The Eliot Spitzer - Bill Clinton Factor: Voters, do you care if your politician cheats on a spouse?
by Lisa Stone

Meet Client 9, also known as New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer. According to The New York Times, Gov. Spitzer was "identified as Client 9 on a telephone call confirming plans to have a woman travel from New York to Washington, where he had reserved a hotel room. The person briefed on the case identified Mr.

Spitzer as Client 9." (More here)


I'll give Gov. Spitzer the first word on the matter. According to the NYT:

"Mr. Spitzer today made a brief public appearance during which he apologized for his behavior, and described it as a “private matter.


“I have acted in a way that violates my obligation to my family and violates my or any sense of right or wrong,” said Mr. Spitzer, who appeared with his wife Silda at his Manhattan office. “I apologize first and most importantly to my family. I apologize to the public to whom I promised better.”


“I have disappointed and failed to live up to the standard I expected of myself. I must now dedicate some time to regain the trust of my family.”



My jaw is on the floor -- a man who gained public office by prosecuting prostitution rings among other crimes has now been revealed as a john? And being caught in the act via federal wiretap is the reason he has his public tearful moment, wifey in hand, and calls himself on the carpet for breaking federal and state law, not to mention his own marriage vows? (Although, hey, maybe they had an 'arrangement'? She sure doesn't look like was a mutual agreement. I want to give her a hug.)

Bottomline: I'm sick and tired of men who gain public office via their big brains and then let their little brains go party. I'm not a New York voter, but if Mr. Spitzer can rationalize breaking the law in order to step out on the woman he supposedly holds most dear, can he rationalize doing anything to and with any of the rest of us?

Tell me:
- Do you think a public official's private life should be public knowledge? Do ethics in personal life affect ethics on the job?
- Do you care if a public official cheats on a spouse?
- Do you care more/less if an official breaks the law as Gov. Spitzer apparently did?
- Hey, Lisa, lighten up - Spitzer's the victim of a partisan attack and everybody does it
- Hey, Lisa, you're right - Spitzer should resign. Here's another hug for Silda.

Related links:

Althouse: "So run out of the room and slam the door. There will be no sympathy."

Feministe: "Say it ain't so, Spitz!"

Gina Cobb: "Help choose Eliot Spitzer's next career..."

Photo credit: Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Comments

 

Here's the thing for me

I don't like infidelity, but I think that's between the two spouses involved. What we're talking about here is breaking the law.Different matter entirely. You've violated your oath of office. I'm not a New York voter, but if I were, Spitzer would be done, in my book.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

SEX is a red herring, AGAIN

I don't care that he had sex outside of his marriage - that's between him and his wife, and for all we know she was all in favor. Nor would I care if it turned out he had done it in a vinyl cat suit or on all fours with a ball gag in his mouth.

The point is that:

1. He made his career busting prostitution rings and then was found as a client of said prostitution rings. Too hypocritical to be trusted.
2. He knowingly and willingly (and presumably with happy endings) broke very clear laws that he - of all people - should be upholding.
3. It's just stupid. I'm sorry, the lack of judgment here is just mind-boggling and not worthy of someone holding such an office.

Now, as I've heard others say, maybe prostitution should be legal. Fine. I happen to agree with that. But it isn't, and when your job and your reputation are stakes 100% on the ability to uphold the communal contracts that we call laws, you have to do it. This sucks.

That said - there must be a back story here.... He just isn't this stupid, is he?

As for the Clinton reference - it's a pretty different ball game. (No pun intended, really.) That was stupid infidelity and, while no less idiotic, it doesn't speak to such wide spread corruption and hypocrisy.

The larger issue for me will always remain honesty - including the ability to honestly manifest our fully sexual selves with integrity in our lives in a way that we don't have to sneak around breaking all sorts of laws and bonds to do so.
___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

My Jaw is On the Floor Too

Not a New Yorker bu that isn't stopping me from having an opinion. If he had an ounce of integrity left he would have resigned today. That's it. For me its completely black and white. He's the governor. He was once the attorney general. He prosecuted prostittutes.

I would like an explanation why he isn't resigning. I don't get it.

.I recently had a conversation with a very good friend who frequents prostitutes in another country and his explanation to me is that women just don't get how men are wired. Seems that Elliot's problem is that someone else was wired.

Of the entire sordid affair I wish that his wife would have said, " Face the music by yourself Elliot. You don't deserve to have me with you as you face the nation with your shame."

Alas, she did what so many public wives do-- they stand by their man. I do admire her strength in a horrendously humiliating moment. I for one could not have done it.

elana
Blogher Contributing Editor,Business&CareersFunnyBusiness

 

Wiring

"I recently had a conversation with a very good friend who frequents prostitutes in another country and his explanation to me is that women just don't get how men are wired."

This kind of comment makes my blood boil. While I have no doubt that your friend believes that (and I truly do not object to the existence of prostitutes, just the necessity of them) this is the most lame-assed excuse, i hear it all the time.

Here's the deal. Unless we are honest about our sexual needs and desires, they will go unmet.

As long as we are led to believe that certain kinds of sexual behavior are "bad" then we will do them in the proverbial closets of the world - and lie about it and feel guilty and dirty for wanting it.

As long as we are not honest with ourselves and our partners about what we need, how we need it and why we need it, then we will continue to create a dangerous "us and them" sexual polemic that necessitates sexual sneakery.

That's dangerous because it creates a black market for sexuality that enables those in power to abuse sex workers. That includes everything from children sold into sexual slavery, sex workers spreading disease because they are not adequately protected and cared for, and a whole host of emotional problems for everyone turning to subterfuge to get their sexual needs met.

We need to create an environment that is accepting of a wide range of sexual freedoms such that consensual adults can have their sexual needs met honestly, openly and safely in a way that does not put anyone at risk. Or their relationships.

Women don't get how men are wired? That's just bull. People are not honest, and we are demonized when we are by being labeled all sorts of things from deviant to slutty. Enough already. We ALL have different taste in sexual activities, and as long as it's honest, safe and consensual, it's all okay. If we get to that point, as a society, these headlines will stop. The crime will stop. But not a moment before.

___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

There are men who don't get it, either

I know men who say, if it's casual sex you want, there are plenty of attractive, intelligent women who like that, too. And I actually know men who find casual sex unsatisfying and prefer to be in a relationship. I've actually had conversations with men who say they don't understand why anyone would pay for sex, and who cringe at the way that prostitutes are exploited.

Maybe I'm just lucky in my choice of male friends.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

Couldn't agree more

we're all just wired differently. want different things, need different things. it's not a gender thing, it's an individual thing. and we all need to communicate about what we want and need, and build honest relationships around that communication. has nothing to do with gender - not even about sex, just about honesty.
___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

I wasn't agreeing with my friend, just
sharing

As they like to say, " that is his truth." It certainly isn't mine. Oh, I just visited your website and the juxtaposition with what you are trying to do and the hypocrisy of Elliot Spitzer couldn't be more vivid.

elana
Blogher Contributing Editor,Business&CareersFunnyBusiness

 

I KNOW YOU WEREN"T AGREEING

Oh goodness - I know you weren't agreeing with your friend. Sorry, I should have been clear about that.

It's just such a lame excuse for NOT honestly discussing these things, as Jill said below.

YES, we should be talking. All of us. We need to create an environment of acceptance that allows..... oh, we all know this.

The idea that women dont' get how men are wired - PULEEEZ! We're all wired different. I know many women who are wildly kinkier than some men. And vice versa. It's not our gender that makes the difference, it's our wildly diverse brains and souls, all muddled by persistently punitive societal and media messaging.

Suddenly I feel overwhelmed at the prospect of raising a kid in this. But we can do it..... The future is ours to make!

Thanks, everyone, for being part of it!
___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

Does anyone else

Think about how all the talking and listening that the Spitzers are about to do, if it had been done, well, anytime before now, should have been done before now and then maybe there wouldn't be a now?

I really believe people know this but their flaws and fears keep them from engaging in the most difficult discussions.

Jill
Writes Like She Talks

 

Political Sexuality Never Really Addressed

With power come responsibility, perks and sex. Pretty lobbyists, campaign workers, co-workers and Rent-A-Perky set of 38s are embedded into the system. I don't know what the female political equivalents to 38's are, well I do but I gotta try to keep this clean.

This didn't just happen when he got into the governor's office. He ain't that stupid or smart. This is some long term creeping. In the next couple of days it will be floated that it was drugs, painkillers, childhood issues or my personal favorite "the devil made me do it".

We collectively shake our hands and say "boot him out" but maybe this is the kind of stuff we need to live with. Really how many frigging times has a politician been caught doing the hankie pankie with someone other than his or her wife?

For the record, yes he has to go. You can't be the governor and have access to high priced hookers and the rest of the fellas get reamed through the judicial system.

I just don't want to be hypercritical - there were some powerful forces invoke to cause him to self-destruct like this. Not male or female forces, but human emotional needs that were suppressed and then acted on.

We've never had a national conversation or healing event that recognizes we all have different sexual levels and needs, and yes this includes politicians.

Gena - Out On The Stoop

 

AMEN Gena!

"We've never had a national conversation or healing event that recognizes we all have different sexual levels and needs, and yes this includes politicians."

THAT is the conversation that we need to have - for the health, safety and happiness of everyone.

I think, sometimes, that people think the sexual revolution mission was accomplished when gay people were told they could - conditionally - come out of the closet (as long as they still seemed mostly straight or were very artistic.) NO, we have a long ways to go.

That's why these things infuriate me. Sure, they're salacious, but they don't address the underlying issues that cause people to lie, suffer, act out, cheat etc.....

___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

Also, who really wins, who really loses

The people of NY voted him in - should they be given the chance to vote him out?

I'm not sure - but I'm just wondering. Who loses them most - how is his work compromised - what if he was the target all along? That doesn't make what he did right, but who is really the injured?

Yes - people are betrayed because of how he's presented himself, but has the work that he's done suffered, will it suffer?

If the answers are yes, then he probably should step down. But if not...and the answers may not be yes.

Other thoughts?

Jill
Writes Like She Talks

 

It's not the sex, it's the hypocrisy

The sex? I think people could not care less.

The hypocrisy of prosecuting others for the same illegal conduct you're engagaing in? Not so fine.

It's the power thing and the attitude of those with power who believe they are above the law that is the problem. And not knowing when the supposed champions of the law are breaking those laws behind our backs.

We need to be done with these kinds of politicians.

And the wives need to stop standing behind their husbands for the horrible photo-ops.

PunditMom
http://punditmom1.blogspot.com
BlogHer Contributing Editor, Politics & News

 

I'm a "People of New York"

As I mentioned in a late-breaking CUSS post about this, I'm pretty distressed by what he did. As the former NYS Attorney General, he made a reputation for himself by standing for reform. He ran on that promise. I voted for him with pride and excitement. This would be the man to clean up Albany, by golly!

Many missteps later, he seems to have wandered off a cliff. As my wise and funny friend wondered, "Why couldn't he just settle for a DC call girl like the other politicians? Is he too good for them?" A former colleague who works in New Jersey sent me an email asking me what was wrong with my governor. "My governor may pay for sex," I replied, "but yours is trying to buy a new Florida primary for his friend Hillary Clinton." (I'm not really sure which is worse, but that's another story anyway.)

I hate that Spitzer violated the public trust in him, or what little was left anyway. The whole thing is gross and vile. If anyone is familiar with NYS politics (and if you aren't, be very glad - ignorance is truly bliss!), you know that Spitzer just handed over a HUGE victory to the Republican Senate leader, Joe Bruno, who himself is under investigation by the FBI for corruption. Who will pay attention to boring old corruption charges when there's illicit, dangerous (literally, according to the affidavit) sex out there? The real losers of all this are New Yorkers, and quite frankly, women who truly are sex trafficked.

Speaking of which, in light of this event and the great discussion here, I would like to write about legalizing prostitution for my CE post on Thursday. If anyone else takes this topic up on their blogs, let me know so I can link to you.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS)& Other Rants

 

It's not even the hypocrisy that gets me

It's that he thinks he can buy women as it we are objects. As a man who seemed to build a heck of a lot of his career on feminist issues, I am heartbroken. He could have taken a bribe, tipped off a Wall Street investor, etc. And it is the fact that he went out and bought a woman. Married or not, I can't and won't stand for that.

He's done. Resign and slither off into the sunset, E. And don't even show your face on any of the talking head shows.

 

Commerce is a 2-way street

I read this comment before I went to bed last night and sort of slept on the idea of "buying women as if we are objects."

I'm not sure that really bothers me, after all, these women were asking to be purchased as objects. Or at least sell services. And that's their decision to make (laws not withstanding.)

I've said time and time again that I believe prostitution should be legal, so I just can't fault the "act" in this case. It's the fact that he built his career and reputation on eliminating "filth" in the city of NY. And then turned out to be part of what he deemed "filth."

Which gets me back to my biggest issue, that we have created a society in which his sexual needs (which were strong enough that he was willing to risk EVERYTHING for them) had to be swept into dark corners and deemed "filth." How must that feel to wake up everyday longing for something deep inside your soul that you - and everyone around you - deems filthy? That's the kind of thing that erodes people. And it makes me sad.

I have friends who are strippers and dominatrix and tantricas, and I absolutely respect their ability to sell their services to people who need and want to purchase them. What makes me sad is that most of their clients don't feel that they can tell their life-partners that they want these things.....
___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

commerce is a 2 way street

I agree, Allyssa, with you. I am a straight divorced mom of three kids and I believe that 'sex for money' isn't the problem. I think the problem is the way we judge the transactions, as filth. My joke is that if women could easily find someone to pay for the security of a safe and hygenic sex act, more would jump at it than ever expected. But its just the men who are always in the news about this. As Johns. So, to me, Spitzer has lost any moral ground he had, by living as a hypocrite. I have no sympathy for him. He had many chances to walk his own moral talk but he didn't. And now he gets to claim the 'high road' by apologizing for betraying his wife and kids and his constituents. Meanwhile, if you read the transcripts available thru HuffingtonPost.com, you see that there are judgements against specific prostitutes for 'not being into it enough' because they leave a john earlier than the hired four hour stint, because they have to get their kid at school. OMG! A responsible mom is devalued, even in prostitution!!! I heard about this on a twitter yesterday before it hit the front page and my deepest repulsion was about the hypocrisy. Now Spitzer buries himself into his wife, whom he has betrayed, expecting her innocence to garner him sympathy, while the prostitute is dismissed as an object of illegal acts.

Mary Wallace

 

wait a minute

We have no idea if the women involved in the sex ring are there willingly or not. This is why I want to see sex work legalized, maybe we could have a better handle on whether the women involved are there because they want to be or because they were trafficked.

Either way...the way the system is set up, it's buying a woman's body. I doubt that Spitzer called the woman up before hand to get consent.

Two adults having sex? yes. With consent...and sometimes sex workers just don't have the freedom to consent.

 

well yes, but

that is one of many reasons why sex work should be legalized. SOMETIMES sex workers have not consented. But MANY times they have. We don't know in this - or many - cases, which it is. legalize and regulate it, that will help.

the problem. however, is still NOT the fact that a woman's body is being purchased, it's by whom and to whom the money is going.....

___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

one male perspective

I agree that as far as the infidelity goes it's a matter between him and his wife.

As far as the legal matter goes I think it should be prosecuted along with all the other cases resulting from that sting operation. If he has to appear in court then so be it. It's not like he didn't know what the potential consequences of his actions were.

However he has quite ably demonstrated a lack of personal control as well as a lapse in judgment and I think those speak against his record and qualifications for public office. We have quite enough politicians who think they're above the law or they get perks of that nature. And the system can never be repaired if we don't hold people accountable for their actions.

If you're going to talk the talk be prepared to walk the walk gentlemen.

Jim Heivilin

 

Eliot Spitzer's incredibly stupid behavior

Regardless of whether or not paying for sex is something we need to look at as a culture, Spitzer had to cobble together $4,300 of his family money to get laid. He couldn't get the money together in time for his first assignation, so it got delayed a day, according to the text messages released to the public. He had reserved a hotel room but couldn't get the $4,300 together to reserve the girl. The pimp/madam texted him again and again asking for money. When, during that whole 'negotiation' did he ever think about the hypocrisy? Or the terrible gut blow he would deal to his wife when he had to tell her 'oh, honey, the feds have me on tape hiring a prostitute'? The pimp/madam interacted with him several times, 'we need the money, the $500 you have ON ACCOUNT with us isn't enough for the girl, please get us more money'. He's not fit to be in office. He's just not.

Mary Wallace

 

The political aspects of this investigation
are interesting also

Liza Sabater has an interesting take on Spitzer's political vulnerability here -- she says his failure to connect with the grassroots leaves him without a base of support in a crisis. She also points to this item from Harpers suggesting that Spitzer might have been deliberately targeted by the Bush Justice Department to keep him from consolidating Democratic power in NY state.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

Unsurprising

Given the other tactics this administration has used that wouldn't be surprising in the least.

Jim Heivilin

 

So, I'm naive

Not doubting it, I LOATHE Bush and his cronies as much as the rest and am more than happy to pin this on them as some sort of conspiracy. Believe me, I am. BUT, can you explain to be how this is their doing?

Spitzer admitted doing "it." Right.

Repeatedly did so.

Did so with ground rules of no condoms, which means he was involved in the planning, at least to some extent.

His voice is recorded arranging such things.

His bank accounts are the origination of transferred funds - presumably at his command.

SO, how do we pin this on anyone other than Spitzer himself?

Even if Bush and Cheney had offered their daughters (which would be very funny in the case of Cheney) up to Spitzer, he could have said NO. He could have NOT called and booked them repeatedly, he could have NOT paid them for sex (which is the crime, not the sex itself, but the paying for it) and, I dunno, at the very least he coulda worn a condom (which strikes me as the most stupid and arrogant move of them all here.....)

BUT, if I'm missing something, please tell me. I so want to blame this - and everything else - on the Bush, Cheney, Rove axis of evil. I just can't see how to.

___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com

 

Hypocrisy is so unattractive.

My issue is that he's a hypocrite. First off, he broke the law, so that's that. If he hadn't paid for sex, though, if he had an affair with his wife's best friend? Then I'd say it's none of my business. Except that he's Spitzer, and he's someone constantly up in everyone's grill about their conduct and ethics, and so I think he deserves every last bit he got.

Surrender, Dorothy - When I was your age, we just let them ride in the back window.