Bio
Son-Noah.Daughter-Berit. Dog-Uma Thurman. One of my first assignments as a TV reporter in 1973 was to get an interview with Elvis Presley. Obviously,...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Do You Take More Sick Days Than Your Male Colleagues?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

toothpaste for dinner

When you are a consultant working out of your home,debating whether or not to take a sick day is not a huge business issue. Since many of us tend to have unhealthy work habits anyway, a sick day may simply mean working in bed, taking a few naps, and not bothering to brush our hair or get out of our jammies.

But sick days are a big deal for anyone who gets a regular paycheck every other Friday. The latest research does little to calm the gender wars incorporate America because it finds that all women--regardless of marital status,age, or whether they have children, take more sick days then their male colleagues. The emphasis is on American.

As it turns out, a study in Europe shows that European men hold the prize for taking the most sick days.

Sweden also stands out in the study by Gimeno and Amick because it is one of only three countries in the EU — along with Finland and Belgium — where more women reported taking a sick day than men.

In all the other 12 countries, men were more likely to report taking a sick day, often by a large margin.

Austria had the largest disparity, with 20.4 percent of men reporting having taken a sick day, compared with just 12.1 percent of women.

In Britain, it was 13.3 percent for men and 10 percent for women. In Portugal, it was 10.1 percent for men and 6.8 percent for women.

What explains the difference? Are women the stronger sex after all? The authors say they don't really know.


So here's something that the U.S. and Europe have in common. American researchers are scratching their heads trying to attribute why women in the U.S. take more sick days. They have no solid explanation.

Eve Tahmincioglu writing  extensively about this issue on on her blog for MSNBC.com  reports,

Making assumptions on why women call in sick can be detrimental to the advancement of women in the workplace, says Eric Patton, an assistant professor of management at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.

As part of his research on how workplace absence is perceived, Patton studied a century’s worth of New York Times articles that dealt with the issue. He found 3,000 articles on the topic.

“Whenever it was an article about women’s absenteeism it was about gender. If it was about men and absenteeism, gender was not brought up,” he says.

That focus on gender, he adds, has created a situation where co-workers and managers expect women to be absent more often, and that, in turn, can creates an air of unreliability around female employees.


Maybe its our philosophy about sick days. It's like seeing the very expensive pair of shoes you've been coveting all season on deep discount and walking away without buying them. Who would do that?

If a company has factored in your sick days into their bottom line calculations, why shouldn't you take the time you are entitled to?

While I can't remember how many sick days I technically had on my first job as a reporter at WWBT TV in Richmond, Virginia, I know that I thought it would be stupid to not use every single one of them. And I did.

In fact, it was my news director who encouraged me to take "mental health" days. I have no idea if he shared this concept,which was probably considered quite forward in 1973, with all the male reporters. I didn't care. I wanted me some mental health days and I had a boss who said use those sick days and refresh.

Luanne At Fifty is a proponent of the mental health day.

When I was teaching, we were allotted ten sick days a school year. For me, maybe one out of ten would be used for an actual personal illness. Another might be used for a family member's illness. A few would be used throughout the year to catch up on grading papers or planning. But the best use of a sick day was when I took a mental health day. Today I took a mental health morning.No, I'm not actually employed any more outside the home. But I still remember that feeling, that thrill that accompanies "playing hooky". Today I felt the urge coming on, so I went with it.


While many of us have the luxury of taking a mental health day, far too many people don't have the option to take a sick day at all. It

  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Trish Robinson 5 pts

When I was reading this, I thought the same thing: Why do people think it's admirable to come to work and infect everyone else? Because corporate america promotes it. No one is encouraged to take a sick day when they are contagious. Nothing makes me angrier than to hear someone brag that they have never taken a sick day when I can remember them coming to work and sneezing and coughing all over the office and making everyone else sick.

I had a really bad experience at my job 3 years ago when I was going through a custody trial. I had worked there 10 years and never used all my sick time and I had to continually take off work and I was told that my sick days were for illness, not for personal problems. Gee, I thought that's why they were called "personal days." So I asked the HR Director if, instead of telling the truth about why I needed to be off,which allowed me to let them know ahead of time that I needed to off and plan for my absense, if I should just wait until the last minute and called in with a fake illness? She said that would be more acceptable, to be sick.Unbelievable!

Trish ( http://lonesophist.com )

Elana Centor 5 pts

ONe of the key things that struck me about Eve's piece on MSNBC is that the experts connected sick days to lack of performance. The purpose of my last piece was to look at the statistics and come up with a different conclusion. To me the conclusion exactly what you say: women are more health conscious, perhpas more considerate of other employees in not wishing to infect the world.

Now, if corporations would praise those that don't infect the world and send sneezing,wheezing, coughing, moaning employees home, maybe those "sick day" numbers would be what they would be: numbers.

elana
Blogher Contributing Editor,Business&CareersFunnyBusiness ( http://funnybusiness.typepad.com/funnybusiness )

nellewrites 6 pts

paragraph is key. Obviously women do still take more time then men for sick kidlets and family members, though that has changed a bit over the last 20 years. With sick protocol, being considerate of co-workers *and* having the presence of mind to realise the world will not screech to a halt with a day off, probably plays a significant role in this.

Men are more inclined to believe showing when sick is a sign of strength and commitment, which is silly if the end result is half the office will be out the following week. And women are more interested in and aware of health issues,
so it follows there would be more awareness.

Society is still undecided over what it wants our work ethic to be. Is it really healthy to work 80 hours a week? It might count as a positive in one area, but lots of baggage comes with that mentality. Sick time is one element of this culture of more is better. I suspect women have (no pun intended) a healthier perspective and balance. At some point we as as a society are going to have to realise life isn't exclusively about work. When I see studies like this, I wonder what the real intent is, because it is being portrayed as a net negative for women, and I'm not sure if that is a sound conclusion.

nelle ( http://www.nelle2nelle.org/ )

alyssaroyse 5 pts

This is such an interesting subject to me, as it uses the pervasive measure of work as "time spent doing something" rather than "what got done." Probably 10 years ago, when I was writing business features for the Saint Louis Post-Dispatch, i wrote an interesting series of articles about changing personal technology and how it should enable employers to evaluate workers by the outcome of the labor rather than the location or quantity of it. I believed, at the time, that it could profoundly shift the the way we work, and the way we define work.

Namely, if I hire someone to design a house, then i evaluate them based on whether or not they designed a house. Not where they designed it, not when they designed, simply that they did design it.

But I didn't take in to account how hard it is for people to "trust" that something is getting done if they can't see it. Or the "injustice" colleagues would feel if two people charged with teh same task were able to accomplish that task in vastly different times. If Susan gets done in 3 hours something that it takes Peter 6 hours to do, then Peter feels that Susan is getting off easy.

In my mind, that's just nonsense. They both got their job done. If we judge people by the outcomes of their labor, then the rest of it is moot.

Sure, it could be a slippery slope. If the standard was set by Susan's behavior, then most other's would get overworked, but I don't think that that is an insurmountable problem. Surely we can figure that out and relax about the dehumanizing metrics of the corporate machine.

Interestingly, when e have had to write employment contracts for our company, I have never included things like vacation time, sick days, office hours. Simply, "this is your job, get it done." I've hired really talented people who seem to be averaging something seemingly absurd like 9 or 10 weeks of vacation..... But you know what, they're getting their jobs done. And they're really happy. And really productive. And really dedicated......

And it's a good thing, because there's snow falling in the mountains. And we're all skiers, so I'm sensing a lot of massive cases of Snow Hysteria coming on (and it's impossible to work in that condition.) (Actually, now that I think of it, some of our biggest breakthroughs came from conversations that our Director of Technology and I had on chair lifts.)

___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com ( http://www.JustCauseIt.com )