Bio
I am a 44 year old single mother of two beautiful children; Brian 20, and Nicole 17. Being a mom is the thing I am most proud of; I could sit and ta...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Is Elizabeth Adeney Too Old To Have A Baby? Do We Have The Right To Judge?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Have you heard about the controversy surrounding the impending motherhood of Elizabeth Adeney at age 66? Is she too old to be having a child for the first time? Is it fair to the child? Is it selfish of the mother? Is it fair for us to sit in judgment of her?

At what age is a woman too old to be a first time mother? Would you have a baby at the age of 66?

Is there a double standard here? Would it be o.k. if she was a married 66-year-old? Or if we were talking about a 66-year-old man? Well, there is a lot of opinion surrounding this topic, do you have one? Here is some of what other women are blogging about this controversial topic.

From Feministing - Pregnant at 66 and putting choice in context...

Each individual woman has the right to decide what's best for her when it comes to reproduction. Women have the right to choose abortion, the right to give up a child for adoption, the right to have children without getting married first, the right to sterilization, the right to NOT be sterilized, the right to IVF treatments (regardless of their partner's gender), and the list goes on. Debating a woman's fitness to be a mother or what course of action is "natural" for her is essentially buying in to an anti-choice worldview in which we can define who is and who isn't a fit mother.

Usually when the media and lawmakers weigh in on a woman's personal reproductive choices, they target low-income women, young women, women with disabilities. Adeney's situation is different because she is a woman in a position of relative privilege who has gotten pregnant via very expensive IVF treatments, but judgments about her decision are rooted in the same brand of sexism.

From Lea at Blah, Blah, Blog...

This is ridiculous!
Not that a woman has CHOSEN to have her first child at the age of 66. Nope. That doesn’t bother me a bit.
So, what is ridiculous?
The notion that a woman is too old to be a first time mom.

From The Presute of Harpyness - 66-Year-Old Woman To Give Birth...

Of course, there’s been blowback and censure and hand-wringing about what it all means. Even the Times–usually one of the more reasonable UK papers–got in on the act with a nasty bit of bias journalism that quotes bioethicist Professor Severino Antinori, who is horrified by Munro’s pregnancy. Unfortunately, when asked to elaborate on why Munro’s pregnancy is so wrong, Prof. Antinori’s logic is painfully weak (also, he sounds like a total dick):

“I am shocked by the idea of a 66-year-old woman giving birth,” he said. “I respect the choice medically but I think anything over 63 is risky because you cannot guarantee the child will have a loving mother or family.

“It is possible to give a child to the mother up to the age of 83 but it is medically criminal to do this because the likelihood is that after a year or two the child will lose his mum and suffer from psychological problems.

O RLY? Because children born to young mothers are thus guaranteed “a loving mother or family”? And their mother’s gestational age ensures that those kids never lose their moms and never suffer from psychological problems? Who are you fucking kidding, buddy? A 2-minute conversation with your local social worker or family court judge will blow away that excuse. I also love how he “respects the choice medically” but then rushes to personal judgement as fast as he possibly can.

From Strollerderby - New Mom-to-be Is 66 Years Old...

I'm sorry if any of the older mom readers who frequent our pages will take this as an insult, but news that a mom-to-be setting a new record in England for her age really made me want to go to take a nap.

Elizabeth Adeney is expecting her first child at the ripe old age of sixty-six, making her the oldest pregnant woman in English history.

And making me really, really exhausted on her behalf.

Here are a few comments from a post on momlogic...

Bravo for being a mature mother raising 2 year old twins and all, but I still think it’s wrong. I believe that when you’re at that age and stage in life you should not be bringing babies into the world. It’s unfair to the babies who will become lil people with very

  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
maria del a 5 pts

Awesome post, DD! I've begun to find Ms. Adeney rather inspiring. She wanted a child more than anything and she made it happen. She didn't give up and she didn't back down when faced with criticism. She even gave her son a name that indicates just how she felt about having him. He will grow up knowing how wanted and loved he is. I doubt she was anything less than euphoric the first time she was able to hold him. You can't tell me all that love and joy is not a positive thing for a child. Babies totally sense their mothers' feelings and moods.

DD 5 pts

I just posted myself about the double-standard associated with this and how society seems to think that women are the ones that must be there as the default parent in any single-parent situation. Why? Because that's what we've become accustomed to.

It wasn't that long ago that women waiting until their 30's were frowned upon. Now we see a shift to increasing number of women in their 40's (I became a new mom at 41 and had my first child at 34). While I will never believe that 50 and 60's will become a norm, I don't think anyone has any right to judge her for her decision to pursue motherhood.

As for being selfish, this adjective bothers me greatly. It's selfish for a child to believe that their parent will be there past their adult years because the point of parenting is to raise our child into strong, independant adults to continue their own lives. Elizabeth is not trying to live her advanced life viraciously through her baby. If she's incredibly lucky, she may get 20 years to spend with her child. On the other hand, while her child may only have 20 years to get to know his/her mom, the child will have a lifetime knowing just how wanted he or she really was. 

~DD~ at Punch Drunk ( http://ddtko.wordpress.com )

Alishia 5 pts

Alishia Poorman I think that getting pregnant at 66 is a big mistake. The poor child will have to live it's life without parents. Think by the time the child is 18 the mom would be 84 years old. I work in a nursing home there are a lot of 8o year old people in there. How imbarrassed do you think that the 18 year old would be,with a mom who is in a wheel chair at graduation,  if she lived that long. I think it is a little selfish myself. All the funnest things wedding, babies, graduation from college. The child would live through all the hard and happy times with no support.

Alishia 5 pts

Alishia Poorman I think that getting pregnant at 66 is a big mistake. The poor child will have to live it's life without parents. Think by the time the child is 18 the mom would be 84 years old. I work in a nursing home there are a lot of 8o year old people in there. How imbarrassed do you think that the 18 year old would be,with a mom who is in a wheel chair at graduation,  if she lived that long. I think it is a little selfish myself. All the funnest things wedding, babies, graduation from college. The child would live through all the hard and happy times with no support.

rachelb75 5 pts

I suppose it's none of my business, and that I should keep this to myself- but really, Really? 66?

There is a reason our bodies go through menopause. 

I hope her child is born healthy. I hope she has a support system in order for when she becomes unable to care for the child herself.  For god's sake she'll be 80 when the child starts high school. If she even lives that long. 

I have to admit- I do think her choice was selfish.  My husband was 43 when our last child was born. He was concerned about HIS age!! That he wouldn't be able to interact with his son the way he would want to. That he would be in his 60s when his son was in high school. 

Maybe this woman didn't think about that.

mysailorsmistress 5 pts

I couldn't do it!!!

It is not for me. I feel for that child. At 66 there is NO way she can do what she did at 26,36 or even 46. I hope she has help and support. 

I am almost 28 and will have my 3rd baby about a month before I turn 28, this pregnancy is MUCH harder than it was when I was 23. 

Good luck to her. I know she will need it!

Jennifer

www.mysailorsmistress.net ( http://www.mysailorsmistress.net )

Elizabeth7 5 pts

She's nuts. But then, she probably is awake at the oddest times anyways so walking the coliciky baby at 3:30am would be a non issue (that's a menopause rib for those who haven't experienced being wide awake at strange & random hours).

I was talking to a high school classmate at our 20th reunion about how so many of our classmates had toddlers. We both had 4 children before we were 31 and thought they were crazy...but then, we knew what they were in for. It was exhausting at 22 and I felt old when I had my 4th at 30 (I had a 5yr gap so I was very used to sleeping all night). I can't imagine having one at 51 (my age now) never mind in 14 years. 

I hope she is wise enough to gather a strong support system because she'll need it. And so will her child. 

Power to her. While I think lightheartedly yet with the wisdom of 29 years of parenthood that she is nuts, I also understand the deep internal drive to have a baby. To experience pregnancy and deliver, to hold, to raise a child that you created and gave birth to. I had it, and in reality, if I got pregnant now (a miracle for sure) I would relish the joy, the spiritual wholeness of creating life. I would also rue the day because I really don't like having nausea all day (oh wait I do now anyways!). Yes, I loved being pregnant...especially the second trimester (visibly pregnant, yet still quite mobile and flexible).

Is she too old to give birth and raise a child? Physically the birthin' going to be very hard on her body (we just don't spring back like we did at 25). Raising the child? I don't think so, just ask all those grandmas who are raising their grandchildren.  

maria del a 5 pts

I wouldn't have a baby at her age.  I don't think most women would.  I doubt there will be an epidemic of "geriatric mothers" in the (so-called) civilised world.  The technology has been in place for some time now and there really have been very few women over 60 who've taken advantage.

It does seem that part of the reason Ms. Adeney has caught so much flack has been that she is single and is reported to have no other family.  I think if she perhaps had a partner and an extended family, people wouldn't be quite as concerned about what will become of her child as she ages.  Or should she pass away before the child reaches maturity.

Do I think what Ms. Adeney has done is right?  It isn't my place to say.  All I know about her is what I've read in the papers and online, much of which could be inaccurate.  She has truly been skewered in the press and in the blogosphere, which I feel is unfair. 

The latest chapter in the saga is an article written round her former husband and featuring quotes from his intimates.  He refrains from saying anything unkind himself, but his friends had plenty to say and none of it was flattering to Ms. Adeney.  It is no wonder she's more or less spurned journalists since this news broke and had tried to limit the news of her pregnancy to people she knew well.  Who would want their dirty laundry aired in the Sunday Mail?

Myself, I would simply give an interview to set things straight, let them take my photo and then tell the press to sod off.  Seems a high sight better than having articles written round quotes from neighbours who barely know you and having paparazzi taking your picture at your home and work.  But I can understand why she would prefer to keep to herself.  She did not court any media attention in the first place and would most likely have preferred to quietly have her baby without the whole world reading about it.  Can you imagine being in that position?  I know I can't.

Based on what I have read, one thing does seem irrefutable.  Ms. Adeney has desperately wanted a child of her own for 20 or more years.  She has gone through a lot to have one.  She may not be a perfect person or be bringing her child into "the perfect family," but I daresay her baby will not lack for its mother's love and attention.  Can we really criticise her for that?  I'd feel like a hypocrite.

AmberS 5 pts

I think that this choice is none of my business. If it works for Elizabeth Adeney, that's all that matters. Well, that and having all your affairs in order. Which is a must for any parent anyways.

I wouldn't make this choice myself. But that's my business. There are a lot of things I wouldn't do myself that work really well for others, you know? 

~ Amber

www.strocel.com ( http://www.strocel.com )