Bio
AV Flox is a Peruvian transplant living in Los Angeles. She is the editrix-in-command of Sex and the 405, a site that shows you what your newspaper w...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Establish Your Dating Terms of Service

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

From my ex-husband to a summer fling -- anyone who's been involved with me is familiar with the discussion of what I affectionately call the Terms of Service. Online, we're used to agreeing to conditions before going forward and investing time on any platform. These conditions matter: they help us see whether we want to use a service, define what we are there to do, and establish boundaries for what we can and cannot do. Why not apply the same to our relationships?

My ex-husband and I met through work. We'd had a few exchanges privately, mostly over chat, but we were never outright flirtatious with one another -- mostly because in a corporate environment I prefer to remain fairly sterile. One day, after a meeting, we went to grab a quick bite to eat. We were both really hopped up on details from the meeting and this excitement catalyzed the existing attraction between us.

I looked at him behind the wheel, completely focused with the exception of the ridiculous grin on his face, and I said, "we're going to fuck, you realize, yes?"

After he recovered from almost crashing the vehicle, he looked over at me, with a look of disbelief, then turned back to the road.

"We need to talk about what this means," I said.

I laid out the risks of getting involved in dating and working together and how any perceived relationship might affect colleagues and our respective companies, suggesting we should employ the utmost discretion in our interactions. Then I told him what I wanted (a relationship), and the expectations I had of it.

"Now you – what do you want?"

He elaborated on what he wanted. Over that late lunch, we cross-examined one another, feeling each other out for possible incongruous elements. There were none. We wanted the same things. We worked well together. And we wanted each other.

It was a green light to proceed. And we hadn't even kissed yet.

You can say that this is too analytical and that it rejects the most wondrous components of relationships: emotion and spontaneous passion. The truth is that we tend to rein in emotion and passion more often because we fear where we're going. If you know what everyone wants and expects, you don't have to hold back. You can fall at your leisure, as fast and as hard as you want.

That's not to say that terms are written in stone. They can change – and because we're not static as human beings and are always changing, terms must change. The thing about being up-front about them from the beginning is that you set the precedent for that kind of conversation.

Yes, I know it's scary to be open about what you want. It means you have to know what that is and it exposes you to the risk of being told someone you like doesn't want that with you. But let me ask you something: would you rather hear about this sooner or later?

Elijah, the first man I dated after my divorce, refused to specify his terms with me. He continuously brought up how I had done this with my husband and how my marriage had failed, suggesting that specifying one's wants and needs doesn't help foster a union because it doesn't consider the "us," only the "me."

This is true in the preliminary stages, where I think it is essential to consider the "me" before running off to the fairytale existence of the "us." My marriage failed, but it wasn't because we told each other what we wanted and expected. It was because our wants changed and became irreconcilable.

Elijah didn't tell me his needs or expectations, but that didn't mean he had none. During the course of our brief entanglement, he would sporadically phone me or instant message me to tell me he felt unhappy or uncomfortable with some minor or completely nebulous thing. We'd go in circles for hours.

"What is the real issue here and what do I do to correct it?" I'd demand, tired of hearing his update on the state of his emotional well-being.

"I don't know. I feel like you're putting this all on me."

"I am putting this all on you. You have the issue, so you tell me what my options are to rectify it and we can go from there."

"I don't think that's fair, Anaiis. We should do this together."

"I don't think that's fair! I have deadlines! I don't have the time to sit here, sift through your catalog of emotional data, figure out

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Bill Cammack 5 pts

I've never done things the way you describe, but you're absolutely on-point that if you're not a middle-of-the-road type of person, agreements have to be made about who's going to do what to whom and under what circumstances.

It's all well and good to have peripheral relationships to people, but you can't honestly be yourself without either clearing your style with the other person or taking the chance that they're going to bounce because they weren't expecting what you did.

You also can't develop the requisite level of respect for people that aren't interested in seeing what's under the hood. If they want to have a shallow relationship to you, there's no incentive to attempt to catalyze a deeper relationship with them.

So.. Ultimately, each person *HAS* to want to know everything they can find out about the other person or else there isn't much of a relationship going on between them at all.

~ Bill ( http://billcammack.com/ )
I blog at billcammack.com ( http://billcammack.com/ )

( http://billcammack.com )

Liz Rizzo 5 pts

to this level of communication. I deal with a lot of fear about who I am and what I want. And who I think other people are and what I think they want.

But this makes so much sense! "It's simple: tell me what you want and I will tell you if I can. Then I'll tell you what I want and you'll tell me if you can. And if it fits, and if we can keep up that level of communication, we'll be able to spend a long time walking through life side by side."

It's really a matter of respect. Respect for yourself, and also having enough respect for your potential partner that they know and respect who they are and what they want as well.

Liz Rizzo ( http://blogher.org/blog/liz-rizzo )

I blog at Everyday Goddess ( http://everydaygoddess.typepad.com/ ).

wolfshades 5 pts

Laying out your expectations, while logical doesn't always work the way you want it to. I suppose it reduces the kind of crap you experienced with Elijah though.

The thing is, sometimes you don't always know what your expectations are. When I'm with a girl for the first time, I like the fact that anything can happen. I don't like restrictions or hard expectations. Maybe she wants a serious relationship leading to a family and kids. And maybe when we first start out, I hadn't given any thought to any of this. Maybe we'll change our minds and I'll want a family with kids while she just wants to travel everywhere.

I used to have hard expectations: no picket fences, no kids and lots of travel. And I made sure anyone who was with me understood those expectations. Now, though - I'm not so sure.

The thing about expectations is that there is no room to breathe. At least that's my experience.

I'd say this was a good blog (and it is) but that should be evident by the fact that I actually had to go and create an account just so that I could comment. *grin*

(Wasn't going to go the Facebook route: it's filled with too many security and privacy holes)

Miss_B 5 pts

I don't find talking about expectations to be boring or sterile at all. I find they give you a "level playing field" right from the start.

It's definitely a learning process to do this, but it is a very rewarding one.

Keira 5 pts

I'm glad to see someone else with the same views on this.

When I tell people about how I got together with my partner, they tend to think we're both anal, boring, ad overly serious. (we also discussed the big issues- seriousness, monogamy, children, cohabitation- before we even kissed).

But the same people will then rant about how annoying it is that their girlfriends doesn't want to live with them, that they just found out kids was going to be an issue, or that they're devastated to find that their partner didn't consider kissing to count as cheating.

I'm so glad we started the way we did. It didn't mean we had the strength to walk away when we realised we'd have a few issues later down the track, but it did mean we started off with ground rules, and an equal understanding.

It set the tone for our whole relationship since that point, and its the only relationship I've ever been in that was this easy, clear, and in which problems can be dealt with without too much drama.