "If this were your neighbor's dog, would you be writing this post?" Maybe. Maybe not. If it were my dog then yes, for sure.

One level-headed reader on the Tribune blog, C.M.C., jumped in to offer an explanation:

"It's news because the dogs were on Oprah and millions of people watched it and connected with the story. It's called follow up. It's also news

  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
christinajeanne 5 pts

I didn't know oprahs dog gracie died last summer. I heard about the puppy and parvo. Any puppy can get parvo it is very contgious so it is not just from adopting shelter dogs. There are so many animals that need homes. If caught early parvo can be cured. My dog had it as a puppy and he lived. If they have upset stomachs and are puppies and have been around other dogs take them to the vet as soon as possible. Do not wait!

Lisse 5 pts

B.

Poor Pup! I don't watch Oprah, but I am aware of the upside of her influence.  I think she uses it mostly for good.

Ok, it might not be "breaking newsworthy" but there are far, far worse (as in trashy) pop culture stories that take up media space to complain about. This isn't one of them. 

- Lisse

@ Home in the World: International Adoption and Other Travels ( http://homeintheworld.typepad.com )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Thanks so much for playing my little game, ladies. I'm relieved that the poll helped reveal that I was on the right track for covering this. The more information, the better when it comes to keeping dogs healthy. 

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

vomviersen 5 pts

As a "psycho dog person" whose breed of choice (Rottweiler) is one that is particularly susceptible to canine parvovirus, the recognition, treatment and prevention of the disease might not be news to me. But it could be vitally important new information to those who are considering adopting or purchasing a new canine family member.

I am not now, nor have I ever been a fan of Oprah, but I feel horrible for her dog's death, as I would for any dog and owner who has to go through this horrible disease. Whether I personally like her or not, her wide sphere of influence is undeniable. If this sad incident can educate others, there would be at least one thing good that came out of it.

vomviersen :: Kathi Wilson
http://brilliant-disguise.net/looktwice/

Debra Roby 5 pts

B

Using a celebrity to educate the population on an issue has been going on for decades. The news media was simply using Oprah's loss to help spread the news about Parvo (a truly serious and devastating disease among dogs). Parvo usually shows up in the spring and has been known to wipe out entire canine populations in shelters. Being aware of the disease -and the need for care and vaccinations to prevent it- IS news.

Debra
A Stitch In Time ( http://astitchintime.blogspot.com )
Weight for Deb ( http://weightfordeb.wordpress.com )

sylinthecity 5 pts

B

My little sister's bf gave her a puppy for her bday and about a month later it (rapidly, bloodily, and unexpectedly) succumbed to parvo. She was devasted. She said there were no signs beforehand, the vet tried his best, and the poor thing really suffered. Even if it's not the MOST important story breaking in the world today, I believe any item of news that spreads helpful information to others is valid. For people with puppies, this parvo stuff might be priority number one. You never know :-(

http://www.somewherethesunisrising.com