Blog
PunditMom
Bio
Joanne Bamberger is a recovering attorney, writer, political analyst and political/media consultant living in the shadow of the nation’s capital....
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Do We Really Need a Presidential Commission on Women?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

So far American women are doing pretty well since President Barack Obama took office. He's only been President for a month, and already he's signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which will hopefully go a long way toward getting women equal pay for equal work in this country.

But many are calling on the new president to create a Presidential Commission on Women, to bring together advocates of women's issues to see what else should be done. Many are advocating for it, but I have to wonder whether such a commission will be helpful. The last time we had one John Kennedy was president and the goals of his commission focused on equal treatment of women in the workplace and creating more equal opportunities for women in the workforce.

That was in the early 1960s and we know how things have changed, or not, in the decades since then. Women are still only getting paid 78 cents for every dollar a man makes for similar work. I would have hoped we would be closer to parity at this stage of the game.

So why should we think that a new Commission for Women would bring us anything this time?

We know what needs to be done, so why not just do it? Isn't it time to write the legislation that we all know needs to be written to put women on a level playing field with men and get our lawmakers to vote on it?

Some who advocate for a commission say we need it because our voices must be part of the discussion. For example, WomenCount has an online petition calling for such a Commission which would supposedly bring together lots of big thinkers to weigh in on where we should go from here.

Linda Tarr-Whelan, at the blog of National Women's Editorial Forum, believes we should have such a political panel:

In the Clinton administration, as the CEO of a nonprofit, I worked closely with Betsy Myers, later head of Women for Obama, and others who headed the Office of Women's Outreach. All of us found it difficult to deliver the president's agenda for women without Cabinet status. ...

All of these offices were cut out by the Bush administration -- ... President [Obama] will face a clean slate and a pressing need. [President] Obama -- and all of us -- will be well-served by taking on board the full recommendation of an integrated approach on women led by a Cabinet-level Office on Women.

Now THAT would be getting us somewhere.

Yes we, as women, were the key to the outcome of the 2008 election and we should not be ignored in terms of the new administration's agenda. I just wonder if there isn't a more direct way to move us forward other than creating another commission.

If it would do some good, I'm all for it. But I really would hate to see another commission formed to talk about issues when we know we should just put our noses to the grindstone and get things done.

Joanne Bamberger is a News & Politics Contributing Editor for BlogHer. She's always talking about lots of political stuff that impacts women at her place, PunditMom.

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
gsteinum 5 pts

politics by nature is beaurocratic. part of the process is a commission. i'm not sure which is more effective, a senate sub-commitee or a commission, but i suspect the later is more effective and expedient (that is expedient in dc time). my thinking is better a comission than nothing.  what would be really nice would be a cabinet position, such a secretary of women's issues.

nellewrites 6 pts

and factoring in politics, by the time the Commission puts forth a report, it is election season again, with election season dynamics (nothing gets done, but a lot of promises get tossed our way.) 

nelle ( http://refractivethoughts.org/ )

/

llhaesa ( http://llhaesa.org/ )

PunditMom 5 pts

.... is that a Commission lets people off the hook. It allows them to say we're talking, we're studying, we're analyzing, without actually taking action. we can't let Obama off the hook in that way.

nellewrites 6 pts

A commission in and of itself is talk. Talk is a starting point, but if it stops at talk, if it goes out, writes a report that is released say... fifteeen months from now, we talk on the report and move on, not a damn thing gets accomplished.

Just the act of establishing such an entity will do nothing. Not until we take actual concrete measures do things begin to change, which is why I so strongly advocate for ERA. It is unconscionable that Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia have chosen not to ratify this amendment.

nelle ( http://refractivethoughts.org/ )

/

llhaesa ( http://llhaesa.org/ )

shawnk 5 pts

PunditMom,

I appreciate the thoughtful questions your blog poses. However, you make two very BIG assumptions. One, you assume that nothing has changed or improved based off of the dialogue born from JFK's Commission on the Status of Women. Two, you assume that we ALL know what needs to be done.

We need much more than just legislation. Lilly Ledbetter was a great victory, but just one small step towards a bigger goal. We need to change the way our country collectively thinks about women. A Presidential Commission would create a much needed, public dialogue on the issues that women face and the steps we need to take to address those issues.

Why we need a Presidential Commission on Women ( http://www.fem2pt0.com/?p=250 )

sgranger 5 pts

 All of your points are good ones - I share your skepticism regarding results.  In California and in Illinois, there have been recent examples of successful commissions on women that have brought added attention to many issues important to women and they have brought more women into the political process.  And if a commission is the best step toward an Office on Women, that could be good too.

The fact that you're expressing what you want to see in a commission is extremely important, because we need as many voices out there advocating on behalf of what you want to see the commission do.  Let's keep this discussion going and if we can create a list of goals for the commission, we can submit it to those who officially propose it.

Sarah Granger is Director of New Media for WomenCount and a Guest Contributing Editor for BlogHer Politics & News. ( http://www.svmoms.com/ )

nellewrites 6 pts

but one that always creates a potential for creation and shunting aside.

Commissions are nice, but results are nicer. If a commission has teeth, if it results in legislation and change, count me in.

And the first place they should start is not dancing the periphery, it is officially extending the ERA passage time frame and getting three more states - one of which is Illinois, Barack - to pass the amendment into law.

nelle ( http://refractivethoughts.org/ )

/

llhaesa ( http://llhaesa.org/ )