Bio
I can be found at Schmutzie.com, Ninjamatics, and Grace in Small Things.
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Drug Prohibition, Accessibility, and Addiction: This Former Addict Says Yes to Legalization

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Given recent news about California's move to legalize marijuana and a new study that shows alcohol to be more harmful than heroin, I have been giving my personal history with drugs and alcohol some thought, especially as it relates to the impact of social influence on my choices, and by choices, I mean my colorful past with regard to getting high.

I have done enough LSD that you might be surprised at how well I keep in touch with reality. I used to smoke pot as a matter of course every day. I gave crystal meth a shot, because I knew the chemist, and, hell, why not? I smoked cigarettes enthusiastically for twenty-one years. Once upon a time until about two-and-a-half months ago when I admitted publicly to my alcoholism and embraced sobriety, I drank so much on a regular basis that I blacked out two or three times a week and couldn't remember how I came home. So, what I am about to reveal here with regard to my thoughts on drugs, accessibility, and legalization might surprise you:

I support the legalization of all drugs, or, at the very least, the decriminalization of possession and personal use.

This is a contentious stance to take. Whenever it comes up in conversation, people invariably turn to talk of addiction in general or mention someone that they lost to addiction or talk about their own negative experience with one drug or another. I get that. I lost a friend to heroin. I have watched the mannerisms of someone I know slowly devolve into a twitchy mash, symptoms of a brain damaged by long-term alcohol abuse. I am battling alcoholism myself. Addiction to drugs and alcohol can destroy individuals and families in startlingly sad ways, but the issue of addiction and the issue of legalization are not necessarily bound together in the ways that our society's messages about them seem to dictate. Your brother's crack addiction lost him his job and my friend's love of the needle killed him, and both of those things happened despite the fact that the drugs they were taking were illegal.

Drug prohibition doesn't work.

America's history with the prohibition of alcohol is a good example of what happens when you don't follow the old wisdom to keep your friends close but your enemies closer. When the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol was banned during Prohibition, also known as The Noble Experiment, in the United States between 1920 and 1933, people did not stop selling, manufacturing, and transporting alcohol. They just did it illegally. What had been an above board industry beforehand was now pushed underground, spawning covert, organized, and widespread criminal activity with extremely violent side effects.

Just as making alcohol illegal directly created a vicious underground criminal industry during Prohibition, so it works now with marijuana, heroin, and other illicit drugs. The same kind of black market industry birthed by The Noble Experiment is now being fostered and supported by drug prohibition.

Marijuana grows, quite literally, like a weed all over the world, poppies will not be eradicated from the earth, the coca plant is an important aspect of the culture in some areas of South America, and salvia divinorum runs rampant in ditches without a thought for its effect on the minds of high school students. Drugs are accessible and will remain accessible simply because we live on a planet that continues to create what we need to get high, with or without our rules to the contrary. This means that, law or no law, drug prohibition can only fail to stop the flow of the substances it purports to prohibit in the first place. The ingredients exist to be dealt with, and if we won't manufacture and distribute the product, someone else will.

Cocaine is the well-known drug of choice for restaurant and bar employees. Meth is cheap as borscht and as easy to come by. Marijuana's so common that, while we are surprised that Zach Galifianakis pulled out a joint on television, we are not surprised that he was even able to find some at all.

If we want the drugs, we can have them, whether they are legal or not. If our attempt to keep certain drugs illegal is born out of a desire to decrease criminal activity and the toll of addiction on our society, then we are doing a terrible job of it, and the thriving criminal industry and desperate face

  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
mstigerlily 5 pts

Decriminalize all personal use, legalize marijuana on a federal level for medical use, decriminalize for personal use. That is my platform :)

onblank 5 pts

Well written, with the research and personal experience to back it up. Good article!

I couldn't agree more. In Utah, we treat alcohol as if it is already illegal, and all it does is encourage abuse. We have senators who lobby to restrict liquor licenses for restaurants (yes, really), then get busted for DUIs. Our liquor commission is made mostly of teetotalers and no foodservice pros who meet regularly with the predominant church on policy (yes, really). As such, we drink too much when given the chance, we pay little mind to developing our palates, and we tend to sneak it, as if a bottle of wine is ever something to be ashamed of.

Legalization will solve the drug trade, provide much needed revenue, relieve the overwhelmed prison system, and shift the entire Puritan-rooted paradigm we have in the US of micromanaging morality. A paradigm so ineffective that it actually encourages immorality. Teach people to make intelligent choices for themselves. When the people are free to make those choices, they will make the right ones.

Solidarity.

--Kristina

www.OnBlank.com ( http://www.OnBlank.com )

erin.etheridge 8 pts

My husband and I just had a conversation about this last night. He's a police officer, and he is one of a group of many police across the country who believe in the legalization of some drugs (mainly marijuana). The horrible violence in Mexico, the amount of time and resources wasted on arrests for marijuana possession and use, and the relative innocuousness of the drug as compared to alcohol all contribute to this attitude.

Thing is, there are two kinds of people: Those who abuse or would abuse drugs, and those who wouldn't. Just like there are those who would be alcoholics, and those who wouldn't. Addiction is a complicated thing, and accessibility isn't an insurmountable issue that will stop a would-be addict in his or her tracks.

Basically what I'm saying is, legalizing certain drugs would not create a wave of new addicts who were sitting around waiting for legal access.

CrazedMama 10 pts

I'm all for legalizing Marijuana. It is useful in sooo many ways and can help people in so many ways. What good does alcohol do? None! But yet it is legal? That makes no sense to me. It wouldn't be that difficult to make Marijuana legal. Look at Amsterdam; their economy is booming and they have a very low crime rate.

Harder drugs? Hmm, I'm not really sure how I feel about that. I do think that people should have the right to choose what they want to do with their own body, good or bad... I just don't want it around my kids and so easily accessible.

ModaMama 6 pts

I agree that the Utopian Netherlands are a haven of safe drug behavior. Not because of giddy tourists running to find hash brownies in cafes but rather the institutionalized policies that allow for addicts to obtain proper treatment the sort of vast system of socialized health care that takes drug use as a lifestyle choice into account is missing within the US. Many people are left untreated to their own downward spiral of addiction.

One comment suggests that we as humans are not ready for the personal accountability involved in widespread legal drug use. My concern is that citizens are not ready to accept the sort of over arching government involvement that would be required in order to legalize a variety of now illicit substances.

Cannabis, poppies, and coca grow abundantly throughout their r3espective regions but the resulting extracts are not all equal. Laudanum was a legal opiate consumed by housewives and blurry-eyed fun lovers alike. You can get a prescription for opium tincture under very limited circumstances. Let us say that the government allows the return of opium cough syrups to resurface to the widespread market, this is legalization, but not a pure refined opioid. So do users push for pure uncut blocks to be delivered to supermarkets for purchase? Society has high end wine and even chocolate snobs, do we really want institutionalized cocaine label snobs?

There will always be thrill seekers who will push against the limits of a drugs society, that is the very nature of the brains addiction to any substance. When your body becomes normalized to a certain amount of nicotine an increase is very simple but a decrease is not. Someone who really enjoys the vivid highs of LSD will look to pursue another similar high...

Yes, I feel legitimizing certain aspects of illicit substances would be a healthy boost for the government, the people and the economy of the US but it also means the serious regulating of said substances by the government. I think state legalization is taking the small steps towards a more open society.

Personally, I feel that drug legitimization needs a case by case review by those in the know, not by the experimental citizen.

www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com ( http://www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com )

Life in the Middle East, with craft and spice

aleigh-kat 5 pts

From the perspective of society as a whole, you're probably right. But I know for a fact that it would destroy my family.

schmutzie 9 pts

Do not confuse legalization with ready and unlimited access. No one is suggesting that heroin or crack cocaine be sold alongside aspirin at the pharmacy. That would definitely be destructive. What I am proposing would actually INCREASE our control over street drugs, not decrease it.

Schmutzie can be found at Schmutzie.com ( http://www.schmutzie.com ), the Canadian Weblog Awards ( http://www.canadianweblogawards.com ), and Grace in Small Things ( http://www.graceinsmallthings.com ).

Gena Haskett 32 pts

Because to legalize it would require a hell of a lot more personal responsibility than we have.

I don't know if you can be a "responsible drug user. There are far more people who can take a drink but the few who can't stop are destructive to themselves and their communities. If it was just the user along, yes you could say live and let live.

We live in communities. People who don't take a drop or hit of anything are killed by those that do.

I do think Hemp should be legalized. I think there would have to be a very carefully crafted law that would allow marijuana use. Prop 19 was a badly written law that did nothing to address public safety.

Crack, Meth and the other stuff? No. Because a legal crack head would still steal to toke up just as fast as the illegal one. It is the drug overtaking the person.

There is no legislating that kind of behavior.

Gena Haskett is a BlogHer Contributing Editor. My Blogs: Out On The Stoop ( http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com ) and Create Video Notebook ( http://createvideonotebook.blogspot.com )

alfredliveshere 5 pts

Good piece!

I am all in favour of legalizing pot, as will be safer, reduce or eliminate the criminal element, and generate tax revenue. All good.

Hadnt really thought about drugs beyond that, is an interesting argument. I certainly thing we have to take the old-world values and judgement out of hte piece and look at it through new eyes. And you are right, people will always find booze and drugs and chocolate chip cookies, so lets make them safe and controllable rather than pretend they dont exist.

bonstewart 8 pts

totally agreed. and well-said.

addiction is a terrible thing, and a hard thing. legal opium dens and smoking in bars - hell, just bars - don't make it easy for people to keep from wrecking their bodies and lives. but. but. there is a difference between making it easy and socially tempting, and making it totally illegal. making drugs illegal only sends them underground. if society spent the energy and funds we spend on trying to chase drug lords and prosecute addicts on imagining ways to make drugs and alcohol less socially powerful, we might be in a useful conversation.

Bonnie Stewart is an educator, writer, and social media fortune teller tracing the epistemology of twitter for her Ph.D. Also fond of tea leaves and teaching. She blogs at http:cribchronicles.com ( http://cribchronicles.com/ ).

toquegirl 5 pts

Nice work, Schmutzie!

I, too, am in complete agreement with legalization. I have not seen (nor would I be able to write) such an eloquent argument for it as this, though.

Excellent article.

thepsychobabble 9 pts

I'm all for legalization, especially of marijuana. It's been proven time and again that it does not belong in the same category as the so-called "hard drugs."

Also? Making it a legal industry would do a lot for the currently struggling economy. Think of all the legal jobs that would be created, with taxable income. Sales tax, licensing fees, operator's licenses....something to think about.

Jen ThePsychobabble runs her mouth over at http://thepsychobabble.net/blog

She can also be found on twitter as @thepsychobabble