Bio
For now, I can only marvel that I am still here. I am fairly grumpy, willfully sardonic but have occasional outbreaks of perkiness - though I underst...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Definition of 'Service Animal' Hotly Debated: Monkeys, Horses, Birds - Oh my!

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

While we recognize guide dogs for the blind, plenty of other kind beasts are helping out humans in need - causing some to cry fowl. Monkeys for quadriplegia, goats for muscular dystrophy and parrots for psychosis?  And cats, ferrets, pigs and ducks? For anxiety. Don't forget the guide miniature horses. Thanks to the dogged efforts of reporter Rebecca Skloot, we’ve learned that all non-canine service animals are threatened to become 'declassified' as service animals by the Department of Justice.

Under the Bush administration, the U.S. government was considering a proposal that would alter the use of non-canine service animals.  Apparently, a growing number of people believe the world of service animals has gotten out of hand. The Americans With Disabilities Act (A.D.A.) requires that service animals be allowed wherever their owners go but challenges from business owners and communities have challenged what constitutes a service animal to begin with and what species should be excluded.

Evidently, while some humanoids enjoy the sight of a miniature horse on a city street or a monkey doing some light shopping, it freaks out others. There also exists a growing suspicion that some abuse the law to get special pet privileges. Increasingly, business owners, landlords and city officials are challenging the legitimacy of non-canine service animals and are refusing to accommodate them. In turn, animal owners are responding with lawsuits and complaints to the Department of Justice.

As Skloot recently reported on her blog, Culture Dish:

"It turns out that the DOJ changes to the Americans With Disabilities Act were the only regulations under review by the Office of Management and Budget that weren't approved before Obama was inaugurated as president ... What this means for the Americans With Disabilities Act and the proposed species ban isn't clear.  With the Obama administration will come a new head of the DOJ and everything else.  Whether the new administration will reject these Bush administration regulations and come up with ADA changes of its own is an open question at this point.  But as it stands, the species ban was not given final approval before today, and therefore isn't in effect yet ... so for the time being, monkeys, miniature horses, parrots, ducks and everything else can legally qualify as service animals."

Though temporarily put on the back burner (Does Obama have his hands full or what?), the issue won't be going away any time soon.

In the United States, service animals don't need to provide ID or other paperwork denoting that status, though in Canada, service dogs must be certified. Many disability advocates prefer the U.S. system, because it allows people who use service animals to integrate more fully into society. Meanwhile, other activists prefer a national ID and testing system for service animals, citing the many reports of ill-behaved 'service animals' which creates a poor impression of all service animals.

It's become a contentious issue in the disabled community. This past summer, the Arizona Game and Fish Department ordered a woman to get rid of her chimpanzee, claiming that she brought it into the state illegally. She disputed this and sued for discrimination, arguing that it was a diabetes-assistance chimp trained to fetch sugar during hypoglycemic episodes.

Then there's the ferret that was banned from Ottawa buses after the owner insisted the animal was needed to help her avoid panic attacks. Of course, there's Richard and Rose - the monkey-human duo that go everywhere together ... except Wal-Mart. The examples are endless.

Otherwise, many of these non-canine types have a large community of support. Take The Guide Horse Foundation, which has been around nearly a decade. They extol the benefits of miniature horses as "mild-mannered, trainable and less threatening than large dogs. They’re naturally cautious and have exceptional vision, with eyes set far apart for nearly 360-degree range. Plus, they’re herd animals, so they instinctively synchronize their movements with others."

The biggest advantage they point to is life span. Miniature horses can live and work for more than 30 years. In that time, a blind person typically goes through five to seven guide dogs. That can be draining both emotionally and economically, because each one can cost up to $60,000 to breed, train and place in a home.

Obviously, there are also limitations. The small horses eat far more than dogs and go to the bathroom about every

  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
elizabethwinchell@gmail.com 5 pts

The service animal law is changing on March 15, 2011, and from then on only "dogs" will be legally recognized as service animals. There is no exception in the law for dog-allergic disabled people needing an animal. Protest this unfair law by signing the petition.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/3/Save-Our-Service-...

Sutton 5 pts

I am disabled as defined by the Social Security Disability Federal Court Case I won Years Ago. I have used Sugar Gliders as my Service Animals now officially for about 5 years now. I started documenting their Public Access Training on my YouTube site but I never told people they were being trained for Service Animals because I don't want people poking at what my disability's are or might be.... Frankly it is none of anyones business.

Anyway I have always said if you don't like a law then Challenge and Change it.. Well I am practicing what I preach. I have filed a Federal Court Case in NC because they have developed a pattern and a history of discriminating against ALL ADA Service Animal Users like me who has ever tried to be in compliance with NC State Service Animal Laws (Which conflict with the ADA)

I have the perfect invisible service animals for my invisible disabilities and if trained properly then for the most part no one will see them on you. They are classified as "Pocket Pets" for USDA enforcement and not listed in an Exotic Animal class for Enforcement Purposes.

I am Pro-Se 3:10-CV-355-RJC-DCK in the Western District US Court NC Clt. Division.

I need an operation and the hospital and many others are violating State and the ADA and the 14th Amended US Constitution. And with the new law changing I am challenging that too. These well represented folks think me being disabled and on social security disability income is going to prevent me from going after them because of my low income...

A Judge approved for me to fight them without having to pay any court fees. So now when I need anyone served the US Marshals Office Serves them for me.... If I didn't have a merit worthy case I do not think the Judge would have approved all that to begin with...

If I loose it will force me to go BACK on medications I haven't needed for years as a result of just one of the tasks that they provide for me. I do not want to have a "BILLBOARD SERVICE ANIMAL"

I am sick of the BULLYING too that I have been put threw by all the Defendants involved too......

hiedi 5 pts

I am 42 years old and was paralyzed 2 years ago.  I have lived this issue on both sides of the fence and i can say unless you are walking in the shoes with this handicapped individual...don't get involved!  When my life changed so did what i thought about certain issues..changed too! A service monkey brought into a rehab shortly after my injury is what gave me a focus that was the ONLY facsinating thing i thought i would ever feel again..If a monkey could change my tears to laughter i thought to myself..then if she could do it ..i could do it too..I at least had my arms she didnt..This service monkey gave her someting to drink..combed her hair..scratched her chin cause she couldnt..When you lose that independence you lose your soul and if an animal can help her overcome those struggles and most of all put a smile on her face and a will to go on..no matter what the breed (within the limits) the it a precious thing.not a slave trade or against animal rights these service animals must feel the love and companionship of thier owners enough that the bond between the human and animal is so meaningful and important that being in the wild cant compare...I beLieve a monkey is very appropriate for who they serve as is the see doogs and horses..yes it can go to far,..A service animal has to perform deeds for that person that is disabled.

I have witnessed and felt this compassion and its the most precious gift i have ever felt..yes family is important..but i had no family support and even if i did it doesnt give you the independence if anything to us..its likely to be embarrassing...its a tremendous thing...Instead of tryin to change the laws and fight to prohibit what breed they have to be...educate people and try to encourage the ones that abuse the system so they can have an animal as a pet to respect the disabled population who rely on this service and find other means to have a pet. 

hiedi 5 pts

i have some information on registering a cappuchin to be a service animal...im not rtying to sell you anything..i have one..

dowens 5 pts

I have a severe to profound hearing impairment. My loss get worst with each passsing year. 12 years ago I purchased a capuchin monkey for my husband and I to train  to be my service hearing monkey. She was trained at home but I followed many of the guidlines that Helping Hands use.My vet is one used by Helping Hands monkeys  that are used in Texas. There were no professional organizatons to train  animals to help the deaf other than dogs. I am allergic to dogs. My capuchin  now  is able to alert me in my home of sounds that hearing people take for granted. She is trained to move fulling in the house without a leash and also can be out on the back patio and was trained by using mask and prop dummies to learn to stay in the boundaries of the patio when let outside. I have had much success with the training.She is learning more as my loss gets worst and I am in need of  more assistance. How the helping Hands have done a wonderful job training the monkeys to help the quageplegic but they refuse to look at any other monkey as a service animal other than their own. They show no support for my need of my service animal.This seems so unfair to me. The ADA allowed people to train  their own animals to be service animals to assist   to the individual needs of the disabled but now all of a sudden my monkey is not professionaly trained so they are not accecped in the "primate captive" bill that was introduced" because my monkey was not trained professionally and I am not in a wheel chair.So my handicap is nothing just like it is to insurance companies who will not help pay the cost of hearing aids. I am so tired of having my rights taken away or my needs ignored while other people's  needs seem to be more important and validated

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Melissa,

I understand your point here - allergies can be deadly. However, I have take issue with your suggestion that human guides can be used in place of these service animals. The cost to pay for a full-time human caregiver is quite beyond mosst people in this situation. An animal, which is also costly, seems like the only viable solution.

I do agree that people should provide proof of need for a service animal. Seems only fair and it keeps everyone honest. 

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Clearly, you have dealt with the reality of the situation. You're right, service dogs - or any service animal, for that matter - are not perfect. Kind of like humans, eh? 

Bottom line, people need to be more understanding of these animals in our midsts. I sure hope we some relaxation in this issue.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

MLOKnitting 5 pts

As someone with the hidden disability of allergy, my life can, conceivably, actually be threatened by a service animal in my presence.  While I believe in the use of guide animals, I truly believe human needs should come first.  Human guides and helpers can often be used instead of animals in many situations.  

 Despite what some would tell you, people can die from anaphylaxis from dander exposure.  Yes, it is rare.  Also, animal allergies are common and decrease productivity in the workplace.  This is not something made up.  There has to be balance between the needs of various groups.

Honestly, I have no problem requiring proof of need for a service animal from a physician. With the ADA, with a severe allergy that sends me into anaphylaxis immediately due to airborne exposure to popcorn, I had to present several letters to get any kind of accommodation. It is not unreasonable to ask and receive of proof that a service animal is required for a hidden disability - or even a visible disability.  This is especially true when there are other options available.

MLO / Melissa

foreverinbluejeansbabe 5 pts

I am disabled and am now living with my second service dog. My first dog died of cancer after 10 years of service and my second dog has been with me 2 years. During that 12 years I have lived in 4 cities - 5 apartments and 1 house. Two of the apartments were Section 8 and 3 were university housing.

 One of the problems with demanding proof of the need for or training of service animals is that money is usually involved. I had to have verification of disability for Section 8 apartments and university housing. This involved doctor's visits that were paid for by Medicaid. I didn't have to pay but the state did. I also had to have vet records and verification - I had to pay for. I didn't have to have proof of training but I did have to disclose how the service animal helps me. This is all under the current system. Moving into rental property is not as easy as saying I'm disabled and I have a service animal.

If a service animal is causing problems then the animal can be asked to leave. For example if a dog is making inappropriate noise in a movie theater the dog can be asked to leave.

If a person doesn't like animals then that is their problem. I lived on the eleventh floor of university housing. Some of the people from other countries were afraid of my dog or had cultural beliefs that made them not want to be around dogs. I had the right to ride the elevator with my dog without being people bothering me or my dog. If they didn't like dogs they could get off the elevator or wait until the next elevator.

If my dog growled, barked, jumped on or in other ways threatened someone then the dog would be out of line. This never happened even though people had to carry food and trash on the elevator. Food and trash can be interesting and hard for even service dogs to ignore on a small elevator. Service dogs are not perfect and have their strengths and weaknesses.

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Yeah, I've heard that about ferrets. I was surprised to discover how intuitive and useful they are as a service animal. 

However, no matter what the law, there are always going to be those who abuse it. It's the nature of humans, clearly not as pure-hearted as the ferret. 

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Hey D,

Always happy to pile more into that busy brain of yours ... I think this issue is coming up more and more as disabled folks look to other species to help lead their full lives. I can see both sides here but really think people should get over the horses and monkey fears. They are clearly well trained and those that depend on them, can't imagine giving them up. Same for blind folks with their seeing-eye dogs. 

I hate to see/read about these ridiculous wars going on over the definition. I think there does need to be some legislation that protects both humans and animals from unneccesary persecution and exclusion. I think this is what lies at the heart of all this; we need a national standard and a clear definition that is informed and up-to-date. 

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

telemna 5 pts

Ferrets have also been used to help autistic children to become more responsive and interactive, and to detect seizures before they occur.  They are intelligent and can be kept by people with allergies to some other types of animals.

As someone with glaucoma who is very allergic to dogs I also help that service animals that I can utilize remain an option in case I ever need them.

Yes, I know there are some people who have misused the claim of service animals for their convenience, but that is not the fault of the animals who help make life healthier and fuller for others, nor the fault of people with real needs.  

Prosecute the abusers rather than hurting victims.  What is being proposed is akin to punishing those who have asthma and can't use steroids because those who don't have asthma have misused the inhalant meds to make illegal drugs.  Oh, wait, that happened under the Bush Administration, too, with useful medications being removed.

Denise 9 pts moderator

We have a 'service dog' living in my house but and I've been sort of interested in what his skills are that classify him as such. He's supposed to have been "trained" in some way or another and there are rumors that he can detect seizures before they occur. I've never seen the dog in action so call me slightly skeptical for now.

Then, the other night TW was reading a book from a series and said "remind me why she has a service dog" and I was confused, didn't remember the heroine having one. When I was reading the book a few days later, the dog was described as a "therapy dog" in some areas and a "service dog" in others.

I re-opened the discussion about this book with TW who was reminded that her mom indicated that she is concerned that their dog may be "tracked down and put to sleep" if anyone finds out the service dog is no longer living with the disabled person...

This led me to put down my book and start surfing for info about why service dogs might be put to sleep. I didn't find anything that indicates this would happen but did find more blog discussions than I care to count that had turned into full out WARS over what was a service animal, what wasn't a service animal and who and when those service animals should be used.

Those folks scared me.

Now here's your post with what I'm hoping are sane, less than angry discussion links. I'm going to click... and wonder what I'd think if I was sitting in a restaurant and a disabled person came in with a miniature horse. Fascinating.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager

Flamingo House Happenings ( http://www.flamingohouse.net/ )